Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Star Ledger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star Ledger. Show all posts

Saturday, February 1, 2014

If Dershowitz Is Right, Christie Is In Big Trouble. Will He Be Forced To Resign Or Face Criminal Charges?

Dershowitz: 'The Dominoes Are Beginning to Fall' for Christie

Friday, 31 Jan 2014 09:02 PM
By Todd Beamon
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Friday "the dominoes are beginning to fall" in the spiraling bridge-gate scandal engulfing New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and said "I think he hasn't told the whole truth and is in trouble."

"The U.S. attorney should now subpoena the documents that were referred to in the letter and should sit down and talk to the governor," the former Harvard Law School professor said in an exclusive interview.

"The governor so far has not spoken to law enforcement nor has he spoken under oath, so legally, he can lie all he wants," Dershowitz said. "He's not obliged to tell the truth. Politically, he may be obliged to tell the truth, but legally he's not.

"But once he sits down and talks to law enforcement, he has to tell the truth, otherwise he can be prosecuted for a crime.

"They have to lock in his testimony as soon as possible, before he knows what all the dominoes are, and he has to give those answers," he added. "That what the U.S. attorney's office should do now. The sooner the better."

Dershowitz's comments came after the lawyer for a former Christie appointee for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey disclosed that his client had evidence that proved the Republican governor knew early on about the lane closures that snarled traffic on the George Washington Bridge for four days last September.

Alan Zegas, who represents David Wildstein, said in a letter that was published by The New York Times and The Star-Ledger that it was "the Christie administration's order" to close the lanes at the town of Fort Lee.

Wildstein resigned in December because of the scandal.

The two-page letter added that "evidence exists as well tying Mr. Christie to having knowledge of the lane closures, during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the governor stated publicly in a two-hour press conference."

Zegas wrote to the Port Authority asking it to reconsider its decision not to pay Wildstein's legal bills, according to The Star-Ledger. Wildstein ordered the abrupt and unannounced closure of commuter lanes leading to the bridge, causing massive gridlock.

In a statement late Friday, Christie's office said he told the truth about what he knew about the politically motivated lane closings, and disputed the allegations in Wildstein's letter.

"Mr. Wildstein's lawyer confirms what the governor has said all along: He had absolutely no prior knowledge of the lane closures before they happened and whatever Mr. Wildstein's motivations were for closing them to begin with," the statement said.

"As the governor said in a Dec. 13 press conference, he only first learned lanes were closed when it was reported by the press and, as he said in his Jan. 9 press conference, had no indication that this was anything other than a traffic study until he read otherwise the morning of Jan. 8.

"The governor denies Mr. Wildstein's lawyer's other assertions," the statement said.
The U.S. attorney in New Jersey, Paul Fishman, said earlier this month that he would open an investigation into the bridge lane closings.

Fishman must give immunity to Wildstein — "and he's going to have to testify and tell the whole truth and be asked hard questions," Dershowitz said.

But regardless, Christie is in trouble, he told Newsmax, and "if he is smart, and he is smart, he's talking to somebody behind the scenes — a very good criminal lawyer.

"He hasn't disclosed that. He doesn't have to. He can keep that a secret."

More broadly, the former law professor said that Friday's disclosures illustrated a personal rift between Wildstein and the governor over the bridge scandal.

The men have known each other since high school, according to news reports, but Christie made negative comments about Wildstein at the Dec. 13 press conference.

"Gov. Christie really made his stupid mistake by treating Wildstein the way he did," Dershowitz said. "He provoked him. Christie showed his total ineptness when he said what he said about Wildstein at the press conference."

