Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Sandy Fitzgerald. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sandy Fitzgerald. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Would A Freedom Party Make it?

Before you laugh, don't underestimate Sarah Palin, she might be just the person to create a new party. Yup, it would be a major event, a very hard job, and some would say, impossible task. But if there is one person on the scene right now, it would be the former Alaska governor.


So what do you think? Will Palin start a new party?

Conservative Tom


Palin: I'm Open to Starting New Political Party

Monday, 01 Jul 2013 10:23 AM
By Sandy Fitzgerald


Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says she's willing to start a new political party to create a home for conservatives who feel they're being ignored by the GOP.

The one-time vice presidential nominee was answering Twitter questions on Fox News Saturday, when a user asked if she and Fox conservative commentator Mark Levin would be willing to build a "Freedom Party if [the] GOP continues to ignore conservatives."



Palin replied, "I love the name of that party: the Freedom Party," she replied. "And if the GOP continues to back away from the planks in our platform, from the principles that built this party of Lincoln and Reagan, then yeah."



Many conservatives with "that libertarian streak" feel neglected, said Palin, and creating a new home for them might be a good idea.

She said she expects people to start asking what is wrong with being independent.

"I think there will be a lot of us who start saying, 'GOP, if you abandon us, we have nowhere else to go except to become more independent and not enlisted in one or the other private majority parties that rule in our nation, either a Democrat or a Republican,'" Palin said.

David Axelrod, a former senior adviser for President Barack Obama, mocked Palin's words Monday, reports The Washington Times.

"With Palin threatening to bolt [the] party, I bet a bunch of [Republicans] are humming that old Dan Hicks tune: 'How Can I Miss You When You Won’t Go Away?'" Axelrod tweeted.

But for now, Palin is remaining connected to mainstream conservative media, as she signed back on as a contributor for Fox and the Fox Business Network in June, after parting ways with the network in January.

Her strong words about the GOP are fine with Fox executives. Fox News Chief Roger Ailes said in a statement that he has had several conversations with the tea party favorite in recent weeks about rejoining the network, and he has "great confidence in her and am pleased that she will once again add her commentary to our programming. I hope she continues to speak her mind."



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Sarah-Palin-Freedom-Party/2013/07/01/id/512770?s=al&promo_code=14052-1#ixzz2XpYIdHrT
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Will Benghazi End Obama Reign



We are not as positive as former Governor Huckabee that Benghazi will be the demise of the Obama Administration. He might be impeached by the House, however, to get a conviction in the Senate is highly improbable as long as the Democrats control the majority in that body. Nothing would please us more, however, with the current makeup, we suspect the chances of a guilty verdict is about 25%.

Conservative Tom

Huckabee: Benghazi Scandal Will Cost Obama His Presidency

Image: Huckabee: Benghazi Scandal Will Cost Obama His Presidency
Tuesday, 07 May 2013 11:25 AM
By Sandy Fitzgerald and Kenneth Hanner
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Influential Republicans are setting their sights on toppling the Obama administration as evidence of a cover-up over the assault on the Benghazi consulate gets stronger.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is now openly talking about impeachment, saying he does not believe Barack Obama will survive the remaining 3½ years of his presidency.

“When a president lies to the American people and is part of a cover-up, he cannot continue to govern,” Huckabee said on his radio show Monday.

“As the facts come out, I think we're going to see something startling. And before it's over, I don't think this president will finish his term unless somehow they can delay it in Congress past the next 3½ years.”

Huckabee isn't alone in his belief that Obama could be toppled. The pressure is growing just as Congressional hearings on the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that left four Americans dead are due to start on Wednesday.

Rep. Darrell Issa of California, who will chair those hearings as chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said he intends to make the president "come clean."

"The administration has made a claim that for classified reasons they changed the story," Issa told Fox News' Sean Hannity. "We believe right now that may be the biggest lie of all, and we intend on making the president come clean as to, quote, 'What the classified reasons are that would justify lying to the American people.'"

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina added to the onslaught against the administration's handling of the assault.

"Political manipulation is rampant here," said Graham in an interview with Fox News' Greta Van Susteren. "The dam's about to break on Benghazi."

And former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton told Newsmax's Steve Malzberg on Monday that he too believes the growing scandal could lead to the "unraveling" of the Obama administration.

