Friday, June 21, 2013

How Does It Feel To Be In The Soviet Union?

The more we read about the NSA and the FISA Court, the less comfortable we are.  It appears as if the National Security Agency can do pretty  much what it wants to do and the Court will allow the agency to do it. It does not matter if the issue is Constitutional or within the bounds of our national freedoms, the court allows this agency to proceed. When 99% of all requests are approved, that means the Court is basically a rubber stamp and only get some backbone when the request is so "out there" that it cannot approve.

This is the same sort of justice that was prevalent in the USSR.  Are we headed the same way? Unless things change, the answer is a resounding yes.

We need more transparency or we need a supervising agency that has some backbone. We have neither now.

Conservative Tom





New documents suggest NSA can spy without warrant

By Jonathan Easley 06/21/13 08:24 AM ET
The National Security Agency (NSA) has considerable leeway to use information it obtains without a warrant. 
Some of the agency's tactics were revealed Friday after the NSA handed over top secret documents to The Guardian and The Washington Post about its domestic phone and email surveillance programs. 
The documents show that the NSA uses a broad, rolling certificate good for one year that allows it to seize phone records and emails for an array of targets that the secretive Foreign Inteliigence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, which oversees the NSA’s intelligence programs, doesn’t approve individually, like it would for a warrant.

In addition, if the NSA deems a communication as containing “significant foreign intelligence” or evidence of a crime, it can go after the alleged transgressor even if the communication was obtained inadvertently.

“The new documents show that the NSA collects, processes, retains and disseminates the contents of Americans’ phone calls and e-mails under a wide range of circumstances,” The Washington Post wrote.

The NSA says the program is only for foreign suspects and that it can’t target American citizens without a warrant.

Still, the revelations are likely to fuel calls for oversight and transparency for the programs, which have been the focus of national attention since the two news outlets first published documents from leaker Edward Snowden. 



President Obama will meet Friday for the first time with an independent oversight board tasked with monitoring civil liberties issues within the federal government, as the White House looks to squelch criticism that it’s been complicit in a program that violates the privacy of U.S. citizens.

The president and many lawmakers on Capitol Hill have argued that the policy, which was implemented in 2007, strikes the right balance between privacy and national security, and that it had been helpful in thwarting terrorist attacks.


Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/306995-new-documents-suggest-nsa-has-power-to-spy-without-warrant#ixzz2WrBpqQrK 
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

1 comment:

  1. "When 99% of all requests are approved, that means the Court is basically a rubber stamp and only get some backbone when the request is so "out there" that it cannot approve."

    The problem is with the FISA law itself. The 2007 change in the law made what NSA is doing perfectly legal. The solution is to change the law, not who sits on the court.

    --David

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.