Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Should Catholic Church Be Named Hate Group?


The White House Website has a petition on it which asks the Obama Administration to designate the Catholic church as a Hate group. This is just another example of the "what is good is bad and what bad is good" symptom that the United states is experiencing.
There are no petitions asking to condemn Islam for the murders around the world, only the Catholic church is treated with such disrespect and scorn. The Pope has the right to say whatever he wants as the leader of his church. We are not catholic, however, we have supported the church in their fight against the Obamacare Mandates and now we will do the same in this issue.
Freedom of religion is important to all RELIGIOUS people. However, the Obama Administration does not believe the same as you do.  We suspect that should the Church lose the Obamacare battle, the white house will "ADMINISTRATIVELY by executive edict", remove the tax free status of the church.  This is just another example of how far this administration will go to get its way.
We hope that we are wrong as this would have a chilling effect on everyone's freedom of religion and speech as those who might oppose the administration on an issue would want to open themselves up to similar actions.  Can you believe this is happening in  the United States?
Be Scared, be very Scared!
Conservative Tom



FAITH

WHITE HOUSE PETITION CALLS FOR OBAMA ADMIN TO DESIGNATE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A ‘HATE GROUP’

On Christmas Day, a petition was added to the White House web site, urging the U.S. government to “officially recognize the Roman Catholic Church as a hate group.” According to a brief description accompanying the plea, the basis for the designation is the church’s stance on same-sex marriage and homosexuality.
“In his annual Christmas address to the College of Cardinals, Pope Benedict XVI, the global leader of the Roman Catholic Church, demeaned and belittled homosexual people around the world,” the petition reads. “Using hateful language and discriminatory remarks, the Pope painted a portrait in which gay people are second-class global citizens.”
White House Petition Calls for Catholic Church to be Called a Hate Group
Pope Benedict XVI attends the Epiphany Mass at the St. Peter’s Basilica on January 6, 2013 in Vatican City, Vatican. During the ceremony the pontiff named four new bishops including his personal secretary Georg Gaenswein. Credit: Getty Images
The text goes on to note that Pope Benedict claimed that same-sex families “are threatening to society.” The individual behind the initiative accused the Catholic leader of implying that gays are also “sub-human.” As a result of the pope’s recent words, the petition argues that the Church meets the criteria to be called a hate group by both the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League.
The effort to urge condemnation from the White House was sparked by Pope Benedict’s Christmas message. As TheBlaze previously reported (as per AP), the Catholic leader has taken his opposition to gay marriage to new heights with a strong denunciation of how people today are manipulating their sex and gender to alter their God-given nature.
White House Petition Calls for Catholic Church to be Called a Hate Group
A screen shot from the controversial White House petition.
Benedict made the comments in his annual Christmas speech to the Vatican bureaucracy — one of his most important speeches of the year and one he dedicated this year to promoting family values. However, following the posting of the petition, Peter Sprigg, senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., defended the pope. The Catholic News Agency has more:
Sprigg argued that the petition is “distorting” the Pope’s words, which do not actually include hateful or discriminatory language.
In his address to the cardinals, the Pope did not directly reference “gay marriage” or “homosexuality” at all. Rather, he defended the Church’s understanding of sexuality and “the true structure of the family, made up of father, mother, and child.”
The Holy Father refuted the modern notion of sex as “a social role that we choose for ourselves,” rather than “a given element of nature” and “bodily identity, that serves as a defining element of the human being.” [...]
Sprigg argued that the petition is misleading and “clearly has political purpose.”
Currently, the effort has 2,184 signatures. The goal, by Jan. 24, is to capture 25,000 total signatures in order to reach the 25,000 goal of receiving an official review from the Obama administration.

Obama To Issue Executive Orders Against Gun Ownership

On December 19, 2012, we told you how Obama would institute gun control by Administrative action on his part. Today, the Vice President admitted as such! The story and video is attached to this posting.

For those of you who think that Conservative Tom is a nut case, a pessimist or a conspiracy quack, look up the posting "The President's Gun Control Plan" at http://political-conservatives.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-presidents-gun-control-plan.html you will see that we called this one right!  More of our predictions will come true as we understand this bunch of hooligans that pose to be leaders of our country.

It isn't taking long to change this country dramatically. These changes will be done by  Obama's latest nominees. They all are Administration suck-ups who will do the President's bidding ala Susan Rice who took a bullet for him by misleading the press and the country in the Benghazi affair. 

