Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Obama Abandons Israel While It Makes Nice With The Murderous, Vile, Evil Iranian Administration.


God Doesn’t Play Dice with the Universe, but Obama Plays Dice with Israel


Albert Einstein, genius, brilliant mathematician, and scientist, wrote “God doesn’t play dice with the universe.” Glimpsing at the intricate layers of mathematical and scientific complexities underlying the composition of our material world and of the Universe, Einstein appreciated the amazing rational, logical Mind behind it; the known and unknown laws that govern this Universe, acknowledging a moral Hand inherent in its framing.
But then Einstein wasn’t a politician, nor was he immortal; unlike Barack Obama who is, a politician at least; the immortal saviour aspect still being open to conjecture in some quarters, down dark community activist alleyways and vapid lily white Ivy League hallways. But what is not conjecture is that Obama is indubitably willing to play dice with the very existence of a people, the Jews, and their democratic state, the State of Israel. Why?
Israel is the sole bastion of democracy and refuge for all the oppressed people of the Middle East; Assyrians, Chaldeans, Christians, Copts etc. and the only ME bulwark against terrorism. Why this brazen gambit with apparent barely concealed antipathy towards Israel by lending legitimacy to Iran, a regime on the threshold of nuclear armament?
One reason is his ardent intention to salvage the wreak that is his foreign policy like a desperate gambler, and place all his bets on a nuclear deal with Iran promising “peace in our time.”
BIN-OpEd-Experts-300x250(1)Undeterred by his cataclysmic foreign policy disasters in Afghanistan, Iraq, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Egypt, and Iraq-the last being a casualty of his flamboyant pre-emptive withdrawal from Iraq leaving behind a massive power vacuum- and equally unfazed by the rare unanimity of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Israel, all in total opposition, warning that it’s a bad deal, that it will lead to military countermeasures including an arms race as each state scrambles for their own nuclear weapons.
Instead, Obama, like a desperate gambler, has placed all his bets on a nuclear deal with Iran promising “peace in our times.” Better a deal with the devil Iran than back America’s steadfast and most threatened ally Israel? A deal with Iran, the world’s first radical fundamentalist Islamic Republic on the scene that rivals Islamic State in its savage pathologies? The country whose biggest export is terror and aid to all terrorist organizations in a concerted worldwide attack to intimidate and coerce the West?
This is the same Iran that has executed 120,000 political prisoners and exterminated all but one or two Christian pastors. A totally sham democracy where the ruling Mullahs preapprove candidates and rigged elections. An Iran whose Mullahs are ranked number one by virtually every international authority on human rights violations; the same Iran that sent hundreds of its schoolboys as human mine detectors clearing the way for their tanks in the Iran-Iraq war! Is this what Supreme leader Khamenei meant when he recently said that “a society steeped in the spirit of martyrdom is unstoppable?”
Clearly this is another “leader” who prefers “leading from behind.” Jerome Corsi notes that “torture, imprisonment without rights, arbitrary arrests, and families unable to contact members arrested for unspecified crimes-these are regular occurrences in the Mullah controlled theocracy”. Many disappear. Some human rights programme Mr Obama. Can we trust these guys? Mr Obama says yes.
Are we expected to forget that this country has Jihad or holy war (a delightful oxymoron, too few ox’s and too many morons) embedded in its constitution and uses terror and violence as an instrument of state to extend their brand of Islamic rule throughout the Middle East? Are we expected to forget that this country, was instrumental in the murder of nearly 300 American marines and a further 300 casualties in Lebanon, Beirut 1983? The same country that provided Iranian military support in the arming and training of the Taliban in Afghanistan as well as protection and safe passage to al Qaeda operatives and support for the Iraq al Qaeda insurgency responsible for at least the death of another 500 American and allied soldiers?
Are we expected to ignore Iran’s twin revolutionary principles or foreign policies: “defying the United States and obstructing US foreign policy in the region as well as not recognizing Israel, as a state” and their stated belief in the words of former Prime Minister Ahmadinejad’s that “a world without America being not only desirable but achievable?” Equally ominous are the constant promises of the Iranian leadership that they will wipe Israel off the face of the earth. Just rhetoric you say? Please, not after 1945. Not after the genocides and mini holocausts of the last five years alone.
What about the things Iran hasn’t tried to hide besides the undermining of the futile attempts by American and coalition troops to create a stable functioning viable Iraqi state?
Firstly, consider its astoundingly successful foundational foreign policy goal since the Iranian revolution of 1979 of removing American presence and influence from the Middle East. Concomitant with apparent White House confusion of thinking, victims of their own spin no doubt, or intoxication with their own brand of “militant liberalism” or simple plain nativity, is the present reality of Iranian military occupation of large parts of Iraq.
In conjunction with its Shiite allies Iran is waging war against ISIS matching brutality with barbarities including the suppression, mass murder and the forced removal of Iraqi Sunni tribes as they pursue the domination of the whole of “Iraq.” And Obama is helping them by tackling Dr. Jekyll and ignoring Mr Hyde. It’s rather dangerous at the moment to be an American ally; you don’t know who is going to push you first. The Sunni tribal leaders who, after the demise of Sadam Hussein, bravely backed America after at great cost know the feeling, so does Mubarak.
