Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Charlie Hedbo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlie Hedbo. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Kerry Is Not An Embarrassment. Calling Him That Gives Him Too Much Credit.

Rupert Murdoch Slams John Kerry for Defending Terrorists' 'Rationale'

Image: Rupert Murdoch Slams John Kerry for Defending Terrorists' 'Rationale' (Getty Images)
By Cathy Burke   |   Tuesday, 01 Dec 2015 10:43 AM
Secretary of State John Kerry sank to "one of the low points of recent Western diplomacy" by suggesting Islamic State (ISIS) gunmen had a "rationale" for a bloody siege at French magazine Charlie Hebdo, media titan Rupert Murdoch says.

In a speech to the Hudson Institute, which honored Murdoch Monday night with its Global Leadership Award, he tore into the Obama administration foreign policy in particular — and the left in general, theNew York Post reports.
"For a U.S. secretary of state to suggest that Islamic terrorists had a 'rationale' in slaughtering journalists is one of the low points of recent Western diplomacy and it is indicative of a serious malaise," the executive chairman of News Corp. and 21st Century Fox and chairman of the Post said.

Kerry drew fire last month after trying to draw a distinction between the rampage at the satirical magazine and the Nov. 13 ISIS attacks in Paris, saying of the Charlie Hebdo siege: "There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of — not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, OK, they're really angry because of this and that."
Latest News Update

Murdoch also slammed Kerry's distaste for the term American "exceptionalism."

"For America to be embarrassed by its exceptionalism is itself exceptional and absolutely unacceptable," he said of Kerry's remark last year that he gets "uptight" hearing politicians call the nation "exceptional." 
The businessman also lobbed a veiled barb at President Barack Obama's leadership, suggesting he misreads the country and "the extraordinary potential of its people."

"For America to have a sense of direction, two conditions are essential: A U.S. leader must understand, be proud of and assert the American personality," he said, the Post reports. "An identity crisis is not a starting point for any journey."

According to Politico, Murdoch decried America's loss of direction, and blamed the current culture of self-obsession on the left.

"The left seemed to be happy for the incarceration of millions, whether in Vietnam under Ho or in China under Mao," he said, Politico reports. "Why agonize over inhumanity when you could blithely celebrate yourself?"
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Monday, November 30, 2015

Radical Islam Must Be Wiped Out, Otherwise Paris Will ONLY Be The Beginning!

  • What if the terrorists had been targeting "just Americans," or "just diplomats" -- would that be "understandable terrorism" in John Kerry's thinking?
  • "If we should stop drawing cartoons, should we also stop having synagogues? Should they be converted into something else? Should we ask the Jewish people to leave?" — Organizer of a targeted fee speech event, in response to the question if they had brought the attack on themselves.
  • Much of the world may only have been just bragging or emoting in saying, "Je Suis Charlie" or "Je Suis Juif" in January. But it turns out not to matter: the terrorists of ISIS think we are all cartoonists and Jews anyway.
  • Since we cannot live with ISIS and similar groups, we had better do whatever it takes to speed up an end of our choosing before they speed up an end of their choosing.
When the truth is revealed, it can be not merely unpleasant but often accidental. There have been several striking examples of this since the massacre in Paris earlier this month. In the days immediately after the attack, The Times of London interviewed residents of Paris. Referring to the latest attacks, one 46-year old resident also referred back to the attacks in January on the offices of Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket. "Every Parisian has been touched by these attacks," she said, referring to the latest attacks. "Before it was just the Jews, the writers or cartoonists."
If "just the Jews" was an unfortunate way of putting it, it was no less unfortunate than the reaction of America's top diplomat. Days after the latest Paris atrocity, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said:
"There's something different about what happened from Charlie Hebdo, and I think everybody would feel that. There was a sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy in terms of -- not a legitimacy, but a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they're really angry because of this and that. This Friday was absolutely indiscriminate."
To the extent these comments have been noticed, they have been ridiculed. It is what lies revealed beneath the statement that deserves our attention.
The true problem with the line that it used to be "just the Jews, the writers or cartoonists," is not that it is offensive or inelegant or any of the other words that are now used to shut down a discussion -- though all these things it may be. The problem is that it suggests that people were not paying attention during those earlier attacks. It suggests a belief that the terrorism in January was a different order of terrorism -- call it "understandable terrorism" -- rather than part of a continuum of terrorism that now reached its logical endpoint, as "impossible-to-understand terrorism" -- because "Jews, writers or cartoonists" were missing.
What if the terrorists had been targeting "just Americans," or "just diplomats" -- would that be "understandable terrorism" in Kerry's thinking? That it used to be "Jews, writers or cartoonists" is precisely what made the attacks on everybody else inevitable. The only surprise should be our own surprise.

