Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Nicholas Dirks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nicholas Dirks. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Ann Coulter Will Speak In An Open Plaza. This Is Very Scary.

UC-Berkeley readies

 police as Ann Coulter

 plans to speak in

 public plaza

 on campus

  
The University of California at Berkeley is bracing for massive protests and potential violence in an open, public space known as Sproul Plaza after learning that conservative commentator Ann Coulter plans to give a speech there Thursday afternoon.
The state flagship university has become ground zero for an intense confrontation between the far left and the far right since Donald Trump’s election in November, with some protesters trying to stop controversial speakers from appearing on campus and others objecting that such actions violate their right to free speech. Some of the clashes have devolved into riots, leaving the school and city to struggle with how best to balance the free exchange of ideas with community safety.
In February — and twice more since then — masked protesters turned demonstrations over the boundary between free speech and hate speech into violent confrontations, setting fires, causing injuries and leaving hundreds of thousands of dollars of property damage in their wake.
“The character of that attack on campus was unprecedented,” UC-Berkeley chancellor Nicholas Dirks said Tuesday.
Coulter’s choice of Sproul Plaza, site of the Free Speech Movement protests in the 1960s, is both symbolic and logistically challenging for the university because anyone can be there. Dirks said that for an inside event, the university would have metal detectors and other ways to search for weapons, but security will be much more difficult in a public outdoor space.
“If somebody brings weapons, there’s no way to block off the site, or to screen them,” Dirks said, noting that officials know that some of the demonstrators, such as those known as Black Bloc, know how to penetrate the crowd and use it as a shield. “In an open space, you have almost no control over that,” he said. “The challenges are immense.”