He will be taking extra-ordinary unconstitutional actions throughout his next four years.  We will see steps taken that would have impeached any other president. However, he is protected whether it is bravado or the Clinton experience he knows that even if the House prepares and passes a bill of Impeachment, the Senate NEVER will convict. In other words, he has a free rein. 

Expect the unexpected and you will not be surprised. This is going to be a very bumpy ride. You will not be able to think the way we used to nor will we be able to follow the laws that exist today. What was good will be bad and what was abhorrent will be acceptable. Rich people will be despised and poor people honored.  Improving yourself will be discouraged and bringing others down exemplified. Life in the US is about to change dramatically.

Be scared, be very scared.

Conservative Tom


BIDEN: OBAMA MAY USE ‘EXECUTIVE ORDERS’ TO CRACK DOWN ON GUNS

Joe Biden Claims President Obama May Use Executive Orders on Guns
Vice President Joe Biden (Photo Credit: YouTube/MSNBC)
Earlier today, Vice President Joe Biden addressed the ongoing discussion and debate surrounding gun control. Rather than relying strictly upon the legislative process, he said that Obama “is going to act” — and potentially without Congress’ blessing.
Before meeting with gun safety and victims’ groups, the vice president told reporters that “executive orders” may be an avenuethat the administration will use to take swift action on firearms.
“There are executives orders, there’s executive action that can be taken,” he said. “We haven’t decided what that is yet. But we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required.”
As the Weekly Standard notes, Biden stressed the importance, in his view, of taking action to curb gun violence. He also said that he is convinced that the government “can affect the well-being of millions of Americans and take thousands of people out of harm’s way” — pending officials “act responsibly.”
Even if Obama attempts to take unilateral action, Biden indicated that legislation is still “required.”
Watch the vice president’s comments, below:

Brennan--Not A Friend Of Israel


For those who thought that Obama was harmless, the recent nominations of Defense Secretary (Hagel) and CIA chief (Brennan) indicate how dangerous he and his positions are. The first four years of Obama were designed to set in place the second four years. We now will see the "real" Obama and his friends.


If you think Obama's attitude toward Israel was bad during the first four, just wait, the next four will essentially isolate the country, deny support both financially and militarily, and  total support of its enemies. Anything less will be a victory. It is not going to be pretty. 

The proof of the above assumptions will come out of his stooges Hagel and Brennan if they are approved by the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats who in the end will support their President. These men will combine their talents with John Kerry, the presumptuous appointee as Secretary of State to make the life of Israeli leaders very tough. We will see actions taken against Israel that most Americans would have thought ridiculous just a short time ago. 

In the accompanying piece we see the background of Brennan prior to his nomination to be CIA chief. It is not one that is supportive of Israel. In fact, many would say he was an enemy.

Be scared, be very scared.


