Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label ACLU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACLU. Show all posts

Thursday, April 5, 2018

Maybe We Should Sue Those Who Have Blocked Us On Facebook!

Maryland forks out $65,000 in taxpayers’ money to settle lawsuit over governor’s Facebook page

Maryland forks out $65,000 in taxpayers’ money to settle lawsuit over governor’s Facebook page
A lawsuit from Facebook users against Governor Larry Hogan has been settled. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

A lawsuit filed by four Facebook users against Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R) was settled for $65,000 on Monday. Both sides are claiming victory.
Maryland’s ACLU represented the plaintiffs, who claim their First Amendment rights were violated after being blocked from the governor’s official Facebook page for raising opposing policy questions. The governor’s office denied any wrongdoing, and insisted that the only times people were blocked or posts were deleted from the page involved instances of spam or offensive comments.
With 163,000 current followers on the governor’s page, roughly 450 people were blocked over a two-year span from 2015-2017.
One of the plaintiffs, Janice Lepore said, “It never occurred to me that the Governor, or his staff, would seek to prohibit me from engaging in conversations in a public forum, simply because my opinions differ from their opinions…I hope this settlement will promote greater access and engagement for all Maryland citizens.”
As part of the agreement, the governor’s page will now follow a social media protocol that includes an appeal process for anyone who believes their comments are unfairly deleted in the future. Hogan’s Twitter, Snapchat and YouTube accounts will also be regulatedunder the plan.
Deborah Jeon, legal director of the ACLU of Maryland, said, “We are excited to see Maryland in the forefront of protecting speech rights in this context with this model social-media policy. It definitely holds the governor accountable to the First Amendment that previously there was no check on what happened on the Facebook page.”
The governor’s office defended the settlement after it was announced, with spokeswoman Shareese Churchill saying, “We are pleased that the ACLU has decided to drop this frivolous and politically motivated lawsuit and reach a settlement with the state. Ultimately, it was much better for Maryland taxpayers to resolve this, than to continue wasting everyone’s time and resources in court.”
Hogan has used his page for political posts, and also to share updates on his battle with cancer over the past few years. The governor did not openly endorse President Trump during the 2016 election, but received criticism on social media for not speaking out against the president’s travel ban in early 2017.
According to one blocked constituent, her comment on the topic got her blocked from the governor’s page last year. Gretchen Weigel Doughty told The Washington Post, “All I did was ask my governor to speak out, and I was blacklisted. I said, ‘I’m an independent, and you’re going to lose my vote if you don’t speak out on this issue.'”

Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Poor Baby ACLU--Supporting Lawbreakers

ACLU Complains: "Trump Used the Word 'America' More Than 80 Times"

By Susan Jones | January 31, 2018 | 7:22 AM EST

(Screen Capture)
(CNSNews.com) - The American Civil Liberties Union -- note the word "American" in its title -- complained Tuesday night about President Trump's repeated use of the word "America" in his State of the Union speech.

In a written response to Trump's speech, Faiz Shakir, the ACLU's national political director, said:
Tonight, President Trump said the word ‘America’ more than 80 times in his speech. Yet, after a divisive first year, we hear and feel how exclusionary that ‘America’ is, with policies that have harmed so many vulnerable American communities. The ACLU stands ready to protect these communities, both in the courts and at the polls.

In particular, the immigration plan put forth by Trump would hold Dreamers hostage to his demands for a harmful border wall and an even larger mass deportation force. We are at this crossroads because of the President’s deeply destructive ideas fomented by his nativist allies and divisive rhetoric. We will continue to stand up for these young immigrants and ensure they continue to contribute to our country. We cannot let America’s Dreamers be deported.
President Trump told the nation Monday night that Congress will be voting on an "immigration reform" package over the next few weeks, and he outlined the "four pillars" of his "fair compromise" plan:


The four pillars include a path to citizenship for 1.8 million dreamers, if they meet education and work requirements and demostrate good moral character; a fully secure border, including a wall in places and hiring more border patrol agents; an end to the random diversity visa lottery and adoption of a merit-based system; and an end to chain migration by limiting sponsorships to spouses and minor children. (Democrats offered scattered boos to the last item.)

"These four pillars represent a down-the-middle compromise, and one that will create a safe, modern, and lawful immigration system," Trump said. "For over 30 years, Washington has tried and failed to solve this problem. This Congress can be the one that finally makes it happen.

"Most importantly, these four pillars will produce legislation that fulfills my ironclad pledge to only sign a bill that puts America first. So let us come together, set politics aside, and finally get the job done."