Ann Coulter vows to speak at Berkeley

 
Play Video1:09
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter says threats of violence won't stop her from speaking at the University of California at Berkeley on April 27. (Reuters)
After the university went on lockdown after a February clash and police urged university officials to cancel controversial writer Milo Yiannopoulos’s speech — which they did — President Trump raised the threat of pulling federal funding from the public school.
But the cancellation of the Yiannopoulos event further galvanized activists on the far right, who viewed it as a call to arms and proof that conservatives around the country are being oppressed. And in recent weeks, rallies in the city of Berkeley have devolved into bloody street brawls. Left-wing activists have clashed with Trump supporters, and anarchists in black masks have squared off against self-proclaimed militia groups.
Coulter did not immediately respond to a request for comment on her planned appearance. On Monday she retweeted a weather forecast with this comment: “Nice day for an outdoor speech at Berkeley.”
Berkeley College Republicans originally invited Coulter to speak on campus Thursday, but university officials canceled the event because of safety concerns. The university, facing backlash, quickly reversed course and invited her to speak next week instead at an indoor location.
Coulter rejected that offer and said she still planned to come to Berkeley on Thursday despite the university’s warnings against it. On Monday, student groups filed a lawsuit against university officials, complaining that the university’s decision was stifling free speech at the school, particularly for politically conservative students whose views are controversial on the liberal campus.
“Though UC Berkeley promises its students an environment that promotes free debate and the free exchange of ideas,” the lawsuit contends, “it had breached this promise through the repressive actions of University administrators and campus police, who have systematically and intentionally suppressed constitutionally-protected expression” by the many students whose political views align with the plaintiffs.
The lawsuit claims that students typically leave campus in early May — the week known as “dead week” before final exams — and that delaying Coulter’s speech until then limits her potential impact. Dirks countered that claim.
ADVERTISING
“That’s not our experience,” he said. “It’s not a vacation. We assume students stay and work in the libraries.”
Having the event next week would open up options because there will be no conflict with classes and it would be much easier to get a safe venue, Dirks said. There were very few places police believe they can secure for such a speech given the current climate, he said.
Dirks defended the university’s commitment to free speech and said his concerns about academic freedom include worries about some members of the College Republicans who have been targeted by other members of campus for their views.
In his time as chancellor, protesters tried to stop liberal television host and comedian Bill Maher from speaking, but Dirks said he insisted that Maher come. He told students and faculty upset about Yiannopoulos that his First Amendment rights should prevail over their concerns that he violates the community’s values.
University officials thought they were prepared for Yiannopoulos, having erected three barrier chain-link fences, placed about 90 police officers on campus, and searched for weapons and other items when ticket-holders came inside. But that wasn’t enough.
“It took about 15 minutes for Black Bloc protesters to come and begin to break the windows and doors … and light a major fire using a propane tank that was there for temporary lighting,” Dirks said.
The campus has become a symbolic center of a much larger fight, he said, with a growing perception among many that universities are so steeped in political correctness that they reject real debate, that they are isolated bubbles with values antithetical to the Trump administration. But they also face anger from the far left for allowing speakers whose views offend some. “We’re getting hit from both sides,” Dirks said.
Since February, he said, “We’re engaged in a new reality — what was unprecedented is not going away.” Now people think of the campus as a place “for the mounting of pitched battle, and the staging of violent controversies.”
Dirks said Tuesday that, given the school’s history, “It is in a way fitting that Berkeley be a leader in helping figure out how the new political realities are going to affect the life of the university.”
It’s not just a problem at Berkeley.
Last week at Auburn University, a fistfight broke out during protests when alt-right leader Richard Spencer spoke on campus. Earlier this year at Middlebury College, an angry mob of hundreds surrounded author and conservative scholar Charles Murray after he tried to give a lecture about his most recent book. Protesters, including some wearing masks, climbed on the hood of his car and pounded on windows as he tried to leave.
Lawrence Lokman, a spokesman for Penn State University, confirmed that its president, Eric Barron, serves on “an academic advisory committee to Homeland Security and co-chairs a subcommittee on countering extreme violence on campuses. As part of that, they have received a briefing on violence related to campus speakers.”
Pranav Jandhyala, who leads one of the two student groups that invited Coulter, said Tuesday that Coulter told him and other students that she plans to speak Thursday afternoon at Sproul Plaza.
Jandhyala said his student group has been trying frantically to find an off-campus venue for Thursday, and he said he shares the concerns of university officials that Coulter’s appearance at Sproul — and the protests and counter-protests it likely will spark — could grow violent. But he said that Coulter made clear in communication with him and other student organizers on Tuesday morning that she intends to go through with her plan to appear at the public plaza.
“We’re worried about it turning into a huge battle between her security and conservative militia and antifascists and others,” Jandhyala said. “To have that right in the middle of Sproul doesn’t bode well for the image of our school or the city. We’re worried about violence and student safety and our own safety as well. It’s a huge safety concern.”
He said the exact time of Coulter’s speech is still uncertain, but he expects it likely will be at about 4 p.m. “She said she doesn’t even know her full schedule on Thursday right now. She’s going to know Thursday morning and relay to us when she plans to come to Sproul,” Jandhyala said.
When Jandhyala’s group, the politically moderate Bridges USA, teamed up with Berkeley’s College Republicans to invite Coulter to campus, the goal was to facilitate a dialogue about immigration.
“It’s an issue that hits home for many of our students,” Jandhyala said. “Berkeley is a sanctuary city. We have many undocumented immigrant students. That’s why it seemed like a good issue to put on the table. UC-Berkeley can represent the liberal point of view very well. So what we were trying to do with Coulter was to bring in an opposing view to have a dialogue about it.”
While that was the original purpose, Jandhyala acknowledged that Coulter might now have a different agenda for her appearance: “Her goal is testing the limits of speech and doing all she can to uphold this value and prove what’s possible and not back down from free speech.”
Her outdoor speech at the plaza likely will make it difficult for any dialogue or interaction with students, he said, and his group is trying to have a separate event with her that would allow for conversation.
Dan Mogulof, a university spokesman, said the school does not discuss security arrangements in detail, but he said officials will take extraordinary steps to protect the campus, in coordination with local and regional law enforcement.
“At UC-Berkeley, we don’t have gates,” Mogulof said. “There are probably literally hundreds of ways to come onto campus from the city. We don’t have a drawbridge or moat. We are a completely porous campus.”
Dirks had a message for extremists: “I’d like to ask them to stay away. It’s a college campus. If they want to come and engage in free speech, that’s great. If they want to come and disrupt and engage in other activities, they should stay away from the university.”