"Understandable terrorism" vs. "impossible-to-understand terrorism"? Stéphane Charbonnier (left), editor and publisher of Charlie Hebdo, was murdered in Paris on Jan. 7 along with many of his colleagues, in a terrorist attack that John Kerry said had "a legitimacy... a rationale that you could attach yourself to somehow and say, okay, they're really angry because of this and that." Kerry contrasted that with the Nov. 13 terrorist attacks in Paris (right), which he claimed were "absolutely indiscriminate."

After the January attacks in Paris, there were large marches through the center of Paris, and the phrase, "Je Suis Charlie," for a moment, seemed to be the hashtag or profile picture of everybody on social media. But, of course, almost nobody was Charlie, because apart from a lot of people dwelling on Twitter and Facebook under various virtual noms de guerre, very few people were keen to republish any cartoon of Mohammed or make new Mohammed cartoons of their own. Sadly, a few months after the attacks, the remaining staff members at Charlie Hebdo announced that they were not going to draw Mohammed any more. No one could blame them: as well as losing most of their colleagues, it must have been exhausting to be among the only people still exercising a right that everyone else was just pretending to defend on Twitter. Despite all the "Je Suis Charlie" signs, it turned out very few people were Charlie. In the end, even Charlie was not Charlie.
The "Je Suis Juif" signs were never likely to catch on as much as the "Je Suis Charlie" signs, nor be followed up on even as much as they were. Did everyone on the streets of Paris take to wearing a skullcap or Star of David? No -- no more than they would have walked through any of the streets with reproductions of the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard's image of Mohammed with a bomb in his turban. A lot of people said they were "Jews," but they were not willing to put themselves in the same line of fire as Jews -- just as a lot of people said they were "Charlie," while not actually being interested in landing on the same Islamist hit-lists as Charlie.
The latest attacks in Paris were, indeed, targeted at absolutely everybody. In that, there should be a lesson of a kind. The lesson should remind us that in a free society, no one can wholly dodge the bullets of these particular fanatics. In the conflict that faces us now, there is no opt-out if you happen to be "lucky" enough not to be Jewish. There is no opt-out if you happen to think that people should not draw or publish opinions that are anything other than 100% agreeable to 100% of the people, 100% of the time. Because one day, you will be targeted for being at a restaurant or a concert, or for having the "decadent" temerity to attend a football match. That this has not yet sunk in to the public imagination is one thing. That it has still not permeated the understanding of the heads of the world's only superpower is quite another.
A month after January's terror attacks in Paris, there was a less-remembered terrorist attack on a free speech event in the U.S., and then on a synagogue in Copenhagen. I asked one of the organizers of the targeted free speech event what she would say to the people who claimed, "You know you might have brought this upon yourselves. You don't have to keep publishing cartoons or defending other peoples' right to publish cartoons, and you know how much the Islamists hate it." Her reply was characteristically succinct: "If we should stop drawing cartoons, should we also stop having synagogues? Should they be converted into something else? Should we ask the Jewish people to leave?"
The problem was that too few people listened to such voices, or too few people fully understood the import of what those voices were saying. They were saying what the dead journalists and cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo had also been saying: If you give up this right, next, you will lose every other right. Much of the world may only have been just bragging or emoting in saying, "Je Suis Charlie" or "Je Suis Juif." But it turns out not to matter: the terrorists of ISIS think we are all cartoonists and Jews anyway.
So here we are, at the end of what should be one of the world's sharpest and most painful learning curves in recent history. At the end of this curve, we ought finally to be living with the realization we might have acquired earlier: that since we cannot live with ISIS and other ISIS-like groups, we had better live without them. We had therefore better do whatever it takes to speed up an end of our choosing before they speed up an end of their choosing.
  • Follow Douglas Murray on Twitter
© 2015 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Monday, November 23, 2015

Sorry Newt, Obama Knows EXACTLY What He Is Doing. Accept The New Reality! Obama's Goal Is To Demoralize, Degrade And Destroy The US

Newt Gingrich: Obama's National Security 'Most Dangerous' in History

Image: Newt Gingrich: Obama's National Security 'Most Dangerous' in History
By Todd Beamon   |   Saturday, 21 Nov 2015 05:14 PM
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Saturday that President Barack Obama is heading "the most dangerous national security administration in American history."

