Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Weekly Standard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weekly Standard. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2019

This Article Crossed The Line

Boston Globe Takes Down Piece Suggesting Waiters Should ‘Tamper’ with Trump Officials’ Food

Grow with Clover POS
Clover
Learn More
Skip ad
Volume 10%
This video will resume in 31 seconds
 
 Print
The Boston Globe took down an opinion piece from its website in which the writer called for waiters to “tamper” with the food of Trump administration officials.
The article, titled “Keep Kirstjen Nielsen unemployed and eating Grubhub over her kitchen sink,” was written by Luke O’Neil — a former waiter and current freelance writer, who has contributed to multiple publications, including The Globe, The Guardian, The New York Times, and others, according to Fox News.
The original version of the story — which was first edited for “tone” and later unpublished — began: “One of the biggest regrets of my life is not pissing in Bill Kristol’s salmon.”

“I was waiting on the disgraced neoconservative pundit and chief Iraq War cheerleader about 10 years ago at a restaurant in Cambridge and to my eternal dismay, some combination of professionalism and pusillanimity prevented me from appropriately seasoning his entrĂ©e. A ramekin of blood on the side might have been the better option, come to think of it, he always did seem really thirsty for the stuff.”
Kristol is the founder and former editor-in-chief of the now defunct conservative publication The Weekly Standard.
TRENDING: Trump Warns ‘Open Border’ Dems, May Bus Illegal Immigrants to Sanctuary Cities
O’Neil concluded the original version of his story by encouraging wait staff to “tamper” with Trump officials’ food, according to The Daily Wire.
“As for the waiters out there, I’m not saying you should tamper with anyone’s food, as that could get you into trouble. You might lose your serving job. But you’d be serving America. And you won’t have any regrets years later,” the columnist wrote.

After receiving significant blowback, The Globe edited the story, explaining with a note at the top, “A version of this column as originally published did not meet Globe standards and has been changed. The Globe regrets the previous tone of the piece.”

Do you think The Globe was wrong to publish this story?

97% (1231 Votes)
3% (32 Votes)
The lede paragraph no longer mentioned “pissing in” Kristol’s salmon, but instead read that one of the biggest regrets in O’Neil’s life was “serving Bill Kristol salmon and not telling the neoconservative pundit and chief Iraq War cheerleader what I really thought about him.”
Likewise, the final paragraph no longer suggested tampering with Trump officials’ food, but instead exhorted, “And when they show up in our restaurants, you have my permission, as an official member of the mainstream media, to tell them where to go and what they can do with themselves when they arrive there, but, you know, said in a more specific and traditional Boston colloquialism.”

Shirley Leung — interim Globe editorial page editor, who presumably had at least some role in approving O’Neil’s Op-Ed — tweeted a link to the original version on her personal Twitter account.
RELATED: Washington Post Pushes Federal Court To Throw Out Covington Defamation Lawsuit
Leung is also a news contributor for Boston Public Radio station WGBH.
The link for O’Neil’s story no longer works.
One reason may be that the piece potentially crossed the line from protected free speech to advocating harm against government officials.
Michele Blood, writing for The Federalist, noted freedom of speech is not an absolute right.
“The concern with O’Neil’s piece goes beyond his arguable incitement to possible threats against a sitting governmental official,” she explained. “The article as a whole, sandwiched by the personal introductory anecdote and the ending word-of-advice, suggests that it is entirely appropriate — even laudable — to express your political opinions through violence.”

O’Neil responded to the controversy on Twitter with a non-apology apology Wednesday evening before eventually locking his account.
“I would like to apologize for my commentary regarding the warden of the baby jail,” he tweeted in an apparent reference to Nielsen.
Mediaite included a screen shot of another O’Neil tweet, in which he wrote, “In the infamously left wing media you can write a op-eds advocating for turning muslim weddings into bloodbaths forever but it you say human right violators or war criminals deserve a pube on their salad its over the line.”

Thursday, November 24, 2016

If The Dems Pick Ellison, They Are Absolutely Nuts!




