Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Is Saudi Arabia Next To Be Overthrown By Obama


If you read nothing of this piece, read the last few sentences which we repeat below. If the author is correct, this is another reason for no second term for Obama.

This is scary stuff and everyone should be aware of the "dictator's" plans for Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Middle East. If this does occur, Obama will be responsible for completely changing the face of the world. This is something we do not want to see.

Conservative Tom


"In conclusion, 30 billion or 300 billion of “advanced” weapons to the Saudi's won't make a whit of difference for Saudi security. The bald inescapable fact is Obama has marked the Saudi Arabian Regime for absolute destruction either from Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, or both.
To Obama, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is the one last Arab bulwark that stands in the way of erasure of any remnants of the Colonial/Winston Churchill's Middle East “borders.”
For to Obama, those colonial “borders” (including Israel) have divided, crippled, and conquered the Muslim Ummah for long enough, and stand in the way of a United States of Arabia which can become a new modern nuclear-armed Muslim superpower which would hold 70% of the world’s oil reserves.
Hence, for Obama, the shortest distance and quickest plan to achieve a Pan-Muslim Caliphate spanning the entire Middle East is straight through the heart of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Once Saudi Arabia is annihilated, Obama, during his second term, will focus on destroying what Obama believes is the worst “so-called ally” of the United States and Obama’s greatest impediment to his dream of Muslim Nuclear- armed Middle East Caliphate: Israel."