"They're totally wrong about the war on terror and they lie about what is going on," he told Uma Pemmaraju on Fox News. "Secretary [John] Kerry suggested that there was justification for the attack on Charlie Hebdo. He said al-Qaida has been degraded, which is not true.
"The president has called ISIS the junior varsity," Gingrich added, referring to the Islamic State. "He said just last week that they have been contained. This administration is out of touch with reality."

Gingrich, the Georgia Republican who served as the House's top Republican from 1995 to 1999, slammed President Obama for its threat to veto legislation passed by the chamber on Thursday that would tighten restrictions on Syrian refugees coming into the United States.

"I don't understand president Obama's thinking or his understanding of reality," he told Pemmaraju. "He was joking the other day about Republicans being afraid of orphans and pregnant women.
Latest News Update

"Well, a couple days ago, a young woman was radicalized, blew herself up in Europe trying to kill several policemen. The president doesn't seem to have any understanding of the reality of what we're facing or the fact that it doesn't take many people.

"Eight people in Paris killed 129 and wounded 350," Gingrich said. "It was 10 people in Mali who took control of a hotel.

"You can do a lot of damage with a small number of terrorists."

He urged Republicans to insert language into the upcoming continuing budget resolution barring funds from being used for Syrian refugees.
That would force Obama to veto the resolution, thus shutting down the federal government. A 16-day partial closure in October 2013 cost taxpayers $1.4 billion.

"I don't think the president can close the government on the issue," Gingrich said. "It's already unpopular with the country.

"I don't think that he could sustain an argument that he's prepared to close the entire government just to be able to let more Syrian refugees in."
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Monday, January 19, 2015

If One Thinks That A Parade Will Stop Jihad In France, You Will Be Very Disappointed!

The demonstration gathered nearly four million people, but seeing in it a mobilization against terrorism, jihad and anti-Semitism would be a mistake.
The Ambassador of Saudi Arabia attended, shortly after his nation had just finished flogging the young blogger Raif Badawi with the first 50 lashes of his 1000 lash sentence. Badawi is being flayed alive -- "very severely," the lashing order said. He has 950 lashes to go.
Mahmoud Abbas, the President of Palestinian unity government, which includes Hamas and supports jihadist terrorism as well as genocide, was at the forefront -- smiling. Israel's Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, was originally not invited. He came anyhow. He was told not to speak. He spoke anyhow. As a sign of disapproval, French officials left before his speech.
Although six Jews were among the seventeen victims, the anti-Semitic dimension of the attacks was barely spoken about.
The words "Islam" and "jihadist" were not mentioned. President François Hollande said, against all evidence, "Those who committed these acts have nothing to do with Islam."
Few Muslims came. They stated their only concern: "Avoid stigmatization of the Muslim community!"
Anyone who watches television and sees what is happening in many Muslim countries has to be doubting that Islam is peaceful.
Several polls show that more than 70% of the French think Islam is incompatible with democracy and Western civilization. Those polls predate the attacks.
The French demonstration of "unity" on Sunday, January 11, may have attracted nearly four million marchers and shown a facade of unity, but behind this facade, rising tensions are approaching the breaking point.[1]
Government members immediately called for fighting "terrorism" and for "national unity." Mainstream media called for defending "free speech." Signs saying "I am Charlie" ["Je Suis Charlie"] began to appear the next day and quickly multiplied. TV channels showed the sign on their screens. Newspapers and magazines put it on their front page.
After the terrorist attack against the kosher supermarket, signs saying "I am a Jew" appeared, too, but were much less numerous. Although six Jews were among the seventeen victims, the anti-Semitic dimension of the attacks was barely spoken about.
And although it was obvious that the attacks were committed by Islamist jihadists, the words "Islam" and "jihadists" were not mentioned. In a solemn statement on television, on January 9, President François Hollande insisted, against all evidence, "Those who committed these acts have nothing to do with Islam."
The calls for "national unity" and the defense of "free speech" led to the organization of a huge demonstration, on Sunday, January 11. Hollande called on the leaders of all political parties to join; they agreed. He called on world leaders to come to Paris; leaders and representatives from forty countries came. He requested the support of all the media; he got it. He requested the support of the entire population, and millions of people responded to his call.

