Sunday, April 24, 2011

Will Dearborn Pay For Its Miscarriage Of Justice


Reverend Terry Jones is changing his tactic from talking about Sharia Law in Dearborn to the First Amendment.  Is this smart or is he an opportunist? On both questions the answer is yes.  He is smart enough to realize that Dearborn grossly over reacted to his visit and he is lucky that the City was so stupid and ham handed in handling him.

In today's Detroit News (reproduced below), reporter Oralandar Brand-Williams, talks about the change in tactic by the Florida cleric.  I do not know this reporter, however, his last paragraph is  chilling. He writes:

"Redford resident Richard Fournier, who attended the first day of Jones' and Sapp's trial, says he doesn't believe their constitutional rights were violated because their protest could have created a disturbance and possibly a riot."

What? Their constitutional rights were not violated because their protest might caused a riot or disturbance?  I don't know where this reporter (and his source) gets his information but in this country we do not charge people with a crime for something that might happen. By ending the story in this way, the reporter (and his editor) are telling us their point of view. So much for balanced journalism!

The really scary part of the story is that Mr. Fournier could sit in a trial and know so little about American government to make such an ill-informed statement. Is Mr. Fournier an example of the education level of our public or is he an outlier? Unfortunately, I think that he is our star pupil and not one on the outside looking in.

What is your opinion?
 
Here is the Detroit News article:



.Jones: Return to Dearborn is 'battle to protect the First Amendment'

Oralandar Brand-Williams / The Detroit News

Detroit— Controversial Florida pastor Terry Jones told The Detroit News on Saturday that he plans to file a lawsuit against the Wayne County Prosecutor's office and other government entities in connection with his arrest Friday and the case the prosecutor filed against him in connection with his planned protest outside the Islamic Center of America.

"We were arrested for something we had not done," said Jones today from Detroit Metro Airport as he prepared to go back home to Gainesville, Florida.

"I was totally shocked. I could not believe it," Jones said of his arrest. "Even the police who put the handcuffs on us were shocked."

Jones said he is working with the Ann Arbor-based Thomas More Law Center to file the lawsuit for violation of his Free Speech rights. The Thomas More Law Center is nationally known conservative Christian law center noted for its religion-based First Amendment case. The law firm filed a suit against the City of Dearborn last year. That case involved alleged violation of the constitutional rights of Christian missionaries jailed by police at the city's International Arab Festival. The missionaries sought to pass out literature but police said they could only do so in a certain area of the massive event.

Constitution expert Robert Sedler said he is glad to see Jones is challenging the "bizarre" ruling by Dearborn District Court Judge Mark Somers.

"The Supreme Court says you cannot deny a permit because of the message," said Sedler, a Wayne State University Law School professor. "The U.S. Constitutional supersedes everything, which is why this is so bizarre."

Jones is coming back to Dearborn on Friday.

He said he will hold the demonstration at 5 p.m. Friday outside Dearborn City Hall. He says he wants to stay within the confines of the law. Jones said the issue has now shifted from "radical Islam" to a battle to protect the First Amendment.

"We're getting support from all around America," said Jones.

Jones and his associate pastor, Wayne Sapp, were briefly jailed Friday for refusing to post a $1 bond requested by Judge Somers after a six-member jury found that Jones and Sapp would likely create a "breach of the peace" if they were to go along with their demonstration outside the mosque on Good Friday.

Jones and Wyatt bonded themselves out of jail shortly after their arrests. Jones said Friday that he and Sapp "made it very, very clear that we posted this under the greatest protest,"

Jones said the "whole proceedings, were a definite violation of our Constitutional rights."

Legal observers said the judge's actions were unusual but Somers had followed the letter of the law."

The Wayne County Prosecutor's office had no comment on Jones plans to sue.

Redford resident Richard Fournier, who attended the first day of Jones' and Sapp's trial, says he doesn't believe their constitutional rights were violated because their protest could have created a disturbance and possibly a riot.

From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110424/METRO/104240314/Jones--Return-to-Dearborn-is-‘battle-to-protect-the-First-Amendment’#ixzz1KSTGZ4B0

3 comments:

  1. OBAMA FULFILLING THE BIBLE

    America's founders spoke highly of the Bible, even without teleprompters. But Barack Hussein Obama, even with teleprompters, studiously avoids the following Bible verses and the other related information:

    Proverbs 19:10 (NIV): "It is not fitting for a fool to live in luxury - how much worse for a slave to rule over princes!"
    Also Proverbs 30:22 (NIV) which says that the earth cannot bear up under "a servant who becomes king."
    And Ecclesiastes 5:2-3 (KJV) advises: "let thy words be few...a fool's voice is known by multitude of words."
    Although Obama is not descended from slaves, he may feel that he's destined to become a black-slavery avenger.
    Or maybe an enslaver of all free citizens!
    For some stunning info on Pres. Obama and his fellow subversives, Google "Michelle Obama's Allah-day," "Obama Supports Public Depravity," "David Letterman's Hate Etc.," "Un-Americans Fight Franklin Graham" and also "Sandra Bernhard, Larry David, Kathy Griffin, Bill Maher, Joan Rivers, Sarah Silverman." Also Google "Prof. F. N. Lee's ISLAM IN THE BIBLE [PDF]."
    PS - Since Christians are commanded to ask God to send severe judgment on persons who commit and support the worst forms of evil (see I Cor. 5 and note "taken away"), Christians everywhere should constantly pray that the Lord will soon "take away" or at least overthrow all US leaders who continue to sear their conscience and arrogantly trample the God-given rights of the majority including the rights of the unborn. Do we need a second American Revolution?
    PPS - For a rare look at the 181-year-old endtime belief which has long neutralized millions of American patriots by promising them an "imminent rapture" off earth - which has diverted them away from being prepared to stand against all enemies, domestic as well as foreign - Google "Pretrib Rapture Dishonesty," "Pretrib Rapture Diehards," "Edward Irving is Unnerving," "Pretrib Rapture Secrecy," and "Pretrib Rapture - Hidden Facts" - all by the author of the bestselling nonfiction book "The Rapture Plot" (the most accurate and highly endorsed documentation on the pretrib rapture's long-covered-up-but-now-revealed beginnings in Britain in 1830 - see Armageddon Books). Also Google "Stamping Out Harold Camping."

    (I read the above bit on the net - Brenda)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great blog, love the mission statement. I'm a blogger myself (http://www.organizedforonce.com/), so it's unusual to find one that welcomes dissent.

    The comment above by Brenda is laughable, but the post itself seems like common sense to me. There's no reason why Jones needed to be arrested, even though the politicians he's been supporting have been the same officials fighting to increase the prison industrial complex. Yes, Clinton did too, but he was criminally insane on this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the comments. I welcome a discussion which is entirely different from argument. In an argument, no one learns. In a discussion, we might disagree but we can do that without calling names. Hey maybe, we both can learn. That is where I am coming from and hopefully we can make a difference.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.