Saturday, August 25, 2018

Leftist Attacks Increase Traffic!

Social Media Bans on Alex Jones Had a Consequence That Was Never Intended

 Print
Love him or hate him, radio show host Alex Jones has an undeniable knack for marketing. Even with tech giants targeting his Infowars empire, Jones has turned lemons into lemonade, capitalizing on what some refer to as the “Streisand Effect.”
Earlier this month, multiple platforms removed Jones’ content. According to UPI, “Google’s YouTube removed Jones’ InfoWars channel Monday after taking other action in previous months. The move followed similar decisions by Apple and Spotify, which removed Jones’ podcasts shortly before Facebook removed Jones’ fan page and the one for his radio show InfoWars on Monday.”
Twitter did not follow suit, much to the outrage of some. CEO Jack Dorsey explained in a tweet thread that Jones had not violated any rules that would allow for such a move:
Anyone, tech giants included, who thought what appeared to be a coordinated effort to silence Jones would work, is in for a huge disappointment. According to data from website traffic statistics tracking site Alexa, Infowars is thriving. In fact, it is continuing to improve.
TRENDING: Cruz Delivers Knockout Blow to Opponent Who Said Nothing Is ‘More American’ Than Anthem Kneeling
Back in October 2017, Infowars had a global rank of 3136. Its ranking in the United States was 1001.
Just days after the massive hit from social media platforms in early August 2018, Infowars’ global rating jumped to 3,513 after experiencing a major drop off in July. In the United States, its rating was even better than it had been in October, at 699:
Today, August 24, 2018, the numbers are even better. The global ranking for Infowars is 3167. And the U.S ranking is 591, which is significantly better than it was in October:
The website traffic statistics for Infowars, according to Alexa.
(Screenshot/Alexa)
According to The Economist, when singer and actress Barbra Streisand sued in 2013 to have photos of her Malibu home removed from the California Coastal Records Project archives, she inadvertently gave birth to the “Streisand Effect.” Essentially, “trying to hide something makes it more visible.”
Her action drove scores of people to seek out the images, creating the opposite effect of what she wanted. The efforts of the tech giants to keep the public away from Jones and his content did the same thing. They created a “Streisand Effect” for Jones.
Jones has been capitalizing on the attacks, and it has been paying off for the “conspiracy theorist” who already regularly opines on the efforts of the global elite to shut down him and others who have similar views. The appearance of a coordinated attack on Jones only added to the outrage of some who are against the global elite.

Should Alex Jones and Inforwars have been deplatformed?

  
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
RELATED: Cop Asks Security Guard For Help, All She Can Do Is Pull Out Her Cell Phone
But he is not alone in driving traffic to his site. Free speech advocates have also been aiding his cause, by defending his right to speak and have his platform, even if they personally disagree with him.
One example comes from television show host Bill Maher, who told his audience, “If you’re a liberal, you’re supposed to be for free speech.” He added, “That’s free speech for the speech you hate. That’s what free speech means.”
Just as with the backfiring of attacks on the NRA drove new members to join, new support for Jones has materialized, some just on principle, alone. For some, the more the left attacks a thing, the more they will push back, even if they weren’t originally customers or supporters:
Chick-fil-A, the NRA and Alex Jones are just a few of the examples the left has yet to learn from. As long as they continue to attack freedom, there will always be those among us pushing back to preserve it.
We are committed to truth and accuracy in all of our journalism. Read our editorial standards.

Censoring Any Person Is Immoral And Abhorrent!

Google Censors Leading 

Conservative Candidate

  • 08/24/2018 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN Staff
13 15 3  47
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/
aanews/media/picture/582f/41ad/6970/2d72/9364/0200/Slideshow_google.
png?1517074724
Google Censors Leading Conservative Candidate
A group affiliated with Kelli Ward's insurgent Senate campaign believe their
 efforts to promote the conservative lighting rod online are being thwarted by
 Google's advertising department.

For over two weeks, Political Media, Inc., has done everything through the
 proper channels to promote a site they say highlights Martha McSally's 
anti-conservative credentials.

"We've been placing digital ads on Google for decades and we have never
seen anything like this," says Ward.

With the Republican primary in Arizona coming up this Tuesday, Ward (no
relation to the candidate) says the whole affair "reeks of censorship."

According to a press release from the organization, this is not the first time
Google has targeted the conservative firm in a politically competitive race.

Political Media, Inc. is no stranger to corporate censorship. In 2012, the

digital marketing agency called out Facebook for censoring content they

promoted for the veterans-backed organization Special Operations Speaks.

The social network suspended Special Operations Speaks after the group

released a meme openly challenging President Barack Obama's response

to the Benghazi incident.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/google-censors-leading-conservative-candidate#ZuKeX8ukM7w4VcgV.99

This Is Insane! Are The Inmates Running The Asylum?

Calling 911 On Black People May Be Hate Crime Under Proposed Law
CROWN HEIGHTS, BROOKLYN — New Yorkers who call 911 on law-abiding people of color are committing hate crimes and should be prosecuted, according to a state senator who was recently reported to police for campaigning in his own district.
State Senator Jesse Hamilton, who represents Brownsville, Crown Heights and Flatbush, proposed new legislation a week after a self-described Trump fan called police to report him for speaking to constituents in public. It would criminalize 911 calls against people of color without evidence of malice.
"That's gonna be a hate crime," Hamilton said. "This pattern of calling the police on black people going about their business and participating in the life of our country has to stop."
Hamilton's proposal would strengthen current legislation that outlaws false reports by designating racially-motivated 911 calls as hate crimes, especially in instances where the call results in police responding with the preconception that the person might cause a threat.
"You shouldn't have your life put in danger due to ignorance," said Anthony Beckford, the leader of a local copwatch patrol unit who is currently running for State Assembly District 42.
Subscribe
Under the new law, the Oakland woman who called 911 to report a barbecue, the Philadelphia Starbucks manager who had two customers arrested and the Yale student who reported a fellow student for napping could be charged and prosecuted, had they called 911 in New York State, Hamilton said.
"Waiting for your friends at a Starbucks is not a 911 call," Hamilton said. "It's a call of intimidation."
The law would affect a Park Slope woman accused of calling police on a black woman who was taking shelter from a rain storm in her doorway this month.
But Hamilton noted that three people who called 911 on Saheed Vassell — the Crown Heights man shot dead by police who mistook the pipe in his hand for a gun — would not be prosecuted under his law because Vassell did legitimately appear to be a threat, Hamilton said.
The onus to report questionable 911 calls would lie on the victim and police would be responsible for investigating whether those calls were justified, according to Hamilton.
But Milan Powell, a Brooklyn resident who stopped to hear Hamilton speak outside the Prospect Park train station Wednesday, had serious concerns about relying on the NYPD to investigate.
"We're putting responsibility in the hands of an institution that's really predatory," said Powell, 30. "I wouldn't feel comfortable with that."
Powell also expressed concerns about the practicalities of tracking down and investigating contentious calls, a task that has proved difficult in the past.
A Williamsburg landlord who made 400 false reports against tenants who opened a coffee shop in his building was only arrested in 2014 when a cop recognized his voice at a local community meeting
Hamilton countered that officials could easily locate 911 callers through tracking devices and interview witnesses to corroborate victim's stories.
"The facts will lay out for themselves," he said.

Photo by Kathleen Culliton