Iran is systematically achieving military and political hegemony in the Middle East by controlling Bagdad, Beirut, Damascus and now Sana, in Yemen. It has forces on the Golan Heights, overlooking northern Israel, southern Lebanon, Gaza and deploying along the Syrian Jordanian border as we write. Why?
Also underreported is Iran’s control vis-à-vis allied forces and proxies, over the two strategically vital transit waterways, the Gulf of Hormuz and Port of Aden, or Bab el Mandab straits at the foot of the Red Sea. To put things into perspective, control over these two main arteries ensured Allied victory in both World Wars.
Can we trust Iran to respect the territorial integrity of neighbouring states? Lt. Col. Michael Segull reported by JCPA presented the Iranian perspective by quoting Ali Younesi, a senior advisor to Iranian President Rouhani and former Intelligence Minister:
“Iran today has become an empire as it was throughout history and its capital now is Baghdad, which is the center of our civilization and our culture and identity today as it was in the past…We will defend all the peoples of the region, because we consider them as part of Iran. We will fight Islamic extremism” (an adapted line from Hitler when describing Stalin no doubt) “Takfiris (apostates), atheists, neo-Ottomans, Wahhabists,” (“geo- speak for Saudi Arabia”) the West and Zionism (Israel).”
Need anything more be said?
What sane rational person looking at the facts and applying the logic that if someone’s past actions are predictive of their future actions then how could any impartial observer trust Iran? What is unconscionable is that Obama’s policy is being applied in the knowledge of Iran’s stated foreign policy goals, the destruction of both America and Israel and anyone else in fact, who opposes their will and also in the knowledge that Iran’s ruling political-religious elite embrace Shi-ite Islamic eschatology (end times)! This apocalyptic end time scenario, is one actively created by the “true believers” that will usher in their twelfth Mahdi or Messiah completely destroying the unbelievers-(that’s you and me baby), if you are not a rabid Islamic Shiite 70 virgins guaranteed, murderer.
As fanciful and farfetched as this sounds to western secular minds, remember that one of the two biggest monsters of the 20 century plainly stated in Mein Kampf what his murderous intentions were, but big Media chose once again to gloss over these statements as being rhetorical. Similarly today, Iran’s apocalyptic vision is a mind numbing nuclear horror their “Supreme Leader” and religious-political elite embrace.
Obama has said he can cut a deal with Iran. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu whose country has the most to lose –nuclear extinction – reiterated:
“Iran has defied international inspectors on at least three separate occasions – in 2005, 2006, and 2010. Iran broke the locks, shut off the cameras. Iran was caught operating secret nuclear facilities in Natanz and Qom that inspectors didn’t even know existed. Iran could be hiding nuclear facilities that we don’t know about, and has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted.”
Iran also refuses “inclusion in the nuclear talks of its missile programs or any other issue, such as its involvement in terror, subversive activity in moderate Arab countries, and blatant human rights violations.”
Are these the civilized, rational, responsible humanitarian- minded players Obama should be scrambling to cut a deal with? Any question of what guarantees we have that Iran will keep the terms of the prospective treaty leads to the simple answer, none, other than their word, and we know how much that is worth.
We need to dump this stacked deck and get some smart players. An internationally recognised, nuclear capable Iran is too high a stake to wager. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, NPT, will be blown sky-high leading to God only knows what else in this, the most unstable environment in the world! Can we trust Obama’s gambling instincts to play a successful hand?
To answer that, look at his track record. His sanguinity is deadly reminiscent of Obama’s Presidential Executive Order111which decreed after 50 years of bipartisan American foreign policy of supporting “authoritarian, secular but stable”, albeit despotic, government rule in the Middle East, that America under Obama was going to support “moderate” “Islamist movements” wave his imperial liberal wand and introduce a new Arab Springtime. This tectonic shift in American foreign policy sent political seismic waves across the ME that have quite literally, unleashed unbridled centuries of sectarian hate in a tsunami of bloodletting over the last five years; but of course that’s all mostly history now isn’t it like the many shattered ancient ethnic religious minorities genocidally obliterated across the Middle East with, it seems, a nuclearized hate.
One cannot overlook the poignant replay of a great historical religious drama to this event. Prime Minister Netanyahu addresses the American Congress on the eve of the Purim, the Israeli feast that celebrates their national deliverance through the agency of Queen Esther and her influence on the Persian King Xerxes, from Haman the Amalekite’s plot to exterminate all Jews throughout the Persian Empire. Xerxes is made known of Haman’s diabolical political chicanery and manoeuvring and in characteristic eastern fashion Xerxes does to him what Haman had sought to do to the Jews. Xerxes heeded and this great ancient superpower prospered.
Will Obama as leader of the sole present superpower do the same? Or will the USA like present Persia (Iran), for so long great friends with Israel, part company and become enemies by playing dice with her existence? Hitler’s guarantees guaranteed nothing. Obama’s assurances and promises promise nothing, except the same result: war.