Conservative Tom

As Obama tries to sneak John O. Brennan in under the radar

Share This Post
 3
http://israel-commentary.org/?p=5641
January 8, 2013
Zionist Organization of American Opposes Brennan Nomination
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Nominee Brennan Dismisses Radical Islam, Calls J’lem Al-Quds, Whitewashes Hizballah
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has expressed concern at and opposition to the nomination by President Barack Obama of John O. Brennan to head the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The ZOA has pointed out that John Brennan, who is currently President Obama’s chief security adviser for counter-terrorism, has been a leading figure in the failure of the Obama Administration to name the enemy – radical Islam – waging war on the U.S.; has called Jerusalem by its Arabic name, Al-Quds, has whitewashed the Lebanese terrorist group, Hizballah; and been implicated in serious intelligence failures:
July 2008: In an article in the July 2008 edition of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Brennan blamed the bad relations between Iran and the U.S., not on the nature of the Iranian regime and its goals, but at least in large part on what he called “iran-bashing.” Brennan stated that, “A critical step toward improved U.S.-Iranian relations would be for U.S. officials to cease public Iran-bashing, a tactic that may have served short-term domestic political interests but that has heretofore been wholly counterproductive to U.S. strategic interests” (Mark Mazetti, ‘Candidates for Obama’s Inner Circle | JOHN O. BRENNAN,’ New York Times, November 18, 2008).
Brennan also accepted the now obviously and spectacularly wrong 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate that asserted that Iran had ceased work on its nuclear program in 2003 and on this basis criticized President George W. Bush for continuing to pressure Iran on the subject, writing that, “Despite a December 2007 National Intelligence Estimate that assessed ‘in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program,’ the administration indicated no interest in easing the pressure on Iran” (Steven J. Rosen, ‘Does Brennan’s influence at NSC extend to Iran?,’ Obama Mideast Monitor, February 28, 2009).
May 2009: Brennan offered a public apologia for the Obama Administration’s policy of discarding basic, factual terms like ‘radical Islam,’ ‘Islamism,’ and ‘jihad’ in reference to the war being waged against America and its allies by Muslim extremists. Addressing the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Brennan said that “describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism, that the United States is somehow at war against Islam. The reality, of course, is that we have never been and will never be at war with Islam. After all, Islam, like so many faiths, is part of America … Nor do we describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists because jihad is holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself of one’s community” (Rowan Scarborough, ‘Obama at odds with Petraeus doctrine on “Islam,”’ Washington Times, July 11, 2010).
In August 2009, Brennan again addressing the CSIS, said the Lebanese terrorist group Hizballah, “started out as purely a terrorist organization back in the early ’80s and has evolved significantly over time. And now it has members of parliament, in the cabinet; there are lawyers, doctors, others who are part of the Hezbollah organization … Hamas, on the other hand … developed an extremist and terrorist element to it that, I think, has unfortunately delegitimized it in the eyes of many.” The Nation contributing editor Robert Dreyfuss also disclosed that, before assuming his current position as President Obama’s top counter-terrorist adviser, Brennan told him that talking to Hamas and Hezbollah is the right thing to do (Robert Dreyfuss, ‘White House Opening to Hezbollah, Hamas?’ The Nation, August 10, 2009).
December 2009: When would-be underwear bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab nearly brought down a U.S.-bound Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas Day 2009, Brennan was criticized because British intelligence authorities had notified their U.S. counterparts of an “Umar Farouk” meeting with al-Qaeda cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen, and Abdulmutallab’s father had warned of his son’s increasing extremism to CIA officials at the U.S. embassy in Nigeria. However, Abdulmutallab was never added to the U.S. no-fly list, nor was his U.S. visa revoked. This led by the House and Senate Intelligence oversight committees to call for Brennan’s resignation (Patrick Poole, ‘The unprecedented power has even Obama administration officials worried,’ PJ Media, June 6, 2012).
February 2010, Brennan defended the policy of treating Abdulmutallab as a criminal by having his rights read to him upon arrest and trying him in civilian court, rather than transferring the would-be bomber to military custody as an enemy combatant, claiming during a speech at New York University’s Law School, that he supported the administration’s highly unpopular move to try al-Qaeda operations chief Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in federal court (Joel Gerstein, ‘Brennan, unruffled, talks terror at NYU,’ Politico, February 28, 2010). In the same speech, he also referred to Jerusalem by its Arabic name, Al-Quds, saying, “In all my travels the city I have come to love most is al-Quds, Jerusalem” (‘Counterterror Adviser Defends Jihad as ‘Legitimate Tenet of Islam,’ Fox News, May 27, 2010).
