Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label SEIU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEIU. Show all posts

Thursday, February 16, 2017

UAW, The Latest Dhimmi Group

BREAKING: UAW Backs

 Muslim Brotherhood Ally

26 4 1  40
Keith Ellison is a friend of the Muslim Brotherhood. He's a defender 
of the Nation of Islam, and a fan of reparations for slavery, 9/11
 conspiracies, and racial segregation.

And he just received an endorsement from one of the nation's
The United Automobile Workers plans to endorse Rep. Keith Ellison

in the race for chair of the Democratic National Committee, according

to two sources with knowledge of the union’s plans.

The UAW is one of the remaining major labor groups that hasn't

weighed in on the race for DNC chair. Ellison has already picked up

support from other major labor organizations including the AFL-CIO,

AFSCME President Lee Saunders, and the International Brotherhood

of Electrical Workers.

It's unclear when the endorsement will happen. When asked about

the endorsement, UAW senior communications adviser Brian Rothenberg

said, “When we’re ready to put out the release we will.”

Meanwhile, the Service Employees International Union will not issue

a formal endorsement, but will urge SEIU DNC members and others

to vote for Ellison, according to a source familiar with the matter.
Do the UAW's rank and file members know about Ellison's history? Or 
is this another case of unions backing an extremist whose values are
 at odds with those of its members?

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/breaking-uaw-backs-muslim-brotherhood-ally#4h00MWKhh2hJoVhv.99

Friday, September 19, 2014

Hillary's Path To The Democratic Convention May Be Impeded By Warren. Catalist May Help Warren Win.

Report: Liberals Bash Hillary, Back Warren in Secret Emails

Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 09:29 PM
By Todd Beamon
Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
Liberal activists are slamming Hillary Clinton in a members-only group on Google, with some calling for Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren to run for the White House in 2016 to teach the former secretary of State and mainstream Democrats a lesson.

"The establishment Dems need to be punished, and the best way for that to happen is for Warren to beat Hillary in the primary on a populist message," Carl Gibson, a progressive activist and writer for Occupy.com, wrote in an email obtained by The Hill.

Warren, 65, who is in her first term, has repeatedly said that she would not seek the presidency in 2016. Clinton, 66, who is seen as the likely Democratic nominee, has said that she will decide early next year on whether to run.

The Hill said it reviewed "hundreds of emails" from a the "Gamechanger Salon," a private, members only forum through which nearly 1,500 progressive activists, journalists, and strategists discuss issues and develop messaging efforts.

The group is run by Billy Wimsatt, founder of the progressive League of Young Voters, according to MediaTrackers.org, which first reported on the Gamechanger Salon earlier this year.

Its members include prominent Democrats, executives of such powerful unions as the SEIU and AFL-CIO, and officials and members of such organizations as Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

The president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Nancy Keenan, is a member — as well as journalists who work for such liberal news organizations as The Nation magazine and The Huffington Post.

New members to the group have to be sponsored by a current member, both the Hill and MediaTrackers report.

According to the Hill, the emails it reviewed from June 2013 through July show a clear dissatisfaction with Clinton.

"[A] Clinton presidency undos [sic] all our progress and returns the financial interests to even more prominence than they currently have," Melissa Byrne, an activist with the Occupy Wall Street movement, said in a November 2013 email.

The newspaper talked with a half-dozen Gamechanger Salon members this week, learning that the frustration with Clinton has only grown since it last read some of the emails.

"There’s good reason to believe the discontent remains the same," said Neil Sroka, spokesman for Democracy for America.

Generally speaking, the emails slam Clinton as "too much of a hawk, too cozy with Wall Street" — and that she "hasn’t spoken out enough on climate change, and will be subject to personal questions and criticisms," the Hill reports.

But group members seem to be most upset with Clinton's vote for the Iraq War in 2002 when she was a New York senator.

She has since said that her vote was a mistake.

"The more progressives I talk to, the more people tell me that they’ll never forgive her for voting for the Iraq War ... and won’t even vote for her in the general," Ryan Clayton, a progressive commentator and strategist, said in a July 2013 email.

