Pocahantas Is Another Political Fraud

Senator Warren's Dirty Secret Revealed

• 08/24/2018 
• Source: TTN
 
• by: TTN Staff

138 34 7  225

image: https://structurecms-staging-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/
trumptrain/media/picture/5a84/9866/6970/2d2f/5730/2100/content_
512px-Elizabeth_Warren_2016_DNC.jpg?1518639205

**Stop Trump from Being Impeached**

Democrat presidential hopeful Senator Elizabeth Warren recently released her tax returns. The returns show that she has a relationship with a natural gas company her Dem voters might not be happy about.

According to The Daily Caller:

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren received royalty payments in 2017 from one of the largest natural gas producers in the nation, according to tax return documents her campaign released Wednesday.

Warren received $121 in royalty payments in 2017 from Chesapeake Operating, LLC, a subsidiary company of Chesapeake Energy, according to her tax return. Chesapeake is the second-largest natural gas producer in the nation behind Exxon Mobil and is the most active driller of new gas wells in the country.

Chesapeake has been hit with over $17 million in fines relating to environmental and leasing violations since 2007, the largest being a $3.2 million fine levied in 2013 after one of its subsidiary companies dumped unauthorized materials into dozens of streams and wetlands in West Virginia.

The natural gas royalties Warren collected in 2017 is negligible in comparison to her estimated net worth of between $3.7 and $10 million, however, the existence of the Democrat’s financial ties with Chesapeake is curious considering her aggressive stance against the energy industry. 

Senator Warren does not like the energy industry unless of course, it is making her a lot of money.

Read more at http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/senator-warren-s-dirty-secret-revealed#qiyBkm1XaGBq1GwT.99

Trump Is Right Pointing Out The German-Russian Oil Deal While Germany Pays A Pittance To NATO

Massachusetts Buys Natural Gas From Russia When Their Climate Change Projections Fail

Warren Trashes Trump on Russia, But Look What the Russians Sent Her State

BY JOE SAUNDERS 
MARCH 14, 2018 AT 11:51AM

 Share on Facebook Tweet Email Print

The irony would be painful, if it wasn’t so predictable.

The deep blue Democrats of Elizabeth Warren’s home state of Massachusetts like to brag about how committed they are to “clean” energy, but when reality sets in, the Bay State will do what it has to in order to deal with frigid winters.

Even if that means turning to Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

According to The Daily Caller News Foundation, the brutal cold of December and January this winter forced Massachusetts to import natural gas through a Russian company, Novatek, that was sanctioned by the Obama administration in 2014 in retaliation for Putin’s invasion and annexation of the Crimean Peninsula.

The purchase was legal because the sanctions on Novatek didn’t cover liquefied natural gas, according to the The Boston Globe.

DAILY

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Breaking news updates and daily headlines from a news source you can trust.

Facebook

 

Email

But the more important question is why it was even necessary. Why is New England importing natural gas from Russia when the United States is in the middle of an energy production revolution?

It’s because the environmentalist wing of the Democratic Party, dominant in the Bay State, has decided that pipelines are a threat to the commonwealth.

As The DCNF reported:

“Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey concluded in 2016 that ‘no new pipelines are needed’ and that we ‘can maintain electric reliability through 2030 even without additional new natural gas pipelines.’”

Are Democrats liars and fools when it comes to Russia and "climate change"?

Yes No

Continue with Facebook

-- or --

 

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Well, Mother Nature didn’t decide to cooperate. And that meant Massachusetts residents weren’t nearly as ready as they should have been for winter this year.

The irony, of course, is that Massachusetts isn’t just Democrat — it’s left-wing fringe Democrat. Besides Warren, who loves to trash Trump on Russia, the state’s other senator is Ed Markey, a Democrat so dumb he once read Dr. Seuss on the Senate floor to make a point about “climate change.”

That was in March 2014. By March 2015, Boston had recorded its worst month of winter snowfall since 1872, when they started keeping track of such things. (Global warming didn’t make an appearance.)

Clearly, Democrats don’t know which way the wind blows when it comes to weather — even in a place where it’s as predictable as the sunrise.

RELATED: New Details on Steele Dossier Source Emerge

So, the same political party, in the same wintery state, decided it doesn’t need any stinking pipelines to transport natural gas. And the result?

The state needed to import natural gas from a country Democrats have been yakking about for more than a year, accusing it of stealing the election from Hillary Clinton and her divine right to rule her fellow Americans.

Will that get them to admit, finally, that they’re wrong about their war on coal and other fossil fuels? Will it stop their endless hosannas for solar and wind energy?

It will be a cold day down under before that happens. (And that doesn’t mean Australia.)

For liars like Elizabeth Warren and fools like Ed Markey, the only path forward is the one that cuts off cheap, reliable fossil fuels. It’s the same path forces their constituents to either do without or turn to their own country’s major rival to meet their basic needs.

It really would be painful, if it wasn’t so predictable.

What does this tell you about Democrat priorities?

More On Pipelines. Where Are They And What Do They Carry?

• lines Work?
• Where Are Pipelines Located?
• Are Pipelines
  Safe?
• How Can You Help
  With Safety?
• The History
  of Pipelines

• How Can You Identify Pipelines?
• What If Pipelines Cross Private Land?
• Natural Gas Pipelines Map

• Home
• Where Are Pipelines Located?

Where Are Liquids

 Pipelines Located?

Source: American Energy Mapping (AEM) 2013

• CRUDE
• NGL
• REFINED
• CO₂

The map above shows major crude oil, refined products and
 highly volatile liquids pipelines in the U.S.

Pipelines exist almost everywhere. Natural gas is delivered
 directly to homes in relatively small diameter distribution
 lines buried under the street and even your own yard. Larger
 cross-country transmission pipelines delivering gasoline, home
 heating oil, or moving crude oil or natural gas are actually
 easier to find.

Nearly the entire mainline pipe is buried, but other pipeline
 components such as pump stations are above ground. Some
 lines are as short as a mile, while others may extend
 1,000 miles or more.

Although a large number of pipeline systems cove
r distances similar to these, not all petroleum markets
 are as distant from the point of supply as others. Some
pipelines start from ports, such as San Diego or San
 Francisco and serve inland areas in California and the
 southwestern U.S. region. Each region of the country
 has some unique aspects. Very few pipelines actually
 cross the highest parts of the Rocky Mountains since the
distances are long and the population centers small. But
smaller refineries and regional pipelines serve these areas
as well.

The United States has the largest network of energy
 pipelines in the world, with more than 2.4 million miles of pipe.

The network of crude oil pipelines in the U.S. is extensive.
There are approximately 72,000 miles of crude oil lines
 in the U.S. that connect regional markets.

Pipeline companies keep in touch with local emergency
 responders along pipeline rights-of-way and work with,
 and sometimes even train with fire departments or
 hazardous materials units.

One useful source of pipeline location information is the
 National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS). The NPMS
shows pipelines at the county by county scale.
Government officials and emergency response officials
have access to information at a more detailed scale.