Is Depression Of The Pilot The Reason For The Germanwings Crash?

All of the attention on the co-pilot of the Germanwings plane is confusing for us. First of all, most crashes take months to come up with a reason for the accident, an answer in one week is very suspect. Secondly, "finding" torn up medical notes, seems a bit "lucky."  Thirdly, there has been no official mention of terrorism. And lastly, along with the terrorist connection, the National Security Council spokeswoman stated on the day of the accident that there was no proof that it was terrorism related yet Middle East websites said different.


We know there is a lot of information that is not known at this time  which will become evident as the investigation continues. However, when the Administration issues a statement on terrorism before any of the bodies or black  boxes are recovered, seems a bit irresponsible. Or is it making a preemptive  strike against those who would assume that is the case? Or does the Administration know something that they are not telling us?

From the very beginning of this tragedy there are a number of issues that usually does not occur in any aircraft accident. Naming the captain but not the co-pilot, the Administration's "no terrorism" here statement, the immediate descent on the co-pilot's home, and the finding of "medical notes" in his trash. Heck, in one week we know more about this pilot's love life than we do for President Obama's!  There is something wrong with this whole picture.

We hope there is not a cover-up going on here, but suspect there is.

Conservative Tom


Depressed Pilots: Ticking Time Bombs?

Friday, 27 Mar 2015 05:43 PM
The tragic crash of a jetliner in the French Alps has spotlighted the potential problem of airline pilot depression.

German pilot Andreas Lubitz intentionally crashed a Germanwings plane, killing all 150 aboard after apparently being treated for mental illness, authorities say.

Depression is one of the most common mental illnesses, with studies showing that about 9 percent of American adults suffer from the condition, according to the Centers for Disease Control.

Since there are 104,000 commercial and airline pilots in the U.S., that would mean there could potentially be some 9,200 pilots with depression, assuming they suffer the illness at the same rate as other American adults.

With such statistics, it is very likely there are pilots flying today who aredealing with depression, a factor that could put passengers at risk, according to Angelos Halaris, M.D., a Loyola University Medical Center psychiatrist who specializes indepression treatment.

Although pilots are routinely screened for physical and mental problems, Lubitz apparently successfully hid his condition from his employer, according to reports.

“People who are depressed can hide it successfully,” said Dr. Halaris, who heads Loyola’s psychiatry department. “They can fake a normal mood, or tear up a letter saying they are not fit for duty, especially if they are so driven or take it as a personal insult or embarrassment.”
Latest News Update

According to crash investigators, the pilot had taken a break from flight training in 2009 for depression and anxiety treatment, which should have been a red flag, said Dr. Halaris.

Such lax oversight points to problems not only in other countries, but in the U.S. as well, Dr. Halaris told Newsmax Health.

