Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nikki Haley. Show all posts

Monday, April 6, 2020

WHO Has Deceived The World!

Nikki Haley Piles On Biting Criticism of WHO Director - 'So Much Suffering Has Been Caused'

Nikki Haley Piles On Biting Criticism of WHO Director - 'So Much Suffering Has Been Caused'
Volume 90%
 
Print
Nikki Haley hasn’t gone away.
The former South Carolina governor, who put her own unique brand on the job of ambassador to the United Nations, stepped down from the job more than a year ago, but she’s still one of the best-known women in American politics.
And she hasn’t lost her touch for acerbic, accurate criticism of the world body she was once a part of.
Last week, Haley joined a growing group of bold-faced Republicans criticizing lawmakers and demanding an accounting from the head of the World Health Organization, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, for why a group founded on the principle that health concerns should transcend politics has become a toadying front for the communist Chinese government.
TRENDING: Watch Dr. Fauci Ridicule Question, Walk Away After Reporter Notes Praise for Communist China's COVID Response
“The World Health Organization is supposed to represent the world,” wrote Haley, who represented the U.S. in the U.N. from January 2017 until Dec. 31, 2018. “It can’t do that if it continues to bow to the Communist Chinese government. The United States should use the power of the purse to demand critical reforms.”
A good start for those reforms would be for Tedros to be forced to find another line of work – like maybe in the PR office of the People’s Republic of China.
However much Democrats want to attack President Donald Trump for problems with the country’s response to the arrival of the coronavirus on American shores after it traveled around the world from its origins in China, not even the densest critic can defend Tedros’ abysmal performance of his duties.
Do you think the WHO director-general is too sympathetic to China?
100% (1869 Votes)
0% (9 Votes)
And it would take the most deranged of the Trump Derangement Syndrome segment of the population to argue that Tedros’ performance did not contribute to the death count the world has witnessed (surpassing 72,000 as of early Monday afternoon, according to Johns Hopkins).
Maybe it’s because of the anti-American stance that seems endemic in officers of the U.N., maybe it’s because Tedros’ own communist background makes him sympathetic to the butchers of the Beijing dictatorship, maybe it’s because he was simply unqualified for the position in the first place, but the reality is that the WHO under Tedros consistently downplayed the deadliness of the threat posed by the coronavirus.
As Haley pointed out, as late as Jan. 14, after Chinese officials knew well that the coronavirus was a contagious killer, the WHO was tweeting out deceitful assurances to the contrary.
RELATED: Joe Biden Picked a Fight with Nikki Haley and She Cleaned His Clock
“The WHO owes an explanation to the world of why they took China’s word for it,” she wrote. “So much suffering has been caused by the mishandling of information and lack of accountability by the Chinese.”
Other Republican critics were more direct.
Arizona Sen. Martha McSally, locked in a tight re-election race against former astronaut and anti-gun activist Scott Kelly, took to Fox News’ “Mornings with Maria” last week to demand Tedros step down.
“Dr. Tedros deceived the world,” she added in a tweet.
“At one point, he even praised China’s ‘transparency’ during its coronavirus response efforts despite a mountain of evidence showing the regime concealed the severity of the outbreak. This deception cost lives.”
(It’s worth noting here that McSally’s reference to Tedros as “Dr.” wasn’t actually wrong, but it might be misunderstood. According to his WHO biography, he holds a doctorate in the philosophy of community health, he is not a medical doctor – the first WHO director-general to lack that seemingly crucial qualification.)
Other Republicans joined McSally in calling out the WHO, as the Washington Free Beacon reported, including Florida Sen. Rick Scott, Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.
“The World Health Organization has consistently bent to the will of the Chinese Communist Party at the expense of global health and of containing the spread of the coronavirus, from downplaying the extent of the virus to systematically excluding Taiwan,” a Cruz representative told the Free Beacon.
“Sen. Cruz believes that the WHO has lost the credibility necessary for it to be effective, and a reevaluation of its leadership is urgently called for.”
Sane Americans, who’ve watched the coronavirus leap from China’s Hubei province to Europe to the United States – and only God knows where else – while the WHO and its director-general patiently parroted Chinese propaganda know that, too.
But Haley, with the rare perspective of having dealt with the inept corruptocrats of the U.N. on a personal basis, probably knows it better than anyone.
Haley hasn’t gone away — but with her high-profile attack, supported by top lawmakers of the United States — the country that pays most of the United Nations’ bills — it’s possible that Tedros and his particular brand of benighted incompetence just might.
Even the U.N. can be embarrassed sometimes.

