Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Free College. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Free College. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

The Elephant In The Room That No One Wants To Address--Especially The Spendthrift Democrats Who Were Elected To Congress In 2018

Here’s The Biggest Problem In American Government. No One's Going To Deal With It.

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
On Monday, The Wall Street Journal reported on a development students of American governance have known about for years, but politicians have studiously avoided doing anything about: the United States’ debt will cost us more in the near future than our own national defense. Thanks to the weakness of the global economy in the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, tremendous appetite for American debt shielded us from the fallout from our $20 trillion debt – but that could soon be ending. When it does, there will be fiscal hell to pay.
Kate Davidson and Daniel Kruger report:
The Congressional Budget Office estimates interest spending will rise to $915 billion by 2028, or 13% of all outlays and 3.1% of gross domestic product. Along that path, the government is expected to pass the following milestones: It will spend more on interest than it spends on Medicaid in 2020; more in 2023 than it spends on national defense; and more in 2025 than it spends on all nondefense discretionary programs combined, from funding for national parks to scientific research, to health care and education, to the court system and infrastructure, according to the CBO.
In the early 1990s, President George H.W. Bush agreed to tax hikes that killed his political career thanks to the burdens of the national debt. President Trump is highly unlikely to do the same – and neither are Congressional Republicans, whose only major legislative achievement is the tax cuts passed last year.
Moreover, Democrats have no interest whatsoever in paying down the national debt. In fact, it’s exactly the kind of lever they’re looking for to raise taxes should they gain office in the near future. Instead of blaming the actual culprit of our national debt – out of control entitlement spending – Democrats have spent the last decade falsely blaming the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and tax cuts. They’re currently proposing an exponential expansion of our spending on entitlements with programs like “Medicare for All” and free college tuition, which won’t be paid for by anything other than a tremendous middle class tax hike. Democrats want Nordic social democracy; they’re going to have to push Nordic tax rates in order to achieve it.
Furthermore, as the Journal reports:
Debt as a share of gross domestic product is projected to climb over the next decade, from 78% at the end of this year—the highest it has been since the end of World War II—to 96.2% in 2028, according to CBO projections.
By way of contrast, Spain, a country with serious fiscal problems, stood at debt-to-GDP of 99.6 percent last year.
Now, some commentators have been sanguine about the possibility of such debt. They say that a little fiscal handiwork will do the trick – simply cut the budget a little, revert to strong economic growth, and the rest will be fine. But that’s ignoring the structural problem of our debt, which is far more ruinous than it was in 1991. We can only stave off serious restructuring for so long.
But there’s no political benefit to staving off the debt for either side. Republicans lose ground when they talk about restructuring entitlements; Democrats want to expand entitlements. The American public is simply unready to talk about doing what we must in order to ensure America’s continued economic growth and strength, particularly at a time when our population is rapidly aging. That’s why Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) will leave Congress with his chief political ambition, entitlement reform, unfulfilled.
What will the consequences be? The continued Europeanization of American politics, as taxes and spending inevitably rise in tandem. The only difference between the parties will be Republican calls for austerity measures at the margins, and Democratic calls for massively higher taxes and higher spending.
We’ve been playing a pyramid game. In the next decade, that pyramid is going to cave in on us.

Friday, November 13, 2015

Students Advocate Free Education, Eradication Of Their Debt And $15 Minimum Wage


Watch: Fox News Host Just Destroyed Liberal Guest With Seven-Word Question She Can’t Answer

"...unless you're high as a kite..."

 Print
Amid widespread civil unrest concentrated within college communities across the nation, one group of university students is making a bold demand for three specific – and costly – federal benefits.
Keely Mullen, who serves as the Million Student March’s national organizer, spoke to Fox Business Network’s Neil Cavuto regarding the group’s list of demands.

“Um, well, so the movement, the Million Student march is a movement for a more equitable and fair system of education,” Mullen insisted, “as opposed to the really corporate model we have now.”
She went on to list the three demands: “Free public college, cancellation of student debt and a $15 an hour minimum wage for people who work on the campus.”

Cavuto immediately steered the conversation toward how Mullen envisioned such a plan might be funded:
And how’s that going to be paid?
The guest took a pregnant pause before suggesting that she did not understand the question. Finally pressed to name a source for the incalculable new revenue stream needed to enact her utopian dream, Mullen acknowledged that she is anxious to see America’s greedy rich have their wealth confiscated.
“Um, the one percent of people in society,” she said, “that are hoarding the wealth and really sort of causing a catastrophe that students are facing. I mean we have a relationship now where one percent of the population owns more wealth than the 99 percent combined.”
Cavuto pointed out that the nation’s top earners have already seen their tax rate jump twice in recent years, as well as a deep cut in the deductions they are allowed to declare.
“How much more do you think they should pay?” he asked.
“Um,” she responded, “I think enough until we have a system where not 1 in 2 American families are threatened with poverty.”
Cavuto explained that the “one-percent hoarders” are “smart people,” asking her “who’s going to pay for all this stuff you want” when the wealthy leave the U.S.
“There’s always going to be a one percent in the U.S.,” she reassured him.
When Mullen began citing the world’s wealthiest citizens to further her narrative, Cavuto got her back on track.
“Are we talking about 85 billionaires,” he asked, “or are you extending this to the one percent or whomever who earn a little bit north of $250,000? At what level, Keely, do you start saying, ‘You’ve got to pay a hell of a lot more than you’re paying right now in taxes?’”
She said she supports a tax rate of at least 90 percent on those in the top tax bracket, suggesting her own peers would gladly give all but a dime of every dollar they earn to the federal government.
“I dare say,” Cavuto shot back, “unless you’re high as a kite, you wouldn’t volunteer to pay 90 percent.”