Friday, August 18, 2017

As Facts Come Out It Appears Charlottesville Was Meant To Go Bad


ACLU Blames Police for Charlottesville; ‘Wanted Us to Fight’


(WND.com) In the wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, which left one dead and at least 38 injured, many members of the national media were quick to blame the “Unite the Right” rally attendees for the outbreak of street warfare between “alt-right” and “alt-left” protesters.
ACLU Blames Police for Charlottesville; 'Wanted Us to Fight'
PHOTO: via WND.com
But according to the ACLU and reporters covering the rally, the violence escalated due to what many believe was an intentional lack of police oversight, with the blame aimed squarely at Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe.
“The police actually allowed us to square off against each other,” one counter-protester told CNN. “There were fights, and the police were standing a block away the entire time. It’s almost as if they wanted us to fight each other.”
The ACLU also contends the “passive” police presence may have been intentional to allow authorities to declare an “unlawful assembly” and justify shutting down the rally.
“We asked the city to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and ensure people’s safety at the protest. It failed to do so. In our system, the city makes the rules and the courts enforce them,” the ACLU of Virginia’s Executive Director Claire Gastanaga said in a statement. “It is the responsibility of law enforcement to ensure safety of both protesters and counter-protesters. The policing on Saturday was not effective in preventing violence.”
McAuliffe authorized a state of emergency that was used to prevent “Unite the Right” attendees from congregating in protest of a plan to remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from a city park. The order went into effect before the rally was scheduled to begin and long before James Fields, 20, plowed into counter-protesters, killing one and injuring 19.
While the “Unite the Right” event had a permit, the counter-protesters did not. However, police shut down the permitted event, forcing white nationalist groups into the Antifa group.
Reporters for the Daily Caller were “in the heart of the action” and described seeing “individual protesters throw themselves against the white supremacist shield line.”
“Both sides eventually advanced on the other, and we were again caught in the crossfire. Several bottles hit us, and members of both sides began swinging wooden stakes and batons at each other all around us. Police remained still on the scene.
“Protesters then brought out a ‘battering ram’ made out of plywood and reinforced with a metal step ladder. Members of the protest charged at the white supremacists, knocking us down in the process. Enforcers managed to stop the device before it reached the actual shield line, but a new group of protesters tried to push the ram further. The force of both groups was enough to tear the metal ladder and break the device in two,” the news site reported.
A video, posted on YouTube by an apparent attendee, shows the moment the “Unite the Right” demonstrators were pushed by police directly into a group of counter-protesters, who are then seen threatening the rally-goers with bats.
Virginia statute 18.2-406 defines unlawful assembly:
Whenever three or more persons assembled share the common intent to advance some lawful or unlawful purpose by the commission of an act or acts of unlawful force or violence likely to jeopardize seriously public safety, peace or order.
Former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli told Breitbart News the law is rarely enforced and so rarely used that “no one has expertise in it.”
“Whenever the possibility [of declaring an unlawful assembly] arises, some attorney is going to have to research it. I’m sure that was happening this weekend in a couple places around Virginia. Specifically, the governor’s office, the Attorney General’s office, the county attorney for Albemarle, and the city attorney for Charlottesville,” he said.
McAuliffe also erroneously claimed the “Unite the Right” attendees hid a weapons cache in the park before the rally.
“They had battering rams and we had picked up different weapons that they had stashed around the city,” McAuliffe told Black Lives Matter activist Deray Mckesson.
Virginia State Police spokesperson Corinne Geller later disputed the governor’s claims.
“The governor was referring to the briefing provided him in advance of Saturday’s rally and the extra security measures being taken by local and state police,” she told Reason.com. “As a safety precaution in advance of August 12, such searches were conducted in and around Emancipation and McIntire Parks. No weapons were located as a result of those searches.”
McAuliffe has defended the police response.
“They had to be very careful,” McAuliffe said in an interview with NPR. “We had been planning for this for a while, we had to show tremendous restraint because we knew, we had a lot of intelligence that people all came armed.”
WND reached out to the Virginia State Police for comment, who directed questions to the city of Charlottesville.
Breitbart News reached out to Charlottesville Director of Communications Miriam Dickler with a host of questions regarding police actions against the “Unite the Right” rally:
  1. Can you please provide the evidentiary basis upon which the City of Charlottesville declared the legally permitted Emancipation Park rally to be an unlawful assembly in violation of Virginia statute, Va. Code §18.2-406?
  2. Given that a federal judge had issued a preliminary injunction less than 24 hours earlier ordering the City of Charlottesville to reinstate the permit for the Emancipation Park rally, did the City of Charlottesville’s legal counsel provide a legal opinion to the City Council, City Manager, or Mayor as to the additional evidentiary standard that might be required to declare an unlawful assembly? If so, could you provide that legal opinion?
  3. Who, specifically, in the City of Charlottesville made the declaration that the Emancipation Park rally was an unlawful assembly?
  4. At what time of day on August 12 did the Council for the City of Charlottesville issue its emergency ordinance stating”the Charlottesville Chief of Policy is hereby empowered to regulate, restrict or prohibit any assembly of persons, or the movement of persons or vehicles on any public street, sidewalk, right of way, park or other publicly-owned property?
  5. By what legal authority was the emergency ordinance issued by the Council for the City of Charlottesville? Did the Council convene in person or telephonically?
  6. Why did the Chief of Police not simultaneously declare the adjacent permitted demonstration as an unlawful assembly at the same time?
Breitbart claims to have received no response.
WND also contacted Dickler and McAuliffe’s office but has not received a response.
Republished with permission from WND.com via iCopyright license.

