Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, February 27, 2012

Damning Evidence on ObamaCare

Gallup recently completed a poll which is the most damning evidence that ObamaCare is on the wrong track.  72% of all Americans and an astonishing 56% of Democrats say the mandate for coverage is unconstitutional. During the debate, the same numbers were expressed by the public, however, those who know better (Democratic legislators) told us to go mind out own business! Now that the law is partially in effect, we see the same disagreement with the program.


Now for the big question--will the Supreme Court see it the same way?  Will it be a larger margin than the normal 5-4 split?  Will we see an 8-1? (Justice Elana Kagan will probably vote for the program regardless of who else votes with her as she was instrumental as the President's lawyer (Solicitor General) to push the law through Congress).


It is obvious to us that the public understands the damage this mandate will cause. If the Supreme Court decrees that this law is legal, where will it take us?  Will we be mandated to buy a certain car, a certain soap, or any other product  the Administration deems to be in our best interests? That our friends, is not freedom!


We still believe in the United States and its superior governmental system, however, this election and as far as this article goes, this decision is pivotal. Should the decision go against the public, we will never recover from it as it will open the floodgates of governmental mandates and requirements.  Let's pray that does not happen.


Conservative Tom





Gallup: 72% of All Americans and 56% of Democrats Say Obamacare Mandate Unconstitutional

Kathleen Sebelius Barack Obama
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and President Barack Obama at the White House on Feb. 10, 2012. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
(CNSNews.com)- Seventy-two percent of American adults and 56 percent of self-professed Democrats say that the provision in the health-care law signed by President Barack Obama that requires individuals to purchase health insurance or pay a fine is unconstitutional, says theGallup Poll.
In March, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear cases challenging the constitutionality of the mandate.
Among Republicans, according to the poll, 94 percent say the mandate is unconstitutional and 6 percent say it constitutional. Among Independents, 70 percent say it is unconstitutional and 21 percent say it is constitutional. In contrast to the 56 percent of Democrats who say the mandate is unconstitutional, only 37 percent say it is constitutional.
Gallup also asked survey respondents whether they strongly favor, favor, oppose or strongly oppose repealing the health-care law if a Republican president is elected this fall. A plurality of 47 percent favored repealing the law, including 26 percent who said they strongly favored repeal and 21 percent who said they favor it. Forty-four percent said they oppose repealing the law, including 20 percent who said they strongly favor repeal and 24 percent you said they favor it.
Among Republicans, 87 percent said they favor repealing the health-care law, including 56 percent who said they strongly favor repeal and 31 percent who said they favor it. Among Democrats, 77 percent said they oppose repeal, including 39 percent who said the strongly oppose repeal and 38 percent who said the oppose it.
Gallup also asked the survey respondents if they believed that the health-care law in the long-run make their family's health-care situation better, not much different or worse. Seventy-two percent said it would not make much difference (34 percent) or make things worse (38 percent).
Only 24 percent told Gallup they thought the health-care law would make their family's health-care situation better.
The survey polled 1,040 American adults Feb. 20-21

Dems: We Love Illegal Immigrants Voting

Have Democrats collectively lost their senses or they just so political that any vote, illegal or not, is great? We suppose their intention is that they need to get re-elected so if a few illegals vote for them, that is OK. We wonder how they would feel if the immigrants all voted Republican. Somehow, we feel they might be very upset!


So goes the political parties in the US today, if it is good for me, then it is good, however, if it harms our party, we must stop it dead cold. Illegal immigrants are flowing into this country from around the world, not just Mexico!  Why can't we stop them?  Could it be a planned program to get more votes for the Democrats? We believe so!


Whether someone is an illegal alien, is a convicted felon who has not served his/her time, does not have a drivers license or state ID or cannot prove his or her identity, they should not vote. The right to vote is guaranteed but it does not mean that you do not have to prove who you are otherwise someone could vote three or four time, instead of once.


Once we allow fraud to start to penetrate the system, it won't be long before illegality is everywhere.  It is sort of like a leak in a dam. If you don't plug the leak, it will grow and grow until the entire structure fails. 


Democrats seem to feel this helps their cause. They are wrong. In the long run, it will damage the entire system to the point that there will be no Democratic or Republican party, just one party--the party of the dictator.  Most of us would not want to live in this type of government.


Should you have the misfortune to live in one of the districts that the gentlemen mentioned in the following article represent, we suggest that you strongly recommend they change their ways before it is too late.  They are looking for short term gains at the expense of long term pain.


Conservative Tom


‘We Don’t Have Any’ Problem of Illegal Immigrants Voting in U.S., Dem Congressmen Say