Charles Lenchner, executive director of the progressive group Organizing 2.0, told the Hill that Clinton — and anyone else who backed the war — was "tainted."

"And personally, I would like to see a Democratic Party where folks who enabled George Bush to drag the country into a permanent war are punished at the ballot box," Lenchner said in an interview.

A Clinton spokesman declined to comment to the Hill.

Related Stories:
© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Saturday, December 7, 2013

When Workers Get $15 Per Hour, How Much Will Your Big Mac Cost? Why Should They Be Limited To $15, Why Not $345?

Drive-Thru Economics

December 5, 2013 by  
 5470 31
 
 5 6046
Drive-Thru Economics
UPI FILE
The Service Employees International Union and others believe fast food workers should earn $15 per hour.

It’s almost as if the left simply refuses to comprehend it, despite its simplicity. Americans will not pay more for the borderline-toxic trimmings and unidentifiable animal parts that we call “fast food.”
Liberals can kick up all the dust they want over the fast food industry’s average hourly wage of 8 bucks or so. They can demand every burger-flipper, fry-cooker and order-screwer-upper in the solar system be paid $45 per hour with full medical and dental benefits, two weeks paid vacation and stock options. They can even picket outside the Taco Bell from now until the Tex-Mex-ish chain offers a free-range chicken burrito with organically grown heirloom tomatoes and handmade guacamole. But they’re never going to convince anyone that a “McRib” should cost $14. Therefore, they will never convince anyone that assembling a McRib from whatever its actual contents might be is anything other than an entry-level job.
Yet our liberal friends from such notable organizations as the Service Employees International Union have retaken their places on picket lines in front of thousands of fast food emporia across the fruited plain. Their demands haven’t changed, nor has their chosen method of shrieking at the top of their lungs. They want the government to mandate the fast food industry pay a minimum wage of $15 per hour. Should they win this battle — and their access to virtually unlimited resources from spigots like George Soros and even the Barack Obama Administration (your tax dollars at work) suggests they’ll certainly continue the fight — their victory will result in either fewer fast food workers or no fast food workers.
Raising entry-level salaries in the fast food industry will do more than just jack up the cost of the No. 2 Super Combo with a Coke. It will force a reciprocal wave of cost increases throughout the industry. If the lettuce guy gets $15 per hour, then the assistant day manager will immediately demand an increase in her salary. After all, she worked for her promotion. Of course, once she gets a raise, the day manager will be in the boss’s office and so on, up through the chain until the company is left choosing between raising prices, lowering labor costs or simply shuttering operations. Since profit margins for the average McDonald’s franchise hover somewhere between 6 percent and 8 percent, something’s gotta give; and I doubt it will be the percentage of actual chicken in Chicken McNuggets. It’s worth noting that more than 50 percent of the labor force of McDonald’s is drawn from minority groups, meaning big labor’s assault on Big Mac will send a disproportionate number of minorities to the curb.
Liberals operate under the mistaken presumption that if a business makes a profit, then its workers must suffer. In fact, the only causal relationship that exists between a fast food company’s profits and its workers’ wages is a positive one. Without fiscal successes, McDonald’s doesn’t expand to become the largest company in the industry and one of the most ubiquitous icons on the planet. Without that expansion, there are 14,000 or so empty commercial spaces providing taxable income to the Federal, State and local — not to mention global — economies. Without that expansion, there are 14,000 or so fewer entities providing jobs. Including the corporate staffers of McDonald’s, that’s just shy of a half-million more Americans cast onto the government dole — a dole that would supported by a half-million fewer Americans. And the 1.3 million McDonald’s employees outside the United States would be thrilled to learn the American big labor movement turned their jobs into collateral damage.
But there is good news for the fast food industry’s millions upon millions of customers. Should big labor manage to force a 100 percent increase in the minimum wage, thousands of fast food employees will be replaced by hundreds of automated order-takers and -makers, dramatically increasing the odds that you’ll actually get what you ordered.