Saturday, February 25, 2017

Another Great Emigre To Canada

Man wanted for Terrorism in Pakistan finds refuge in Canada

A Pakistani-Canadian man wanted for leading a mob attack on a Mosque in Pakistan has found refuge in Canada.
In December 2016, Rasheed Ahmed, a dual citizen of Pakistan and Canada led a 3000-strong mob which attacked a historic Mosque in the town of Dulmial, northern Pakistan. The Mosque which dates back to 1860 has been at the center of a property dispute between Ahmadis and Sunnis. In 1996 the local Sunnis claimed ownership of the Mosque, a claim which was subsequently dismissed by the court.
Rasheed who is in his early 80’s and has lived in Canada for over 40 years traveled to Pakistan from his home in Missausaga and revived the decade-old campaign to grab hold of the Mosque property. Rasheed along with local clerics also filed an application with the Police requesting assistance in the “take over” of the Mosque.
An application filed with the local Police department by Rasheed and dozen other clerics stated:
“The Qadianis (Ahmadis) are using the Mosque as their worship place which is illegal under the law, We request that you free the Mosque from the Infidels and save Muslim interests by saving the Mosque from these Infidels, If these steps are not taken we will be forced to take extreme measures in order to liberate this Mosque”
The Ahmadis are followers of the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam which is considered heretic by mainstream Muslims. In 1974 Pakistan amended the constitution to declare the Ahmadis “non-Muslims”.
On December 12, 2016, a mob of roughly 3000 armed with automatic weapons and led by Rasheed attacked the Mosque leaving two dead and a half-dozen injured. During the attack which lasted several hours, the Police stood by as the mob ransacked the Mosque and set fire to property. The violent episode came to an end after the Army was called in and imposed a curfew in the town.
Days after the attack, Pakistani authorities named Rasheed Ahmed as the main suspect in the Mosque attack. On December 17th, five days after the attack, the Provincial Government requested the Federal Government that Rasheed should be barred from leaving the country for his role in the attack.
On January 15th, Dawn News reported that Rasheed had managed to flee the country before his name could be added to the Exit Control List (ECL).
While talking to Stewart Bell of National Post, Rasheed acknowledged that he was wanted for “terrorism” in Pakistan and said that in addition to terrorism charges police had also charged him with 10 to 12 more crimes.
Describing the events of December attack, Rasheed said, Fearing arrest, he phoned the Canadian high commission for help but it was closed. He went on to say:
Luckily I escaped, Thank God. It’s all work of God, I believe, because had I been caught it would have been not good for my health at all.
Rasheed said upon his return to Canada, he was questioned by Canadian authorities but “they were satisfied and said that I can go.” He claimed the Canadian Intelligence also cleared him of any wrongdoing:
“CSIS (the Canadian Security Intelligence Service) came and asked me questions and they said, ‘Okay, no problem.’”
Since the attack, Pakistan has arrested up to 80 people involved in the attack and more are being looked for, But Rasheed has managed to escape prosecution as there is no extradition treaty between Canada and Pakistan.

Illegal Aliens Strike Again




Another Day, Another Victim 

of a Violent Illegal Alien Crime

  • 02/25/2017 
  • Source: Townhall 
  • by: Cortney O'Brien
11 1 1  17
You may have seen an Amber Alert on Friday detailing that a 6-year-old
 girl had been abducted by her father from her home in Bridgeport,
Connecticut and her mother had been stabbed and killed, while another
 woman suffered injuries. Police chased down the subject and caught
him on Interstate 99 in Benner Township, Pennsylvania. The little girl
 suffered minor injuries in the pursuit. The suspect, Oscar Hernandez,
is an illegal immigrant. Worse, he had been previously deported.

Federal immigration officials said Hernandez is a citizen of El Salvador
 and had been previously deported on Nov. 27, 2013. He has prior felony
convictions including assault and threatening. U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement had placed a detainer on him, an agency
 spokesman said in a statement.

Despite such horrid crimes, several cities (and now states) are seeking
sanctuary status to harbor illegal immigrants like Hernandez.

