Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, July 15, 2013

Could Zimmerman Avoid Federal Civil Rights Case?

We hope that the FBI evidence and Dershowitz's opinion are validated, however, we doubt it will happen. This Administration is based upon keeping the racial divide around. It guaranteed their election and they will keep it around as a good whipping boy.  


Conservative Tom


TWO THINGS THAT COULD PREVENT THE DOJ FROM BRINGING CIVIL RIGHTS CASE AGAINST ZIMMERMAN

As the Department of Justice is looking into whether criminal civil rights charges could be brought against George Zimmerman, who was acquitted over the weekend from second-degree murder charges in the death of Trayvon Martin, some are pointing to interviews by the FBI that could thwart such a case accusing Zimmerman of racial profiling. Additionally, Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz has another bit of information that could also thwart the civil rights action.

THE FBI INTERVIEWS

George Zimmerman Found Not Guilty In Death Of Trayvon Martin
George Zimmerman listens as the verdict is announced that the jury finds him not guilty. (Photo: Joe Burbank-Pool/Getty Images)
The Miami Herald reported last week that FBI records released Thursday recorded Sgt. Arthur Barnes saying he “felt the shooting was not racially motivated, but it was a man shooting an unarmed kid.” The Herald included that Barnes was among others in the police department who lead investigator Chris Serino with the Sanford Police felt were “pressuring him file charges against Zimmerman,” the FBI’s records stated, even though he “did not believe he had enough evidence at the time to file charges.”
Here’s more from the Herald regarding some of the information included in the nearly 300 pages of the FBI’s report as it pertained to potential racial profiling:
After interviewing nearly three dozen people — including gun dealers, Zimmerman’s former fiancĂ©, co-workers and neighbors — the FBI found no evidence that racial bias was a motivating factor in the shooting, the records show. It’s unclear whether more interview transcripts remain to be released.
The evidence released Thursday includes witness-statement summaries from co-workers. They described Zimmerman as a consummate professional who was exceedingly pleasant and didn’t fly off the handle, even when someone cut off the lock he had used to make sure no one moved a special ergonomic chair from his desk. An ex-girlfriend described him as someone who sometimes wanted to drive into a lake and was prone to road rage, but she said he had plenty of black friends and was the “last person” she would expect to get into the kind of confrontation that led to Trayvon’s death.
The Smoking Gun posted an FBI document that also noted “Serino believed Zimmerman’s actions were not based on Martin’s skin color, rather based on his attire, the total circumstances of the encounter and the previous burglary suspects in the community.”
“Serino described Zimmerman as overzealous and having a ‘little hero complex,’ but not as a racist,” the report stated.
zimmerman martin civil rights
Americans angry at the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the death of black teen Trayvon Martin protest in Los Angeles, California July 14, 2013. A jury in Sanford, Florida late Saturday found Zimmerman, a volunteer neighborhood watchman, not guilty of shooting dead Martin, a 17 year-old unarmed teen on the night of February 26, 2012. (Photo: ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images)

