First Of A Series Of Articles By Stephen L. Rush

Title: Declaration of Revoked Consent, Part 1 - Conundrum of Governance

By Stephen L. Rush

Liberties of the people have effectively been undermined.  It appears laws have been made to specifically subvert the economics and liberties of the people otherwise guaranteed by the Constitution and higher law.  Erosion and denial of rights to the middle class and small business, along with profiteering to the specific detriment of the taxpayer, homeowner, and worker, from corporate bailouts to universal insurance schemes, have resulted in grave inequities to lesser fortunate and understandable public outcry.  Worse, orders were given and laws were made designed to quell the people from reaction, allowing police officers to apply brut force and arrest anyone who would question lawmakers.  (See www.willofthepeople.agency for partial list of these laws.)  Resolution of these grievances are imperative for the protection of the people.

These laws are written in a way that their language is so broad, and their application is so wide, there can be no mistaking what they accomplish.  These laws are a concerted attempt to attack nearly every right throughout the Bill of Rights: abridging freedom of speech, disparaging peaceful assembly, resisting and obstructing protestors, denying petition for “redress” (new correction), authorizing soldiers and spies in times of relative peace to be quartered by electronic means in every house and mobile equipment, issuing unreasonable searches and seizures of electronics and communications devices without warrant or probable cause, depriving persons of their life, liberty, or property without any compensation, as well as discouraging accountability of representatives to the people, amending the Constitution through laws made in secret and other unconstitutional means, and prohibiting or excluding power otherwise guaranteed by the Constitution to and for the people.  The Bill of Rights guarantees consent to be governed and sovereign accountability by will of the people.  Without them, the people have no real protection from tyranny.

It matters not whether the threat is perceived or real; the Constitution affirms rights and freedoms to the people.  But, people are genuinely concerned about their liberties for good reason.  In spite of the uncertainty as to what government intends with these laws, the government has taken taxpayer monies to reward financial executive pay through the Troubled Asset Recovery Program (Bank Bailout), and has required the working and middle classes and small business to participate in costly health insurance.  Laws like these were made in closed door sessions, and people were physically thrown out of the Senate hearings for the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare) in 2010.  The government has not required the same of the wealthy or corporate executives, creating greater income inequities – that have flatlined since the 1970’s.  Jobs that have been added since the Great Recession are either menial or have exacerbating stringent qualifications because the market is still flooded with applicants.  And, news of photos of the National Guard and statements attesting to high powered weapons arriving in Fergusson, Missouri to aid local police is not a casual response.

These are the most recognizable laws and acts, but numerous other examples of disparity persist.  The government has not responded to these concerns, either.  So, people believe the government has acted with malice against the Constitution for the detriment of the people.  The people have every right to see their liberties restored and easement of such taxation and Marshal Law over the American people.  This is where the government has fallen short.  The government cannot resist a protest of the people; it is a First Amendment right to assemble.  The government cannot reject petitions and notices of the people; it is a First Amendment right to receive new correction.  The government cannot refrain from accountability; it is our system of government.  The government cannot retain consent of the governed when it has been revoked; it is our heritage to dissent oppression.  The government cannot return an extraordinary writ unresolved; it is the purview of the people.  The government cannot refuse the proclamation by a Continental Congress; it exists to protect the Union from anarchy.  The government cannot restrict a people-initiated recall election; it exists in defense of the Constitution.  The government must not rebel against any order to comply with the sovereign authority of the people, even for contempt, warrant to leave, or registrar notice; it restores faith in governing laws.

Every effort has been made by the people to rein in the government of this nation – by each one of these endeavors.  Yet, the government of the United States has failed to acquiesce to the will of the people and relinquish unrestrained power.  In other words, this event is considered catastrophic failure of governance.  The federal government cannot both be authorized of the Constitution and simultaneously act against it.  This has been called, a “conundrum of governance”.  Will of the People Constitutional Authority board has declared the U.S. government to be illegitimate.  What is left is for the people to enforce the results of the recall (despite attempts to derail it) and assert a government of the Constitution.

Stephen L. Rush, Defender of the Constitution

Will of the People Constitutional Authority Board

www.willofthepeople.agency