May 2010, in a speech to the CSIS, Brennan called jihad a “legitimate tenet of Islam,” arguing that the term “jihadists” should not be used to describe America’s enemies.” He described violent extremists as victims of “political, economic and social forces” but said that those plotting attacks on the U.S. should not be described in “religious terms” (‘Counterterror Adviser Defends Jihad as ‘Legitimate Tenet of Islam, Fox News, May 27, 2010).
September 2010: On Brennan’s watch, a top U.S. Hamas official, Kifah Mustafa, was permitted to tour of the top-secret National Counterterrorism Center, FBI headquarters in Washington D.C., and the FBI training academy at Quantico. Mustafa had already been named in 2007 and 2008 as an unindicted coconspirator as a registered agent for Holy Land Foundation, a Hamas fund-raising front closed by the Bush administration after the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history. Evidence produced in court showed Mustafa to have participated in a fundraising troupe singing “‘I am a member of Hamas’ as well as other songs glorifying violence and inciting the murder of Jews” (Patrick Poole, ’10 Failures of the U.S. Government on the Domestic Terrorism Threat,’ Center for Security Policy, 2010). Following this, several former top intelligence and defense officials again called for his resignation (‘National Security Hawks Call for Brennan’s Resignation,’ Fox News, September 28, 2010).
May 2012: Brennan was implicated in a serious intelligence breach detailing an ongoing counterterrorism operation led by British and Saudi intelligence agencies that had placed an operative inside the al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) organization. The White House leak forced the termination of the operation and the immediate withdrawal of the double agent (‘Exclusive: Did White House “spin” tip a covert op?,’ Reuters, May 18, 2012).
ZOA National President Morton A. Klein said, “One of our biggest failings in dealing with Islamist extremism at home and abroad has been the failure to acknowledge that the extremism is rooted in religion. This does not mean all Muslims are enemies – in fact, it is important to have Muslim moderates fighting on our side – but it does mean that we have to confront the fact that the inspiration for the terrorists’ hostility and that of their supporters and enablers here and overseas stems from their religious beliefs.
“That being the case, it is deeply worrying that the Obama Administration continues to deny this and refuses to educate the American public and, no less important, U.S. military and intelligence, on the nature of the enemy. Major counter-terrorism manuals, for example, the February 2010 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review Report, do not even refer to Islamic extremism or jihad. Yet it is jihad – the use of war to extend and perpetuate the dominion of Islam over non-believers – that motivates the terrorists we are fighting.
“America does not become at peace with radical Islamic terrorists who regard themselves at war with the United States simply by choosing to ignore the ideology that animates them.
“Are people aware that, in October 2011, the Obama administration recalled all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security agencies in order to eliminate all references to Islam, following objections from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC)? These are both Muslim Brotherhood linked, Islamist organizations.
“If the Obama Administration sees nothing wrong with the Muslim Brotherhood – and it doesn’t, seeing that President Obama supported the replacement in Egypt of the Hosni Mubarak regime by one in which the Muslim Brotherhood would predominate – then our ability to deal with these threats in the long-term are compromised.
“In that context, the nomination of John Brennan for head of the CIA – someone who has whitewashed Hizballah as a moderating, legitimate political group, pretends jihad is a harmless and unproblematic Muslim religious obligation, and called Jerusalem Al-Quds – is deeply worrying and a further sign of the disastrously wrong direction the Obama Administration is taking the U.S.”
PS I happened to watch CSpan late last night and caught a taping of Obama presenting Hagal and Brennan to the press. It was the most pathetic and revealing presentation I have ever seen. There was Obama in all his truly obnoxious arrogant narcissism shepherding in two complete obsequious toadies that will do his every bidding. All three mouthed the most embarrassing platitudes that only the completely uninformed or Obama devotees could swallow. When are US citizens finally going to wake up to this guy? But, it is too late, anyway. I cannot even imagine the amount of irreparable damage this terrible destroyer will do to the US in his next four years. And may G-d, in his ultimate wisdom, save us. (jsk)

