Friday, June 1, 2012

Lech Snubbed By Obama, Pleases Russian Bosses

Earlier today we posted an article about Obama and his relationship with the Russians and how concerned we were about the relationship and the President's "flexiblity" he would have after the election. Well, it appears as if the White House does not want to upset their "handlers" as they turned down a request for Lech Walesa to accept the Medal of Freedom for a World War II polish underground fighter. Walesa was deemed to be too controversial.


Why would the Russians want the Polish electrician who founded the Solidarity Party to receive this honor? It is a blot on the old Soviet Union that this uneducated gentleman had brought the puppet government to its knees. Having him accept this award would have been a stick in the eye of the Ruskies.  


It appears that when issues involve Europe, the White House uses the red phone to call the mucky mucks in Moscow to determine how they should handle the situation.  Flexibility, paws-haw, it is the Manchurian President come to life!


This whole incident stinks to high heaven. It is a great example of the United States not taking the moral high ground and leading by example. One can only wonder how this incompetent would have reacted to previous crises like the Civil War, WWII, Cuban Missile Crisis or 9/11.  We believe it would not have been what previous leaders did.  


He must go.


Conservative Tom
President Obama Shuns Lech Walesa
The Polish Solidarity leader is “too political” for the administration.
By Rory Cooper
ArchiveLatestRSSSend
Lech Walesa

Text   
Listen to the Audio Version
Comments
103
Lech Walesa was once a trade-union activist. He was often arrested for speaking his mind against Communist oppression behind the Iron Curtain in Poland and for defying the Soviet Union. He was an electrician who, with no higher education, led one of the most profound freedom movements of the 20th century — Solidarity. He became president of Poland and swept in reforms, pushing the Soviet Union out of his homeland and moving the country toward a free-market economy and individual liberty. And President Obama doesn’t want him to set foot in the White House.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Polish officials requested that Walesa accept the Medal of Freedom on behalf of Jan Karski, a member of the Polish Underground during World War II who was being honored posthumously this week. The request makes sense. Walesa and Karski shared a burning desire to rid Poland of tyrannical subjugation. But President Obama said no.
Administration officials told the Journal that Walesa is too “political.” A man who was arrested by Soviet officials for dissenting against the government for being “political” is being shunned by the United States of America for the same reason 30 years later.
Meanwhile, one of the recipients of the Medal was Dolores Huerta, the honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. So socialist politics are acceptable, but not the politics of a man who stood up and fought socialism.

Advertisement
This revelation follows an eruption of outrage in Poland after President Obama referred in his remarks at the Medal of Freedom ceremony to “Polish death camps,” a phrase that Poles have battled since the end of the Cold War. The phrase suggests that Poles were complicit in Nazi concentration camps, which of course is not the case. In fact, Poles were exterminated in the camps.
The White House’s flippant response to the uproar caused the Polish president and prime minister to demand more thoughtful and personal reactions. But White HousePress Secretary Jay Carney said Wednesday that the president has no plans to reach out to his Polish counterparts and has shrugged off the outrage in Poland.
Few observers are suggesting that President Obama’s written remarks noting “Polish death camps” were intentionally malicious. The comment was more likely a result of historical ignorance and careless inattention. This is the same ignorance and carelessness that would cause president to turn away Lech Walesa and label him as “too political.”
Ironically, Lech Walesa shares a distinction with President Obama: They both won Nobel Peace Prizes. Walesa earned his in 1983 after years of fighting for peace and freedom, and being monitored, harassed, and jailed for it. President Obama received his award in 2009. Some may think that this would be enough of a bond for President Obama to set aside political differences for the greater good. But instead, President Obama treated Walesa the same way he treated the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize winner, His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama, who was ushered out the White House kitchen past piles of garbage in 2010.
The likelihood is that President Obama didn’t want Walesa in the White House because Walesa has made critical remarks toward the president’s policies and in 2010 warned that the United States was slipping toward socialism. But rather than taking the mature and diplomatic path and respecting Walesa’s right to have a differing perspective, Obama chose to shun his lifetime of achievements.
Congratulating Walesa on his Nobel Prize in 1983, President Ronald Reagan said: “For too long, the Polish government has tried to make Lech Walesa a non-person and destroy the free trade-union movement that he helped to create in Poland. But no government can destroy the hopes that burn in the hearts of a people. The people of Poland have shown in their support of Solidarity, just as they showed in their support of His Holiness Pope John Paul II during his visit to Poland, that the government of that nation cannot make Lech Walesa a non-person, and they can’t turn his ideas into non-ideas.”
The White House should not treat President Walesa as a non-person, and they cannot turn his ideas into non-ideas.
— Rory Cooper is director of communications at the Heritage Foundation. You can follow him on Twitter @rorycooper
ppet government