"This could be a hinge point for the Obama administration. It's that serious for them,'' said Bolton, who served under President George W. Bush.

Many in the GOP believe the cover-up began as the attack on the Benghazi consulate was going on. The U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stephens, was killed along with information management officer Sean Smith and security staff Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

Obama's U.N. ambassador Susan Rice insisted from the start the attack was not a coordinated act of terror, but a protest that escalated. The administration was later forced to backtrack, saying Rice made her statement before all the information was known.

But that failed to stem the tide and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — the Democratic front-runner for presidency in 2016 — has now been accused of failing to send in troops to rescue Stephens and other staff.

Gregory Hicks, who became the top diplomat in Libya after Stevens was killed, claims troops who were ready to come to the rescue were told to stand down.

Lawyers representing Hicks and others now claim the administration is trying to intimidate them against speaking out in Issa's committee's hearings.

Huckabee said that as more reports come out about the deadly attack, and the truth emerges, Obama and his administration "will have lost the right to govern."

"This is not minor," he said. "It wasn't minor when Richard Nixon lied to the American people and worked with those in his administration to cover up what really happened in Watergate. But, I remind you — as bad as Watergate was, because it broke the trust between the president and the people — no one died.

"This is more serious because four Americans did, in fact, die."

Huckabee maintains that what happened in Benghazi is not political, but "goes all the way to the heart of the integrity of the United States government."

Huckabee said Obama's best chance of avoiding impeachment would come if Democrats seize control of the House and keep their control of the Senate after the next round of Congressional elections in November 2014.

"They won't let it happen; not because they're protecting just the president, they're trying to protect their entire political party," he said. "If they try to protect the president and their party, and do so at the expense of the truth, their president and their party will go down."

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


  Breaking News from Newsmax.comhttp://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/huckabee-benghazi-obama-presidency/2013/05/07/id/503192?s=al&promo_code=1367B-1#ixzz2SdpGPoY6
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Benghazi Hearings Could Be Explosive


3 State Dept. 'Whistleblowers' To Testify at Benghazi Hearing

Saturday, 04 May 2013 12:10 PM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Three career State Department officials – who describe themselves as Benghazi "whistleblowers" — will testify at Wednesday's widely anticipated congressional hearing,Fox News reported, releasing the names that have been kept a well-guarded secret.

The three men who will testify about the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks, in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed, are:
  • Gregory N. Hicks, a foreign service officer and former Deputy Chief of Mission/Chargé d’Affairs in Libya
  • Former Marine Mark I. Thompson, acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism for the State Department.
  • Diplomatic security officer Eric Nordstrom, former Regional Security Officer in Libya. He was the top security officer in the country in the months leading up to the attacks.
They will appear before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, chaired by California Republican Darrell Issa.

Related: Hiring Brigade for Benghazi a 'National Security Failure'
“I applaud these individuals for answering our call to testify in front of the Committee," Issa said in the statement releasing the names of the witnesses.

"They have critical information about what occurred before, during, and after the Benghazi terrorist attacks that differs on key points from what Administration officials – including those on the Accountability Review Board – have portrayed,” said Issa. “Our committee has been contacted by numerous other individuals who have direct knowledge of the Benghazi terrorist attack, but are not yet prepared to testify.

"In many cases their principal reticence of appearing in public is their concern of retaliation at the hands of their respective employers. While we may yet add additional witnesses, this panel will certainly answer some questions and leave us with many new ones.”

Nordstrom testified before the committee in October 2012, just a month after the assault, telling lawmakers about the series of requests he, Stevens and others made seeking enhanced security at the Benghazi consulate.

The State Department refused most of their requests, leading Nordstrom to angrily declare "for me, the Taliban is on the inside of the [State Department] building."

Newsmax Exclusive: US Hired al-Qaida-Linked Group to Defend Benghazi Mission
Hicks and Thompson have not yet spoken publicly about the attacks. Hicks, a veteran Foreign Service officer, has been stationed in Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen in the past, and received one of Stevens' earliest phone calls during the attack, Fox news reported.

Thompson is an expert who advises "senior leadership on operational counterterrorism matters, and ensures that the United States can rapidly respond to global terrorism crises," according to the State Department website.