Obama's Next Arab Toppling Target: Saudi Arabia

Mark Langfan - Arutz Sheva,  October 3rd, 2012

On January 20, 1933, the democratically elected Adolf Hitler was installed as Chancellor of the Weimar Republic. It took Hitler two months, the Reichstag “Fire,” and the Enabling Act for Hitler to become the absolute dictator of Third Reich.
On June 30, 2012, the democratically elected Mohamed Morsi was installed as the President of Egypt. It also took Morsi two months, the Sinai attack, and no enabling act for Morsi to become the absolute dictator of Egypt.
President Obama has now completed the toppling of the key US ally Mubarak and Egypt’s entire benign power structure, and has empowered the Muslim Brotherhood to turn Egypt into the “neither enemy, nor ally” Sunni Islamo-Nazi version of Iran.
Also, without the US Congress’ approval, Obama, as the new “Executive Order” US Dictator, is attempting to unconstitutionally finance the nascent Islamo-Nazi Morsi Regime with a billion dollar bonus from the USAID Agency slush fund.
But, Egypt’s topple is just the opening act in Obama’s vision of his Middle East. Now, Obama has trained his sights on toppling the last and only remaining real Arab pillar of American Middle East support: Saudi Arabia.
Confusing??!!??
Well, if we think back to Obama's now infamous 2002 Iraq War speech, the then-Illinois State Senator Obama clearly stated who the now-US President Obama believed were the real enemies of the United States that needed to be destroyed. In 2002, three years before Obama was even a US Senator Obama told the world what Obama really thought of Mubarak of Egypt, and the Kings of Saudi Arabia:
“You want a fight, President Bush? Let's fight to make sure our so-called allies in the Middle East, the Saudis and the Egyptians, stop oppressing their own people, and suppressing dissent, and tolerating corruption and inequality, and mismanaging their economies so that their youth grow up without education, without prospects, without hope, the ready recruits of terrorist cells.”
But, one doesn't need to go so far as the history books to read about Obama's obsessive animus to the current “Custodian of the Two Holy Places.” One need only read Obama's ultimate Middle East Policy speech at the State Department on May 19, 2011:
“The story of this revolution, and the ones that followed, should not have come as a surprise. The nations of the Middle East and North Africa won their independence long ago, but in too many places their people did not. In too many countries, power has been concentrated in the hands of a few. In too many countries, a citizen like that young vendor had nowhere to turn -– no honest judiciary to hear his case; no independent media to give him voice; no credible political party to represent his views; no free and fair election where he could choose his leader….
“Prosperity also requires tearing down walls that stand in the way of progress -– the corruption of elites who steal from their people; the red tape that stops an idea from becoming a business; the patronage that distributes wealth based on tribe or sect.”
Or what Obama said at the September 2012 Democratic Convention:
“The historic change sweeping across the Arab World must be defined not by the iron fist of a dictator or the hate of extremists, but by the
hopes and aspirations of ordinary people who are reaching for the same rights that we celebrate here today.” Sounds good, but for whom?
Or as recently as September 25, 2012 at Obama’s UN GA speech:
“Moreover, there will always be those that reject human progress – dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend upon the status quo; and extremists who fan the flames of hate and division.
“The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources – it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs; workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the men and women that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.”
The “corruption of elites” of the Saudi princes of “the Arab World” must have been scratching their heads to guess where Obama’s “change” would “sweep” next.
With regard to toppling Saudi Arabia, the newly installed Muslim Brotherhood President of Egypt and Obama are on the exact same page and common cause. In President Morsi's New York Times interview, the NY Times reported Morsi as having stated:
“Successive American administrations essentially purchased with American taxpayer money the dislike, if not the hatred, of the peoples of the region,” , by backing dictatorial governments over popular opposition and supporting Israel over the Palestinians.”
Now, now, isn't Saudi Arabia the quintessential remaining “Arab World” “dictatorial government” backed by the United States where “power has been concentrated in the hands of a few,” – “the future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources,” – and where the “patronage distributes wealth based on tribe or sect”?
So Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood Islamo-Nazi Morsi and Obama exactly agree on the next step: “Prosperity also requires tearing down walls” of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia “that stand in the way of progress.” At least this is Obama’s vision of “progress.”
But let us look at Obama’s Middle East videotape at the trajectory of absolute chaos Obama’s programme of “Change” has brought to the Middle East, starting from the first moment he took office.
In three years, Obama has made Carter look like a Middle East “genius.” Instead of setting only one Carter-like-Iran into Islamo-Nazi flames, Obama has engineered about eight Carter-Iran- type Islamo-Nazi wild fires in the Arab Sunni world. Tunisia, Libya, Yemen,
Egypt, are in flames and others like Bahrain that are smoldering white hot ready to explode. (And we not even talking about Africa!) Obama’s Odyssey Dawn did not open a new dawn for Libya, but closed an old night-time of Islamist hate and darkness where “ordinary people” have even less to eat than before Obama’s “prosperity.”
Curiously, the only Middle East revolutions Obama has not helped and perfected are those of countries on the US State Sponsors of Terror list – like Syria and Iran.
So it seems, under the Obama Doctrine, if you are a state-sponsor of terror against the United States and are trying to build a nuclear bomb to annihilate Israel, Obama doesn’t want “ordinary people” to overthrow such “so-called” enemies. However, if you are a Sunni Arab US “so-called ally” not in touch with “ordinary people,” Obama wants to “tear down your walls” and wipe you out.
The Saudis are asking themselves, “With allies like Obama, who needs enemies?”
Make no mistake about it, in Obama's Pan-Muslim Middle East vision, Mubarak's and Egypt's demise equals one Arab “so-called ally” of the US down, and one more Arab “so-called ally” of the US left for Obama to topple. And, that one remaining targeted Arab “so-called ally” of the US is the kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
For while most people listen to Obama's refusal to draw any “red line” for Iran through an “Israeli prism,” think how the Saudis see Obama's “No Iranian Nuke Red Line” policy: Outright catastrophic F-F-F-FEAR.
Israel is relatively far from Iran.
Iran is just across from the Persian Gulf from Saudi Arabia.
And, all of Saudi Arabia's oil is within 100 miles west of the of the Persian Gulf shore line. And, almost all of Saudi Arabia's “ordinary people” Shiites sit on top of these oil rich Saudi-territory Persian Gulf areas and don’t get oil “patronage” specifically “based on tribe or sect.”
While Obama refused to see Netanyahu at the UN, Obama also refused to see King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. Instead, the Saudis sent a lowly Deputy Foreign Minister to say to the UN GA, in essence, that the “UN’s (i.e. Obama’s) inaction in Syria is a “Green Light” for Assad/Iran to massacre 30,000 Sunni Syrians.”
Now, Saudi Arabia sees a Muslim Brotherhood Egypt with control of the Suez Canal to its north with Israel as its only defense, an Iranian Republican Guard Shiite directed genocide of 30,000 Arab Sunnis to the North, and a soon-to-be- nuclear-armed Iran to its east.
The Saudi princes can’t be exactly feeling Obama's love and “ordinary people democracy.”
To make things worse for the Saudis, Obama has totally frozen out any chance the United States would actively arm the Saudi-backed rebels in Syria. So, the Saudis saw Obama aggressively topple their key ally Mubarak of Egypt in a “Cairo minute” because Mubarak sent a couple of over-weight proxies armed with canes on top of camels into Tahrir Square.
But, the Shiite Assad genocidally massacres 30,000 Sunnis Arabs with fuel-air bombs, and Assad gets Obama's total, absolute “protectcia.”
To boot, Obama has passively watched Iraq, Iran’s newest puppet, become a perfect air-bridge for hundreds of Iranian military supply planes to Syria loaded with thousands of Iranian Revolutionary Guards and thousands of tons of munitions to further genocidally murder more Syrian Sunni Muslims.
And Obama's stern reaction?? He has VP Biden call and “strongly protest” the transit of the Iranian planes to the Iraqi “President” Al Maliki.
What's worse, Obama struts like a peacock that “Four years ago, I promised to end the war in Iraq. We did.” The key Obamanized word in Obama’s sentence is “end.” The Saudis and the entire Middle East know that Obama loudly “ended” the Iraq War, but Iran with their murder of thousands of US soldiers with their IEDs quietly won the Iraq War and pocketed Iraq.
This only means the Obama unilaterally retreated under Iranian IEDs and fire, and that Obama single-handedly lost the Iraq War to Iran. Everybody, especially including Obama, knows that Al Maliki and Iraq are now total Iranian puppets, and that Iran now effectively sits on Saudi Arabia's land contiguous northern border.
But, true to form, Obama is dead set to repeat his same catastrophic “Iraqi ending” in Afghanistan, and concomitantly, Iran is ready to “win” the Afghanistan prize Game-Set-Match the same way it did in Iraq.
Obama’s “Grand Bargain” with Iran is “Just don’t make me look too bad when I retreat and you take-over the countries I’m giving you.” But to repeat a key element of this Obama “the Emperor has no clothes on” farce, while 30,000 Sunni Muslims have been genocidally murdered in Syria, and thousands of Iranian al Quds forces direct Assad's Shiite butchers, Obama and the new Islamo-Nazi Muslim Brotherhood Sunni Dictator of Egypt Morsi are, unsurprisingly, on the same exact page on Syria – which turns out to be exactly the opposite page of Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
In Morsi's UN speech, he said his government would continue pushing its plan to end the conflict in Syria in a manner that would give Syrians their choice of a new government “without the foreign military intervention that we all oppose.” What “all” is President Morsi talking about? Saudi Arabia and Qatar have wanted US intervention in the form of the US arming the Syrian rebels months ago.
Add to this tragi-comic Obama “Foreign” Policy, thousands of Iranian Revolutionary Guards are the only “foreign intervention forces” in Syria and are, in effect, now sitting on Jordan's northern border.
So, can you imagine bricks the princes of Saudi Arabia lost when they heard Obama’s “sound and fury, signifying nothing” pronouncement that “We've reasserted our power across the Pacific.”
The Saudi Princes know Obama’s “important” sounding pivot east was only a rhetorical fig leaf to explain Obama’s “impotent” pivot out of the Middle East, and his ceding the entire Middle East to the Islamo-Nazi regimes of Iran and Egypt.
In conclusion, 30 billion or 300 billion of “advanced” weapons to the Saudi's won't make a whit of difference for Saudi security. The bald inescapable fact is Obama has marked the Saudi Arabian Regime for absolute destruction either from Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, or both.
To Obama, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is the one last Arab bulwark that stands in the way of erasure of any remnants of the Colonial/Winston Churchill's Middle East “borders.”
For to Obama, those colonial “borders” (including Israel) have divided, crippled, and conquered the Muslim Ummah for long enough, and stand in the way of a United States of Arabia which can become a new modern nuclear-armed Muslim superpower which would hold 70% of the world’s oil reserves.
Hence, for Obama, the shortest distance and quickest plan to achieve a Pan-Muslim Caliphate spanning the entire Middle East is straight through the heart of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Once Saudi Arabia is annihilated, Obama, during his second term, will focus on destroying what Obama believes is the worst “so-called ally” of the United States and Obama’s greatest impediment to his dream of Muslim Nuclear- armed Middle East Caliphate: Israel.
The writer, has created an original educational 3d Topographic Map System of Israel to facilitate clear understanding of the dangers facing Israel and its water supply. It has been studied by US lawmakers and can be seen atwww.marklangfan.com.