Participants march in the Paris unity rally, January 11, 2014. (Image source: Wikimedia Commons)

The event gathered nearly four million people, but seeing in it a mobilization against terrorism, jihad and anti-Semitism would be a mistake. Leaders of "anti-Zionist" left-wing organizations that support Hamas were present. Ministers of states financing jihadist terrorism, and even genocide, were also there.
The Ambassador of Saudi Arabia attended, shortly after his nation had just finished flogging Raif Badawi, a young Saudi blogger accused of "insulting Islam," with the first fifty lashes of his sentence of 1000 lashes plus 10 years in prison, for practicing the most gentle free speech. Badawi is now being flayed alive -- "very severely," the lashing order said. He has 950 lashes to go.
Turkey, which hosts part of the leadership of the genocidal Hamas organization, was there. Turkey has also jailed more journalists than any other country, including Iran and China.
Mahmoud Abbas, the president of a Palestinian unity government, which includes Hamas and directly supports jihadist terrorism as well as genocide, was at the forefront -- smiling. Binyamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, was initially not invited. He came anyhow. French officials let him know that he was not welcome and not to speak. He spoke anyhow. As a sign of disapproval, French officials left the Grand Synagogue of Paris during the ceremony for the dead Jews, before Netanyahu's speech.
The President of the populist National Front, Marine Le Pen, was also not included. She is silent. She is sure a coming explosion will happen, and that she will receive more votes.
The slogans in the demonstration spoke of "free speech" and the need to "live together." Signs saying "I am Charlie" were everywhere. Signs saying "I am a Jew" ["Je suis Juif"] were rare. No signs or slogans mentioned jihad or the need to combat jihad or terrorism: the watchword was that these subjects should be shunned. No signs or slogan mentioned anti-Semitism or the real cause of jihadist attacks: caricatures of Mohammed, considered by Koranic law to be blasphemous. Those subjects had to be abandoned.
Few French Muslims came -- the tiniest drop in a huge ocean -- and the television cameras immediately homed in on them. They were interviewed and stated their only concern: "Avoid stigmatization of the Muslim community!"
Prime Minister Manuel Valls had told journalists he was "afraid" for Muslims. Two days later -- and only two days later -- on January 13, he said that "France is at war against terrorism, jihadism and radical Islam." He added immediately that one of his priorities was to fight mercilessly against "Islamophobia."
Emergency decisions were taken. Ten thousand soldiers were deployed throughout the nation. Military patrols were placed at the entrance of Jewish sites and mosques. A few Muslims who shouted "Long live Coulibaly" or "Long live the Kouachi brothers" were arrested.
Debates in the media were organized around ethereal questions: "How to build a 'French Islam'", "how to explain that Islam is peaceful," "how better to integrate Muslims."
Anyone who knows Islam and knows of the existence of the internet also knows that "French Islam" does not exist, and that Islam in France cannot be separated from Islam as it is everywhere else.
Anyone who watches television and sees what is happening in many Muslim countries has to be doubting that Islam is peaceful. Most Muslim "experts" invited to speak are familiar with Islam, familiar with the internet and familiar with what is going on in many Muslim countries -- but they lie. Almost all of them are militants, imams, Muslim scholars. Most of them are members of Islamic organizations. Many belong to the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the French have just obligingly given them a platform.
The idea that Muslims have to be integrated was discussed many times -- in vain. The absence of integration has worsened decade after decade. "Experts" invited to speak about integration were forcefully lying too. Those who knew the truth and could tell it were kept away.
More than 750 no-go zones exist in the country, all under the sway of gang leaders and radical imams.
More than 60% percent of inmates in French prisons are Muslim. And future Amedy Coulibalys, Cherif Kouachis, Mohamed Merahs and Mehdi Nemmouches are radicalized every year before going off to train for jihad in Syria or Yemen.
Terrorism experts say that dozens of jihadists are preparing attacks in France alone, and that more deadly attacks will take place. They stress that many terrorist sleeper cells exist in the country. France is a country where gun ownership by ordinary citizens is forbidden. So most people are powerless against aggressors, as tens of thousands of guns are hidden in basements.
French Jews have no illusions. Anti-Semitic attacks have become common and increasingly severe. When members of the government dare to speak of anti-Semitism, they refuse to speak of Islamic anti-Semitism, even if Islamic anti-Semitism is now the cause of almost all anti-Semitic attacks.
French Jews could see on January 11 that Prime Minister Netanyahu was not welcome, while Abbas and other supporters of jihad were celebrated. They see how speaking ill of Israel blows through the mainstream media and feeds increasing Jew-hate. They see the French parliament vote for the creation of an admittedly genocidal "Palestinian State."
They see that they are unarmed and that the soldiers in the streets will not be there forever. They see that jihadists are preparing more attacks. They see no-go zones grow increasingly turbulent. They see what is happening in prisons. They see that the French justice system gives short terms to jihadists and releases them quickly. They see that the government cannot stop mass riots and has no way to prevent more attacks. They see that if just Jews had been targeted in recent attacks, no protests would have taken place. Each year they see more Jews leave the country. Seven thousand left for Israel in 2014, and the Jewish Agency for Israel expects 15,000 this year.
The Muslim population is largely silent, except in the heavily-Muslim suburbs, where those who support Coulibaly and the Kouachi brothers can speak without risking arrest. Those who speak officially in the name of the French Muslim community explain that Islam is not the threat, that the real culprits are those who "insult Islam," and that "the main victims" are Muslims.
The rest of the French population is not convinced. Several polls show that more that 70% of the French think Islam is incompatible with democracy and Western civilization; those polls predate the recent attacks.
French society has not been this split for a very long time. The political consensus that prevails in the country will not last. Recent polls show the rising fear of a widespread explosion.
The French journalist Eric Zemmour said a short while ago that France was on edge of civil war. His remarks provoked shock. He received multiple death threats. He is now under police protection. All those who criticize Islam in France suffer the same fate. Charlie Hebdocartoonists received death threats. They were also under police protection. They are dead.
French Jews are now under military protection.
More than three million copies of the issue of Charlie Hebdo published January 14, a week after the murders, were sold on the day of its release, and at least four million more the days after. The cover says, "All is forgiven," and shows Mohammed crying and bearing a sign saying, "I am Charlie." Many French Muslims, and Muslims in Niger and Pakistan, are voicing their anger. Jihadist movements are hurling threats against France.
On January 15, two jihadists who had returned recently from Syria were killed in Verviers, Belgium, a hundred miles from the French border. They were about to commit serious attacks, police reported. They had accomplices, and there have been arrests. The situation in Belgium is as bad as the situation in France. There are terror cells, we are told, in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. The jihad in Europe is just beginning.