Joe diGenova, a former U.S. attorney, and wife Victoria Toensing, a former chief counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee told Fox this week they are representing, pro bono, two career State Department "whistleblowers" who believe their accounts about Benghazi were disregarded by the Accountability Review board, convened by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Further, they claimed their clients – whose names they did not discuss in the interview – have faced threats from some superior officers.

“I'm not talking generally, I'm talking specifically about Benghazi — that people have been threatened,” Toensing said. “And not just the State Department; people have been threatened at the CIA….It's frightening….They're taking career people and making them well aware that their careers will be over.”© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/benghazi-whistleblowers-hearing/2013/05/04/id/502782?s=al&promo_code=13604-1#ixzz2SMfINCnL
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Friday, April 26, 2013

Boston Bomber Questionning Halted Due To Miranda


Although we believe that we should get everything that we can from Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, one cannot forget that he is an American CITIZEN.  That designation gives him certain rights that his older brother would not have been eligible since he was a foreign national and not a citizen. 


We strongly disagree with Giuliani and Mike Rogers, regardless of the depravity of what these guys did, the younger brother has the rights guaranteed all Americans whether they were born here or naturalized.  Sure we would like to hang him by his fingers until he screamed but we don't do that in this country especially to fellow citizens.


We must protect fellow citizens Constitutionally guaranteed rights regardless how hateful their actions are.  To not protect their rights, means our own rights are might be forfeited in the future.  

Both of these gentlemen are great people and inspirations to us, however, on this matter, we disagree. Our rights are too valuable and must be protected at all cost.

Conservative Tom

Giuliani: Judge's Abrupt Halt to Terror Questioning 'Mind-Boggling'

Friday, 26 Apr 2013 11:49 AM
By Kenneth Hanner and Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Republican outrage is rising over the decision to read teenage Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev his Miranda rights just as he was beginning to open up about the blast that killed three and injured about 270 people.

Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said it was “ridiculous” that a judge stopped the questioning while the 19-year-old was talking to FBI agents.

And House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers called the decision to intervene a “God-awful policy.”

Lawmakers are demanding to know why Tsarnaev, who has confessed to being involved in the planting of two bombs near the Boston Marathon finish line, was read his Miranda rights in the middle of his interrogation.

“That’s just mind-boggling,” Giuliani said in an interview with Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren.

“This guy is kind of telling you about how he’s coming to New York and do a bombing, a judge walks in and we cut off the questioning?” Giuliani said. “What are we, crazy?”

Tsarnaev had been under interrogation for about 16 hours in his hospital room before a magistrate and representatives from the U.S. Attorney’s Office entered the room and read him his Miranda rights. He then stopped talking, according to sources briefed on the interrogation.

Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, said rules need to be loosened for law-enforcement officials who are conducting terror probes.

“One of the FBI agents said he thought it would be illegal to keep the guy on the list. Of course, there’d be nothing illegal about it,” said Giuliani, who was mayor of the Big Apple  at the time of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

“Some of the explanations that I’m getting make me very nervous that the FBI is erring on the side of caution, when I want them to err on the side of safety.”

Giuliani also criticized the administration of Massachusetts Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick for refusing to release records of welfare payments the Boston terror bombings may have received, saying it was essential information in determining how they financed their activities.

“What possible privacy interest do you have in that?” he asked. “They either got welfare or they didn’t get welfare. And that would also be important to how were they financed.

“I’d like to know how much they were getting in welfare. A trip to Russia for six months is a pretty darn expensive proposition. I’ve wondered, was anybody financing them?”

While federal law-enforcement officials can subpoena the records for their ongoing investigation, Giuliani said the only reason Massachusetts is keeping the records private is to avoid embarrassment.

“I can’t figure out what the heck the privacy interest is, except maybe an embarrassment that by mistake, Massachusetts was giving welfare to potential terrorists,” he said.

Meanwhile, Rogers said he will be demanding answers from Attorney General Eric Holder about the decision to Mirandize the baby-face bomb suspect.

“We can’t have, in a case like this, the judiciary deciding, because it’s on TV and it might look bad for them … that they were going to somehow intercede in this,” the Michigan Republican told MSNBC.

“It’s confusing, it is horrible, [a] God-awful policy, and dangerous to the greater community,” said Rogers. “We have got to get to the bottom of this, and we’ve got to fix it right now.”