DERSHOWITZ

In addition to these statements given to the FBI during their interviews regarding the shooting that occurred Feb. 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida, resulting in the death of 17-year-old Martin, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz told Mike Huckabee Sunday of other challenges that could arise from such a case.
“In general, the Justice Department does not investigate civil rights violations committed by one individual against another unless that individual works for the state or federal government,” Dershowitz said.
Dershowitz continued that “George Zimmerman can’t really alone violate the civil rights of an individual even if he were to be guilty of the crime.”
Watch the clip with Dershowitz’s thoughts (via the Gateway Pundit):
Though the Justice Department does have an established history of using federal civil rights laws to try to convict defendants who have been previously acquitted in related state cases, experience shows it’s almost never easy getting guilty verdicts in such high-profile prosecutions.
Lauren Resnick, a former federal prosecutor in New York who secured a conviction in the killing of an Orthodox Jew during the 1991 Crown Heights riots in Brooklyn, said the Justice Department could conceivably proceed under a theory that Zimmerman interfered with Martin’s right to walk down a public street based on his race. But even that is difficult since the conflict occurred in a gated community, which may not fit the legal definition of a public facility. Prosecutors would also probably need to prove that trailing Martin on the street constituted interference, she said.
“One could argue it did, if it freaked him out and he couldn’t comfortably walk down the street – there’s an argument here,” said Resnick, who now specializes in white-collar defense and commercial litigation.
But she said federal prosecutors were likely to encounter the same hurdles as state prosecutors in establishing that Zimmerman was driven by racial animus and was the initial aggressor, as opposed to someone who acted in self-defense.
Samuel Bagenstos, a former No. 2 official in the Justice Department’s civil rights division, said: “This is an administration that hasn’t shied away from bringing hate crimes cases that are solid prosecutions based on the facts and the law, but from what I’ve seen this would be a very difficult case to prosecute federally because the government would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that George Zimmerman acted because of Trayvon Martin’s race. If you’re trying to prove racial motivation, you are usually looking for multiple statements related to why he is engaging in this act of violence. I think it’s a difficult case to prove.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

How Could So Many Events Happen On The Same Day?

Those who are not familiar with the Jewish commemoration of Tisha b'Av will find the following short history lesson interesting.



Obviously, the destruction of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem are very important and the reason for the commemoration.  Not only does this event establish that Jews have been in and around Jerusalem for 3000 years but it also is a reminder that It was the Babylonians and the Romans who destroyed the Temples and not the Palestinians (who never existed as a people until the last century.)

In the light of history, other events, all tragic, have occurred on the same day. Ironic or planned? You decide as scholars do not know.

Jews remember the Temple and the forced diaspora after the Second Temple was destroyed. Since that time they have longed to return and rebuild the Temple.  We think it is high time for this to occur.

Tomorrow is a big day on the Jewish calendar, let's hope it is not memorable.

Conservative Tom

Why Jews commemorate the 9th of the Hebrew month of Av (Tisha b’Av)?









This year falling on July 16, 2013

On that date the following awful events occurred:
586 BCE – The First Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians
70 AD – The Second Temple was destroyed by the Romans and the Jews fled into the Diaspora – mostly areas surrounding the Mediterranean including Spain.
133 CE – Simon bar Kochba Revolt with remaining Jews warring against the Romans brutally butchered in the final battle at Betar.
1290 – July 18 King Edward I expelled the Jews of England
1492 – August 2 – Expulsion of Jews from Spain as a result of the Inquisition. Among them a likely Jew, Christopher Columbus, who, with his Jewish navigators, took his 3 ships to look for riches in the New World.
1941 – August 2 – The German Nazi SS murdered 600 Jews in Targivica, Ukraine with the Ukrainians participating joyously as “Willing Executioners.” (Hitler’s Willing Executioners by Daniel Jonah Goldhaggen 1996 No. 1 bestseller)

Obama Statement On Trayvon Martin Trial

With the acquittal of George Zimmerman on charges that he murdered Trayvon Martin, we had hoped that the matter would be put to rest and that the former neighborhood watchman could resume his previous life. It looks like that will not occur.  In addition to him re-starting his lawsuit against NBC, it appears as if the Justice Department will "investigate" if there were civil rights violations. Believe us, they will find them.
Although Obama's statement seems to not lead us that way, it is  the President's approach to let it appear as if the system was working. We believe that if there was an investigation, it would be found that Obama placed a call to Attorney General Holder within minutes of the verdict being announced. The message would be "find something that we can hang this guy on."  He will deny it but we are sure that the call was made.
Zimmerman's problems are far from over. Sadly, those who thought he was guilty will demand charges and will continue to believe that the jury was biased. Those on the opposite side, including yours truly, believe that justice prevailed and any thing else is a travesty. The problem is that the prior group is in power and uses their "racial politics" to get what they want.
This is the state of racial politics in the country today.
Conservative Tom