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Very Scary Stuff





Interviews said to be with an insider at the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), saying that the US 'fiscal cliff' game, along with these 'mass shooting' incidents like in Connecticut, are all part of the US gov't preparing the US public for a managed US dollar and economic collapse and a new kind of domestic US dictatorship
The interviews say the plan is to let the system collapse, the EBT 'food stamp money' cards won't work and so on, have a few weeks of chaos and hunger and violence, till most hungry Americans beg for protection from their government
Then they will put in steps where the US government will control nearly everything, many dissidents taken off to camps, and most types of firearms and upper-capacity magazines get confiscated ... with a few less high-power, totally registered guns allowed to be kept by US citizens who don't violate the new rules or restrictions on life
Unsettling stuff, if true ... site is Douglas J Hagmann's 'Northeast Intelligence Network' ... here are the DHS 'insider' interviews in text, two parts
Part 1
Part 2

America's Airplane Ride to Oblivion

All we can say when we read this posting is WOW!  If you don't get it, you are one of those Americans who want everything for nothing or are completely oblivious to this country's dire situation.  Hopefully, after understanding what Doug Hagmann is saying, we can wake up one more American!

Are you fearful of current situation?  If not, read this piece.
Be afraid, be very afraid.

Conservative Tom

Flight of the U.S.A


23 December 2012: Imagine the United States as one big jumbo jet on a lengthy journey to what our travel brochures described as the land of “milk and honey.” We are all passengers aboard this marvelous airbus of state-of-the art comfort along with a litany of well-trained pilots, crew members and support personnel, each taking their respective shifts on this multi-generational journey. The flight is complete with in-flight movies, food service, the all of the latest technology, along with a flight staff seemingly dedicated to our comfort.