“One area in we have lagged is our ability to do a good job assessing individuals in terms of putting them in charge of a plane, train, or even surgeons -- any job in which they have control of other people’s lives. We need to get serious about it.”

Dr. Halaris has treated thousands of people with depression over the years, and said he makes such a recommendation with reluctance. But in the case of pilots, this is justified, he believes.

“If the person fails, we are left with a disaster,” he said.

Such a prohibition should apply even to those people successfully controlling their depression with medication, said Dr. Halaris.

“People on medication can stop taking medication, and unfortunately, with depression this happens all the time. If people stop taking it, they can go into a massive relapse,” he said.

“We don’t know if this is what happened in the case of the German pilot, but if it was, it took the lives of 150 people.”

Dr. Halaris said he was taking his stance to prohibit depression patients from being pilots reluctantly because, “I am the last person to support any discrimination with people with a psychiatric disorder.”
© 2015 NewsmaxHealth. All rights reserved.


Climate Refugees Will Get Worse As Global Warming Increases Says Kerry. Hogwash!

John Kerry Warns Ambassadors about 'Climate Refugee' Threat

Image: John Kerry Warns Ambassadors about 'Climate Refugee' Threat(Bao Dandan/Xinhua/Landov)
Friday, 27 Mar 2015 12:25 PM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Countries will be dealing with "climate refugees" as the effects of climate change are felt around the world, Secretary of State John Kerry warned U.S. ambassadors attending the Global Chiefs of Mission Conference in Washington this week.

"There'll be climate refugees that all of you will be coping with at some point. If not now, in the not-too-distant future," Kerry told the ambassadors, while making dire warnings about the threats posed by climate changes around the world and calling for them to make the issue a priority moving forward, reports CBS News in Washington.
According to National Geographic, climate refugees have been around for many years, as the climate has actually changed many times since the Earth's formation billions of years ago.

Generally, National Geographic explains, climate refugees are included in a larger group of immigrants, environmental refugees, who are people forced to flee their homes because of natural disasters like volcanoes or hurricanes.

And according to the International Red Cross, there are far more environmental refugees who flee their homes than there are political refugees running from wars and other issues.

The United Nations high commissioner for refugees, in its last such report in 2009, said some 36 million people were displaced by natural disasters in that year alone, and scientists are predicting that number could raise to at least 50 million by 2050, and some even say that number could climb to 200 million.
Latest News Update

Climate change is already resulting in billions of dollars in damages, Kerry said.

"It is a national security threat, it is a health threat, it's an environmental threat, it's an economic threat," said Kerry in his address. 
"We're spending billions upon billions — $110 billion last year on the damages that occurred because of the increased level of major weather events around the world; droughts that are 500-year droughts, not 100-year droughts; places that have less and less water; food that is less produced where it used to be."

And while the arguments continue about whether climate change is caused by humans or is just part of natural changes, Kerry insisted that scientists concur that humans are at fault.

"Ninety-seven percent of all the scientists for 20 years tell us unequivocally that this is happening and happening now, and humans are causing it, and we have a responsibility to respond to it," he said.

The comments came as part of a longer address to the ambassadors, during which Kerry outlined their roles in helping to keep order in an increasingly complicated world.

"We are in a moment of remarkable transformation — not all of it in our control," he said.

"But because of technology, because of more and more people in the middle class, because of travel in today's world, because of access to information, more and more people are demanding more from governance. And in too many places, governance is not up to the task. It's a failure of governance in many places that is giving us the challenge of these failing states — not our failure, if you don't mind my saying so."
Related Stories:
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Anti-Israel Groups Ignore The Truth And Politicize Lies