Monday, April 24, 2017

Free Speech Movement Birthplace Has Become The Place Where Only Politically Correct Speech Is Allowed



Conservative students strike

back after UC Berkeley

 cancels Ann Coulter speech

 

Conservative students strike back after UC Berkeley cancels Ann Coulter speech
UC Berkeley College Republicans threaten to sue UC Berkeley for canceling an event featuring conservative Ann Coulter. (Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)

Officials at the University of California at Berkeley canceled conservative
commentator Ann Coulter’s April 27 event on Tuesday,
 citing security concerns and Coulter’s safety.
UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks said police have
 “very specific intelligence regarding threats that could
 pose a grave danger to” Coulter, according to an 
Associated Press report.
Now, students at the notoriously left-leaning college are
fighting back. In a letter sent Friday, a lawyer representing
the UC Berkeley College Republicans, Harmeet Dhillon,
said the students she represents are planning to sue the
 university if it continues to refuse to let Coulter speak.
According to the letter, the College Republicans are arguing
UC Berkeley’s rejection of the Coulter event is a violation
of the young Republicans’ First Amendment rights.
“It is a sad day indeed when the birthplace of the Free Speech
Movement, is morphing before our eyes into the cemetery
of free speech on college campuses,” the letter said,
according to a report by the Washington Examiner.
Officials at the college told
Coulter they would be
 willing to reschedule the event
 to May 2, but Coulter rejected
the offer, citing other obligations.
 On Thursday, Coulter attacked
UC Berkeley on Twitter for
picking the May 2 date, because
 the university has no courses
scheduled for that week; students will be studying for their
 final exams.
“In addition to facts: We’ve already spent $ for 4/27 Berkeley
 spc & I can’t do May 2 …THERE ARE NO CLASSES
 AT BERKELEY THE WEEK OF MAY 2!!!” Coulter wrote.

In February, 150 masked rioters caused damage to property
 totaling $100,000 during their protest of a scheduled event
 that featured controversial former Breitbart editor Milo
 Yiannopoulos. Only one person was arrested by police.

Thursday, April 20, 2017

Pressure On Berkeley Does Its Job But It Is Not Satisfactory

Berkeley reverses

 decision to cancel 

speech by

 conservative pundit 

Ann Coulter

  

Ann Coulter defiant after Berkeley speech cancellation

 
Play Video1:06
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter says she will still go to the University of California at Berkeley despite the university canceling her speech over safety concerns. In February, riots occurred when conservative Milo Yiannopoulos was asked to speak by a group of campus Republicans.(Reuters)
Officials at the University of California at Berkeley on Thursday reversed their decision to cancel a speech by conservative firebrand Ann Coulter.
The university had previously announced Wednesday that it was canceling Coulter’s appearance following several political protests in Berkeley that turned violent. But on Thursday, the university said it had found a venue where it could hold the speech on a different day May 2, instead of the original April 27 date.
Coulter and the group arranging her event said they are rejecting the new invitation.
In a series of tweets Thursday night, Coulter criticized the university, saying Berkeley officials were adding “burdensome” conditions to her speech. She said she had already spent money to hold the event on the original April 27 date and is not available May 2. She also pointed out that May 2 would coincide with a reading period before final exams, when there are no classes on campus and a fewer students around.
And she vowed that she is going to speak in Berkeley on the originally planned April 27 date, whether the university approved or not.
A leader of the college Republican group that invited Coulter also said his group planned to reject the new terms and alleged that the university is placing strict conditions on the event.
A Berkeley spokesman, however, rejected the claim that the university is placing unreasonable restrictions on Coulter’s event. The one main request the university made in extending their new invitation was to hold the event in the afternoon, said Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof. Holding the event in the later in the day would risk protests and potential violence stretching into the evening when the campus tends to get crowded with commuters and students.
ADVERTISING
In their offer to Coulter to host her speech on campus on the new date, Mogulof said, the university has asked for the event end by 3 p.m. or 3:30 p.m.
“Everything we’re doing is so the speaker and students can actually exercise their rights without disruption,” Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof said. “It’s hard to understand this display of disdain and disregard for the assessment of law enforcement professionals, particularly when they’re primary concern is the safety and well-being of college students.”
Even before the university’s new invitation and date was announced, Coulter had vowed to go ahead with an appearance anyway. If she does appear next week as she has promised, it will probably put security officials on high alert and may spark still further debate on the campus as the university wrestles with safety, student views and ideological openness.
“What are they going to do? Arrest me?” she said late Wednesday on the Fox News show “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”
Coulter said she “called their bluff” by agreeing to rules set by the university seeking to prevent violence.
University officials originally sent a letter canceling the event to a campus Republican group that invited Coulter to speak. In it, university officials said Wednesday that they made the decision to cancel Coulter’s appearance after assessing the violence that flared on campus in February, when the same college Republican group invited right-wing provocateur and now-former Breitbart News senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos to speak. As the protest and clashes escalated during the Yiannopoulos’s event, some began setting fires, throwing rocks and molotov cocktails and attacking members of the crowd.
The violence and damage caused by Yiannopoulos’s invitation garnered national attention and forced officials to put the campus on lockdown. And after the university canceled Yiannopoulos’s talk, President Trump criticized the school and threatened in a tweet to pull federal funds from Berkeley.
The decision by Berkeley to cancel both events involving high-profile conservatives were especially notable given the campus’s role during the 1960s and 1970s as the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement and its long tradition of social protest.
In a statement explaining the university’s surprising reversal on Thursday, Chancellor Nicholas Dirks framed it mainly as a problem of safety and finding a suitable venue. “Our police department has made it clear that they have very specific intelligence regarding threats that could pose a grave danger to the speaker, attendees and those who may wish to lawfully protest the event,” said Dirks. “At the same time, we respect and support Ms. Coulter’s own First Amendment rights.”
Dirk said that after the cancellation was already announced on Wednesday, he asked university staff to “look beyond the usual venues we use for large public gatherings to see if there might be a protectable space for this event….Fortunately, that expanded search identified an appropriate, protectable venue.”
Before the university reversed its decision, Coulter said in an email to The Washington Post on Wednesday that the university had been trying to force her to cancel her speech by “imposing ridiculous demands” on her but that she still agreed “to all of their silly requirements.” She said she believes that her speech “has been unconstitutionally banned” by the “public, taxpayer-supported UC-Berkeley.”
Coulter said the university insisted that her speech take place in the middle of the day, that only students could attend and that the exact venue wouldn’t be announced until the last minute. She said that she agreed with the conditions but that apparently wasn’t good enough.
“They just up and announced that I was prohibited from speaking anyway,” Coulter said, noting that her speech topic was to be immigration, the subject of one of her books. “I feel like the Constitution is important and that taxpayer-supported universities should not be using public funds to violate American citizens’ constitutional rights.”
A conservative national group that was helping organize the event, Young America’s Foundation, said Coulter also made demands of her own, including that any students engaging in violence be expelled. In her email, Coulter said she is still planning to give her speech, and YAF spokesman Spencer Brown said she has told them that she plans to appear at Berkeley on April 27.
“If Berkeley wants to have free speech, they are going to get it,” Brown said.

