The late Margaret Thatcher was a very important link in ending the Cold War along side her good friend, Ronald Reagan. Her strength of character, her willingness to take on all comers and her desire to improve the world all combined to make her very formidable. We need leaders like her. May she rest in peace.
Conservative Tom
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Ruddy/Thatcher-leaders-Reagan-Obama/2013/05/02/id/502479#ixzz2SMiXe0oj
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Conservative Tom
Mrs. Thatcher: The Final Word
Thursday, 02 May 2013 11:47 AM
All of the eulogies have been spoken by now for Margaret Thatcher; there is not much I can add about her contribution to the West.
After her passing, I received a phone call from a British friend, a college classmate. "We have no leaders. Where are the likes of Mrs. Thatcher or Ronald Reagan today?" he lamented.
He is right — the West has no great leaders.
How fortunate we were in the middle of the Cold War to find a powerful triumvirate of Reagan, Thatcher, and John Paul II, willing to offer leadership that confronted the Soviet Empire with resolve, causing it to collapse.
Back then there were so many formidable figures: Francois Mitterrand in France, Helmut Kohl in Germany, even Mikhail Gorbachev in Russia.
The picture is bleak now.
President Barack Obama, for all his talk about being a transformational leader, has not lived up to the hype. While his handling of national security matters has, on the whole, been surprisingly good, there is a global perception that he is weak. That is always bad. It is certainly dangerous.
A real leader would have mapped out a strategy for us to play out our role as the great superpower. We have followed in the Middle East when leading is crucial. Israeli President Shimon Peres recently said the region is "disintegrating."
China is rapidly gaining supremacy in Asia. Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans are rattling in their cages, whimsically pointing nuclear warheads.
Vladimir Putin is ascendant in Russia. He is a leader, but he is not our leader.
There were hints we might find a great leader in the West. Germany's Angela Merkel seemed strong. But she is fizzling, and fast.
In the immediate aftermath of the Japanese nuclear meltdown, she moved to shut down every nuclear power plant in her country.
It was a foolish move, and now Germans are finding out they can't generate anywhere near the power they need using "green" technology. Meanwhile, their energy rates are skyrocketing as their economy hits a wall.
France's Nicolas Sarkozy in his early days showed signs of greatness. But he lost power.
And then there is the new Pope, Francis. The early signs suggest greatness.
We need leadership because the world is in crisis. We're still living through the greatest recession since the Great Depression.
The economies in the West have been kept afloat by a massive injection of cash by central banks, which have kept interest rates at the unbelievable rate of zero for a long time. Such extreme measures can only last so long.
We also see growing signs of foreign policy crises on the horizon, in the Middle East and in Syria, on the Korean Peninsula, and in other hot spots.
This moment brings us again to Mrs. Thatcher and her legacy.
I met the Iron Lady on two occasions. The last time was just five years ago, in the summer of 2008. It was in London at the 80th birthday of the longtime chairman of Newsmax, the late Lord Rees-Mogg.
I told the former British prime minister, "Mrs. Thatcher, I want you to know that your legacy will live, not for decades, but for centuries to come."
She looked at me and took both of her arms and brought them close to her chest. "But Chris, I won't be here for centuries," she said with disappointment. I laughed and she smiled.
She will be remembered for a long time. Her championing of the individual over the state, and her efforts to roll back government control of whole industries and stop the expansion of the welfare state — which she saw as nothing more than state-sponsored slavery — is still applauded and emulated.
Interestingly, at the same 2008 party was Paul Johnson, the famed British historian. He seemed agitated about the upcoming election, as it stood fairly clear that Obama would win that November.
I remember Johnson telling me that civilizations commit suicide, and it could happen again with Obama. He said America almost committed suicide during the Carter presidency.
People think a great power like the United States will always last forever, Johnson told me. But they are wrong, he was quick to add.
I believe we will endure — as long as we keep to our founding principles and find leaders like Mrs. Thatcher.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Ruddy/Thatcher-leaders-Reagan-Obama/2013/05/02/id/502479#ixzz2SMiXe0oj
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Tom, please pardon my digression, but I would like to request you post an article about the Israeli bombing in Syria. It is a very interesting development, because, indirectly (and ironically) they are helping Syria as much as the rebels. The arms from Iran were going to Hezbollah for Hezbollah to use to fight the Syrian government. Meanwhile, the "dictator" Obama has backed Iraeali bombing of Syria and indicated that the U.S. intelligence aided Israel in the targeting. It is a very complicated situation politically, and plenty for us to talk about instead of Margaret Thatcher.
ReplyDelete--David
I only heard about this event this morning. It is apparent that the "dictator" has made a mistake by putting down a line and then ignoring his own declaration.
ReplyDeleteIsrael MUST protect itself and by taking out the arms depots.
I will do more investigation and report.
I think the U.S. policy on Syrian chemical weapons, goes like this: "If you cross our red line, we will send in our attack dog (Israel)." In the speech, Obama said that the attack was coordinated between U.S. and Israel. U.S. supplied the intelligence, and Israel supplied the warplanes (courtesy of U.S. sales to Israel).
ReplyDeleteOn the face of it, Hezbollah would support Assad. But Assad has never really done much against Israel. Politically, Hezbollah would have a stronger ally against Israel if the al-Qaeda in Iraq rebel group (the strongest of the rebel forces at the moment) took over the government -- even though they are Sunni. What does Hezbolah hate more: Sunni or Israelis? That is what I have been wondering.
--David
Muslims hate other Muslims but hate non-Muslims and Israel even more.
ReplyDeletePerhaps, but then that means Hezbollah would be acting against their own interests by not backing the rebels. An Islamic fundamentalist regime in Syria would be more of a threat to Israel than Assad has been. Of course, that requires a prediction about what government will come after Assad.
ReplyDelete--David
I would agree that an Islamic fundamentalist regime in Syria would be worse for Israel. I believe that is the reason that Israel has been pretty much staying out of the battle in Syria.
ReplyDelete