The troublesome truth is that there is no apartheid in Israel. Israel allows Arabs and Muslims full human and civil rights in all areas of life, including as full members of Israel's Parliament, the Knesset.
To brand Israel as an apartheid state when none of these restrictions exist is not only defamatory propaganda but, according to the black South African Reverend Kenneth Meshoe, trivializes the real suffering of blacks under apartheid.
While Tutu et al discuss Israel the "oppressor," Israel's surrounding enemies seek to obliterate it in accordance with their genocidal charter. Given the silence of Tutu et al on that subject, apparently an agenda of genocide is not seen by them as an injustice.
Tutu also disregards the countless Christians being slaughtered in Muslim states; that black slaves are still being held in Muslim states such as Mauritania; the forcible taking of "infidel" slaves by Boko Haram and ISIS; the racist genocide in Darfur and the 10 million Muslims slaughtered by other Muslims since 1948.
Critics of Sabeel suggest that it actually seems to be a political organization promoting anti-Israel propaganda while driving Church policy toward destroying Israel through BDS.
Why are Desmond Tutu, Sabeel and the anti-Semitic Churches that support BDS so tolerant of the persecution of Christians, global Islamist terrorism, the perpetual threat of Israel's obliteration and the fact that Muslims have driven Christians out of Bethlehem, the very place of Jesus's birth?
These calumnies and misrepresentations have nothing to do with peace and even less to do with justice. They are even more unacceptable coming from church groups or a man of the cloth.
A virulent global campaign by a powerful Christian lobby is trying to influence the Church and use it to delegitimize Israel. The lobbying group is the Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, with Nobel Prize Laureate and retired Anglican Bishop Desmond Tutu as its patron.
Tutu not only agreed to serve as Sabeel's patron but also to "assist the Palestinian Christian organization in its outreach and development work with Christian Churches around the world."
On its website, Sabeel refers to Israel in terms such as "oppressor," "occupier," "immoral", a violator of Palestinian human rights and its founder, Naim Ateek, refers to Israel's "crucifixion" of Palestinians:
"It only takes people of insight to see the hundreds of thousands of crosses throughout the land, Palestinian men, women, and children being crucified.... The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily."
As a principal agent of the Sabeel lobby, Desmond Tutu's words of indictment reference Israel as the "oppressor."
Tutu knows hate first-hand from South African apartheid, but acutely damages his stature and credibility by unjustly exploiting the tragedy inflicted by the South African regime. He does this in a defamatory propaganda message permeating the Christian Church under liberation theology. He stated outright in an article: "I know firsthand that Israel has created an apartheid reality within its borders and through its occupation. The parallels to my own beloved South Africa are painfully stark indeed." Meanwhile, Israel allows Arabs and Muslims full human rights in all areas of life, including as full members of Israel's Parliament, the Knesset.
Liberation theology is a radical movement that originally developed in South America before making its way to South Africa. The movement was apparently created in response to poverty and ill-treatment of ordinary people. It was caricatured in the phrase, "If Jesus Christ were on Earth today, he would be a Marxist revolutionary."
Liberation theology subsequently became influential in the Churches under South African apartheid. Black theologians, to answer the faith questions of the poor and oppressed, confronted the theology of the Christian status quo, which tended to align with the prevailing institutions of power. Hence, in 1985, the Kairos document was developed, which offered a necessary alternative to biblical and theological models. In essence, the Kairos document focused on the message of liberation theology by encouraging the reading and interpreting of the bible through the eyes of the poor.
To the theologians, the Kairos document was a challenge to the church to rise up against apartheid. The theologians deemed it to be "the moment of grace and opportunity, the favorable time in which God issues a challenge to decisive action." They continued: "If this opportunity is missed, and allowed to pass by, the loss for the Church, for the Gospel and for all the people of South Africa will be immeasurable."
What was once crafted as a just challenge to the Church in 1985 thus became warped into propaganda in 2009, when a new document, the Kairos Palestine , was written. Although based on the same "faith questions of the poor and oppressed" under the South African apartheid regime, this time the Palestinians were presented as the equivalently oppressed.
While Tutu et al discuss Israel the "oppressor," Israel's surrounding enemies seek to obliterate it in accordance with their genocidal charter. Given the silence of Tutu et al on that subject, apparently an agenda of genocide is not seen by them as an injustice.
Continuing to misuse South African black suffering as a launch pad, Tutu has also been forceful in his push for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel. He states that BDS helped to achieve South African democracy and that BDS will work toward ending "Israel's decades long occupation of Palestinian territory and the unfair and prejudicial treatment of the Palestinian people by the Israeli government ruling over them" -- despite the fact that Jews have lived in the area for nearly 4,000 years.
Tutu also states: "I have witnessed the systemic humiliation of Palestinian men, women and children by members of the Israeli security forces... their humiliation is familiar to all black South Africans who were corralled and harassed and insulted and assaulted by the security forces of the apartheid government."
The troublesome truth, however, is that there is no apartheid in Israel. Black South African Reverend Kenneth Meshoe, founder and president of the African Christian Democratic Party and member of the South African parliament since 1994, indicates that under apartheid South Africa, blacks could not vote or hold high government positions; the races were strictly segregated at sports arenas, schools, hospitals, public transportation, public washrooms, benches in waiting rooms; and blacks had inferior medical care, hospitals, and education; they were forced to live in separate residential enclaves. Blacks also carried IDs to show their place of residence at all times, or they faced the penalty of being beaten or thrown in jail. In other words, blacks were criminalized for being black and severely restricted by state laws. Further, marriage was also outlawed between different races.
To brand Israel as an apartheid state, when none of these restrictions exist, is not only defamatory propaganda, but, according to Meshoe, trivializes the real suffering of blacks under apartheid. Meshoe has visited Israel many times, and says that he has never seen any evidence of apartheid. In his reference to the purely defensive so-called "apartheid" wall, Meshoe accurately calls it the "security" barrier. "It is the responsibility of every government to assure the safety of its citizens," he says.
While Sabeel states as its mission support of the "oppressed" Palestinians of the "indigenous Church," it never highlights the oppression and abuses of Palestinians by their own leadership, or the leadership of other countries hosting them such as Jordan or Lebanon. Tutu also disregards the abuses by Hamas, which uses its Palestinian citizens as human shields in its wars to obliterate Israel.
As the patron of Sabeel Center, Tutu also disregards the countless Christians being slaughtered in Muslim states; that black slaves are still being held in Muslim states such as Mauritania; the forcible taking of "infidel" slaves and sex slaves by Boko Haram and ISIS; the racist genocide in Darfur and the 10 million Muslims slaughtered by other Muslims since 1948.