Monday, August 14, 2017

Charlottesville's Mayor Did Not Commit Police To Keep The Warring Parties Apart. Was This Planned To Go Bad?


Charlottesville Mayor Lays Blame for Violence on President Trump


 Print

On Saturday, the United States watched in horror as violence engulfed Charlottesville, Virginia. Far-right and far-left protesters clashed with each other, culminating in one far-right protester driving his car into the far-left protesters, killing a woman and injuring several.
Immediately after this act of domestic terror, liberals began looking around for someone to blame, and they all seemingly settled on one target: President Donald Trump.
Charlottesville Democrat Mayor Michael Signer singled out Trump for the violence, placing the blame for the day’s events on him and his administration, The Daily Caller reported.

“I mean, look at the intentional courting, both on the one hand of all these white supremacists, white nationalists, a group like that, anti-Semitic groups, and then look on the other hand the repeated failure to step up, condemn, denounce, silence, you know, put to bed all those different efforts, just like we saw yesterday,” Signer explained during an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper.
The only problem with Signer blaming the White House is that if anyone should be blamed for what happened on Saturday (besides those who committed crimes), it is Signer himself.
As mayor of the city, it was his responsibility to deploy police officers, protect citizens and ensure that the protest didn’t turn violent. He failed across the board, and now an innocent person is dead.
Even liberal outfits pointed out that the authorities — that would be Mayor Signer — let the violence unfold.
Pro Publica noted that during the protests, many police simple stood by and watched as the violence unfolded, opting to take a more “hands off” approach.
In a tweet, the ACLU wrote that police stated they would not intervene “until given command to do so,” indicating that someone in the city government ordered the police to stand down while violence engulfed the city.




Clash between protesters and counter protesters. Police says "We'll not intervene until given command to do so." 

Trump didn’t make a violent racist thug commit murder. Trump didn’t make violent leftist thugs beat up a reporter and cause mayhem. Blaming him for the day’s horrors is ridiculous.
Signer knew these protests were going to happen long before any violence broke out. He could have prepared the city for what was going to happen, but he failed to do his job.
If he wants to blame anyone, he should go take a look in the mirror.
Share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know who you think is responsible for the violence that plagued Charlottesville on Saturday.
What did you think of the mayor's claim?

Saturday, July 1, 2017

FGM Is Becoming A Major Issue Among American Muslims. The Deceiving Of Americans Is Beginning.

Video from Virginia: Imam at mosque with multiple terror ties endorses female genital mutilation

“Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) (by cutting off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but circumcision of the female is by cutting out the bazr ‘clitoris’ [this is called khufaadh ‘female circumcision’]).” — ‘Umdat al-Salik e4.3, translated by Mark Durie, The Third Choice, p. 64
Why is it obligatory? Because Muhammad is held to have said so: “Abu al- Malih ibn Usama’s father relates that the Prophet said: ‘Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women.’” — Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 5:75
“Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah: A woman used to perform circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: ‘Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.’” — Abu Dawud 41:5251
“Do not cut severely,” but not “Do not cut.”
That’s why it is so common around the world, and why it is certain to become increasingly common in the United States, particularly with help from the ACLU, which doubtless wants to avoid appearing to be “Islamophobic.”
Note that Shaker Elsayed is quite clear in his remarks that FGM is to be practiced in order to control female sexuality.
Meanwhile , even lawmakers who fatuously praised Dar Al-Hijrah noted that “the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center is affiliated with the Muslim American Society.” The Muslim American Society is the chief arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S., according to Ikhwanweb, the Muslim Brotherhood’s English website. Shaker Elsayed, the mosque’s imam from 2005 to the present, was Secretary General of the Muslim American Society. According to a captured internal Brotherhood document, the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. is engaged in a “grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
There is more. The late jihad leader Anwar al-Awlaki was the imam at Dar al-Hijrah. He is said to have been a “spiritual adviser” to three of the hijackers who attacked America on September 11, 2001. Al-Awlaki was also in regular contact with Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab, the Christmas underwear bomber who tried to blow up a passenger jet over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009.
Former Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who murdered thirteen Americans in a jihad massacre at Fort Hood in Texas, worshiped at Dar al-Hijrah when he lived in the area and was in touch with al-Awlaki shortly before he carried out his attack.
The Saudi-backed North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, bought the mosque’s grounds in 1983. Mohammed al-Hanooti, the mosque’s imam from 1995 to 1999, was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Ahmed Omar Abu Ali taught Islamic studies and was a camp counselor at the mosque; he is now in prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush. Abdelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar, a member of the mosque’s Executive Committee, was convicted in November 2007 of contempt and obstruction of justice for refusing to testify regarding Hamas and received an eleven-year prison sentence.
“Dar al-Hijrah Imam Endorses (Partial) Female Genital Mutilation,” by John Rossomando, IPT News, June 2, 2017 (thanks to the Geller Report):
Female genital mutilation (FGM) can be an effective tool to prevent promiscuity among girls, the imam at a prominent northern Virginia mosque claimed in a recent lecture flagged by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).
Without it, “hyper-sexuality takes over the entire society and a woman is not satisfied with one person or two or three,” said Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center Imam Shaker Elsayed in a May 19 talk, “Foundation of a Happy Family.” Only tip of a girl’s clitoris should be cut, he said, otherwise it creates “serious harm in the sexual life of the child when she grows up. And this is why the West thinks of alkhikah as sexual mutilation…”
The video remains posted on the Falls Church, Va. mosque’s YouTube channel.
Muslim societies which prohibit FGM are making a mistake “to prohibit the tradition and they end up causing a lot of damage on the other extreme side of the sexual life of a woman,” Elsayed said.
He isn’t the only prominent voice in the U.S. Muslim community endorsing female genital mutilation. The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America (AMJA) endorses the practice in two fatwas posted on its website, using justifications similar to Elsayed’s. While not required, one fatwa says, “it is considered an honorable thing for females.”
Islamist advocates argue that FGM has nothing to do with Islam.
After several Detroit area doctors were charged with violating Michigan’s ban on female genital mutilation in April, activist Linda Sarsour denounced denouncing the practice as contrary to Islam.
“FGM has no place in Detroit or anywhere else in the world. FGM is barbaric & not an Islamic practice,” Sarsour wrote.
She should target that message to its proponents. Sarsour spoke at a fundraiser at Elsayed’s mosque six days before his talk on female anatomy and promiscuity. FGM did not come up, but Sarsour described Islam’s prophet Mohammed as “a feminist in his own right.”

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Coulter Speech Cancellation At Berkeley Is So Outrageous Even ACLU Finds It Bad

You'll Never Believe Who Actually Stood Up To Defend Ann Coulter

33506477091
The raging debate over conservative firebrand Ann Coulter delivering a speech
at the University of California, Berkeley, has seen two very neatly divided camps.
Except for one outlier: The American Civil Liberties Union.
The ACLU stands for many liberal positions: Opposing the death penalty,
supporting same-sex marriage and abortion. Just yesterday there was
this headline: "ACLU Sues Catholic Hospital On Behalf of Transgender
 'Man' Who Wanted A Hysterectomy."
But the ACLU sometimes – rarely, but sometimes – takes a stand purely
 on principle, leaving behind its hard liberal bent. That's what they did on
 Wednesday.

The heckler’s veto of Coulter's Berkeley speech is a loss for the 1st Amendment. We must protect speech on campus, even when hateful.
The unacceptable threats of violence that have led to the ‘hecklers’ veto’ of Ann Coulter’s speech at Berkeley are inconsistent with free speech principles that protect us all from government overreach," ACLU Legal Director David Cole said in a statement. "Hateful speech has consequences, particularly for people of color, LGBTQ people, immigrants, and others who have been historically marginalized. But if the government gets to decide which speech counts as hate speech, the powers that be may later feel free to censor any speech they don’t like.
For the future of our democracy, we must protect bigoted speech from government censorship. On college campuses, that means that the best way to combat hateful speech is through counter-speech, vigorous and creative protest, and debate, not threats of violence or censorship.
Coulter announced on Wednesday that she was canceling the speech, citing
security concerns. “I looked over my shoulder and my allies had joined the
 other team," she said. "It’s a sad day for free speech,” she told The New York
 Times. “Everyone who should believe in free speech fought against it or ran away.”
The group that sponsored the campus speech, Young America’s Foundation,
 said there was simply no way the speech could go on. “Berkeley made it
impossible to hold a lecture due to the lack of assurances for protections from
 foreseeable violence from unrestrained leftist agitators."
“Berkeley should be ashamed for creating this hostile atmosphere,” the group
 said in a statement.
Coulter praised the ACLU (that has GOT to be a first!). 
And she left open the possibility that she may show up on campus anyway. So,
stay tuned...