FBI's Insurance Policy Against
Trump Revealed
image: https://structurecms-staging-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/
trumptrain/media/picture/5a2a/ed0e/6970/2d2c/c235/7500/content_Mattis
.jpg?1512762638
We all had our suspicions about what FBI agent Peter Strzok meant by
“insurance policy,” which he wrote in a text to bureau lawyer Lisa Page,
a woman with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The text was
one of 10,000 that were sent between these two FBI officials from
August 15, 2015-December 1, 2016; this one was sent to Page in August
of 2016. The Wall Street Journal reported that according to agents familiar
with Strzok’s account, he was referring to the Russia investigation when
he mentioned “insurance.” He was removed from Special Counsel Robert
Mueller’s investigation in August once he was informed about these
communications; the DOJ inspector general was looking into their texts.
Strzok, who was in counter-intelligence, was part of two key FBI investigations.
He was involved in the Hillary Clinton email probe and the bureau’s
counterintelligence investigation into whether the Trump campaign
colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election, which he signed
off on making this inquiry official back in July of 2016. Hence, why
eyebrows were raised over this “insurance” reference (via WSJ)
[emphasis mine]...
...
On Twitter, Wilber expounded more on this, while adding that this doesn’t
...
On Twitter, Wilber expounded more on this, while adding that this doesn’t
point to a deep state plot to block Donald Trump from winning. Plainly, it
shows that this isn’t one of the FBI’s proudest moments, with former agents
apparently appalled by Strzok’s behavior, given the nature of these texts,
his position in two key investigations, and the added bonus that he was
having an affair with an FBI attorney. All of this speaks to the credibility of
the agency. It potentially speaks volumes about the office culture at the
FBI, along with the judgment Mueller has when it comes to picking his
staff. The Journal’s editorial board noted other troubling instances, like a
now-demoted DOJ official, Bruce Ohr, meeting with the authors of the
infamous and unverified Trump dossier. Oh, and his wife, Nellie, worked
for the firm—Fusion GPS—that hired former MI6 operative Christopher
Steele, who compiled the file, which was subsidized by the Hillary Clinton
campaign. The publication added that evidence is mounting that the FBI
possibly engaged in election meddling. We’ll see, but for now—the
“insurance” referred to is the Russia investigation. Also, another thing
the WSJ noted that former agents and prosecutors were flabbergasted
that Page and Strzok were even texting each other about these cases.
Yet, let’s be honest. Even if the probe was to be an aggressive review
Yet, let’s be honest. Even if the probe was to be an aggressive review
into whether the Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia colluded, and
there was—in this hypothetical—evidence of collusion, you don’t think
Democrats would try to refocus this inquiry upstream to ensnare Trump?
Of course they would. That’s why they’ve been obsessing about it for months.
To this day, there is zero evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with
Russia.
There are other instances at the FBI that are just as troubling as the texts,
There are other instances at the FBI that are just as troubling as the texts,
like former FBI Director James Comey drafting an exoneration statement
for Hillary Clinton before agents had interviewed the former first lady. Oh,
and Mr. Strzok editing the statement, like nixing the phrase “grossly
negligent” to “extremely careless.” Mr. Comey was also investigated for
violating the Hatch Act, a law that bars federal employees within the executive
from engaging in most political activities. His top aides, FBI chief of staff
James Rybicki and FBI attorney Trisha Anderson were interviewed, but the
FBI has refused to turn over the transcripts. Even without the deep state
drama, we already have conduct that some in the FBI were injecting their
political biases into the investigations. Hence, the reason why the National
Review wants someone to scrutinize the FBI’s conduct in the execution of
their investigations into the Clinton email probe and possible Russian collusion.
Why? Because it’s night and day...
Read more at http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/fbi-s-insurance-policy-against-trump-revealed#u5p0DcYgzVR4yVvm.99
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.