In conclusion, 30 billion or 300 billion of “advanced” weapons to the Saudi's won't make a whit of difference for Saudi security. The bald inescapable fact is Obama has marked the Saudi Arabian Regime for absolute destruction either from Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, or both.
To Obama, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is the one last Arab bulwark that stands in the way of erasure of any remnants of the Colonial/Winston Churchill's Middle East “borders.”
For to Obama, those colonial “borders” (including Israel) have divided, crippled, and conquered the Muslim Ummah for long enough, and stand in the way of a United States of Arabia which can become a new modern nuclear-armed Muslim superpower which would hold 70% of the world’s oil reserves.
Hence, for Obama, the shortest distance and quickest plan to achieve a Pan-Muslim Caliphate spanning the entire Middle East is straight through the heart of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Once Saudi Arabia is annihilated, Obama, during his second term, will focus on destroying what Obama believes is the worst “so-called ally” of the United States and Obama’s greatest impediment to his dream of Muslim Nuclear- armed Middle East Caliphate: Israel.

Iranians Could Wipe Israel in 24 Hours


If someone makes a statement, one must believe what they say. To not do so, is foolhardy. So it goes in the Middle East. The latest blast from Iran is that Israel could be destroyed in 24 hours.  

Anyone who does not listen to the Iranians, has their head deeply stuck in the sand. The world must listen to them and prepare for the unthinkable. Could the Iranians be further along in their nuclear ambitions than has been reported?  Or are they all bluster?

We believe the former.