 Source: Townhall

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/another-day-another-victim-of-a-violent-illegal-alien-crime#jwG1WFBykGSZX7OV.99

Why Represent Your Constituents? Baldwin Finds A Way To Not Help Vets


Tammy Baldwin Quietly Left Committee With Oversight of Scandal-Plagued Wis. VA Facility

Republican Party of Wisconsin says Baldwin fled from her responsibilities


Sen. Tammy Baldwin
Tammy Baldwin / AP
BY: 
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D., Wis.) has quietly
stepped away from the committee that has
 oversight over a scandal-plagued Wisconsin
 Veterans Affairs facility, actions some
 Republicans see as the Democratic senator
 running from her past failures on the issue.
Baldwin served on the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee throughout
 the 114th Congress but does not appear to
be on the committee in the 115th Congress,
according to its roster. The committee has
oversight over the Tomah VA, a VA facility
 in Wisconsin that was over-prescribing opiates
 to patients and saw a Marine die from an
overdose.
A memo, first circulated in 2009, warned
 of the dangerous amounts of narcotics that were being ordered by Dr. David Houlihan, the Tomah
VA chief of staff, and prescribed to veterans at the Tomah VA center.
Individuals at the center feared objecting to the orders of Dr. Houlihan, who received the nickname "the candy man."
"It is a known fact that if providers or pharmacists refuse to follow Dr. Houlihan’s orders, they will be
 yelled at and perhaps fired," the memo stated.
Five years later, in 2014, a veteran was prescribed a lethal mixture of drugs by the medical center
and overdosed. Dr. Houlihan was fired from the facility in 2015.
It was later discovered that Baldwin, who was first elected to the Senate in 2012, was the only
member of Congress from Wisconsin to receive an official federal government Inspector General
 report on the abuses at Tomah. However, Baldwin did not take action until more than four months
 later after the scandal became public, according to reports.
A former staffer of Baldwin, Marquette Baylor, was ousted from her position as deputy state director
 over the controversy.
Baylor was offered a severance package that came with a stipulation of signing a confidentiality
agreement, according to news reports at the time. The amount that Baylor would have received is
 not known. Baylor rejected the severance package.
Heather Fluty Simcakoski, the widow of the veteran who died at the facility, previously said that
Baldwin's handling of the VA report on Tomah was "frustrating" to her.
"She said (she's) so sorry for our loss, and that she takes very serious those things, but not, ‘Sorry
 for not reading the report,'" Simcakoski said during an interview in 2015.
A spokesman for the Republican Party of Wisconsin told the Washington Free Beacon that Sen. Baldwin
 is running from the issue rather than standing up for Wisconsin veterans.
"Senator Baldwin's decision to run from her failures rather than stand up for Wisconsin's veterans
 is shameful," Alec Zimmerman said. "Instead of fighting for reforms to the system by participating
in the ongoing oversight of the Tomah VA by the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Committee, she has embraced the Washington status quo and fled her responsibilities to solve
 the problem. Nothing can change the fact that Senator Baldwin failed to act when she had reason
 to believe Wisconsin's veterans were in danger."
Sen. Baldwin's office did not return a request for comment by press time.

