Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Larry Summers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Larry Summers. Show all posts

Monday, February 29, 2016

Cashless Society Is A Freedom Killer


Kill cash? Only if you want to kill freedom, says law professor

Glenn Reynolds, a law professor and regular contributor to Instapundit, says calls to begin weakening the power of cash by doing away with large bills means killing the currency of freedom.
We told you about the recent interest in eliminating large forms of currency here a couple weeks ago.
Here’s a little refresher:
Larry Summers, an ex-treasury secretary who served as an economic advisor to the Obama administration, argues in a recent Washington Post blog that large bills such as the U.S.’s $100 and the European Union’s 500-euro bills aid in corruption and criminal activity throughout the world.
His rather simplistic basis for the argument: Large sums of money consisting of big bills weigh less than if they were made up of smaller currency denominations.
To make it harder for criminals to move money unnoticed, Summers is calling for “a global agreement to stop issuing notes worth more than say $50 or $100.”
In a recent USA Today rebuttal to Summers’ idea, Reynolds reiterates why this would be a very, very bad plan.
He writes:
The Federal Reserve and various other financial regulatory bodies were sold politically in no small part as protections against inflation. But inflation has run rampant. According to the inflation calculator, today’s $100 bill is worth only as much as $4.18 in 1913, the year the Federal Reserve was established. When you realize that inflation helps debtors and that governments are the world’s biggest debtors, this makes a certain amount of sense — for them.
But at a time when, almost no matter where you look in the world, the parts of it controlled by the experts and technocrats (like Larry Summers) seem to be doing badly, it seems reasonable to ask: Why give them still more control over the economy? What reason is there to think that they’ll use that control fairly, or even competently? Their track record isn’t very impressive.
Cash has a lot of virtues. One of them is that it allows people to engage in voluntary transactions without the knowledge or permission of anyone else. Governments call this suspicious, but the rest of us call it something else: Freedom.
In other words, cash is an important tool if you value the modicum of financial freedom you have left in a world where wealth is increasingly thought of as easy to track numbers on a screen.
If you want to know more, Bob Livingston recently wrote an extremely informative article about the powerful voices behind efforts to take away cash as an option for average Americans: Why there’s a war on cash; it’s about central banks consolidating power

Monday, April 28, 2014

Is Economic Growth Returning?

Old Normal Returns as Pimco Foresees 'New Destination' for US

Monday, 28 Apr 2014 08:06 AM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
The “new normal” U.S. economy is starting to look more like a classic expansion.
Signs of a quickening recovery are casting doubt on the notion that lasting stagnation has become the norm for the world’s largest economy, a view advanced by Pacific Investment Management Co.’s Bill Gross, Northwestern University’s Robert Gordon and former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers.
Behind the improved outlook: Consumers spending more freely after working down their debts, less drag from government budget restraint, a housing recovery and continued easy monetary policy.
“We are returning to an old normal,” said Neil Dutta, head of U.S. economics at Renaissance Macro Research in New York. “A lot of the headwinds that are holding the economy back are beginning to abate, including local government spending, fiscal tightening and household balance-sheet deleveraging.”
 