Conservative Tom


IRANIAN OFFICIAL SAYS COUNTRY NEEDS ONLY ‘24 HOURS AND AN EXCUSE’ TO DESTROY ISRAEL
Iranian Official Says Iran Needs only 24 Hours and an Excuse to Destroy Israel
AP
Words from Tehran about wiping Israel off the map have been launched with abandon in recent weeks. Here’s another one for the lexicon. This time from Hojjat al-Eslam Ali Shirazi, representative for Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to the Qods Force, who not only reiterated the bombastic threat but also added his own twist: that Iran can do the job in just 24 hours.
Specifically, he said all Iran needs is “24 hours and an excuse” to finish off the Jewish state. The Jerusalem Post reports on the interview:
In his first public interview in a year, reported in the Persian-language Jahan News, which is close to the regime, Shirazi said if Israel attacked Iran, the Islamic Republic would be able to turn the conflict into a war of attrition that would lead to Israel’s destruction.
“If such a war does happen, it would not be a long war, and it would benefit the entire Islamic umma [the global community of Muslims]. We have expertise in fighting wars of attrition and Israel cannot fight a war of attrition,” Shirazi said, referring to Iran’s eight-year war of attrition against Iraq.
Iran’s Qods Force is a unit of the Revolutionary Guard that aims to export the Islamic Revolution worldwide, and is reported to be active in the Middle East, Asia and South America. Last year the U.S. accused its operatives of working on a plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington.
The Post reports that Khamenei tapped Shirazi last year as his personal envoy to the Qods Force:
Click here to find out more!
In his interview, Shirazi said that Israel was “close to annihilation” and wanted to attack Iran as an act of desperation.
“Are our enemies intelligent, wise or foolish? They are foolish. It’s also possible that they will do this foolish thing [and attack Iran]. Why do we sometimes say this is the strongest probability? Because today the Israelis are telling us that ‘we are not the Israel of yesterday, we are getting weaker day by day and the Islamic Republic is getting stronger day by day,’” he added.
“Well, when Israel finds itself in danger of extinction, it flails around, and so it’s easy for it to do foolish things and will start a war just to sting Iran.”
Shirazi is in good company. Other statements in just the past week from Iranian leaders in the same spirit as Shirazi’s include:  President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s assertion that Israel has no historical roots in the Middle East and will be “eliminated,” Revolutionary Guard Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari saying a conflict between Iran and Israel will destroy the Jewish state – “the end of the story for them,” and Brigadier General Hossein Salami of the Revolutionary Guard saying a war will provide “a historical opportunity for the Islamic Revolution to wipe them [Israel] off the world’s geographical history.”
All this means we’re unlikely to hear such statements cease anytime soon.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Will Government Solve The Debt Crisis Before It Occurs?

In the following article, former Senator Alan Simpson (R-Wyoming) and one of the Chairmen of the Simpson-Bowles commission that President Obama did not listen to, says that neither candidate or party will address the approaching financial crisis.  He is so right.  We will hear sound bites but not legislation will be instituted. Instead, both parties are going to push the string as long as they can until they have used up every bit of capital they can put their hands on and then the world will come down on their heads.  Only then will they find the guts to make the decisions that should be made now.

To make any moves now to prevent the catastrophe will be politically disastrous as the other party will claim their opposition is attacking poor people. In reality, it will be the poor people who will be hurt worst by a crisis.  According to Simpson,  “Where you talk about the most vulnerable in society and the odd thing is those are the people who are going to be hurt the worst by not doing anything.”

This article is good but also bad. It is frustrating to see that we know what we need to do but due to politics, we cannot or will not.  

Maybe it is time to look for that "cave in the Adirondacks!" However, we would prefer something more nearby to which we could escape when the "s" hits the fan!  Any ideas?

Conservative Tom




Fiscal Commissioner on Debt Crisis: 'You Better Get Yourself a Cave in the Adirondacks'

