On the Tea Party.net site, they make a very good point. This Administration trusts the Muslim Brotherhood with F-16s and Abrams tanks, yet distrusts Americans with most guns. Is it that they trust the "Brotherhood" more than Americans? We think so!
Why would an Administration be so anti-American, so afraid of law-abiding individuals with weapons? We can only surmise, guess or divine their intentions and real desires. However, we cannot believe they will be in the best interests of the average Joe or Jane.
Sure, the political class will be protected from their edicts. as will their friends, however, the rest of us will be left up to our own devices. Those of us who live in "fly-over country" or are clinging to their "guns and bibles" will pay the price. It will not be pretty.
Earlier today we wrote about the pledges that the Administration has been forcing top military brass to make in regard to firing on Americans. This is very disturbing, however, it goes along with the selling of planes and tanks to a regime that is anti-American and definitely anti-Israel. All that we have grown up knowing about America will now be destroyed to meet the vision of America that Obama has.
Neutering the Second Amendment is just the latest step. We already see how Obama has gone around Congress to institute the Dream Act, appointed dozens of Czars to run our lives, has selected anti-American Secretaries of State and Defense, nominated a far left Secretary of Treasury and sees nothing wrong with continuing spending on social programs while massively cutting military spending. He insists that we need to increase taxes and very selectively cut spending which only means more debt and more programs.
When Obama said that he would "fundamentally change" America. He was not joking. It will only get worse. Should we consider relocating? You tell us.
Conservative Tom
Why would an Administration be so anti-American, so afraid of law-abiding individuals with weapons? We can only surmise, guess or divine their intentions and real desires. However, we cannot believe they will be in the best interests of the average Joe or Jane.
Sure, the political class will be protected from their edicts. as will their friends, however, the rest of us will be left up to our own devices. Those of us who live in "fly-over country" or are clinging to their "guns and bibles" will pay the price. It will not be pretty.
Earlier today we wrote about the pledges that the Administration has been forcing top military brass to make in regard to firing on Americans. This is very disturbing, however, it goes along with the selling of planes and tanks to a regime that is anti-American and definitely anti-Israel. All that we have grown up knowing about America will now be destroyed to meet the vision of America that Obama has.
Neutering the Second Amendment is just the latest step. We already see how Obama has gone around Congress to institute the Dream Act, appointed dozens of Czars to run our lives, has selected anti-American Secretaries of State and Defense, nominated a far left Secretary of Treasury and sees nothing wrong with continuing spending on social programs while massively cutting military spending. He insists that we need to increase taxes and very selectively cut spending which only means more debt and more programs.
When Obama said that he would "fundamentally change" America. He was not joking. It will only get worse. Should we consider relocating? You tell us.
Conservative Tom
What's your view of the new Karl Rove Super-PAC?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/02/karl-rove-new-super-pac-republican-primary-steve-king
My take on it is that Wall Street is tired of losing the Senate races in states where they should be winning easily. Prime example is Dick Lugar. He was absolutely unbeatable, but they still put up a weak Tea Party candidate and lost the seat. If they were running "establishment" Wall Street Republicans instead of social conservatives, they would probably have already taken over the Senate by now.
--David
The purpose of the pac is to put in place moderate Republicans and not Tea Party members so that they will vote for what the republican leadership wants.
ReplyDeleteYes, I know the purpose of it. I was asking whether you support the idea.
ReplyDelete--David