DNC chair candidate cancels NYT interview to avoid questions about this person

 




DNC chair candidate cancels NYT interview to avoid questions about this person
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite





Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim to be elected to Congress and a candidate to be the next chair of the Democratic National Committee, reportedly pulled the plug on a New York Times interview when he learned the newspaper planned to ask him about his connection to the extremely controversial Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan.
During his first congressional run in 2006, questions arose about Ellison’s ties to Farrakhan. As outlined by The Weekly Standard, during his third year of law school at the University of Minnesota from 1989 to 1990, Ellison — using the pen name “Keith Hakim” — wrote very complimentary columns about the radical Muslim leader. He then went on to work with the Nation of Islam for 18 months.
Now Ellison, apparently concerned about the impact his connections to Farrakhan could have on his chances of becoming the next DNC chief, is not at all interested in talking about his past, according to the Times:
Aides to Mr. Ellison were going to make him available for a telephone interview, but then declined when informed that he would be asked about his past comments on Mr. Farrakhan. They emailed a list of his links to the Jewish community and a statement that said, “Democrats need an organizer who will energize the grass-roots across this country to build the party from the bottom up.”
While many are concerned about President-elect Donald Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon and his past comments about Jews and minorities, Farrakhan has gone on the record as a rabid anti-Semite, according to the Anti-Defemation League, blaming Jews and Israel for 9/11 and saying they “don’t fear America because they control it from within.”
Not to mention Farrakhan frequently calls white people “devils.”
In addition to Ellison, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and South Carolina Democratic Party chairman Jaime Harrison are interested in the post at the DNC.

If The Dems Pick Ellison, They Are Absolutely Nuts!



DNC chair candidate cancels NYT interview to avoid questions about this person

 



DNC chair candidate cancels NYT interview to avoid questions about this person
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite




Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim to be elected to Congress and a candidate to be the next chair of the Democratic National Committee, reportedly pulled the plug on a New York Times interview when he learned the newspaper planned to ask him about his connection to the extremely controversial Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan.
During his first congressional run in 2006, questions arose about Ellison’s ties to Farrakhan. As outlined by The Weekly Standard, during his third year of law school at the University of Minnesota from 1989 to 1990, Ellison — using the pen name “Keith Hakim” — wrote very complimentary columns about the radical Muslim leader. He then went on to work with the Nation of Islam for 18 months.
Now Ellison, apparently concerned about the impact his connections to Farrakhan could have on his chances of becoming the next DNC chief, is not at all interested in talking about his past, according to the Times:
Aides to Mr. Ellison were going to make him available for a telephone interview, but then declined when informed that he would be asked about his past comments on Mr. Farrakhan. They emailed a list of his links to the Jewish community and a statement that said, “Democrats need an organizer who will energize the grass-roots across this country to build the party from the bottom up.”
While many are concerned about President-elect Donald Trump’s chief strategist Steve Bannon and his past comments about Jews and minorities, Farrakhan has gone on the record as a rabid anti-Semite, according to the Anti-Defemation League, blaming Jews and Israel for 9/11 and saying they “don’t fear America because they control it from within.”
Not to mention Farrakhan frequently calls white people “devils.”
In addition to Ellison, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and South Carolina Democratic Party chairman Jaime Harrison are interested in the post at the DNC.

Monday, July 11, 2016

The Anti-Trump Forces Score Their First Victory




Judge Sides With Anti-Trump Movement & This May Change Everything

2 2 0  7
Special: Warren Buffett FURIOUS After This Secret Brain Pill Gets Exposed
image: http://engine.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/i.gif?e=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&s=gMFnqbMoB6xPraImHaMSv2q8HQM


The Weekly Standard reported big news that could dramatically change the
 dynamics of the RNC Convention next week in Cleveland:
A GOP delegate has won his lawsuit challenging a Virginia law that would

have forced him to vote for Donald Trump on the first ballot at the Republican

National Convention next week.

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Virginia statute, which carries a

sentence of up to 12 months of jailtime or a $2,500 fine or both, "is an

unconstitutional burden on his First Amendment rights of free political

speech and political association."

The case was brought by Virginia delegate Carroll Boston Correll, who

"pleads under oath that he 'believes that Donald Trump is unfit to serve

as President of the United States and that voting for Donald Trump' on

the first ballot at the 2016 Republican National Convention, as required

by Section 545(D), 'would therefore violate Correll's conscience.'"

The federal court's ruling arrived on the heels of anti-Trump delegate

Kendal Unruh's announcementthat there are enough delegates on

the RNC's Rules Committee to force the entire convention to vote on

whether or not delegates should be free to vote their conscience on

the first ballot in the GOP nomination.
Could this be enough for the #NeverTrump movement to strip Donald
 Trump of the nomination?

Stay tuned. American Action News will cover all the developments.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/judge-sides-with-anti-trump-movement-this-may-change-everything#vFCbUIIowX7ztwlX.99