Why Are We Just Finding Out This Fact Now?

ARMED ANTIFA PROF ADMITS CHASING CHARLOTTESVILLE DRIVER — BEFORE DEADLY CRASH!

Leftist brags about armed intimidation which may have been a factor in death of Heather Heyer

Jamie White | Infowars.com - JANUARY 16, 2018 8 Comments 

IMAGE CREDITS: ABC NEWS.

18

0

0

An Antifa leader admitted on social media to chasing down the Charlottesville driver with a rifle, causing him to ram into a group of counterprotesters.

University of North Carolina anthropology professor Dwayne Dixon is the leader of armed Antifa group Redneck Revolt, who admitted to using armed intimidation to chase James Alex Fields, Jr. into a group of fellow counterprotesters which resulted in one death and dozens injured last August.

“I take perverse pleasure in having carried this Spike’s lower in the defense of Justice Park on August 12th. I used this rifle to chase off James Fields from our block of 4th St before he attacked the marchers to the south. Spike’s needs a good lesson in ethics and antifascism,” Dixon posted on Facebook.

The post included a picture of Dixon holding a rifle. His account has since been made private.

The “Spikes” Dixon refers to Spikes Tactical, a firearm company that triggered leftists last week with a social media ad that read “not today Antifa.”

spikes_tactical@spikes_tactical

Not today ANTIFA...not today. @spikes_tactical & @OfficialPHU #spikestactical… https://www.instagram.com/p/BdrFEzxDabs/ 

10:18 PM - Jan 7, 2018

•  3434 Replies
 
•  1111 Retweets
 
•  2929 likes

Twitter Ads info and privacy

The corporate media was quick to brand Field’s actions as terrorism, but according to authorities, Fields expressed remorse and shock after the incident, asking “Are they okay?”, suggesting the tragedy could have been an accident.

“He did appear to be very shocked,” detective Steve Young said.

Revelations that an armed Antifa thug chased down Fields bolster to that theory, especially given Dixon said he did so just before Fields drove into protesters.

Dixon was interviewed by ABC News following the violence, saying he felt he was “leaving a battlefield.”

“They’re not just speaking – they’re marching. They’re marching in a way that’s intimidating, as we all know is harking back to the torch light rallies of the Nazi era.”

“When the left uses violence, in the rare cases that it happens, it’s resistance,” Dixon said.

Fields, 20, is currently charged with first-degree murder for killing Heather Heyer and injuring 32 other people at the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, NC.

As we covered, the left is more than willing to justify violence for political aims, but loses their marbles if President Trump calls third-world impoverished countries “shitholes,” or suggests politicians “would do anything” for campaign contributions.

Are We About To Lose First Amendment Free Speech Rights? Whose "Hateful" Speech Is Not Appropriate?

VIDEO: MSNBC PRESENTS CASE AGAINST THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Host complains of the ‘Pitfalls of Free Speech’

Steve Watson | Infowars.com - AUGUST 22, 2017 21 Comments 

Share

Tweet

+1

Pin

Email

SHARES0

After promoting Antifa violence twice in one week, NBC had a ‘debate’ about whether the First Amendment protects ALL speech or not, declaring that there are ‘pitfalls’ to free speech.

MSNBC’s Katy Tur declared that the broadcast would focus on “challenging the First Amendment.”

“Should extremist groups have the right to rally? We’ll delve into the power and pitfalls of free speech.” Tur stated during the opening segment.

Tur  previously badgered the mother of Heather Heyer, the woman who was tragically killed in Charlottesville, about her opinions on President Trump.

“Over the weekend the debate over free speech raged on,” Tur stated, claiming that “the free speech event was a thinly veiled way to shield hate groups in the wake of the deadly crash in Charlottesville.”

“The ACLU helped the unite the right group obtain a protest permit in Charlottesville and says it will continue to consider requests from hate groups seeking legal help to protest,” she continued, then asking whether that is acceptable.

Tur then brought in ACLU Senior Staff Attorney Lee Rowland, and quoted a New York Times op ed which asked whether “Prioritizing the First Amendment rights could make the distribution of power in this country even more unequal.”

Rowland responded by exclaiming that the First Amendment ensures “all of us can speak truth to power no matter whether we’re trying to change the status quo for better or worse in your eyes or my eyes, and still do that in a way that in the long run lifts up all voices.”

“We’ve been through an entire century where we’ve seen the First Amendment play out,” Rowland noted, adding that “it’s asking the wrong question” to suggest free speech could be limited.

“I’d like to think that the moral arc of the universe or the least our country is closer to justice than it was when we began decades ago.” said Rowland, adding that the Civil Rights movement would not have even started without the First Amendment.

“People hoping for a violent confrontation are not heroes of the First Amendment,” Rowland told Tur, adding “regardless of whether they’re white supremacists or not.”