Iranians Have NO Intention Of Living Up To Nuclear Deal And US Has NO Intention Of Making Them

Iran Unveils News Missile Silo in Defiance of US Appeasement Attempts

By Abra Forman January 6, 2016 , 1:30 pm

0 0

0 0Email 0Share

“For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as idolatry and teraphim. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, He hath also rejected thee from being king.” (1 Samuel 15:23)

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/iran-silo.png

(Photo: Iranian TV footage)

Just weeks before the Obama administration is set to implement the controversial Iran nuclear deal, Iran has proudly announced the construction of a new missile silo designed to hold its surplus of illegal medium-range ballistic missiles.

Iranian state television broadcast footage of the new underground depot on Tuesday, less than a week after its naval missile test in the Gulf led to US threats of new sanctions against the country.

The depot will house Iran’s arsenal of Emad missiles, which are capable of delivering a nuclear payload. According to the US State Department, Iran’s construction of the missiles violates a 2010 UN Security Council resolution.

The US first threatened new sanctions after Iran performed an illegal test of the missile in October, and then another in November, but had yet to implement them when Iran did another test, this time dangerously close to three US warships in the Gulf, in December. The US military called the test “highly provocative” and quickly prepared to impose sanctions.

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/82-Iranium-600WIDE.jpg

However, the Obama administration backed off at the last minute, declining to put new sanctions into effect. The administration is likely fearful of stirring up more conflict with Iran as the fateful Implementation Day of its landmark nuclear deal, whose signing was strongly opposed by Israel, draws near.

Once Iran is considered to have upheld its part of the deal in dismantling part of its nuclear program, nearly all sanctions on the country will be lifted.

The revelation of the new missile depot will do little to assuage the concerns of the deal’s critics, who warn that the deal will make the US beholden to Iran and limit the international community’s ability to reign in Iran’s violations of human rights, sponsorship of terrorism, and ultimately its nuclear program, which, under the deal, can be resumed in eight years.

In open defiance of the US’s wishes to resolve Iran’s military ambitions diplomatically, the Iranian government has brazenly ordered the continuation of its ballistic missile program. Last week, in response to the US’s threat of new sanctions, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani instructed his defense minister to expand the program with the goal of improving the precision, range, and payload capabilities of Iran’s missiles.

On Friday, Brigadier General Hossein Salami, second-in-command of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, said that Iran’s missile depots and underground facilities are so full that Iran doesn’t know how to store its new weapons.

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/58252/iran-unveils-news-missile-silo-defiance-us-appeasement-attempts-middle-east/#hfDS8D4o9wocf2kG.99

Obama Is The Chamberlain Of The 21st Century. His "Negotiations" With Iran Are Foolhardy And Will Endanger The Entire World

President Obama Surrenders to Iran After British Prime Minister Chamberlain signed the Munich Pact with Hitler in 1938, Winston Churchill responded, “You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war.” By the end of the appeasement process Hitler was stronger, the allies were weaker and the war, when it came, was more violent and more devastating than it might have been. President Obama's surrender to the Iranian dictatorship is based on the same mistake Chamberlain and his predecessor made about Hitler--and the same false analysis that required them to lie about Hitler's rearmament program and then abandon allies in efforts to appease an aggressive, evil regime. When dealing with a regime that is fully prepared to enforce its will, appeasement doesn’t make us safer. It makes the world much more dangerous. President Obama's surrender to Iran is the biggest undermining of American national security since President James Buchanan failed to oppose and repress seceding southern states in 1860 and allowed federal forts to fall into confederate hands. Buchanan's timidity, confusion, and lack of firmness enabled southern radicals to feel emboldened and to begin arming militia who would end up fighting the union in a few months. The Obama Administration is clearly surrendering on virtually every aspect of Iranian policy. The Iranians have been publicly humiliating the President and the Secretary of State by ridiculing American claims about the agreement. The head of Iran’s militia said last week that the destruction of Israel was “non-negotiable.” President Obama ignored it. The head of the military said this week that no military site will be inspected. President Obama ignored it. The Iranians are demanding an immediate end to sanctions and President Obama is apparently consideringthe release of $50 billion in Iranian funds currently frozen. This is about 10 percent of the entire Iranian economy and would be a huge boost for the leading state sponsor of terrorism worldwide. The Russians are now willing to sell a very advanced air defense system to Iran. This will make it dangerous for all but the most advanced aircraft to enter Iranian airspace. Thus it appears President Obama is willing to accept a better armed, more powerful Iranian dictatorship. No President in modern times has been as willful in pursuing a policy in which the United States is humiliated, its allies are weakened, and its enemies are strengthened. We had better start a national discussion how about how we are going to deal with a nuclear-armed Iran because it is clear that the Obama surrender concedes, in fact guarantees, that we will soon be facing an Iranian dictatorship equipped with nuclear weapons. The consequences of a nuclear Iran for the entire region are very sobering. Churchill was right. President Obama will have given away our honor and if war comes it will be worse and more devastating than it might have been if only President Obama had been prepared to defend America. Your Friend, Newt