National Journal
President Obama on Sunday responded to verdict in the George Zimmerman trial, recognizing that although many Americans are disappointed with the outcome the nation should respect both the law process and the families of those involved.
In the aftermath of the jury's announcement out of Sanford, Fla., several politicians chimed in, many saying that they were pleased with the outcome and others calling it an injustice. But the president took a middle ground, attempting to unify those feelings.
Here is the president's statement in full: 
The death of Trayvon Martin was a tragedy.  Not just for his family, or for any one community, but for America.  I know this case has elicited strong passions.  And in the wake of the verdict, I know those passions may be running even higher.  But we are a nation of laws, and a jury has spoken.  I now ask every American to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son.  And as we do, we should ask ourselves if we're doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion and understanding in our own communities.  We should ask ourselves if we're doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence that claims too many lives across this country on a daily basis.  We should ask ourselves, as individuals and as a society, how we can prevent future tragedies like this.  As citizens, that's a job for all of us.  That's the way to honor Trayvon Martin.
Back in March 2012 when the Martin case was front-and-center in the national conversation, Obama added his take, saying, "When I think about this boy, I think about my own kids." 
He continued with the controversial statement that has widely been referenced in recent months: "My main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."
Several lawmakers have called for the Justice Department to get involved in the process, now. Following the president's statement on Sunday, though, the Justice Department did say it would review the Zimmerman case.
"Experienced federal prosecutors will determine whether the evidence reveals a prosecutable violation of any of the limited federal criminal civil rights statutes within our jurisdiction, and whether federal prosecution is appropriate in accordance with the Department's policy governing successive federal prosecution following a state trial," the DOJ said in a statement to Politico.

NBC Being Sued By Zimmerman

The lawsuit against NBC is proceeding. Will Zimmerman win? Probably, will this be end of his legal problems, probably not.  Even though President Obama suggested yesterday that "we need to move on", we doubt that the Justice Department will let the matter drop.  In fact, we expect to hear that Federal charges are being levied against the former neighborhood watchman within weeks, if not before.


Holder made a statement today that they were going to "look into the matter" and determine if there were any violations of Trayvon Martin's rights.  We believe they will find some. Whether they make them out of whole cloth or invent some, they will charge him.

Remember Los Angeles and  Rodney King, the LA cops were acquitted and then charged under Federal law and lost big time. This case will be no different especially since the President made it clear that if he had a son "he would look like Trayvon". Additionally all the normal race hustlers (Sharpton, Jackson etal) are out there demanding "justice for Trayvon."  It is a foregone conclusion.

Zimmerman will need the victory over NBC to pay for his upcoming Federal charges.

Conservative Tom

Zimmerman to Press on With NBC Defamation Case

Monday, 15 Jul 2013 11:27 AM
By Melanie Batley
Share:
More . . .




With his acquittal in hand, George Zimmerman plans to resume his defamation lawsuit against NBC News for its coverage of the call he made to police the night he came face-to-face with 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The neighborhood-watch volunteer contends the network's March 27, 2012 "Today" broadcast painted him as a racist by editing out significant portions of the discussion he had with police, The Washington Post reports.

NBC's abridged version of the conversation stated that Zimmerman told police, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. He looks black."

The full tape of the call went like this:
Zimmerman: This guy looks like he's up to no good. Or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about.
Dispatcher: OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.

Zimmerman started the lawsuit against NBC in December, but the case was put on hold pending the outcome of his trial. At the time, NBC pointed out that other media outlets had also played up the racial angle of the conversation.

Last year NBC News' then-President Steve Capus called the edit "a mistake and not a deliberate act to misrepresent the phone call," and said disciplinary action had been taken against the people involved.

James Beasley, a Philadelphia-based attorney representing Zimmerman in the case told the Washington Post, "We're going to start in earnest asap."

Asked whether the innocent verdict in favor of his client would affect the NBC civil case, Beasley said, "This verdict of not guilty is just that, and shows that at least this jury didn't believe that George was a racist, profiling, or anything that the press accused George of being.