Rep. John Lewis
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) AP Photo
(CNSNews.com) - Two congressional Democrats who oppose tougher voter ID and voter registration laws told CNSNews.com that such laws are not needed because, they claim, documented voter fraud by illegal aliens is nonexistent.
At a discussion panel on voter identification (ID) laws held at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 17, CNSNews.com asked Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.): “What should be done in regards to illegal immigrants voting?”
Lewis replied, “I don’t know of any. I don’t know of any case in any -- in Georgia, in Alabama, in North Carolina, Mississippi or any parts of America -- that some illegal person, some person who’s not a citizen had cast a vote and I just think that’s a lot of say-and-do about nothing. That’s not happening.”
Lewis also said voter ID laws, or proof of citizenship laws make it harder to restore voting rights to people that paid their debts to society.
“These laws are barriers to an all-inclusive democracy," Lewis said "They are a disgrace and a shame. We continue to step backward toward another dark time in our history.”
Following the same event, CNSNews.com also asked Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver II (D-Mo.) --  “In your opinion is there anything that should be done to prevent, say illegal immigrants from voting?”
Cleaver, as well, said there are no illegal aliens voting in the U.S.
“We don’t have any, we don’t have any problems of illegal immigrants voting in this country,” Cleaver told CNSNews.com. “And in the last 10 years we’ve had something like 13 cases of voter fraud in the 50 states of the United States of America.”
While tracking illegal immigrant voting is difficult, according to a report issued by the Commission on Federal Election Reform in 2005, the Justice Department has conducted more than 180 investigations into election fraud since October of 2002. Federal prosecutors have charged 89 individuals and convicted 52 for election-fraud offenses, including giving false voter-registration information.
The report also noted that in 2000, random checks by the Honolulu city clerk’s office found 200 registered voters who admitted they were not U.S. citizens. And in 2004, at least 35 foreign citizens applied for and received voter cards in Harris County, Texas, the report noted.
The bipartisan blue-ribbon commission, which was chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, recommended laws that require voters to show a photo ID before voting – aa recommendation that came before the federal REAL ID law was created.
Recent events also suggest at least the strong possibility of non-citizens voting.
In 2011, Colorado’s secretary of state found by comparing drivers’ licenses that Colorado had potentially as many as 16,270 non-citizens on its voting rolls.
In 2007, the Dallas Morning News ran a piece titled “Non-citizens likely voted in Bexar County” which explained how 330 non-citizens were discovered on voting rolls after they were summoned for jury duty.
The 2004 Washington State gubernatorial election was decided by 133 votes while 1,678 illegal votes, mostly by felons, were cast. The election was upheld because there was no accurate way to determine which candidate was the recipient of the illegal votes.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, currently 31 states require some form of identification to vote, with eight having strict photo ID requirements. Another 29 states have no ID requirement to vote.
Court cases will likely continue over voter ID laws, which opponents like Lewis and Cleaver argue are often unconstitutional.
Crawford v. Marion County Election Board upheld Indiana’s voter ID law which requires government issued photo ID. To be constitutional, voter ID laws have to follow the 24th amendment, which prohibits a poll tax.
Reps. Lewis and Cleaver were joined by Reps. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas), in a voting rights panel that also included the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the American Civil Liberties Union, the William Kellibrew Foundation, the Advancement Project, the American Association of People with Disabilities, and the George Soros-funded Brennan Center for Justice.

Child's Art Sends Dad To Jail

The latest from Canada involves a 4 year olds art showing a gun which results in the father being arrested, strip searched and jailed. This is the PC movement gone crazy.  Please understand that we are for responsible gun ownership without government oversight.  We have found that most gun owners take their duties seriously when it comes to their weapons. There are always those "knuckle draggers" who don't and as much as those in leadership believe--you cannot legislate common sense.


However, this entire situation DID NOT involve an actual weapon but rather a picture of a man holding a gun.  Isn't this way over the top!  The man did not even own a gun or have access to one. Additionally, the police had searched his house PRIOR to getting his permission!  Is this what we can expect of our government when the Second Amendment is  emasculated?


Government cannot guarantee any rights which is the reason the Constitution was set up the way it is. Without this document, the United States would be no different from all other countries, a fact missed by those who would deny the rationale behind this wonderful piece of paper. Rights, not guaranteed, can be eliminated by the stroke of a pen, we better never forget that.


The story of the "crayola gun toter" is below. Outrageous and scary. Are we headed the same way?


Conservative Tom




The Nanny State in Action; Could it Happen Here?

By Bobby Eberle 
Here's a story that one might find hard to believe. It shows what a Canadian father went through simply because his four-year-old daughter drew a picture of a gun in school. From the teacher, to the principal, to the police officers... everyone threw common sense out the window as the nanny state rolled into high gear. Rights? Due Process? Forget it!
So here's what happened as reported by The Toronto Sun. Jessie Sansone is a 26-year-old father of four. He showed up to pick up his kids from school, just like he always does. But this time, he was in for a shock. It turned out that the police were waiting for him, because earlier in the day, his 4-year-old daughter drew a picture of a man with a gun.
When the teacher saw the picture, she asked the girl about it. The girl said it was a picture of her daddy getting the "bad guys and monsters."
From there, the teacher contacted the principal who contacted the police. Mr. Sansone was arrested, taken to police headquarters, and strip searched. His home was also searched.
And so they found a gun... a toy gun that shoots foam darts. Can you imagine the trauma this man -- and the entire family -- went through?
How can common sense break down this dramatically? The little girl drew the picture as if her father were a hero... getting bad guys and monsters. This is a cause for alarm?
Yes, this happened in Canada, but raise your hand if you could see it happening here? Canada certainly doesn't have a monopoly on stupid people or big-brother officials running amok.

A Must See Movie

Sometimes movies hit the right notes and strike the truth.  The movie (link below) is right on and must be shown to all your liberal and independent friends.  It is worth the time!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOpwCQsMbCE&context=C3631be0ADOEgsToPDskKAR0ywiBc8cUXPl6WdAc6p

Conservative Tom