Sybaritic West Surrenders to Islamists
Omar Mateen did not choose the Pulse gay nightclub because it had few security guards or because it was an easy target. He could have targeted a supermarket or a school. No, Mateen chose Pulse because it is a nightclub, where he slaughtered 49 "infidels" and wounded 53 more.
Before murdering 2,977 people, the leader of the 9/11 terrorists, Mohammed Atta, along with four of the other hijackers, made several trips to Las Vegas during the summer before the attack, where they were entertained by dancers in nightclubs. Fifteen years later, there was another country, another jihadist cell, another nightclub. Salah Abdeslam was dancing in a nightclub in Brussels with his brother, Brahim, and flirting with a blonde woman. A few months later, Brahim blew himself up in Paris at a concert in the Bataclan Theater. Nightclubs haunt the Islamist imagination with their mix of alcohol, sexual promiscuity, drugs and music. ISIS labelled Paris "the capital of prostitution and obscenity." The London nightclub Tiger Tiger, located between Piccadilly Circus and Leicester Square, was the target of a terror plot in 2007. Last February, the French intelligence service foiled a plot to attack swingers' clubs in Paris. Places such as Les Chandelles, which boasts a "fascinating journey into the heart of sensuality," or the Overside, which offers 250 square meters "dedicated to pleasure." The most spectacular and bloody of these attacks at nightclubs took place in Bali, Indonesia, in 2002: 190 victims, mostly Western tourists, Australian surfers and girls in bikinis. In 2008, Islamists attacked the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, which they used to call "the den of Western decadence." Like the nightclubs, the hotels are ideological targets, places where men and women freely mix and guests can consume alcohol and enjoy music. In July 2005, at least 88 people were killed by terrorists storming Sharm el Sheikh, the tiny Egyptian seaside village transformed by Hosni Mubarak into a global attraction for foreign tourism. In 2015, ISIS butchered British tourists on a beach in Sousse, Tunisia. "We desire death more than you desire life," these Islamist terrorists have been telling us for the last twenty years. It seems they want to achieve a catharsis by spilling blood in our comfortable promiscuity, in the dark of a nightclub.
Senior Hamas official Fathi Hamad, addressing Israel, has said the same thing. Major Nidal Malik Hasan wrote, "We love death more than you love life" before murdering 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas. "We are going to win, because they love life and we love death," said Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, along with Osama bin Laden and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The West, however, should be proud of what the Islamists call "decadence." For the West, "decadence" is synonymous with freedom. The problem is that we postmodern Westerners have sacrificed the very values that ensure our survival and exchanged them for "decadence" -- pleasure. That is why Pim Fortuyn, the openly gay sociology professor and politician murdered in 2002, scorned Islam as a "backward culture" (an animal rights activist killed Fortuyn "to protect Muslims"). Fortuyn fought on behalf of what Islamists would consider "decadence," and he regarded permissiveness as the great glory of Western civilization. The problem is that the West does not desire life. It seems tired of it. You can see that from the post-Orlando reactions which cannot even mention the word "Islam." The West is ready to surrender its love of life to those who want to take it away from them. To quote the French atheist philosopher, Michel Onfray: "Islam manifests what Nietzsche called 'great health': there are young soldiers ready to die for it. What are the values of our civilization? Supermarket and e-commerce, trivial consumerism and egotistical narcissism, vulgar hedonism or scooters for adults?"Pleasure has become sad in the West. In a fever of moralistic prudery, Italy recently veiled naked art at the Capitoline Museums in Rome during the visit of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani. But we obligate other Muslims who arrive in Europe to see far more explicit naked images. From Norway to Denmark, the Scandinavian nations have adopted compulsory sex education for migrants. In the Netherlands, the minister of education decided to impose the teaching of LGBT courses in migrant centers. Germany has published guidelines, leaflets and cartoons to communicate to immigrants the new sexual norms to follow. Is that all we have to offer to these people? "The morally illiterate leaflets European local authorities are distributing to migrants reflect the problems that official EU culture has in the realm of values," wrote sociologist Frank Furedi. Europe already tried to integrate Muslims by offering them wantonness and libertinism. And it failed. Asked what drove them to convert to Islam, many Europeans talked of feeling their lives had been lost and lacking in purpose, citing "lack of morality and sexual permissiveness". The "clash of civilizations" has turned into a war between those who cry, "We will not give up our lifestyle" and those who sing, "We desire death more than you desire life." It is a war between a decadent apathy with moral inertia and Islamist theological turmoil. The Caliphate is much stronger than our disarmed and self-righteous decadence. ISIS's black banner, crying "No God but Allah" -- the banner of the people who kill cartoonists in Paris and gays in Orlando -- is marching over the ruins of our addiction to pleasure. Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.
© 2016 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
|
Our goal is to have intelligent discussion of the topics of the day. We realize everyone has their opinion and they should be allowed to express it in a discussion forum without calling each other names. We learn from discussion and not from name calling or argument.We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. See details
Contact Form
Showing posts with label sex education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex education. Show all posts
Saturday, July 2, 2016
The West Does Not Understand What Drives ISIS And Other Terrorists
Friday, August 8, 2014
Isn't Sex Education A Parents Responsibility? Books Now Too Explicit.