The term “new normal” was popularized in 2009 by Gross, Pimco’s co-founder and chief investment officer, and former Chief Executive Officer Mohamed El-Erian to describe an era of lower returns, heightened government regulation, diminishing U.S. clout in the world economy and a bigger role for developing nations. The term was coined by Bloomberg News reporter Rich Miller.
Gross and El-Erian pegged U.S. growth at about 2 percent for the following three to five years, a period that is drawing to a close.
‘New Destination’
“What you’ll see in next the few years is we’re going to head back to a new destination,” Scott Mather, one of Pimco’s six deputy chief investment officers, said in an April 25 Bloomberg Radio interview. The firm’s forecast for U.S. growth has increased to the high 2 percent level, “which is better than sub-2 percent level of growth that we’ve experienced for several years,” he said.
The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists this month calls for growth to accelerate to a pace of at least 3 percent for the rest of 2014 and the following two years. Dutta sees an expansion of 3.5 percent for the next three quarters and says 3 percent “seems reasonable” for the subsequent two years.
The forecasts are in line with the 3.1 percent average annual rate per quarter from 1980 until the start of the recession in 2007. Since June 2009, the end of the deepest downturn since the 1930s, quarterly growth has averaged 2.4 percent. That’s slower than the average 3.8 percent rate seen in comparable 18-quarter periods following the previous three recessions.
Persistent Slack
The pickup would come in the face of persistent slack in the labor market, which is keeping the Federal Reserve committed to accommodative policies to bring about full employment and 2 percent inflation, Chair Janet Yellen said in an April 16 speech. Unemployment of 6.7 percent in March remains above the 5.2 percent to 5.6 percent level that policy makers consider full employment.
“This shortfall remains significant, and in our baseline outlook, it will take more than two years to close,” Yellen, 67, said to the Economic Club of New York.
Federal Open Market Committee participants project gross domestic product growth of 2.8 percent to 3 percent for 2014, 3 percent to 3.2 percent in 2015 and 2.5 percent to 3 percent in 2016.
“We are making considerable progress, and many of the headwinds that came from the crisis, from fiscal policy, from housing, are beginning to dissipate,” former Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said in Toronto on April 22.
While housing has stumbled in recent months, more than 5.5 million new and previously owned homes were sold in 2013, the best year for the industry since 2006, according to data from the Commerce Department and National Association of Realtors.
Financial Crisis
“Many forecasters, and I would put myself among them, think we’re looking at a very good potential for faster growth in the U.S. and continued progress towards a full recovery from the tremendous impact of the financial crisis,” Bernanke said.
Bernanke, whose term at the Fed expired on Jan. 31 and who joined the Brookings Institution as a distinguished fellow in residence, led unprecedented actions such as cutting the benchmark interest rate to zero and buying bonds to bring down long-term interest rates.
The FOMC said last month that its benchmark rate will probably remain low for a “considerable time” after bond purchases end. The Fed, which holds a two-day policy meeting starting tomorrow, said it will weigh a “wide range of information” in considering when to raise the rate.
Monetary Policy
“Monetary policy and financial conditions generally are very supportive of growth, and fiscal drag, while still present, is much reduced,” said Peter Hooper, chief economist at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York.
Fed officials, in forecasts released last month with the policy statement, upgraded projections for gains in the labor market and predicted the main interest rate will rise to 1 percent by the end of 2015.
“Growth should accelerate in 2014 and 2015 as the housing recovery is gaining traction and household balance sheets are in much better shape,” said Christophe Barraud, chief economist at Market Securities LLP in Paris who has been the top forecaster of the U.S. economy the past two years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. “Public spending will rebound following the reduction of the federal deficit and significant surpluses at the states’ level.”
Barraud foresees “a sharp rebound” in this year’s second quarter, with “close to 4 percent” growth, followed by a rate “slightly above 3 percent” for the rest of the year. Over the long term, he projects “GDP could return around the level reached during the period 2000-2007, namely 2.7 percent.”
Europe Recovery
Global growth, including a recovery in Europe from a regional debt crisis, is also aiding the U.S. The world economy may expand at a 3.6 percent rate in 2014, 3.9 percent in 2015 and 4 percent in 2016, the International Monetary Fund said this month. That is up from an estimated 3 percent in 2013.
“Global growth should accelerate,” Barraud said, helped by recovery in Japan, “mini-stimulus measures in China, and fiscal and monetary adjustments in emerging countries.”
The U.S. labor market has shown signs of healing too, with unemployment falling from 10 percent in October 2010. U.S. payrolls have risen an average 187,000 a month the past eight months, Labor Department data show.
Economists with more pessimistic forecasts still think their views will be vindicated.
Historical Trend
Growth remains “below the historical trend,” said Gordon, who predicted the expansion may stall over the next century in a paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in August 2012. Innovation’s contribution to higher standards of living will slow, and headwinds such as an aging population and increased income inequality will reduce growth, he said.
Just because the economy is expanding doesn’t mean everyone shares in the benefits, he said. GDP figures reflect “the rising incomes of the top 1 percent who are accumulating at least half of annual income growth each year,” he said.
Summers said he remains concerned the U.S. could be in for a “secular stagnation,” in which the Fed can’t provide enough stimulus to deliver full employment without risking financial stability.
“Perhaps growth will accelerate, but if it does with current financial conditions, how long will it be before we start to see substantial emergence of financial excess?” Summers said in a Bloomberg Television interview April 25. “We need more stimulus to growth from someplace other than monetary accommodation.”
Aging Population
Pimco’s Gross, in a Bloomberg Radio interview April 4, said that while the U.S. has “a good 2014 ahead of us,” the country still faces slowing productivity “along with a lot of other structural factors,” such as an aging population.
To Wall Street economists, the recent healing in household and government finances outweighs concerns about a persistent slowdown.
“The headwinds are diminishing,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York. “This could be the year, and our forecast remains a hopeful one.”
Gloomy forecasts stem from an overreaction to a disappointing economic recovery since 2009, added Carl Riccadonna, senior U.S. economist in New York for Deutsche Bank Securities.
“Maybe 2014 is the year we shift back to the old normal, not the new normal, and we’re going to see faster economic growth,” he said. “I think we are done with the new normal phenomenon.”

© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved


Sunday, April 20, 2014

More Challenges Are Coming To The Economy. Will It Survive?

Brown Economists: 'Secular Stagnation' May Strangle Economy

Friday, 18 Apr 2014 09:21 AM
By Dan Weil
Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
The U.S. economy may not mend its woes soon and instead may suffer a bout of "secular stagnation," Brown University economists Gauti Eggertsson and Neil Mehrotra maintain in a recent paper.

A deleveraging shock, a drop in population growth, or an increase in income inequality could shift people from borrowing to savings, the economists say. Essentially, there simply aren't enough promising real-world investments, forcing investors to put their money into stocks, junk bonds, etc. — and not investments that create demand for a product. This weak demand results in economic stagnation.