As Americans, we boarded this aircraft long ago as we were promised a destination to the promised land of peace and prosperity by the flight planners and smiling and most accommodating crew. We were impressed by the amenities of the aircraft, complete with logos of the stars and stripes on the plane’s exterior and patriotic songs playing in a loop in the boarding area. Oh how proud we were!
As passengers excited and enthusiastic about our future, we paid little or no attention to the backgrounds, bona-fides or intentions of the pilots or crew. Seeing them clothed in their dress flight uniforms, standing aboard the aircraft to warmly greet us as the patriotic music faded quietly behind us,  they instilled confidence in our flight experience.
We boarded, settled in and took off, leaving the airport in “every town,” U.S.A. behind us as a memory of what once was. Upon reaching cruising altitude, drinks were served, the in-flight movie began, and passengers removed their various vices and devices from their carry-on bags to pass the time during this long flight.
As time passed, however, some passengers began looking out of the windows, seeing a different and unexpected landscape below. A landscape that was not advertised in the travel brochures. Questions among a few passengers began slowly at first, but then the curiosity of many passengers began to grow. Some began to ask, just what is this destination of milk and honey? By then, however, the hour grew late as the aircraft approached the point of no return.
Point of no return
The phrase “point of no return,” abbreviated “PNR,” originated as a navigational phrase that basically means what it says. Pilots flying aircraft experience a point in their flight when their fuel situation is such that they cannot return to their point of departure and barring any other possibility, must continue to their destination. Metaphorically, I believe America has reached the point of no return on our long journey to tyranny and totalitarianism disguised on the travel brochures as the land of “milk and honey.”
I also believe that we, as Americans, must contemplate our PNR as it means that we’ve been on our metaphorical journey for quite some time. We’ve switched pilots and flight crew during our journey, our pre-selected elected leaders, but never once changed our flight path. Please think carefully about this, as it serves as a serious indictment of our elected leaders and those who put them in office. As passengers, most of us watched our unchanging flight path, doing nothing more than complain to the flight crew while dutifully remaining in our seats. Others remained transfixed with the in-flight movie designed from the start to divert our attention from the events around us. That tactic alone served the ever-changing pilots and crew well.
Of conspiracy theories and racism
Throughout our flight, some passengers attempted to warn others of our flight path, leading to a change of pilots and crew. This window dressing calmed the fears of a number of passengers who failed to realize that merely changing pilots and crew would not change our destination. Some passengers attempted to warn all of us of the flight plan and that the pilots and crew were complicit. For the first part of our flight, those astute passengers were rebuffed by accusations of “McCarthyism,” followed by the label of conspiracy theorists, and now, with the current pilot, racists.
Interspersed among the passengers and quietly assisting the pilots and flight crew have been representatives of the media, who have done much to quell the complaints from the cabin. Working in exquisite synchronicity, the pilots, crew and media were well trained by the Marxist ideology through the likes of Antonio Gramsci, the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Socialists and even the Communist Party U.S.A. They were in on the flight plan from the start, and most of the pilots, crew, media and even some of the passengers graduated magna cum laude from these contemptible institutions of ideological Gomorrah.
Sadly, many passengers simply could not be bothered as they remained engrossed in the movie or their own devices, even becoming annoyed despite the ominous and obvious signs of trouble aboard the aircraft. The enlightened minority was rebuffed over and over. Complicity and complacency always work well in tandem.
We are still aboard this aircraft, and the commotion within the cabin has been increasing as we continue to travel at just below mach speed toward the critical point of no return. A number of previously complacent passengers changed from being complacent to inquisitive, and others from inquisitive to plotting the retaking of the aircraft. Yet, the spirit among many of the travelers en route to this unsavory destination continued to be split. In fact, a few of the spiritually renegade among us are still determined to join the mile high club, and have even been cheered on by both the complicit and complacent. After all, why not enjoy the flight while you still can, they reasoned.
Meanwhile, as the true flight plan of the aircraft began to become more well known among the passengers in the cabin, the accusations of conspiracy, lunacy, and the mother of all conversation stoppers, racism were shouted with greater tenor and more effective frequency. Some of the more vocal passengers, mentally and emotional bloodied by the accusations, chose silence. Others rebuffed the accusations but did little to inform or educate the other passengers of the greater picture, hoping that at the very least, their partial acquiescence would keep their frequent flier miles safe and intact. Sadly, no one will emerge with such benefits of this one-way flight.
The point of no return?
As I see it, the question today is whether we have reached the point of no return on our journey aboard the aircraft known as the United States of America. I believe we have, and as such, our options have become extremely limited, and are diminishing with every mile we travel.
We can chose to retake the aircraft, but in so doing, will have to fight a gauntlet of other passengers and flight crew. It will be ugly. We can choose to do nothing and simply hope for the best, in which case we deserve the welcome we receive upon landing at our ultimate destination.
Despite the obvious and adhering to their own normalcy bias, an overwhelmingly large number of passengers will continue to demand a change of pilots and crew, believing that will change the destination. Yet others will continue to be mesmerized by the in-flight movie, opting to listen to lies of the crew and other passengers in on the flight plan from the beginning.
In any case, we are about to learn the fate of the “Maiden of the World,” Flight U.S.A

