Sunday, October 23, 2011

Paul Proposes Major Cuts

Today on NBC's Meet the Press reiterated  his statement that is reproduced below. Although we disagree with the candidate on some of his isolation-ship ideas, his fiscal ideas are the tough medicine that the country needs if we are not going to become another Greece.

For all the anger against S&P by politicians and media commentaries, it appears as if the other major rating agencies (Moody's and Fitch) are ready to join in downgrading the creditworthiness of the country.  Is anyone in the Administration or in Congress listening?  Or is their tin ear ignoring the warning bells?

It will take drastic cuts of the type Representative Paul is proposing if we are to right the ship of state. The changes will be short term painful, however, if we don't, the result will be unimaginable. If you want to know what it might look like, imagine the worst condition and multiply it by ten times.

So if we are to do the right thing, major changes in government agencies and programs must be made. Will we demand that of our leadership or will we await the inevitable? It is your decision.

Here is the article:




Paul Will Eliminate $1 Trillion, Cut Presidential Salary By $360,664

October 18, 2011 by  
Paul Will Eliminate $1 Trillion, Cut Presidential Salary By $360,664
UPI.COM
President Ron Paul would drastically cut Federal spending in his first year, according to his “Restore America” plan.
GOP Presidential candidate Ron Paul in a recent email to supporters said that he has been given only 18 minutes, 47 seconds to speak during the past three debates; mainstream ignorance of the candidate may end with his Monday release of a budget plan announcing about $1 trillion in specific Federal budget cuts.
According to The Wall Street JournalPaul’s plan calls for the massive cuts to be made during his first year in office along with the elimination of five cabinet-level  agencies and the lowering of corporate tax rates from 35 to 15 percent.
The candidate’s “Restore America” plan is focused on drastically reducing government reach to spur American business growth. This will be accomplished in part by repealing Obamacare, last year’s Wall Street regulations law and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Paul also calls for a 10 percent reduction in the Federal workforce which may be achieved by eliminating the Departments of Education, Commerce, Energy, Interior and Housing and Urban Development.  He also calls for a 30 percent budget cut to the Environmental Protection Agency, a 40 percent cut to the Food and Drug Administration, slashed Pentagon funding for foreign wars and completely eliminating spending on foreign aid, according to POLITICO.
The Congressman from Texas also wants to see programs like Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, food stamps, family support programs and the children’s nutrition program block-granted to the States and removed from mandatory Federal expenditures. In regard to Social Security, his campaign says that the plan “honors our promise to our seniors and veterans, while allowing young workers to opt out.”
In his plan, Paul also ensures voters that he is not going to make massive Federal budget cuts while living like a fat cat politician. He plans to reduce the Presidential salary from $400,000 yearly to $39,336 a year, which the plan says is “approximately equal to the median personal income of the American worker.”

5 comments:

  1. It was a good interview. Ron is not a "me too" candidate on foreign policy or much of the "social conservative" agenda. He should have stayed with the Libertarian Party and tried to build it up as the alternative to conventional Democrat/Republican politics.

    He is stuck at around 10%. Romney is stuck at around 23-25%, but that is enough to win unless the "not Mitt" voters can decide to back one of the others instead of split their vote among 4-6 of them. Eventually, some of the fringe contenders will drop out, but it may be too late by then to stop Romney. How do you see it shaping up over the next few months?

    --David

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Republican establishment would love to see Romney as the candidate. There have been rumors that he agreed to be the candidate during the 2008 campaign. In other words, it was guaranteed, however, no one asked Herman Cain who I believe has a great chance of being the candidate.

    As far as other candidates, Michelle Bachman, I feel that she has made too many mistakes and is a bit angry. She will drop out within a couple months.

    Perry who I really liked initially is not my candidate as did not like some of his stands such as immigration. I believe in removing all illegal immigrants and completely stopping the flow of those who come to this country unlawfully. He will not continue past the first couple tests and be March he will be back in Texas.

    Paul will be in it for a while. But will not go on past March.

    The only two who will battle the way to the convention will be Cain and Romney. Cain the rebel, the easy going, businessman and Romney the uptight, conventional businessman. My hope is that Cain will win but I fear that the "safe" candidate for the establishment Republicans will be Romney.

    Sandorum, McCotter, and the rest will drop out early.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The problem is that Perry has a ton of financial backing from some rich folks in Texas, so he can stay in for as long as his ego can take it. It is clear that a lot of his early supporters have switched to Cain. My prediction is that Perry will stay in at least long enough that he and Cain will split the "not Mitt" vote. This will allow Romney to win most of the primaries before March, gaining unstoppable momentum. If Perry and Bachman would step aside soon (like after New Hampshire), Cain would beat Romney in the Southern primaries and get on a roll.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you make a good point. Time will tell. I hope that you are wrong about the "not Mitt" vote but you definitely might be.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.