Former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and Erskine Bowles
Former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and Erskine Bowles, co-chairmen of the president's fiscal commission, at the National Press Clun in Washington, D.C. (AP photo)
(CNSNews.com) – Former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) said Tuesday the first presidential debate will “be the biggest tap dance since Fred Astaire,” and that neither political party in Washington is willing to tackle the country’s fiscal problems.
"You better get yourself a cave in the Adirondacks," he mirthfully said when asked what would happen if politicians did not deal with the debt.
Simpson, who along with Erksine Bowles co-chaired the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, appeared at George Washington University for an event on the upcoming election and the approaching fiscal cliff.
After the event CNSNews.com asked Simpson what he expects to see during the first debate on Wednesday evening.
“I think it’ll be the biggest tap dance since Fred Astaire,” he said. “There’ll be marvelous dancing and oh, it’ll be a joy.”
CNSNews.com then asked, “You mentioned that the debt, that would be one of the big things that you would like to see out of the debate, why do you think there hasn’t been much discussion about this $16 trillion debt in this election?”
“It’s because it’s too sensitive, and when you have people say these people are more interested in the debt than they are human beings, and on and on it goes,” Simpson said.  “Where you talk about the most vulnerable in society and the odd thing is those are the people who are going to be hurt the worst by not doing anything.”
When asked which candidate he believes would better approach the debt and deficit, Simpson said neither President Obama or his challenger Mitt Romney would fix the problems.
“If they were going to deal with it, they would’ve done it,” he said. “I mean there’s a campaign going on, and neither one of them are dealing with it in any positive way that gets anywhere. They both talk about it, and they both like Bowles-Simpson and you get into specifics, and they’re gone.
“So they’re not going to deal with it – it doesn’t matter which candidate or candidate for Senate or the House,” Simpson said. “They’re not going to deal with these issues because they will get eaten by rats, by the AARP [American Association of Retired Persons] and Grover Norquist and the realtors.
"everybody out there got hit. We hit everybody,” he said of his deficit plan. “And that’s the only way this can work, and when you have 105 groups out there to rip up anything you do, then they’re not going to do anything. They’re not going to touch it.”
CNSNews.com then asked, “What happens if nothing is done?”
“Well, you better get yourself a cave in the Adirondacks and learn how to eat watery gruel and herbs and berries,” he said. “No, I tell you what’ll happen. The markets will shoot the hole through us.”
“And at that point – and you don’t want it to happen, and I don’t – and they don’t care about Democrats or Republicans or presidents. They care about their money,” Simpson added. “And they’ll say if any country is stupid enough to borrow $16 trillion bucks in the hole, then we’re just stupid enough—smart enough, maybe—to loan you some more money.
“And when they do that, then our country will take a real hit, and inflation will go up and interest rates will go up, and you and your young people your age will be the ones most affected, while the seniors and the money guys, most of them, will take good care of themselves,” he said.
The Simpson-Bowles National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, appointed by President Obama, proposed a six-part plan to “put our nation back on a path to fiscal health, promote economic growth, and protect the most vulnerable among us.”
Taken as a whole, the plan, which was released in December 2010, would have achieved nearly $4 trillion in deficit reduction through 2020, more than any effort in the nation’s history.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

What Happened in 1950?


For the past several years we have been asking the following question to everyone to whom we have talked. What happened in 1950 or thereabouts to dramatically change this country?

Since 1950, we have not won a war? Nor have we gone to war with both barrels blazing. Our morals have gone by the wayside. We have started giving away the store to our citizens and countries around the world. Our "apparent" power as a world power is present but in decline. Our respect as a country has shriveled up.  Why the change?  What caused this dramatic change?

There is something afoot and we want your input.

The following article may get some of those brain cells and synapses moving.

