Another View of the Colorado Massacre

Was James Holmes a patsy?  We do not know but here is another analysis of the murders.  Could he be right?  Your opinion is......


Conservative Tom

My Take On The Colorado Shooting by goldbuggal

Authored by Goldbug

Okay, here's my take:

1. There were two (2) shooters, as reported by witnesses. They wore masks and body armor, so nobody could identify either individual .. nor could anyone swear that James Holmes was the shooter.

2. The shooters sustained no injuries inside the theater, since guns were not allowed.

3. When they exited the theater through the security door, their "handler's" assassins were waiting for them.

4. Shooter #1 was shot and killed; shooter #2 was injured.

5. Shooter #2 tried to run away, leaving the trail of blood spurting from his wound (as shown in video taken behind the theater and outside the security door).

5. Shooter #2 was then shot and killed.

6 The assassins then moved the bodies of Shooters #1 and #2 back inside the theater and placed them among the dead, accounting for the blood evidence that showed a return to the door.

7. Then they "placed" the drugged-out, carrot-top, bozo, a.k.a. James Homes, in the parking lot, where he was arrested without incidence.

8. James Holmes was never inside the theater and had no clue what had happened.

9. The second gas mask was discarded in the parking lot, because the assassins had to get the hell outta' dodge before the Aurora cops became aware of their cover-up activities.

10. The official story is so full of lies, a second grader could refute each of them. It's black ops, mind control, all about a tyrannical government attempting to rid these pesky American citizens of their guns.

-

Now, we know why they first reported 14 DEAD .. and then downgraded to 12 DEAD. They could never have explained who these two extra victims were IF James Holmes were, as they claimed, the "lone wolf gunman." He, indeed, has become the Sirhan-Sirhan, James Earl Ray, and Lee Harvey Oswald of 2012.

-

Whaddya' think?