He said the Justice Department has “a lot of explaining to do.”

According to the Department of Justice, prosecutors, the federal defender, a court reporter, the U.S. Marshal Service, and the hospital all coordinated in having Tsarnaev read his rights.

Before that happened, the University of Massachusetts sophomore had reportedly told authorities that his brother, Tamerlan, 26, had only recently recruited him to be part of a plot to detonate pressure-cooker bombs at the marathon's finish line and that they planned to go on to detonate more bombs in New York City.

Tamerlan was killed in a police shootout on Friday last week.

Lawmakers have long disagreed over whether to read terrorism suspects their rights after they are captured in the United States. Some prominent Republican lawmakers have called for Tsarnaev to be considered an enemy combatant, but the Obama administration opted to try him in civilian criminal court proceedings instead.

The Supreme Court created a public safety exemption to the Miranda warning almost 30 years ago, meaning suspects can be interrogated if the public could be in danger, but Rogers said he still wants to know why the FBI's interrogation was interrupted.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia said he favors asking a suspect questions about who else may have been involved in a terror plot, whether there are future attacks in the works, or if other weapons have been discovered.

Most courts will not admit statements made before suspects are officially made aware of their rights, and if cases are to be tried in a civilian, rather than military court, a suspect must be read the warning.

Even some Democrats have questioned the decision. Rep. Adam Schiff of California said, “I would have thought the public safety exception would have allowed more time for the questioning of the suspect prior to the arraignment and/or advising of rights.”

The issue has come up in other cases, including in 2010, when Holder ordered “underwear bomber” Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to be read his rights. He eventually was sentenced to life in prison.

Tsarnaev has been moved to a prison hospital at Fort Devens, Mass., the U.S. Marshals Service said Friday. He continues to recover from numerous gunshot wounds. The federal prison where he is housed specializes in inmates who need long-term medical or mental health care, according to the Bureau of Prisons.

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/giuliani-judge-miranda-rights/2013/04/26/id/501559?s=al&promo_code=134B0-1#ixzz2RbZQdZB1
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Monday, April 15, 2013

Where Is America's Missile Defense

Once again it appears as if Ronald Reagan was correct. The US needs a missile defense against idiots that run third world cesspools like North Korea and Iran. Normal sane people like those in Russia during the Cold War understood the destruction a nuclear bomb would make. Not so for these idiots. Isn't it time we built  a network to knock down these errant rockets and their devastating payloads?

Yet, where is Obama? Sitting on his hands. We are sure that if the time comes when a nuke does hit an American city, he will blame the Republicans for not budgeting it, for the military for not knocking it down and the CIA for not letting him know there was a problem. He, of course, is blameless! What a failure of a President!

Conservative Tom

Ben Stein: Obama Failing on Missile Defense

Sunday, 14 Apr 2013 06:14 PM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |


Commentator Ben Stein wants to know why the United States isn't “working, hell for leather,” to create an Iron Dome system that will protect the United States from nuclear attack.

“Ronald Reagan was totally right when he said he wanted a ballistic missile defense system comprehensive enough to protect the U.S. from ICBM attacks,” he said in a CBS News commentary this morning. “His liberal opponents scoffed and called it "Star Wars," and said it couldn't possibly work. They blocked money for its deployment on any scale. Nevertheless, in tests, it worked well.”

He noted that Israel and the United States deployed the “Iron Dome” defense system to defend Israel from Hamas rocket attacks.

Iron Dome works well in shooting down short-range rockets within seconds, and “so very possibly, Star Wars could work too,” he said.

North Korea, “run by a mentally ill person,” will soon be able to hit the United States with nuclear bombs, Stein said, and Iran, “a nation run by a group of insanely angry persons” will soon be able to hit Europe, Israel and eventually America.

“Why, if the challenge is real enough for Mr. Obama to beef up the limited defense systems we have, don't we spend every dime we can beg, borrow, or steal to defend ourselves against nuclear rocket attacks from people who hate us?” Stein said. “What more urgent priority do we have?

The system could be expensive, but “so what if it's expensive? What is Portland worth? What's L.A. worth? What's Seattle worth?”
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ben-stein-missile-defense/2013/04/14/id/499378?s=al&promo_code=13249-1#ixzz2QXbYiVG0
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!