Thanks in advance.
Conservative Tom


It’s Not America Anymore

October 2, 2012 by  
It’s Not America Anymore
PHOTOS.COM
Many of us in the liberty movement find ourselves searching for a distinct root cause of the trials and tribulations of American culture — the Holy Grail catalyst that, if unraveled, would save this country and heal the septic wounds covering the landscape of our hobbled society. The obvious answer would be to remove the global elites who are poisoning the well from the picture entirely. Yes, this has to be done eventually. However, we must also identify how those elites have been able to so thoroughly con the masses of this Nation for so long.
What inherent weakness has made us susceptible to manipulation? For this question, there are no easy answers. If I had to choose a single frailty of our collective psyche as paramount to our downfall, I would say that Americans most of all are confounded by their own patriotism. We often embrace the ideal without knowing what it really means.
There are in fact two kinds of patriotism: the concrete and the imagined. Many Americans fall haphazardly into the fantasy of being patriotic. They define patriotism upon the exploits of the mainstream and of the government in control at the time. They become cheerleaders for the establishment instead of stalwart champions of their country’s founding principles. In fact, true patriotism is not about blindly defending one’s nation or leadership regardless of its trespasses; true patriotism is about defending the philosophy that made one’s nation possible in the first place — even if that means standing against the power structure in place today.
I often hear the uneducated and unaware claim that America and its principles have been a bane to the rest of the world. They say America is at the center of the vampire squid, flailing its vicious tentacles against innocent foreign civilizations. This is an oversimplification at best. The crimes that these well-meaning but naïve activists scorn cannot be attributed to “America” because the American ideal has been completely abandoned by those in the seat of power in our modern era. We do not live in “America” — at least, not the America that the Founding Fathers and authors of the Constitution created.
America has been ransacked and deformed into a hideous lampoon of its former self. This has been done for the most part through the destruction of the guiding principles we pretend we still hold onto as a culture, but in reality have abused and cast aside. If we are ever to undo the damage that has already been done, we have to rediscover what the original design of America was. Wailing and growling about the inadequacies of the present do nothing unless we establish where it is that we have fallen from grace. What is America supposed to be? What did the Founders truly intend?
America Is Supposed To Be Controlled By The People
The concept of a republic revolves around a reversal of the traditional narrative of power. Throughout most of history, government stood at the top of the pyramid, where the hands of a few dominated the destinies of the citizenry. The future was a matter for the elites, not the peasants, to be concerned with. The American republic, as designed by the revolutionary colonists who defeated the old oligarchy, flipped the role of government to servant rather than master. The goal was to make government tangible and accountable rather than abstract and untouchable. The America of today has no such accountability anymore.
We have a two-party system that pursues the mechanizations of globalism in tandem, not in contest. When both parties have the same desires and goals, when both parties collude to remove civil liberties rather than protect them, and when both parties are funded by the same corporate backers, there is no such thing as change through the process of elections. Anyone who claims that government corruption can be punished through the ballot box hasn’t the slightest clue how our system really functions. They think we are still living in the original “America,” one that values the voice of the people.
When the government decides to push through banker bailouts, the Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, etc., all while ignoring opposition by a vast majority of citizens, it is clear that the paradigm has shifted and the American value of representation by and for the people is lost.
America Is Supposed To Prosper Through Free Markets
One of the first acts of the American Revolution in the fight against British tyranny was to decouple from British economic dominance. They stopped relying on goods produced in England and peddled by the European merchant class and began making their own. From homespun clothing to homemade rifles, Americans created a legitimate free-market environment. Free markets are systems controlled by the people, thriving on the natural functions of supply and demand. They are not administered by bureaucracies or corporate hierarchies that manipulate the economy to fit preconceived political and social ends.
Free markets are decentralized markets. Corporations were never meant to exist, according to Adam Smith, the architect of traditional free markets. Today’s framework operates on centralization and the removal of options and choices, which is facilitated by the imbalance and lack of accountability in the corporate legal structure.
I have to laugh every time I hear someone attack “capitalism” and free markets as the source of all our ills. America has not had the pleasure of free markets for at least 100 years (since the construction of the private Federal Reserve, a collusion between banking and government interests). No one alive today has ever seen an actual American “free market.” So to blame free markets for our modern failings is rather thoughtless.
America Is Supposed To Have A Reserved Foreign Policy
The Founding Fathers specifically sought to keep America out of foreign entanglements and haphazard alliances. They knew from experience that the elites and monarchies of Europe often used wars as a means of consolidating power and keeping populations in relative fear. They were well aware of the methodologies of Niccolo Machiavelli and knew that forced alliances were a trap used to ensnare nations into unnecessary conflict and financial dependency while keeping the masses subservient through false patriotism.
Today, our government has utterly violated the original principles of reserved foreign policy, especially in the past century. The excuse always used is that “we are under attack,” yet we usually discover later that these “attacks” were actually fabricated by our own leaders. From the sinking of the USS Maine, to the sinking of the Lusitania, to the Gulf of Tonkin and beyond, for the past 100 years, Americans have been presented with false flag threats used as leverage to convince us to become entangled in foreign engagements. This strategy has become so common that elitists now openly admit their intentions to commit future false flags in order to draw us into yet another war, this time with Iran.
The current policy of “exporting democracy” has not only been a complete failure (just look at Egypt, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), it is also a total affront to the foundation of the American dynamic. Patriotism in the name of interventionism is foolhardy and decidedly un-American.
America Is Supposed To Respect Individual Rights
The Founders witnessed the extreme abuses of government firsthand: invasion of privacy, invasion of property, wrongful arrest and imprisonment, loss of representation, overt and malicious taxation, thuggish law enforcement, and the targeting of those who dared to dissent in their speech. The excuse used by the British for their tyrannical behavior was, essentially, national security. In the end, though, the elites’ actions had nothing to do with security for the populous and everything to do with what they saw as opposition to their hegemony. Our government has become a mirror image of the elitist power-mongers of Britain in the days of the revolution. Absolutely everything the colonists fought against has been re-established by the globalists in our political structure today, once again, all in the name of national security.
We have seen the enslavement of our money supply and general economy by the Federal Reserve; invasive and violent taxation through the Internal Revenue Service; loss of privacy through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance and the Patriot acts; loss of property rights through multiple agencies including the Bureau of Land Management, the Environmental Protection Agency, the IRS, the Food and Drug Administration, etc.; the militarization of law enforcement through the Department of Homeland Security and Federally dominated fusion centers; potential loss of habeas corpus through the NDAA; and even wrongful arrest against those who merely speak openly of their discontent (look into the case of Marine veteran Brandon Raub for a taste of what is to come).
What Have We Become?
Those who rally behind the America of today rally behind a façade — an empty shell devoid of the heart and soul that gave life to this once great experiment. I do not support what America is. I support what America was and what it could be again if the truth is adequately smashed into the faces of the currently oblivious public. If this country is content to suckle from the putrid teat of globalism and forsake the moral force of conscience that gave it life, then it has become another place — an alien land.
I have heard the argument that America is meant to be a kind of chameleon meant to change its stripes and adapt to the demands of the era. I have heard it argued that the Constitution and the principles of the Founding Fathers are outdated and inadequate for our new age of technological wizardry and terrorist ideologies. This is pure intellectual idiocy. The principles of freedom never expire. Individual liberty is inherent and eternal. It is the driving force of every great accomplishment in the history of mankind. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights embody the spirit of the eternal battle of individual liberty. There is no adaptation. There is only freedom or tyranny.
It is time for us to decide what kind of Americans we wish to be: the deluded rah-rah puppets of a desiccated totalitarian society or the watchmen on the wall. Will we be the keepers and protectors of the vital core of the American identity or will we be fly-by-night consumers of the flavor-of-the-day political carnival, eating every sample from the elitist platter in an insane attempt to replace our free heritage with a sleek, sexy rehashed form of top-down feudalism?
–Brandon Smith

Monday, October 1, 2012

We Do Have A New Political Prisoner In The US

We do have political prisoners in the US and it is going to get worse!  Over the next 24 months, should the dictator be re-elected, we predict that blogging like we are doing here, will be ruled unconstitutional.  It causes riots, makes people unsatisfied with their situation, and does not promote domestic tranquility.  (Isn't that just right out of the Constitution?)

