Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label border. Show all posts
Showing posts with label border. Show all posts

Monday, March 16, 2020

The Border Must Be Blocked

The Left Is Perfectly Fine With Any Coronavirus Measure, Except This

Scott Morefield
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2020 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Left Is Perfectly Fine With Any Coronavirus Measure, Except This
Source: AP Photo/Evan Vucci
  
In the ultimate manifestation of extreme ‘cancel’ culture meets the domino effect, Americans have decided to cancel seemingly everything, everywhere, because of the coronavirus epidemic. My gut (and hope) says this is all cartoonishly overblown and we’ll look back on some of these extreme measures and laugh, but the rest of the world seems to have decided that it’s the next bubonic plague, or something, and is taking action accordingly.
The purported logic is to slow the virus’ spread so medical facilities aren’t overwhelmed, and there is soundness to it. Even with a more than slight percentage chance of older and sicker folks who contract it dying and/or needing hospitalization, the death toll could be staggering if the spread isn’t contained.
To be fair, I’m not blaming left or right for this brand-new kind of ‘cancel culture.’ Both seem to be equally dedicated to doing whatever it takes to stop this virus, but while the right is doing it reluctantly, there is almost a sense of glee from the left, whose motives are obviously by definition suspect. The politicians are all saying politics shouldn’t be a factor, of course, but isn’t politics always a factor? After all, didn’t we hear speeches last week by Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders telling us this crisis is larger than politics, before proceeding to bash the president? Indeed, nothing whatsoever about this is good for an incumbent president the left hates and hopes to remove in November. And sadly, it seems of late that the political left are the only ones who benefit from every economically detrimental action we take in our efforts to stop the spread of this virus.
First they criticized Trump for banning travel to and from China in early February when most had no idea the extent of what was coming. It was “racist” and “xenophobic,” so they told us. Then, once the virus arrived, they criticized him for supposedly not doing enough. Sure, there are a few things he could and should have said differently along the way, but let’s face it, if President Trump walked right into a research facility tomorrow, donned a lab coat and proceeded to find a cure for coronavirus himself on live television, the left would still find fault. So yeah, there’s little doubt that leftists, particularly the media and politicians, are manipulating this crisis to maximum effect in order to hurt President Trump’s chances of getting reelected. And why wouldn’t they? Isn’t that right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook, to never let a crisis go to waste?
So here’s a thought. Why can’t the right also use that particular play from the Alinsky playbook, except for good instead of evil? Why can’t the right use this crisis to fight for the things we believe in, things we know will make this country a better place for everyone? Sure, of late it seems like everything has favored the Trump-haters, but all the while there’s been one thing that’s becoming increasingly clear to more and more people as we fight the Chinese coronavirus pandemic - the fact that borders matter.
To put the left’s complete idiocy in perspective, you won’t find anyone on that side of the political persuasion disagreeing with any sort of social distancing proposals, right down to declaring martial law and banning all nonessential people movement on pain of felony. They’re perfectly happy to shut down the entire U.S. economy in the name of fighting coronavirus for as long as necessary, with absolutely no regard for the people THAT action will hurt. However, there IS one thing no true leftist would ever agree to do, under any circumstances, no matter how dangerous the costs could be for not doing so - close the U.S. / Mexico border. Evidence of their staggering insanity on the issue was captured last week during a Fox News town hall with socialist Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders when Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked, “If you had to, would you close down the borders?”
“No,” Sanders said after a short pause during which he likely thought ‘I know that’s not true, but the political correctness of 2020 that I must adhere to in order to maintain my base requires that I give this insane answer.’ 
“What we don’t want to do, we have a president who has promulgated xenophobic, anti-immigrant sentiment from before he was elected,” he continued, because “X is racist” has become the leftist retort to everything, especially if they know deep down that they’re making a ridiculous point. “What we need to do is have the scientists take a hard look at what we need to do,” Sanders claimed.
Come on, Bernie. You know the scientists could all sign a petition tomorrow begging us to close the border and you still wouldn’t take that position. Sanders went on to say that self-quarantines and “not having public assemblies” were an option before laughingly neglecting to offer any sort of rationale why closing our border would be a bad move.
Even Mexico, which has spent the entire Trump administration lecturing us about how nothing good can come from the United States controlling its border, has all of a sudden changed its tune now that thousands of Americans have come down with coronavirus. So has Guatemala, of all countries. They’re perfectly happy to send any of their citizens packing, but are saying a quick “no, thank you” to the idea of any Americans coming there.
In truth, notions like borders and travel bans tug at the “permanent Democratic majority” dreamed of by leftists who depend on an endless influx of poor foreigners to maintain and grow their power. Thus, anything that could result in fewer future Democratic voters on our shores is automatically judged as bad and labeled ‘racist’ to keep a well-meaning but often-ignorant public in line.
Consider early February, when President Trump first issued his ban on travel to and from China. Former Vice President Joe Biden was critical at the time and has maintained his position to this day, claiming just last week that a “wall will not stop the coronavirus,” nor will “banning all travel from Europe, or any other part of the world.” He then called for a “plan to combat it,” as if Trump is sitting there twiddling his thumbs.
Uh, there is a plan, Sleepy Joe, but instead of providing support you’ve got to find fault. It’s hard to beat what Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw said in response: “Walls quite literally stop a virus. It’s kind of the whole point of a quarantine, for instance.”
I’ll end with what Dr. Anthony Fauci told Face the Nation yesterday: “So what we've got to do is a couple of things, and we're doing it. One is preventing new infections from coming in, hence the travel restriction. And the other is doing containment and mitigation within the country.”
By logic, one would seem to work hand in hand with the other. But when has logic ever gotten in the way of the left’s endless quest for power? They’re perfectly fine with tanking the economy, but closing the borders is a bridge too far, coronavirus victims be damned.