Clockwise from top right: Anglican Bishop Desmond Tutu; Anti-semitic writer Max Blumenthal addresses the Friends of Sabeel North America 2014 conference; A Friends of Sabeel North America activist in Portland, Oregon stands in front of a Target store, demanding the boycott of SodaStream, an Israeli company.

Critics of Sabeel suggest that it actually seems to be a political organization promoting anti-Israel propaganda in Christian churches globally, while driving Church policy toward destroying Israel through BDS.
Sabeel also states that, "for many years the Palestinians rejected the establishment of the state of Israel because it was founded on the denial and violation of Palestinian rights." Historically, however, it is the Jews -- then Romans, then Christians, then Arabs then later the Turks -- who lived on that land during nearly 4,000 years. Historically, it has always been the Arabs who rejected all Jewish rights, including, in the last century, their rejection of the UN partition plan. On the day of Israel's founding in 1948, a group of Arab armies invaded Israel. The Palestinians also refused to make even a counter-offer to generous plans set forth by Israeli Prime Ministers Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, both of which offered 97% of everything the Palestinians were demanding.

According to a brief by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, face-to-face surveys found that most Palestinians in east Jerusalem would prefer to become citizens of Israel rather than citizens of a new Palestinian state.
One must ask, then, why is it that Desmond Tutu, Sabeel and the anti-Semitic churches that support BDS are so tolerant of the persecution of Christians, global Islamist terrorism, the perpetual threat of Israel's obliteration and the fact that Muslims have driven Christians out of Bethlehem, the very place of Jesus's birth?
Bethlehem's Christians accounted for over 85% of the population in 1948, and the numberdwindled since then, to 12% in 2006. The disputed territories of the West Bank and Gaza have for years been administered by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and by an elected Hamas. Under these regimes, Christian Arabs have been victims of human rights abuses, including beatings, torture, kidnappings, forced marriages, sexual harassment, intimidation, land thefts, firebombing of churches, denial of employment and economic boycotts.
In addition, PA Leader Mahmoud Abbas has declared about a future Palestinian state: "In a final resolution, we would not see the presence of a single Israeli -- civilian or soldier -- on our lands." And a declaration like that is not considered apartheid?
Friends of Sabeel conferences continue to take place several times annually in major North American cities, where calls for BDS are sounded, and where "overcoming Christian Zionism in a quest for Justice" in "seeking the peace of Jerusalem" is a major theme. These calumnies and misrepresentations of Israel have nothing to do with peace and even less to do with justice. They are even more unacceptable coming from church groups or a man of the cloth.