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the Muhammad filmmaker, is the first to be locked up for producing a film. Of course, there will be those who say that this is not true. They will say that somehow violated the rules of his probation by using a computer and he is a flight risk.  Yea right!  So, if he flees the country, what damage has he done?

The major point is that this is a trailer, a very poor example at best. Heck, we believe that we could do a significantly better job ourselves and we have only shot home movies. Hey, maybe we should go into the picture business.

This piece of dog excrement did not cause the riots in Libya. Only after the White House said it did, did the riots spread across the Muslim world.  If the people at 1600 Pennsylvania had kept their mouths shut, none of the riots would have occurred. So one can only wonder, was that not the plan?

As you know we are not supporters of the current occupant of the People's House and believe he has done significant damage to the credibility of the US. This is not by mistake, it is by design. We have only seen the beginning as it will get worse should he be re-elected.

From the start with the Arab misery tour, to pledging to the Russians that he would have more flexibility, to bankrupting the treasury and to the attack of the consulate to which they threw gasoline on an easy controlled situation, this group of traitors in the White House have executed a flawless plan to turn the "bright light on the hill" to a burned out third rate trash heap. 

Can it get worse? It sure can.  We see daily attacks on our freedoms. Whether it was trashing Catholic organizations freedom of religion by forcing them to provide abortions and contraceptives to their employees or the jailing of a filmmaker for expressing his freedom of speech in a film that upset Muslims, the loss of these freedoms will never be regained if Obama is re-elected.

It might have sounded like hyperbole when we wrote that blogging would be unconstitutional in 24 short months, but we believe it. Are we crazy? At the speed new rules are being passed, we doubt it. Let's hope we are all WET!!

Conservative Tom





Read more about the jailed movie maker at:

Is Class Warfare Good For The Country


This is not an investment piece, rather it is a philosophy article.  We think it really sums up the difference between the two parties in this election year. It will effect the future of the United States.

We would like to hear your take.

Conservative Tom



Is This 'Untruth' Keeping You From Getting Rich?
By Alex Green, Chief Investment Strategist, Investment U


I know it's a political year, but I don't generally like to talk politics.

When I'm not making readers money, I'd like to at least make them happy. And when you talk politics, you often make half your audience – and sometimes more – unhappy.

Still, I'm shocked and surprised by an ominous development in this year's presidential election. No, not the personal attacks, negative ads, or over-the-top promises. Those have been staples in national elections for more than 200 years. What's new – and troubling, in my view – is that some see political gain in demonizing economic success.

I don't get it. As a kid growing up in a solidly middle-class family, I admired the businessmen, entrepreneurs, and professionals in my community who earned large financial rewards. I remember feeling that these folks must have studied hard, put in long hours, or taken big risks. I didn't envy them. I wanted to be like them.

Yet there was former President Bill Clinton at the Democratic Convention stoking the flames of resentment with his remark that some "want a you're-on-your-own, winner-take-all society."

I find this disheartening, in part because Bill Clinton is not a left-wing ideologue. Yes, he's a card-carrying liberal but in his two terms, he promoted free trade, slashed capital gains taxes, and reformed the welfare system.

I thought the class-warfare remarks were beneath him. For starters, capitalism is about voluntary exchange for mutual benefit. Businesses don't "take" money. Only government (which has a monopoly on the legal use of force) and criminals do that. Businesses merely collect the money that consumers and other businesses voluntarily trade for products and services.

Perhaps Clinton meant the rich "take" in that they don't pay their fair share in taxes. This is certainly a debate worth having – and opinions are bound to vary. But we should begin with the facts. According to the Internal Revenue Service, the top 10% of Americans pays almost 70% of all personal income taxes. The bottom 50% pays essentially nothing. What would George Orwell say about calling the 10% of Americans who pay 70% of the taxes "takers" … and stoking a sense of grievance among the half that pays nothing?

I'm also confused about the "you're-on-your-own" bit. No one objects to a social safety net for the truly needy. But when I reached the age of majority – after receiving a free public-school education and a library card – I expected to take care of myself.

If I couldn't take care of myself in a pinch, I knew I might have to lean on family or friends temporarily. If I couldn't find help there, I might have to count on churches or local charities for a while. And if that still weren't enough, maybe I would have to turn to the state government as a last resort.