"That probably doesn't get you that much but it's simply time for us to start the case and hold accountable anyone who is irresponsible in their journalism," he added.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/NBC-defamation-black-tape/2013/07/15/id/515061?s=al&promo_code=142CC-1#ixzz2Z9FFDYTb
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Could The US Unravel Like Argentina?

We believe in being prepared. Whether getting another passport is wise or a waste of money is something that you will have to determine for yourself. We present the following article as a thought provoker, an option that you might want to investigate to find out if it is something you consider reasonable.


Could a similar situation arise in the US as occurred in Argentina? It is possible. Would it follow the same track as it did there, probably not.

Let us know what you think.

Conservative Tom


How quickly the U.S. could unravel …


On December 1, 2001, Argentina’s economy was in trouble. Unemployment was high, debt was high, and recession had taken hold. But life was somewhat ‘normal’.
Basic services still functioned. And no one had to really worry about… food. Or water. Then it all changed. Literally within a day.
On December 2nd, the bankrupt government imposed measures that essentially froze everyone’s bank accounts. You can just imagine– one day having access to your funds, and the next day being completely cut off.
Within a matter of days, people were out in the streets doing battle with the police. The government soon defaulted on its debt, and the currency went into free fall.
Overnight, people went from being able to pay their rent and living expenses to being completely cut off from my funds.
Everything became scarce. The electricity went out all the time. Even food on the grocery store shelves ran low.You would eat what you had available at home.
And in a way, food became a medium of exchange. Within just a few days, people went from having confidence in their currency to not trusting it at all. No one wanted to accept paper money anymore, especially for something as valuable as food.
And if they did, it would be at 2-3 times the normal price.
The best way to describe it is despair. And this is really the worst emotion you can have. Because when you’re in a state of despair, you’re hopeless. It’s a terrible position to be in.
Life becomes hell because you do not know whether you are going to be able to put food on the table the next day.
And in such a state of despair, you’re not in a position to make good decisions. It’s all about survival.
Of course, people thought, “why didn’t we see this coming? Why didn’t we do something sooner?”
If I only had established citizenship elsewhere, if only we had moved some money out of the country before, or taken steps to safeguard his pension, life would have turned out much differently.
It’s like that old saying– better to be a year (or decade) too early than a day too late. Because one should never underestimate the speed with which things can unravel.
When you’ve got a guy like Senator John McCain who says “The battlefield is the United States of America,” it tells you that almost nothing is safe in the US anymore.
Whatever remains of civil liberties is going to feel the full brunt of the state’s boot heel.
They’re already regulating some of the most fundamental aspects of life, from how we are allowed to educate our children to what we can / cannot put in our bodies to the very nature of money.
People are forced to hold their savings in insolvent banks backed by insolvent insurance funds backed by insolvent governments. And those insolvent governments have demonstrated that they are perfectly willing to directly confiscate accounts.
Retirement funds have proven to be an easy, tempting target. A number of countries including our Argentina example, and others such as Ireland, and Hungary have appropriated private pensions. Even the US government temporarily dipped into federal employee pensions.
Western governments are making every possible effort to take over the Internet. Despite every previous attempt (SOPA, PIPA, etc.) failing due to public outcry, they keep trying and trying (ACTA, CISPA, etc.).
They’re raising taxes, creating new ones (including Maryland’s new ‘rain tax’), imposing capital controls, racking up debt, and rapidly devaluing their currencies.
It all reeks of desperation… and it’s all so obvious. At least, for anyone paying attention.
Unfortunately it’s easy to lose sight of the truth. After all, how can there be any economic problems when the stock market is at an ‘all-time high’ and Nobel Prize winning pseudo-scientists tell us that debt levels don’t matter?
Truth is, these enormous challenges shouldn’t be ignored. The entire global financial system is sitting on a bed of dynamite. Central bankers are dousing the pile with gasoline while politicians are standing around smoking.
The potential for epic disaster cannot be understated.
This is not to say that the world is coming to an end. Far from it. History is quite generous with past example of once-great civilizations that collapsed under the weight of their own hubristic debt.
Things didn’t end. They changed. Simple. And that’s what’s happening now in a textbook fashion.
Governments in trouble almost ALWAYS resort to the same destructive tactics. When things are clearly on the decline, rather than INCREASING freedom and opportunity, they try to control EVERYTHING.
We’re already seeing the early stages of this with competitive devaluation, basic capital controls, and bank withdrawal limits.
These will soon give way to wider capital controls, increased border controls, wage and price controls, asset confiscation, and more.
It only delays the inevitable. The more they control, the more rapid the deterioration becomes. Again, this isn’t some sensationalist prediction; it is the very common historical trend.
The other thing that history shows us, however, is that there are always a handful of people who see the writing on the wall and take action.
Why A Dominican Passport?