Trump fans and foes clash in Berkeley

 
Play Video0:42
Supporters and protesters of President Trump clashed on Saturday, April 15 in Berkeley, Calif.(Reuters)
But on Wednesday, when university officials initially cancelled the event, they emphasized that they are not canceling her event because of her controversial nature or sharply conservative views and said they were trying to reschedule it for September
“It has nothing to do with anyone’s political views. We believe in unqualified support to the First Amendment. But we also have an unqualified focus on safety of our students,” Mogulof said. “We are going to be making a concerted effort to explain the reasons behind this.”
The decision to cancel Coulter’s speech came drew sharp criticism from some on the campus, such as Robert Reich, a Berkeley professor who served as labor secretary under President Bill Clinton.
“This is a grave mistake,” Reich said in a Facebook post. He said universities should “do everything possible to foster and protect” free speech, writing that students should be allowed to hear Coulter’s arguments and question them.
“It’s one thing to cancel an address at the last moment because university and local police are not prepared to contain violence. … It’s another thing entirely to cancel an address before it is given, when police have adequate time to prepare for such eventualities,” he said.
As recently as last weekend, protests again turned violent — though in the city of Berkeley, not the university campus — as pro-Trump and anti-Trump protesters clashed in the streets. The violence on Saturday escalated throughout the day as far-left activists and far-right activists joined the fray.
And on Tuesday at Auburn University in Alabama, three people were arrestedamid protests and a fistfight that occurred over a speech by self-proclaimed white nationalist leader Richard Spencer.

Violence erupts when white nationalist Richard Spencer visits Auburn University

 
Play Video1:27
Self-proclaimed white nationalist Richard Spencer spoke at Auburn University Tuesday, April 18. His visit sparked protests that turned violent and led to three arrests. (YouTube/Ryan Crumpler)
When Berkeley officials initially made their decision to cancel Coulter’s speech, they said the recent violence has caused them to rethink where and when to hold such events. In their earlier letter, university officials also partly blamed the college Republican group for inviting Coulter and setting a date for the event — April 27 — without consulting the university.
Officials learned of Coulter’s event, the letter said, from reading about it in newspapers. And after consulting with university police, officials said, they could not find a venue available on that date that would allow them to protect Coulter, the audience and bystanders.
Perry Stein and Brian Murphy contributed to this report, which has been updated.