[1] On Wednesday, January 7, two men entered the office of the satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo, in Paris. They killed twelve people, including four famous French cartoonists and two police officers, then fled, shouting, "We have avenged the Prophet!" The next day, a man driving a stolen car had a traffic accident in Montrouge, south of Paris, close to the entrance of a Jewish primary school, at 8:20 a.m., when parents accompany their children on their way to class. A female police officer was present. The man killed the police officer and escaped. It is easy to imagine what would have happened in the Jewish school if he had not had that accident.
The day after that, the man who had an accident in Montrouge entered a kosher supermarketat Porte de Vincennes in the east of Paris. He killed four people, kidnapped those he did not kill, and threatened to kill all of them. A few hours later, the killer in the kosher supermarket was shot dead.
The two killers who acted at Charlie Hebdo, Cherif and Said Kouachi, were Muslims born in France. The killer at the kosher supermarket, Amedy Coulibaly, was also a Muslim born in France.
The three killers of the Paris office of Charlie Hebdo magazine and the kosher supermarket knew each other. Two of them, Cherif Kouachi, the younger brother of Said Kouachi, and Amedy Coulibaly, had met and been radicalized in prison. They had served short sentences, despite involvement in jihadist activities, and were released prematurely. They joined al Qaeda in Yemen, then returned to France. French police knew about their ties with al Qaeda, but did not monitor them.
The attack against Charlie Hebdo was the deadliest terrorist attack in France since 1961.
The attack against the kosher supermarket was the third deadly jihadist attack committed by young Muslims born in France against Jews on European soil since 2012.