When You Lose Moral Grounding, These Things Happen! No Morals, No Good/Bad Decisions Can Only Lead To Disaster

GIRL, 16, FACES 25 YEARS FOR STRANGLING MOLESTER

Mentally ill teen 'said they got in a fight and he was hitting her'

Published: 13 hours ago

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     100

Jessica Burlew, 16

A 16-year-old mentally ill girl – who is accused of killing her 43-year-old statutory rapist – now faces up to 25 years in prison for second-degree murder.

Jessica Burlew of Glendale, Az., reportedly suffers from schizophrenia and autism. She has been charged as an adult for the murder of Jason Ash, 43, a man described by almost every media outlet that has reported on the case as her “boyfriend,” even though the age of sexual consent in Arizona is 18.

Burlew, who is accused of strangling Ash with an electrical cord on Jan. 28, said the two had been engaged in a sexual game of autoerotic asphyxiation, a method of increasing sexual excitement by cutting off oxygen to the brain.

Jessica Burlew (Photo: Facebook)

According to court documents, Burlew claimed Ash didn’t say the “safety word,” and she told police she began cutting him with razor blades in an attempt to wake him up since she believed he had passed out.

Once Burlew realized Ash wasn’t waking up, she said, she continued “cutting” him to “alleviate her stress from the situation.”

Burlew’s mother, Tracey Woodside – who left the apartment and claims to have gone to the store while her daughter and Ash were inside – said the teen has a history of cutting herself “as a release,” according to the court documents.

Woodside called 9-1-1 after she returned to her apartment and found Ash not breathing. She tried to revive Ash, but police say Burlew fled the scene.

“They were playing a sex game,” Woodside told the dispatcher. “She said they got in a fight and he was hitting her.”

Glendale police confirmed Burlew has a mental illness and a history of running away.

Just five days before his death, Ash posted the following lyrics on his Facebook page: “I like to dissect girls … did you know I’m utterly insane?”

The same day, he also wrote, “Your throat, I take grasp, can you feel the pain?”

Reacting to media claims that Burlew “consented” to sex with a man 27 years her senior, Ben Johnson of Life Site News, wrote:

Jessica Burlew (Photo: Facebook)

“The sexual revolution has presented itself as the great emancipator of women, freeing them from the shackles of outdated misogynistic double-standards that prevented the fairer sex from engaging in as much unbridled, shameless promiscuity as men. But insisting that all women, and sometimes children, are equally capable of exercising their ‘sexual rights’ may get a young girl 25 years in prison. …

“Immediately [after the incident], salacious headlines proclaimed that the teenage girl ‘strangled her boyfriend during sex,’ often reporting Ash’s age as a minor detail in a kinky drama.”

Johnson blasted the “new world of the sexual liberation,” arguing, “Under the stuffy, Victorian morality of the 1980s, Ash would have been recognized as a sexual offender, case closed.”

In his Oct. 11, 2013, column, “Left’s new crusade: Adult-kid sex,” WND columnist Matt Barber wrote, “Tolerating ‘intergenerational romance’ for ‘minor-attracted’ adults is all the rage these days. … There is categorically a movement to normalize pedophilia. I’ve witnessed it firsthand and, despite ‘progressive’ protestations to the contrary, the ‘pedophile rights’ movement is inexorably linked to the so-called ‘gay rights’ movement.”

Barber added, “[D]uring Obama’s first term, the official website for the Department of Health and Human Services linked to ‘parenting tips’ that referenced children as ‘sexual beings’ and suggested that they should experiment with homosexuality and masturbation.”

As part of that “new world of sexual liberation” Johnson and Barber described, even the nation’s largest abortion provider has trained teens how to practice torture sex.

Life News reported in June that Planned Parenthood was caught “teaching teenagers about S&M-based sexual relationships and concepts such as gagging, whipping and asphyxiation.”

In videos released by Live Action, Planned Parenthood counselors can be seen reassuring undercover investigators posing as teenagers, “If it’s consensual, it’s OK. It’s totally OK.”

Live Action President Lila Rose said, “It’s not a matter of ‘don’t judge,’ but rather explicit endorsement of violent and harmful sexual practices to boys and girls as young as 15 years old.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/girl-16-faces-25-years-for-strangling-molester/#T51hFjHW1eOKKJpr.99

Obama Has Not Learned That He Is Not King. He Goes After Conservative Groups Again.

PULLING NO PUNCHES

OBAMA MOVES TO WEAPONIZE IRS

Exclusive: Matt Barber sounds alarm over attempt to double down on conservative groups

Published: 2 days ago

 MATT BARBER About | Email | Archive

  Subscribe to feed

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     364

In 2010 millions of American tea-party constitutionalists, to include the GOP’s Christian base, united in a remarkable grass-roots effort to rein in our unbridled federal government and return it to its expressly limited constitutional confines. As a result, an unprecedented number of counter-constitutionalist lawmakers (read: liberal Democrats) were swept from office.