Thursday, April 5, 2018

Democrats Never Miss A Chance To Fight Trump Even At The Expense Of Their Constituents

Rebellion: Governor Revolts, Refuses to Order Nat’l Guard to Border

Rebellion: Governor Revolts, Refuses to Order Nat’l Guard to Border
 
 Print
Oregon Democratic Gov. Kate Brown announced on Wednesday that she would not comply with President Donald Trump’s request to send National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border if asked to do so.
Trump issued a proclamation that same day calling on the defense secretary to “request use of National Guard personnel” to secure the border.
The president cited the flow of illicit drugs, MS-13 gang activity and illegal immigration as his reasons for the move.
“Our American way of life hinges on our ability as a Nation to adequately and effectively enforce our laws and protect our borders,” the memo stated. “A key and undeniable attribute of a sovereign nation is the ability to control who and what enters its territory.”
“The situation at the border has now reached a point of crisis,” it added. “The lawlessness that continues at our southern border is fundamentally incompatible with the safety, security, and sovereignty of the American people. My Administration has no choice but to act.”

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Facebook
 
Protecting her citizens from drugs and gangs apparently are not good enough reasons for Brown. The governor’s defiance came despite a report released last summer finding Oregon has the fourth highest teenage drug abuse rate and the sixth worst drug problem overall in the country!
“We have a massive problem,” Mark Kruger, captain of Portland Police Bureau’s drugs and vice division, toldKATU. The 23 year-veteran added, “We’re seizing larger quantities of methamphetamine and heroin and cocaine in Portland, Oregon than we have historically ever seized.”
Brown responded directly to Trump with a pair of tweets indicating she has no intention of complying with his request, though there is no indication she’s even been asked.
“If @realDonaldTrump asks me to deploy Oregon Guard troops to the Mexico border, I’ll say no. As Commander of Oregon’s Guard, I’m deeply troubled by Trump’s plan to militarize our border,” she wrote.
“There’s been no outreach by the President or federal officials, and I have no intention of allowing Oregon’s guard troops to be used to distract from his troubles in Washington,” Brown said.
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen told reporters at the White House on Wednesday the details of the deployment are still being worked out, but made clear the administration was not federalizing the troops and governors retained control over their troops.
She gave no inkling non-border states would be asked to send soldiers to support the mission, so it looks like Brown is just grandstanding against Trump. She is up for re-election in 2018, after all.

Do you think a showdown is coming?

   
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
RELATED: Watch: Woman Actually Asks Ted Cruz for DNA Test to Prove He’s Human
“I have spoken with all of the (border state) governors, and will be continuing these conversations,” Nielsen said. “It is very encouraging that some of them have already taken dramatic steps in their own states to confront illegal immigration and to strengthen that border security to prevent the criminal activity and the inflow of drugs.”
Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott tweeted that National Guard troops from his state are already deployed to the border.
GOP Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey supports the move.
New Mexico Republican Gov. Susana Martinez stated that she “appreciates the administration’s efforts to bring states to the table as they go about taking steps to better secure our border.”
Meanwhile, California Democrat Gov. Jerry Brown is so far non-committal, the Sacramento Bee reported. Given that he has taken many opportunities to rail against Trump and tout California’s status as a sanctuary state, one can predict compliance may not be forthcoming.
NPR reported all the recent presidents including Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan have ordered National Guard troops to the border, citing drug smuggling and illegal immigration.
Oregon’s Gov. Brown, like her California counterpart, has been an outspoken critic of Trump.
Maybe Brown needs to care more about her charge of protecting her citizens and less about trying to score political points against Trump, if she truly wants to lead her state.
What do you think?