Saudi Firm With Muslim Brotherhood Ties Manufactures Vaccines



  • "Selling the crucial manufacture of vaccines to an ideologically hostile country, which might - for whatever reason – suddenly decide to shut down production, does not sound like a good idea... Those who say that the Saudis are merely interested in profit, just like everybody else, should know better". — Rachel Ehrenfeld, expert on financing terrorism
  • Virtually all political parties supported the Danish government's sale of its vaccine manufacturing facility to the Saudi conglomerate.
  • After the publication of the Danish Mohammad cartoons in 2006, Saudis boycotted Danish goods. Do Danish politicians really have such short memories?
  • Vaccines are not an easy commodity to come by. It takes minimum six months for an order of vaccines to be delivered, but, according to the World Health Organization, delivery can also easily take up to two years.
  • How much trust are Danish consumers supposed to have in a Saudi owned conglomerate, which employs jihadists such as Usmani and donates heavily to jihadist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, who want to bring about a caliphate? The potential for political exploitation is too evident to reject.
Would you want your vaccines produced by a Saudi company that supports jihad? Danes, it seems, may have no choice.
Denmark recently sold its state-owned vaccine manufacturing facility to a conglomerate owned by the Aljomaih Group, a Saudi family dynasty[1] led by Sheikh AbdulAziz Hamad Aljomaih. The sheikh is also the largest single stockholder and chairman of Arcapita Bank, (formerly First Islamic Investment Bank) headquartered in Bahrain. As an Islamic bank, it has a so-called Sharia Supervisory Board comprised of Islamic scholars, who ensure that the bank's activities comply with sharia (Islamic law).
Former Islamic judge and leading Islamic scholar Taqi Usmani, who sits on the bank's Sharia Board, in his book, "Islam and Modernism", writes ruminations such as: "Aggressive Jihad is lawful even today... Its justification cannot be veiled..."
Usami had also, after Danish newspapers reprinted the Mohammad cartoons in 2008, co-signed an appeal to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), urging it to boycott Denmark:
"If the Danish government does not declare the [publication of] shameful and blasphemous cartoons as a criminal act, the OIC [should] appeal to all Islamic nations for a trade boycott of that bigoted country".
Equally noteworthy is that the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Yussuf al-Qaradawi, used to sit on Arcapita's sharia board, until he eventually resigned. Qaradawi, already in 1995, told a Muslim Arab Youth Association convention in Toledo, Ohio, "We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America!" According to Qaradawi, sharia law should be introduced gradually, over a five-year period in a new country. Presumably, this gradually-introduced sharia legal system would include the end of free speech under "blasphemy laws", the denigration and oppression of women, such as women worth half as much as men in court, polygamy, the persecution of Jews (Qaradawi advocates killing all of them), beating wives as a way of "disciplining" them and so on. Only after this transition phase, sharia laws such as killing apostates and homosexuals, as well as chopping off hands for theft, would be introduced.
Given Qaradawi's former prominence in Arcapita, it hardly comes as a surprise that the bank has given financial support to the Muslim Brotherhood in Bahrain, known there as the Al Islah Society. According to a leaked report by former US Ambassador to Bahrain, Ambassador William T. Monroe:
"Arcapita reported giving a total $591,000 in 2003 and $583,000 in 2002 to a variety of charitable organizations... the Islamic Education Society (Al Tarbiya Al Islamiya - Sunni Salafi) and the Al Islah Society (Sunni Muslim Brotherhood) are the largest beneficiaries of Arcapita's charitable giving... We are aware of concerns linking Arcapita advisors and staff to questionable organizations."
In August 2016, the Danish government announced that it "...rejects any organization representing antidemocratic and radicalized environments" and considers the Muslim Brotherhood to be "deeply problematic" and something they "strongly reject".
Clearly not strongly enough.
"Selling the crucial manufacture of vaccines to an ideologically hostile country, which might -- for whatever reason -- suddenly decide to shut down production, does not sound like a good idea. Those who say that the Saudis are merely interested in profit, just like everybody else, should know better", Rachel Ehrenfeld, an expert on the financing of terrorism, told Ekstra Bladet.


Denmark's Statens Serum Institut (State Serum Institute). Image source: Wikimedia Commons/Froztbyte.