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Thursday, January 9, 2014

BBC View Of Christie's BridgeGate Problem

Chris Christie's bridge-sized headache


Chris Christie speaks at a conference in Idaho in July 2011.New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's presidential ambitions could be at risk

Related Stories

It looks like a bridge scandal is putting New Jersey Governor Chris Christie in some rough water.
On Wednesday, emails revealed that one of the governor's senior staff members ordered a political appointee to close lanes of a major bridge to New York City in order to punish the mayor of a New Jersey town who refused to endorse the governor in his re-election bid.
It's the kind of obvious alleged abuse of power that would resonate with most Americans, and which could prove very damaging if it can be directly tied to Mr Christie. There is hardly anyone who doesn't know what it's like to be stuck in traffic. The claim that ordinary citizens were forced to endure additional inconveniences because a New Jersey politician (or his staff) wanted to flex political muscle is fairly inflammatory.

“Start Quote

It's almost the definition of an abuse of power”
Joshua MarshallTalkingPointsMemo
The Bergen County Record's website, NorthJersey.com, reports that traffic caused by the lane closures delayed emergency medical responders from reaching four patients - one of whom, a 91-year-old woman, later died at a hospital.
Mr Christie has been widely tipped as a potential frontrunner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, so the latest developments in this story quickly brought out commentators on the left and the right. The outrage (and glee) from liberals was as obvious as it was predictable.
"So petty. So vindictive. So Christie," writes the Washington Post's Jonathan Capehart.
He notes that Christie cancelled the one public event on his schedule today, writing: "Like all bullies, he's running away from a real fight. And it shows that he realizes that his political standing at home and nationally is in danger."
TalkingPointsMemo's Joshua Marshall thinks Mr Christie's political future has been seriously damaged:
It's not bribery or killing someone or a high crime. But it's vindictive and quite possibly illegal. It's almost the definition of an abuse of power. It won't sink Christie. At least not the evidence so far. But it will hang around his neck forever as that bad thing Christie's operation did that supposedly (depending on whether you're a friend or enemy) tells you who the real Chris Christie is about.
The editors of the Newark, NJ, Star Ledger write that no matter how things turn out at this point, the emails prove that Mr Christie bears responsibility for the scandal.
"If it turns out he did know, he is obviously lying and unfit for office - let alone a 2016 presidential run," they write. "And even if he did not, his officials are liars. If Christie can't control them, how can we trust him as a potential future leader of our country?"

“Start Quote

I have had Congressmen, Governors, and the staffers of Congressmen and Governors tell me horror stories about dealing with Christie's people”
Erick EricksonRedState blog
Although Mr Christie has been considered a Republican rising star, having just been re-elected by a large margin, he has often been perceived as a moderate and never has been fully embraced by the conservative base. This lack of support was reflected in the response in many conservative quarters.
"We like to judge politicians based on their policy positions, and that's the main way they should be judged," writes Paul Mirengoff on Power Line blog. "But policy positions change based on which way the wind is blowing and the nature of the office being sought. Temperament and personality don't change so easily. And they also matter."
The National Review Online's Jim Geraghty writes:
If the allegations are true, the lane closures would represent a petty and obnoxious abuse of authority, one worrisome in a potential president. Some may erroneously insist this is a display of toughness or hard-nosed political power, but the form of the vindictiveness punished Fort Lee commuters of all political stripes, not just the mayor. The state isn't given the authority to shut down road lanes as a tool for enforcing political loyalty, and it's rather shocking that this point needs to be made.
RedState blog's Erick Erickson says that he has been ambivalent about Mr Christie's potential presidential candidacy and thinks the governor wouldn't have gotten far even without the bridge controversy. The problem is that he and his staff operate "as divas".
"I have had Congressmen, Governors, and the staffers of Congressmen and Governors tell me horror stories about dealing with Christie's people," he writes. "All of them seem to dread it."
This story, like many scandals before it, may eventually blow over. Politicians in the past certainly have made it through worse. The governor came out on Wednesday afternoon with a firm statement calling the actions of his staff "completely inappropriate and unsanctioned".
If Mr Christie is to survive the coming days with his political future intact, however, he will have to move quickly and skilfully. As early commentary on this story indicates, he has enemies on the left and the right who are sharpening their knives.