And with a short-term interest rates already at zero, the Fed will be "unable to generate a sufficient monetary stimulus," they assert. The outcome: a "permanent slump in output,"Eggertsson and Mehrotra write.



"It's not a baseline scenario, but I think people should at least be starting to consider the possibility that this could go on for a while," Eggertsson told CNBC.com. 

That could "lead us to be a little bit less optimistic than people have been about re-normalization coming [for the economy] in the next year or two."

GDP expanded 2.6 percent in the fourth quarter and has run at about a 2 percent growth rate since the recession ended in June 2009.

Economic stagnation is commonly defined as a prolonged period of slow economic growth (traditionally measured in terms of the GDP growth), usually accompanied by high unemployment.

The economists base their recent conclusion on the "secular stagnation" hypothesis by Harvard economic professor Alvin Hansen, who contended that inadequate capital investment hindered full deployment of labor and other economic resources. During the Great Depression, private capital investment fell because of excess capacity and lack of good investment opportunities.

Former White House economic adviser Larry Summers is perhaps the most prominent advocate of the secular stagnation theory.

"In its current World Economic Outlook , the IMF essentially endorses the secular stagnation hypothesis, noting that the real interest rate necessary to bring about enough demand for full employment has declined significantly and is likely to remain depressed for a substantial period," Summers writes in The Washington Post.



Related Stories:


© 2014 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Summers Will Be Wrong On His Assumption That QE Was Good. We Are Germany In The 30's. Only Difference Inflation Has Not Started Running.

Lawrence Summers: History Will Overwhelmingly Approve Fed's Easing

Thursday, 21 Nov 2013 11:30 AM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The Federal Reserve’s decision to make unprecedented asset purchases to prop up the U.S. economy was the right call, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers said.
“On the question of whether the Fed stepping up and providing liquidity when no one else would was the right thing to do, I think historians are going to judge that about 98 to 2,” Summers said, speaking on Bloomberg Television with Stephanie Ruhle from the Robin Hood Foundation’s investors conference in New York.
Summers, 58, said he’s a Democrat and is more interested in whether monetary policy benefited the middle class than Wall Street, while stock market gains have been a side effect of the asset purchases known as “quantitative easing.”
“The primary consequence of QE is that we’ve avoided the bottom falling out of the economy in the way that it did when they didn’t do QE in 1930 and 1931,” said Summers, a Harvard University professor. “As a consequence of saving the economy, has it been better for Wall Street? Yes, it has been. Is that a reason not to save the economy? I surely don’t think so.”
Summers said he wasn’t going to make a “precise judgment” on when bond buying should slow. The Federal Open Market Committee plans to press on with $85 billion in monthly purchases until it sees substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market.
While U.S. employers last month added 204,000 workers, the Fed probably won’t decide to taper its purchases until a March 18-19 policy meeting, according to the median of 32 economist estimates in a Bloomberg News survey Nov. 8.
Summers also said that the economy lately hasn’t shown an ability to grow without bubbles.
“It has been a long time since we have had rapid, healthy growth in the country,” Summers said. “That is not an argument for bubbles. That is an argument for changing the framework.”
© Copyright 2013 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/lawrence-summers-federal-reserve-easing-history/2013/11/21/id/537912?ns_mail_uid=12139903&ns_mail_job=1547050_11212013&promo_code=15B0D-1#ixzz2lKcjrMfD
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Will New Fed Chairman Be Independent Or More Of The Same?

WSJ: 'Fed Needs New Independent Leadership'

Wednesday, 18 Sep 2013 07:48 AM
By Dan Weil
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
What the Federal Reserve could really use in its next chairman is someone who will be non-political, according to a Wall Street Journal editorial.

So it's a good thing that former White House adviser Larry Summers won't get the nod, The Journal editors say. "He would have been an exceptionally political Fed chairman at a time when the institution needs the opposite," they write.

The editors aren't too happy with current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke. "The Fed has already sacrificed so much of its political independence since 2008," the editorial states.


"Though a nominal Republican, current Chairman Ben Bernanke was former Treasury chief Timothy Geithner's political sidekick for most of the last five years. He became an advocate for Treasury's regulatory agenda, its tax and spending priorities and even its housing policy."

So what sort of central bank chief chairman do The Journal editors want?

"The Fed needs new independent leadership," they say. "Sooner or later the next Fed chairman will have to raise interest rates, and the pressure not to do so will be enormous from Democrats who want to elect Hillary Clinton in 2016."

The Fed needs a chairman who can change policy, the editorial says.

Meanwhile, Bill Gross, co-chief investment officer of Pimco, sees the move of Fed Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen to the frontrunner position for the chairmanship as positive for stock and bond markets.

It makes a difference for markets "to the extent that markets prefer certainty over uncertainty, and that ratio shifted significant [Sunday] with the withdrawal of Larry Summers," Gross told CNBC.

There is more certainty about Yellen's policy approach than Summers', he says.

© 2013 Moneynews. All rights reserved.