Virtually all political parties supported the Danish government's sale of its vaccine manufacturing facility to the Saudi conglomerate. This is strange, given the recent history of Danish-Saudi relations.
After the publication of the Danish Mohammad cartoons in 2006, Saudis boycotted Danish goods. Saudi Arabia's religious leader, Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz al-Sheik, demanded that the Danish government hold Jyllands-Posten, the newspaper that printed the Mohammad cartoons, to account and force the newspaper to give an apology: "The government should give [the newspaper] a fine as a deterrence. This is the least that Muslims should demand", he said.
Do Danish politicians really have such short memories?
Vaccines are not an easy commodity to come by. It takes minimum of six months for an order of vaccines to be delivered, but, according to the World Health Organization, delivery can also easily take up to two years. Astonishingly, the Danish state has given the Aljomaih group an incredible start by promising to buy all its children's vaccines from the sheikh for the first 30 months. Only after that will Danish authorities be able to buy their children's vaccines elsewhere. The Danish government has also promised the Aljomaih group not to create new Danish state vaccine production for the first three years.
Should consumers not be able to trust a producer of something as critical as vaccines? How much trust are Danish consumers supposed to have in a Saudi owned conglomerate, which employs jihadists such as Usmani, which donates heavily to jihadist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, which in turn wants to bring about a caliphate? The potential for political exploitation is too evident to reject. Ekstra Bladet ran a poll on its website asking whether Danes were in favor or against the sale: 95% were against it.
Even more remarkable is that the government claims not to have known about the connection between the Muslim Brotherhood and Aljomaih; all the information is easily accessible on the internet.
Health Minister Ellen Trane Nørby has defended the sale: "We did not have several buyers to choose from. We have the buyer we have and it has saved 600 Danish jobs, which would otherwise have been lost".
Is she saying that the safety of Danish citizens is worth 600 jobs?
The sale of the Danish vaccine production facility to the Saudi conglomerate captures perfectly everything that is wrong with European politicians today: their apparent gullibility, their carelessness and their desire to sell out to places such as Saudi Arabia, seemingly without giving much thought to the long-term consequences.
Judith Bergman is a writer, columnist, lawyer and political analyst.

[1] The Group has been active in healthcare through its investment arm AJ Pharma Holding, and it is its Malaysian subsidiary, AJ Biologics, which will take over the vaccine production in the Danish facility in Copenhagen with its 100-year-old history and approximately 500 Danish employees. The deal was a steal for the Aljomaih group, which acquired the vaccine production company for what is believed to be a tenth of its actual value, a mere 15 million DKK.

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Bigotry Is Alive And Well In The Black Community



Sage Steele Claims the Worst Racism Toward Her Was From Fellow African-Americans


 Print

Speaking at a panel discussion in Florida, biracial ESPN anchor Sage Steele created controversy when she said that the “worst racism” she had ever received was “from black people,” according to The Daily Wire.
Steele, a SportsCenter anchor, was appearing this week at a conference on race at The Crossing Church in Tampa, along with Super Bowl-winning former NFL coach Tony Dungy and former NFL star Benjamin Watson. She said her experience as being biracial, as well as being married to a white man, had opened her up to bigotry from the black community.
“There are times that I believe that we, as African-Americans, can be hypocritical, and that is to not look ourselves in the mirror when we are saying certain things and blaming other groups for one thing when we are doing the exact same thing,” Steele said.

“The worst racism that I have received, and I mean thousands and thousands over the years, is from black people, who in my mind thought would be the most accepting because there has been that experience,” said Steele, 44.
“But even as recent as the last couple of weeks, the words that I have had thrown at me I can’t repeat here and it’s 99 percent from people with my skin color. But if a white person said those words to me, what would happen?”
It didn’t take long for liberals to go after the ESPN anchor in no uncertain terms. The Root, a black-centric opinion site founded by Gawker, ran an article condescendingly titled “Sage Steele Keeps Sage Steele-ing; Claims Worst Racism She’s Received Is From Blacks.” In it, the author went after Steele not only for her comments but for not being supportive of the Black Lives Matter movement and anti-Trump protests.

“Look, I’m under no illusion that Steele hasn’t received a strong side eye from segments of black America, but I really wish she’d stop acting as if she didn’t know where it’s coming from,” the author wrote.
Translation: Yes, you’re getting a lot of racism directed at you, but you had it coming. As apologetics for bigotry go, that’s not exactly the strongest example I’ve ever seen.




Sage Steele is impulsive & lack critical thought. She will be traded during the next racial draft.


The black delegation would like to trade Sage Steele for Michael Moore and a bag of peanut M&M's.

That’s hardly the only screed out there attacking Steele for having an opinion about the racism directed at her (as you can see from the tweets above) and it’s clear that many would rather see her not have a voice in the media.

However, it’s a brave stand for the rarely reported fact that racial hatred in America doesn’t just go one way. And considering how ESPN has treated other big-name personalities who didn’t toe the liberal line, Steele might have been putting her job on the line to do it.
H/T Breitbart
Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter with your thoughts on Sage Steele’s remarks.
Do you think Sage Steele has a point here?