Quite simply, it is the most economical insurance policy you could have – especially for US citizens. Located in the Caribbean, the Dominican Republic is only 90 minutes from Miami. The weather is perfect all year round and the cost of living is low. It’s a great escape in case things unravel. Other factors which make this an ideal second passport …

Safety – Dominican Republic passport holder are relatively safe worldwide. These passport holders can travel on any continent without the fear of being kidnapped or worse. That’s not the case with US or European passport holders.

Cost – The procurement cost of the Dominican Republic passport can be as low as $24,900. This compares favorably with Dominica at $150,000 or St. Kitts at $395,000.

Wait time – A second passport from the Dominican Republic can be acquired in as little as 9 months.
Other reasons for acquiring a Dominican Republic passport – Buy and rent out property wherever you choose without punitive taxation; Avoid electronic logging of your existing passport; Take greater advantage of offshore business opportunities; Obtain employment worldwide and invest in offshore mutual funds and other vehicles closed to US passport holders.
The very fact that a second passport opens up the additional options already mentioned is actually reason enough to obtain one, but in case you need a little more convincing … Your passport is in fact the property of your government – and for US citizens, government which claims, and increasingly exercises, the right to confiscate it at any time. Even if you have sensibly removed the bulk of your assets to an offshore haven, they are no good to you here if you are trapped in your home country because your passport is no longer valid or has been confiscated. Most countries have laws which allow them to restrict not only entry but also exit from the territory. Exchange controls can be imposed overnight and the necessary legislation is already in place in the US.
U.S. citizens are subject to tax wherever they work and live in the world. But a Dominican Republic passport can open opportunities for sheltering income and protecting assets. If your citizenship demands fulfillment of military service contrary to your beliefs, it would pay you to a Dominican Republic passport that does not. If your passport allows your government to supervise your movements, monitor or control your travel in any way, or restricts your liberty to invest, borrow, or participate in any currency transactions, you are at a disadvantage.
If you wish to keep a low profile, for reasons of nationality, religion, race etc., a second passport can give you the necessary mobility you require. It could even save your life. As an insurance policy against future economic stability, political strife or war, you should think about a second passport. When catastrophe is imminent you’ve left it too late. A second passport in these circumstances would be worth its weight in diamonds.
Anyone who reads much about international tax law knows that the USA is the only country on earth that taxes its citizens on their worldwide income, even if they choose not to live there. This situation, though the US government doesn’t want to admit it, has led to long waiting lines at US consulates abroad as America’s brightest and most productive citizens queue up to renounce their citizenship.

British citizens still have the freedom to leave the UK, and as long as they don’t have any UK income they don’t even have to file British tax returns any more, never mind pay taxes.This, however, may be changing soon. France may not be a country we normally expect to follow the US example, but French politicians are increasingly stating: “We’re going to apply what the Americans apply… a tax based on citizenship.” 

French politicians wants to tax “tax exiles” but not French expat workers. Good luck drafting laws that make that distinction work! We somehow doubt this proposition will come to fruition too quickly.
What advantages really are there to having French citizenship, if one does not live in France?
Granted, it’s a pretty good passport to travel on. And if you get into a spot of bother in Colombia or Afghanistan they might send some commandos from Paris to help you out. But is that worth paying more than half your income for?
France was also in the news recently due to a lone Al Qaeda gunman who went on the rampage in Toulouse, killing seven people including two children. A very, very sad case, but it shows again the probability that terrorists will single out French citizens just as they will single out American (or British) citizens.
You probably don’t need the implications of this news spelt out. Other countries have crazy politicians too. Will the UK, Australia, or Canada be the next country to propose worldwide taxation for its citizens? Or will it be Brazil or Russia or China? We don’t know, but it is highly on the cards that this will happen.
Could It Happen in the US?