‘Oh My Gosh’: Mom Looking at High School’s Sex Education Book Expressed Shock When Seeing Its ‘Pornographic’ Content
10.6K
SHARES
Parents in a California school district are protesting a sex education book meant for high school freshmen that they think goes too far in the content it covers.
According to KPIX-TV, the book that will be used this fall in the Fremont Unified School District includes topics like masturbation, bondage, orgasms, the use of vibrators and how to buy and use condoms. It includes pictures and diagrams that parents think are too explicit for their teens.
“Your Health Today” will be introduced to high school freshmen in Fremont, California, this fall, but some parents have signed a petition against the book for explicit content. (Image source: KPIX-TV)
“It’s a bit much for me, I’m not comfortable with my child – I mean, wow, that’s, the graphics are extreme – oh my gosh,” parent Latonya Stevenson told KPIX, looking at some of the book. “They are very pornographic. The pictures are very explicit.”
Though more than 1,600 parents have signed a petition against the book, the school board president, Lara Calvert-York, defended it, telling KPIX “[o]ur high-school students today need all the tools they can have to arm themselves to make the best-informed decision.” The news station also pointed out that teachers unanimously agreed upon the book earlier this year.
“Your Health Today” was reviewed and decided upon with input from some parents as well, costing the district $204,600, according to the Oakland Tribune.
These parents expressed shock and said they were uncomfortable with their child being taught some of the content in the book. (Image source: KPIX-TV)
District Superintendent Jim Morris said that the teachers won’t be covering the topic of sex toys in the book and noted that aspects of anatomy are “required to be taught.”
“It’s part of students’ learning about their bodies,” he told KPIX.
Watch the news station’s report about the uproar of some parents and the school district’s response:
While the district doesn’t plan to change its stance on using the book, the creator of the petition pointed out that parents can opt their child out of the class if “the course conflicts with [...] religious training and beliefs.”
Some parents might even go a step further though. The Oakland Tribune reported that Asfia Ahmed, a parent and also an employee of the school district, said she might actually sue if the book is used, arguing that it’s a violation of state law for the course to include information that is not age appropriate.
“[...] I am a very liberal person, and, in spite of that, I still find the book shocking,” Ahmed told the Tribune.
Monday, February 20, 2012
Free Condoms For 12-19 Year Olds
Have a 12 year old that needs a condom? Don't want to take the time to explain the facts of life to your child? Don't fret, there is a website that will help you out. It is http://www.teensource.org/ts/ And if your teen does not want you to know, she/he can get the condoms for free and they come in a plain brown envelope!
And if you need to go further go to the Planned Parenthood site for teens http://www.plannedparenthood.org/info-for-teens/ It is better than many porn sites!
The first site is from California and the second is a national site. Regardless, there is information out there for your child and many will say that is great. Having information is always good, however, we should stop at that point.
When we are encouraging our teens to have sex via free condoms, is that the right message? Should we be encouraging them to obtain condoms "because they are doing it anyway?" Or should we be teaching restraint? We believe the latter is the right message.
Part of growing up is learning to restrain yourself, delaying gratification, and learning to appreciate the value of relationships. In the television show Two and a Half Men, Charlie (Charlie Sheen) never learned to have a relationship as it was one "conquest" after another. Many viewers laughed along with his ways and some might have wanted to be like him. But he was not happy, had nothing to show for his life and like the real Charlie Sheen was facing all sorts of psychological issues. All meaningless.
Do we want our children to become Charlie or Charlie Sheen? I doubt it but with the sexualization of our society, it is very hard. Sex is a basic drive, it must be tamed and controlled. Providing information is one thing but providing at no cost, condoms and other services is wrong.
The two sites we have shown are only examples of our sex crazy nation. Will we ever see a return to normalacy? Rome only did after it fell. Will that also occur here? Please give us your opinion.
Conservative Tom
And if you need to go further go to the Planned Parenthood site for teens http://www.plannedparenthood.org/info-for-teens/ It is better than many porn sites!
The first site is from California and the second is a national site. Regardless, there is information out there for your child and many will say that is great. Having information is always good, however, we should stop at that point.
When we are encouraging our teens to have sex via free condoms, is that the right message? Should we be encouraging them to obtain condoms "because they are doing it anyway?" Or should we be teaching restraint? We believe the latter is the right message.
Part of growing up is learning to restrain yourself, delaying gratification, and learning to appreciate the value of relationships. In the television show Two and a Half Men, Charlie (Charlie Sheen) never learned to have a relationship as it was one "conquest" after another. Many viewers laughed along with his ways and some might have wanted to be like him. But he was not happy, had nothing to show for his life and like the real Charlie Sheen was facing all sorts of psychological issues. All meaningless.
Do we want our children to become Charlie or Charlie Sheen? I doubt it but with the sexualization of our society, it is very hard. Sex is a basic drive, it must be tamed and controlled. Providing information is one thing but providing at no cost, condoms and other services is wrong.
The two sites we have shown are only examples of our sex crazy nation. Will we ever see a return to normalacy? Rome only did after it fell. Will that also occur here? Please give us your opinion.
Conservative Tom
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