The Obama administration wasn’t going to take this lying down. Whether it was by tacit approval or via direct order remains largely immaterial. The president quickly and unlawfully politicized the Internal Revenue Service, using it as a weapon against his political enemies. In an explosive scandal that continues to grow, the Obama IRS was caught – smoking gun in hand – intentionally targeting conservative and Christian organizations and individuals for harassment, intimidation and, ultimately, for political destruction.

Not only has Obama faced zero accountability for these arguably impeachable offenses, he has since doubled down. With jaw-dropping gall, his administration has now moved to officially weaponize the IRS against conservatives once and for all.

Despite the furor over the IRS assault on conservative groups leading up to the 2012 elections, this man – a despotic radical who’s turned our constitutional republic into one of the banana variety – has quietly released a proposed set of new IRS regulations that, if implemented, will immediately, unlawfully and permanently muzzle conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofit organizations and their individual employees. (The 501(c)(4) designation refers to the IRS code section under which social welfare organizations are regulated).

The new regulations would unconstitutionally compel a 90-day blackout period during election years in which conservative 501(c)(4) organizations – such as tea-party, pro-life and pro-family groups – would be banned from mentioning the name of any candidate for office, or even the name of any political party.

Here’s the kicker: As you may have guessed, liberal lobbying groups like labor unions and trade associations are deliberately exempted. And based on its partisan track record, don’t expect this president’s IRS to lift a finger to scrutinize liberal 501(c)(4)s. Over at a Obama’s “Organizing for America,” the left-wing political propaganda will, no doubt, flow unabated.

These Orwellian regulations will prohibit conservative 501(c)(4) organizations from using words like “oppose,” “vote,” or “defeat.” Their timing, prior to a pivotal election, is no coincidence and provides yet another example of Obama’s using the IRS for “progressive” political gain.

Although these restrictions only apply to 501(c)(4) organizations for now, under a straightforward reading, they will also clearly apply to 501(c)(3) organizations in the near future.

Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel Action – one of the many conservative organizations to be silenced – commented on the breaking scandal: “One of the core liberties in our constitutional republic is the right to dissent,” he said. “But desperate to force his radical agenda on the American people, Barack Obama and his chosen political tool, the IRS, are now trying to selectively abridge this right, effectively silencing their political adversaries.”

Specifically, here’s what the proposed regulations would do to conservative groups and their leaders:

• Prohibit using words like “oppose,” “vote,” “support,” “defeat,” and “reject.”
• Prohibit mentioning, on its website or on any communication (email, letter, etc.) that would reach 500 people or more, the name of a candidate for office, 30 days before a primary election and 60 days before a general election.
• Prohibit mentioning the name of a political party, 30 days before a primary election and 60 days before a general election, if that party has a candidate running for office.
• Prohibit voter registration drives or conducting a non-partisan “get-out-the-vote drive.”
• Prohibit creating or distributing voter guides outlining how incumbents voted on particular bills.
• Prohibit hosting candidates for office at any event, including debates and charitable fundraisers, 30 days before a primary election or 60 days before the general election, if the candidate is part of the event’s program.
• Restrict employees of such organizations from volunteering for campaigns.
• Prohibit distributing any materials prepared on behalf a candidate for office.
• Restrict the ability of officers and leaders of such organizations to publicly speak about incumbents, legislation, and/or voting records.
• Restrict the ability of officers and leaders of such organizations to make public statements regarding the nomination of judges.
• Create a 90-day blackout period, on an election year, that restricts the speech of 501(c)(4) organizations.
• Declare political activity as contrary to the promotion of social welfare.
• Protect labor unions and trade associations by exempting them from the proposed regulations.

Continued Mat Staver: “We would be restricted in promoting conservative values, such as protecting our constitutional rights against these very kind of Executive Branch infringements.

“We would even be prohibited from criticizing the federal bureaucracy. If this new set of regulations goes into effect, Liberty Counsel Action – all conservative 501(c)(4)s for that matter – will be forbidden to ‘oppose’ or ‘support’ anything in the political arena and we’ll be prohibited from conducting our ‘get-out-the vote’ campaigns or issuing our popular voter guides.

“Further,” continue Staver, “individual employees of conservative groups will be banned from speaking or messaging on incumbents, legislation, and/or voting records – or speaking on the nominations of judges or political nominees being considered by the Senate. This also includes taking on state and local politicians.”

“These are the same tactics used by the Obama administration to illegally target conservative 501(c)(4) organizations during the last two election cycles, only now the strategy has been greatly intensified and formalized.

“You may recall that former President Richard Nixon was famously forced to resign for improperly using Executive Branch assets for political purposes.

“Rather than preparing a solid defense to confront these serious allegations, a brazen Barack Obama has chosen instead to reconfigure his illegal tactics into a set of ‘regulations’ on nonprofits, opening the door for an IRS crackdown on select organizations,” Staver concluded.

Indeed, once caught abusing his executive authority to target the very U.S. citizens he’s sworn to serve, even a nominally honorable man would immediately reverse course, resign and accept the consequences of his illegal actions.

But we’re not talking about an honorable man.

We’re talking about Barack Hussein Obama.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/obama-moves-to-weaponize-irs/#Uj1IbRi7DZzup0kl.99