I never imagined that some bureaucrat in far-off Washington cared about me… or even wanted to meet me. Some folks seem to mistake government for community.

My point is that class warriors aren't just attacking Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan (two men with whom I have my own differences). They aren't just vilifying the Republican party (a party fully deserving of some vilification). They are attacking the very notion of individual initiative and personal responsibility. Now that's new.

You might reasonably ask what this has to do with investing. My answer is everything. Investment begins with savings. Savings comes from earned income. An income high enough to permit saving comes from education and hard work. And the desire to get educated and work hard comes from a belief that the system is fair and these qualities will be rewarded.

To me, it seems particularly corrosive to tell people – for political advantage – that they don't have a fair shot… that the system is rigged… that Wall Street is corrupt… that the rich don't pay their fair share… and that, somehow, you have less because "millionaires and billionaires" have more.

This strategy may win votes in some quarters… But that doesn't mean we shouldn't call it what it is: a profound untruth.

Good investing,

Alex Green

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Why Jews Cannot Vote For Obama


There used to be a saying that “Jews earn like WASPS and vote like Puerto Ricans,” the idea being that no matter how successful Jews become they still retain a sense of themselves as minority underdogs and vote accordingly.
Today, however, I think that saying needs to be changed to “Jews think like Einstein and vote like fracking idiots.” Because while Jews are widely viewed as an intelligent race of people who hold learning in high regard, a recent poll still shows a majority of them planning to vote for Barack Obama’s re-election — and that’s just plain stupid.
Here are three reasons.
1. Obama’s policies are actually bad for the underdogs and minorities.
The notion that big government helps the poor is a false one. Some government programs may help some poor people in the moment, but the long-term effect of such programs is well proven to be disastrous. Look at Detroit, New Orleans, and Chicago — all Democrat strongholds since forever. Why do you think blacks are moving out of thenorthern cities and back to the south?
Under Obama, the poverty rate has swollen, real unemployment (including those people who have despaired of finding work) has skyrocketed, and government dependency has increased a stunning 23 percent. All these numbers are worse for black people. Conversely, the supposedly greedy and racist policies of Ronald Reagan brought poverty down every year for the last five years of his presidency and improved the economic lives of blacks more than any other group.
Dumb people vote for what looks good. Smart people vote for policies that work. Assuming Jews truly care about helping minorities and underdogs, Jews who vote for Obama are dumb Jews.
2. Obama appeases Jew-hating Islamists.
The idea that Obama is secretly Muslim is ridiculous. It is well-documented that Obama believes in the America-hating, racist form of non-Christian Christianity preached by Jeremiah Wright. I only wish Obama were Muslim so you could reason with the guy! However, his policy of apology and appeasement to Islamistsis giving strength and incentive to a world-wide movement of jihad that has the destruction of the Jews as one of its primary goals. As a recent example: After terrorists murdered our ambassador and military men in Libya, Obama’s people refused to call terrorism terrorism and instead blamed the pre-arranged 9/11 assault on a silly YouTube video. To avoid confronting the Islamists, the administration went so far as to pressure YouTube to remove the vid (YouTube courageously refused). And at the very least, the administration inspired (if they did not actually encourage) law officers to drag the filmmaker from his home at midnight for “questioning.” Encouraged by this sort of puling weakness, Islamist protests have spread from Libya to more than a dozen countries worldwide.
Obama’s failure to understand the nature of the Islamist threat has led to his bungling of the Arab spring. Despite his narcissistic belief that his personal life experience would help him reach out to the Muslim world,tension between Islam and civilization is on the rise. Even Obama’s strutting pride at having personally killed Osama bin Laden with his bare hands is indicative of the fact that he misunderstands that the Islamist chantis true: “Listen, Obama, we’re all Osama.” Terrorism isn’t crime; it’s warfare.
Jews don’t always have to vote for what’s “good for the Jews.” But Jews who vote for policies that encourage their own annihilation are dumb Jews.
3. Obama is no friend to Israel.
It’s insulting to think that American Jews care more about Israel than they do about their own country — they don’t. But the lives of 5 million Jews in the Middle East should be of Jewish concern as should the health of a Jewish homeland. Against the fact that Obama has treated Israel’s prime minister with disdain anddisrespect, has been meddlesome on the issue of Jewish settlements, and has offered to give away theIsraeli farm before negotiations with Israel’s enemies even began, friends of the administration argue that Obama’s behind-the-scenes practical support for the Jewish nation remains strong. There’s some truth to that — though I’m not sure his administration could have survived any other approach. But Obama’s appeasement of Islamism, his identification of Israel with colonialism, which he hates, his delusional notion that jihad is a matter of sporadic crimes committed by outlying individuals, and his resulting mishandling of the Arab Spring and Iranian nuclear threat constitute a long-term danger to Israel’s existence.
Smart Jews know that Israel is important not just for their own survival but for the freedom of the world.
Jews who vote for Barack Obama are dumb Jews.