Not All Jews Are Bright!

The Jewish Voice for Peace and J Street are both Jewish groups who favor "peace" but in reality are either front groups for Arabs or are dumb Jews. We know that is very politically incorrect, however, these people cannot really believe what they are saying or are so indoctrinated by their socialist teachers, that they cannot think or are just plain "intellectually challenged."

No one who understands the history will ever believe what Israel has done for peace. The Camp David accords or the unilateral withdrawal from  Gaza are two examples of this democracy has gone out its way for peace. What does it get in return, nothing but rockets.

It puts up a security fence to protect its people and it gets blamed for fencing out Palestinians. However, in the time since the fence was put up, deaths by terrorists and auto thefts, for example, have dropped significantly. This does not influence these mal-informed, self hating Jews.

Conservative Tom


Jewish Voice for Peace: Arab front group?




6 January 2013: As we move into the year 2013,  part of the campaign to de-legitimize Israel abroad is to deconstruct the idea that Jews, particularly American Jews, are in favor of a Jewish national homeland and state.

At the Palsolidarity conference held at Ohio State in 2003 by the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), it was determined that deconstructing support by American Jews would be the best route to bring down the national Jewish homeland. This was to be accomplished by putting Jews out front who would deny any affiliation or support for Israel. The ISM has called terrorism attacks on Israelis “legitimate resistance” and its leadership has admitted to working with terrorist groups including Hamas.
The Arabs have learned that overt antisemitism against Jews does not play as well in democratic Western societies as it does in the Middle East; therefore, to suggest Arab subversive goals against Israel and the Jews that do not look religiously based, the euphemisms of fighting “Zionism” and “Zionists” are used to enable the unknowing to be persuaded to attack or boycott “just” the Jews in Israel, while avoiding the stigma of appearing to advocate either outright antisemitism or Islamist expansionism.
This drive includes placing “Jews” out front to call for the dissolution of a Jewish state as part of preserving “human rights” to deconstruct and mitigate attacks on other Jews in Israel.
Now comes written proof that Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) is not for “peace” as their moniker suggests, but for the victory of Israel’s enemies against the Jewish state. Although this was always the case before, JVP managed to convince mainstream media even in Israel more than once that it was merely a peace organization of Jews striving to end the conflict while the organization worked stridently to advance pat Arab propaganda against a Jewish state. In an email solicitation (viewable by clicking  here ) to the organization’s list serve on December 24th, 2012 in which she asked for year-end donations, Cecilie Surasky, who officially identifies herself as “Deputy Director” of JVP, stated that the most virulently anti-Semitic Muslim groups and their known front groups in the U.S. which openly call for exterminating world Jewry are “allies” of JVP.
Below are some quotes from her missive:
“Our entire reason for being is to unleash the courage of people like you and me to speak up, to speak the truth, and to do it now – all to prevent the dehumanization and oppression of entire peoples. When an anti-Muslim hatemonger put up ads calling Palestinians “savages,” Jewish Voice for Peace activists in San Francisco, New York, and DC quickly acted in support of Muslim and Arab allies and said NO.” [Emphasis in italics added by this writer].
It is important to distinguish between “allies” who might be claimed as fellow peace activists who would, say, denounce terrorism or missiles fired into Israeli communities (if such groups even existed), and “allies” whose sole purpose is to spread anti-Israel propaganda and lies to de-legitimize the Jewish state and thus continue unending war. Surasky in her email is referring to bus ads paid for by Pamela Geller of the Atlas Shrugs blog that were critical of Hamas and other terrorist groups in general like Al Qaeda that wage a classical Islamic jihad against Israel and the West. None of the ads mention “Palestinians” at all, the second largest faction of the PLO whom is Christian, not Muslim.  In fact, many Arab-Israelis, both Christian and Muslim support the right of the Jewish state to exist and some even serve in the Israeli army. Visual examples of Geller’s bus ads can be seen by clicking here.
By accusing Geller of attacking all Muslims, Surasky shows her real aim it to bolster militant Islamists such as in Hamas and its support fronts in the U.S. like CAIR as victims of ethnic prejudice. Hamas, a Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood that now controls Gaza after murdering the PLO leadership there is said by some Middle East experts to not be representative of all Muslims and is designated as a terrorist group by the US State Department and many European Union countries. Hamas is also an ally of Al Qaeda. But Hamas is a strange “ally” for Jews and Jewish Voice for Peace as Surasky and JVP openly considers them to be.
Below are just a few quotes from the Hamas Charter; no “Palestinians” or even the Muslim religion were mentioned in the Geller bus ads:
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”
‘The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Muslim generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up. “
‘There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and international conferences are all a waste of time and vain endeavors.”
‘After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, and their present conduct is the best proof of what we are saying.”
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is a notorious anti-Semitic forgery created by the Czar’s secret police in Russia at the turn of the 20th century and was used to promote pogroms against the Jews. The Protocols are still being sold as fact in the Arab world and are part of a mini-series on TV there where Jews are portrayed killing children for their blood to use in Jewish rituals or to murder non-Jews.
Still another quote from the Koran’s hadiths is included in the Charter to be followed:
“The day will come when the rocks and trees will cry out, ‘Come! There is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him!’”
Geller used the reference to terrorist jihadists as “savages” from a quote by the late Ayn Rand. In fact,  Surasky does the majority of the world’s  Muslims a disservice by conflating them with terrorism by her condemnations of the ads as being against all Muslims in general instead of jihadis who are militant Islamists and conduct terrorist acts.
Another quote from the same JVP email:
“When UC Irvine students protesting Israel’s Operation Cast Lead ,which killed over 1,300 Palestinians in Gaza, were criminalized because they were Muslim, Jewish Voice for Peace members made sure that Jews were heard saying: we reject this bigotry because of our history as Jews.”
The students who were prosecuted for disrupting a speech by Israel’s ambassador at UC  Irvine were not “criminalized because they were Muslim.” They were prosecuted for a proven conspiracy to disrupt a legal speaking event on a state university campus, as proven in court. The prosecution had nothing to do with their being Muslims, and the disruption was not an Islamic religious obligation except, perhaps, for militant Islamists.  Cecilie Surasky was simply repeating the usual line of the Hamas supporting fronts in the Islamic community, like CAIR, with her statement.