Monday, December 10, 2018

The Media Is Blatantly Anti-Trump And Is Shows From Every Story They Cover

MSM Blast Trump Nomination Of Fox News Reporter For U.N. Job, But Two Dozen 'Journalists' Joined Obama Team

Anadolu Agency / Contributor / Getty Images
Back in 2013, president Barack Obama nominated a 42-year-old former journalist for one of the top diplomatic posts in the federal government, ambassador to the United Nations. There was an immediate outcry from the media, which questioned her qualifications.
Just kidding. That never happened. But it is happening now, as President Trump nominates a 48-year-old former journalist to the very same post.
In 2013, Obama nominated Samantha Powers for the U.N. post. Powers had begun her illustrious career as a war correspondent for four years, covering the Yugoslav Wars for U.S. News & World Report and the Boston Globe, among other publications. She went on to become director of a human rights center at Harvard, but also continued as a columnist for Time magazine.
She joined the Obama campaign in 2008, but was quickly forced to resign after she called Hillary Clinton a "monster" who was "stooping to anything" to win.
But after Powers' nomination to the U.N. position, powerful Republicans like Sen. John McCain and Sen. Lindsey Graham, along with independent Sen. Joseph Lieberman, backed her, and she was confirmed by a Senate vote of 87-10. She served in the position for more than three years and was succeeded by Trump's appointment, Nikki Haley, who is stepping down at the end of this year.
Fast forward to today. Trump has nominated as Haley's replacement Heather Nauert, a former Fox News journalist. Nauert worked in journalism for 20 years but also served as a government affairs consultant on issues including health insurance, Social Security and taxes and was a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
In April 2017, the United States Department of State announced that Nauert would become the new department's spokesman. This past March, she was named Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. And on Thursday, Trump nominated her for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
CNN immediately called into doubt Nauert's skills. In a section of a news piece titled "Qualifications questioned," CNN cited a "senior diplomat" who said, "This is extraordinary. Especially in the footsteps of the former ambassadors: Madeleine Albright, Susan Rice."
The Washington Post quoted career presidential aide David Gergen, who said, "In terms of what we normally look for at the United Nations, her résumé is very thin."
But that's not all the MSM was moaning about. Many liberal news outlets criticized the Trump administration for employing former journalists, including a few from Fox News.
In another Washington Post piece headlined "The Foxification of the Trump White House, visualized," the liberal paper complained about the "remarkable bit of interplay between the administration and the network that is also the only one Trump has praised regularly since taking office ..."
Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, who served under George W. Bush, noted the irony. "More than 26 reporters went into the Obama Administration. I guess that was fine with the press back then, but not now," he wrote on Twitter.
We couldn't find the 26 Fleischer cited, but a 2013 story in The Atlantic listed 24 journalists who joined the Obama administration. Some took public communications roles, like former Time writer Jay Carney, who served as Obama's second spokesman. But others joined on for policy roles, like:
  • Boston Globe online politics editor Glen Johnson, who worked for Secretary of State John Kerry as a senior adviser.
  • Rosa Brooks, an author who was a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, became a counselor to Michele Flournoy, the undersecretary of defense for policy.
  • CNN national security correspondent Jim Sciutto worked as chief of staff for U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke.
Erik Wemple, a Washington Post reporter, responded to Fleischer's tweet: "All right: Were they from the same cable-news network -- the same cable-news network that the president watches for hours and hours each day, and gets bogus information from?"
But Fleischer got the last zing in, responding: "No, silly. Barack Obama had his pick of reporters from every network, newspaper and magazine. They almost all fell for him, and those who didn’t join his Administration loved him and gave him soft coverage for 8 years."