Earlier last year, we were shocked to learn about Senate Bill 1813, also known as the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century” Act.
Its original purpose was to “Reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes.”
Other purposes? What could that possibly mean?
Much of it described funds that would be allocated to create jobs building roads and digging ditches for the government.
But there was another section in this 1,676 page document, a small section, tucked away – all about tax delinquency.
There were two disturbing things we found almost immediately. The first one was that if you owed money to the IRS, your debt would be multiplied for inflation, and if that amount was not a multiple of $1,000, they would be so kind as to round it up to the next $1,000 mark for you!
But that wasn’t the real kicker… It also read that if you are believed to owe $50,000 in taxes or more, the Internal Revenue Service now had the ability revoke or deny your passport – eliminating your right to free travel.
I think we all breathed a sigh of relief when this act got shut down. But it got us thinking – could this possibly happen in the US?

When learning about World War II and the Holocaust,  a natural question is, “Why didn’t the Jews just leave?”.

Obviously it wasn’t that simple.  In 1935, the first of the anti-Semitic laws (called the Nuremberg Laws) were instituted – Mainly to get and keep the Jews out of any civil service positions.
In 1938, the Nazis ordered that all Jews were to register their wealth and property and Jews over the age of 15 were also required to apply for identity cards to be shown – on demand – to any police officer.
Soon after, Jewish passports had to be stamped with a large red “J” and were not allowed to leave the country.
Many who tried to leave were simply denied visas to do so. Those who did escape were officially stateless so no country would even take them in!
Then in 1939, Jews in Germany were subject to a curfew and doctors, lawyers, and dentists were forbidden to practice.
They were gathered in Ghettos and required to wear yellow stars on their clothing. Shortly after, the Ghettos were sealed off and the mass killings followed suit.
In the end, an estimated 11,000,000 people were killed – 6,000,000 of which were Jews.
In this case in history, people were forced to register all of their wealth and then denied the right to travel (sound familiar?).
US citizens are already required to register all their wealth and property. They are already required to have identification on them at all times. There are no secrets.
We ask you this:
Would it be so far-fetched that the government places a 75% tax on the wealthy? (Already happening in France…)
Would it be so far-fetched that the government creates “tax-police” that pull over Ferraris and other nice cars to ask for tax returns? (Already that’s happening in Italy…)
Would it be so far-fetched that while the economy collapses and wealthy people attempt to expatriate, the government imposes laws to take the majority of their wealth before they leave? (It’s are already trying that here!)
Lastly…would it be so far-fetched that the government decides it should stamp large dollar signs on wealthy people’s passports so that they can easily identify who they need to take money from?
Who knows …
Our solution: Getting a second passport.
Have the right to travel freely no matter what happens and do what others in history weren’t able to do: leave!

WHY NOW IS THE TIME TO GET A SECOND PASSPORT
Why should you get a second passport now? Simply, because if you don’t get the process started now, it may be too late. The trend is undoubtedly that things will become more difficult and more expensive.
We would say there is at least a 50% chance that some European nations, Canada or Australia will move to worldwide taxation of citizens in the next five years. Some might argue the chance is much higher.
One significant reason this might happen is simply that it is getting more possible to track international assets. Before there was not much point in worldwide taxation because it was unenforceable from a practical point of view. With information exchange on assets and bank accounts becoming the norm rather than the exception, this has changed. The US is blazing the trail with FATCA and will likely share the FATCA information with other friendly governments, who will thus have even more incentive to introduce worldwide taxation for their citizens.
We are not here to preach doom and gloom. We hope we’re wrong and that taxation of worldwide income for expats does not become the norm. But having a second passport up your sleeve would definitely seem like a smart strategy.
How to get one? We procure passports from the Dominican Republic as well as other jurisdictions. Please call our office at (809) 712-4412 or email BankerTrust@gmail.com. One of our qualified professionals will contact you within 24 hours.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Will The New Black Panthers Follow Through On Their Threats

NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY TWEETS ABOUT ‘STREET MANEUVERS’ SURROUNDING ZIMMERMAN VERDICT: ‘HIGH CHANCE OF REBELLION’ IF ACQUITTED

New Black Panther Party tweets indicate that rallies and gatherings surrounding the George Zimmerman verdict are being planned, but whether violence or unrest will accompany them is unclear, the Washington Times reports.
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: YouTube)
Zimmerman faces murder charges in the killing of Trayvon Martin, 17. Closing arguments completed on Friday, the verdict is now in the hands of the jury.
While the NBPP notes on its Twitter page that it “will engage in no unlawful activity” if Zimmerman is “exonerated”…
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: Twitter)
Other tweets posted in the same time period lay out plans for “street maneuvers” and “unrest”:
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: Twitter)
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: Twitter)
And while telephone calls to the NBPP for clarification weren’t returned, the Washington Times reported, the tone of NBPP tweets regarding Zimmerman and his legal team seem clear:
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: Twitter)
The New Black Panthers have been vocal and active regarding the Martin killing from the start. But a few examples:
At least one prominent member of the NBPP won’t likely take part in post-verdict public gatherings:King Samir Shabazz (a.k.a. Maruse Heath), who infamously incited a federal probe for voter intimidation after he brought a billy club to a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day 2008.
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: YouTube)
TheBlaze confirmed Friday that Shabazz—the NBPP’s national field marshal and Million Youth March 15-Year Anniversary security chief—remains in a New York City jail on a felony weapons possession charge.
New Black Panther Party Tweets about Street Maneuvers Surrounding Zimmerman Verdict: HIGH Chance of Rebellion If Acquitted
(Credit: YouTube)

Zimmerman Should Not Celebrate Yet

The relief that George Zimmerman experienced by the not guilty verdict that he received in his trial for the death of Trayvon Martin will be short lived.. We fear that the "race baiters" will soon have a "conversation" with the President and Attorney General Holder to have the Justice Department bring Federal racial discrimination charges against the former neighborhood watchman.

As we watched the Sunday morning programs, it became clear that there were many who did not agree with the verdict and  were disappointed with the jury.  These people want retribution in the death of the Florida teenager.  They will not rest until Zimmerman is in jail for the rest of his life.

This is the state of racial relations in the US today.  In the eye of the race hustlers, any black is automatically innocent and any "non-black" is guilty, regardless of the  evidence. They will do anything to avenge the death of Trayvon Martin, push any buttons, use any tactic or use any political advantage they can to make sure that Zimmerman pays.

We suggest that George Zimmerman enjoy the upcoming days because they won't last for long. Obama and Holder will soon make sure their "son" is avenged.

Conservative Tom

George Zimmerman Found Not Guilty in the Death of Trayvon Martin
George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer who fatally shot an unarmed black teenager, igniting a national debate on racial profiling and civil rights, was found not guilty on Saturday of the second-degree murder of Trayvon Martin. He also was acquitted of manslaughter, a lesser charge.
After three weeks of testimony, the six-woman jury rejected the prosecution’s contention that Mr. Zimmerman had deliberately pursued Mr. Martin because he viewed the hoodie-clad teenager as a criminal and instigated the fight that led to his death.
Mr. Zimmerman said he shot Mr. Martin on Feb. 26, 2012, in self-defense after the teenager knocked him to the ground, punched him and slammed his head repeatedly against the sidewalk. In finding him not guilty of murder or manslaughter, the jury agreed that Mr. Zimmerman could have been justified in shooting Mr. Martin because he feared great bodily harm or death.

READ MORE »

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/us/george-zimmerman-verdict-trayvon-martin.html?emc=edit_na_20130713