8 comments:

  1. Well, do you really think this is going to help Obama get cooperation from the Russians on Iran sanctions or Syria condemnation?

    Meanwhile, obviously the BLS still hasn't received the memo directing them to fake the unemployment statistics. I see it increased to 8.2% in May. Are you getting nervous yet?

    --David

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yesterday, Hillary Clinton publicly blasted the Russians for selling weapons to Syria and not backing U.N. Security Council actions against Syria. It appears the Russians aren't handling her very effectively.

    --David

    ReplyDelete
  3. no worries about unemployment it all is a head fake to make people think they are really doing their jobs.

    As far as Hillary v the Russians, again, another head fake. Appearances are important and for it to appear as if we are upset keeps us thinking that they are doing the right things. However, the back channel is, don't listen to what we are saying, it is all for public consumption. The administration supports what Russia is doing as it will give the US the opportunity to invade Syria in October.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What?!! Why on earth would the Russians want the U.S. to invade Syria -- a sworn enemy of Israel and buyer of Russian arms? And why would the Russians want Hillary giving "head fakes" (you gotta be kidding me!) that only serve to give Russians bad publicity for their failure to help stop a human rights atrocity? Around 10,000 civilians -- including defenseless women and children -- have been mercilessly slaughtered already. And you think Hillary is just give "head fakes" about it protesting and trying to get action in the U.N. Security council against Russian opposition. Simply incredible. And Russians have also been dragging their heels on supporting U.S. sanctions against Iran. Your idea that the U.S. and Russia have the same foreign policy interests is amazing to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Republican Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said she hoped the Obama administration would be able to use diplomacy to "get Russia to do the right thing" - at least by stopping arms sales to Assad's government, which is using deadly force against an uprising in Syria.

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-06-01/news/sns-rt-us-syria-usa-ros-lehtinenbre8501dz-20120601_1_assad-s-alawite-iran-sanctions-bill-syria-last-weekend

    ----------
    If Hillary is just giving "head fakes", then so is the Republican head of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. I am sure I can find other Republicans protesting against the Russians complicity with Syria as loudly as Hillary and her.

    --David

    P.S. When do you expect the BLS to stop their so-called "head fakes"? They aren't helping Obama by announcing the unemployment rate clicked up to 8.2% in May.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When the State Department says things that sound right, don't believe them. They have back channel conversations which are entirely different. It's the same as when a football coach is told by the owner "you are our man" and then is fired a week later.

    BLS will change the numbers soon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As far as our invasion of Syria in October, how else is Obama going to be re-elected without a "wag the dog" invasion of Syria?

    ReplyDelete
  8. There isn't going to be any war against Syria in October, and the BLS is not going to fake the unemployment statistics in October. I don't think anything I could say can change your mind on this, but I will be curious to see how you explain in November why these things did not happen. And you still have not explained why Russia wants the U.S. to attack Syria. Russians must be doing their own "head fakes" by selling them weapons and opposing actions against Syria in the Security Council.

    --David

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.