By leaving out facts and  details, Surasky takes this even farther by accusing Israel in the email of killing “over 1,300 Palestinians” during Operation Cast Lead, as a suggestion of mass murder of innocent civilians.  Yet even Hamas has admitted at least over half of those killed in Operation Cast Lead were armed combatants fighting Israeli soldiers who were responding to 10,000 missiles fired into Israel over the last 8 years. Surasky conveniently  ignores this as do her “allies” in their propaganda as she asks for donations. It’s as if Surasky copies verbatim what she writes off of Palestinian propaganda websites (which she very well may do).
Started in Berkeley by two Marxist professors  from UC Berkeley in the late 1990s, Jewish Voice for Peace was expanded and taken over by Mitchell Plitnick and an Israeli ex-patriot named Liat Weingart in the early 2000’s. Plitnick claims to be a Middle East Studies graduate from UC Berkeley, but seems to know little about the Middle East history. He also claims to be from an Orthodox Jewish family yet knows very little about Judaism.
Weingart once lectured at the UC Berkeley Hillel, where she told students that she considered herself a “citizen of the world” for whom her Judaism held little meaning, yet she was a “Jewish” voice for peace. She was in fact using her Jewish ancestry to speak for anti-Semitic irredentist and revanchist Arab groups like Al Awda. Al Awda, which means the return,  is a virulently anti-Semitic anti-Israel groups that supports Hamas and its goals openly and advocates the flooding of Israel with five million Arab “refugees” to overwhelm the Jewish population and achieve the end of a Jewish state. Al Awda also openly supports Hamas.  Jewish Voice for Peace would send out al-awda.org emails and promotionals on a regular basis and the original JVP group possibly had more anti-Israel Arab members in it than Jews,  a question the leadership repeatedly refused to answer. Ultimately, more and more Marxist “Jews,” who appeared to support the Stalinist edicts against “Zionism,” became members as members of Israel’s communist party joined in alliance.  Plitnick would write in the JVP newsletter and website that the Jewish Temple and the Exodus were merely myths and imply that Israel’s Jews today were not indigenous to the Middle East. Plitnick would repeat the standard propaganda denials that there was any Jewish connection to the land of Israel, the same as one can hear from Arabs in Ramallah.
JVP later apparently created liaisons with Israeli communists and anti-Israel anarchist radical groups in Israel. According to former JVP acolytes, Plitnick misused JVP funds for personal trips to engage in BDSM (sado-masochistic sex trysts)  he arranged over the Internet — until the  leadership in Israel got wind of this misappropriation of resources. The JVP demoted Plitnick and sent one Cecilie Surasky to the U.S. to replace him and retake the helm.  Surasky was previously involved in communist and various anarchist movements in Israel, including advocating for Palestinians to overrun the country.
Surasky began a campaign of deconstructing American awareness of Arab anti-Semitism by claiming JVP was merely presenting “just another point of view” to help Israel in the conflict, and that Jews like her were being “muzzled.”
Others in JVP like Penny Rosenwasser spoke of “re-framing antisemitism” in a JVP-promoted propaganda book and tried to suggest it was a bugaboo word used to stifle dissent that was pressing for “peace,” however, accusations of “Islamophobia” from Arab groups was always classified as legitimate by members of the group. This line of denying antisemitism while attacking Jews in Israel has worked to some degree successfully for JVP activists, who have managed to persuade some secular Jews that the group is striving for peace when it is in fact supporting an ideology to bring down the Jewish state by deconstructing American Jewish support for a Jewish national homeland. Raving favorable reviews of the book are written by anti-Israel activists known by few of the public.
A recent visit to Israel by the actor Mandy Patinkin  during which he mentioned that he belongs to JVP is an example. Patinkin, who played Che Guevara on Broadway in Evita, possibly thinks he is the mythical embodiment of the revolutionary communist leader, who was in fact was a mass murderer. While in Israel, Patinkin gave a speech hoping for the removal of Jews from Hebron, and suggesting that such a gesture would   bring about “peace” with the Arabs as well as make Jewish shrines in Hebron more accessible to Jews. In other words, deporting Jews would somehow be better for them.
Ed Asner, a former leader of the Screen Actors Guild in the US, also is a member of JVP; Asner possibly sees himself as a union leader fighting the revolution for the downtrodden, so he supports the “Palestinian revolution,”  with other “Jewish actors” like Roseanne Barr, who wasraised a Mormon, but claims she is Jewish,  and who admitted she lied about being sexually abused by her Jewish parents (no Jewish parental issues there). Being well-known names they were also brought on board.   Other actors who similarly have no real frame of referenceregarding Israel are sent allegations of Israeli atrocities, no matter how false, and then told that if they support “peace,” they can show it by joining JVP and lending their names.  It is doubtful that most of them have the time or inclination to investigate in any depth what and who it is they are supporting.
Openly, JVP suggests it only wants Jews deported from the West Bank, but the front group definitely belongs to consortiums led by Arabs that seek not only the destruction of all of Israel, but even the annihilation of all of world Jewry
That Surasky should then try to cloak her deceptive statements in her email as being “because of our history as Jews” is a classic example of how she and JVP are set up as a front group:  they maintain that the Jewish people do not support peace, do not support Israel, that Israel is a murderer of innocent people and that it is against Muslims.  She certainly is not  promoting “peace.” Jewish Voice for Peace’s leadership routinely meets at the Saudi- funded Washington Report on Middle East Affairs conclaves.  One has to wonder if a $100,000 “anonymous” matching donation Surasky tells her readers JVP will get if they reach $100,000 by the end of 2012 in that same email will come from the Saudis.  JVP isn’t talking.
Because JVP members claim to represent Jews, not Arabs, and are written about as if they legitimately represent only a political “peace” faction of Jews, when their real purpose is to enable Hamas and other Jew-killers in the Middle East,  they  are still admitted as speakers to Hillel meetings on campuses where they can sneak in posing as “peace activists.” Many Jews are even suckered into thinking they donate to a legitimate peace organization when their funds are really going to promote the destruction of Israel and even to support the Jew-killers in Hamas.
It is high time that such “Jewish” front groups be exposed — and rejected –for what they really are and for their real purpose, which is to undermine and help destroy a Jewish state as a homeland for the Jewish people.