Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, June 27, 2019

Would This Not Be Sweet Revenge?



Obama-Clinton bribery BOMBSHELL set to explode on 2020 race

by Frank Holmes, reporter
Right now, 24 people are running for the Democratic presidential nomination — but only one of them could land the last two Democrat presidents in jail.
Former Rep. Joe Sestak, D-P.A., has accused former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton of committing felonies… at the expense of his political career.
He’s a career military man who put service to his country first, whose honesty might have cost him two elections. But it might just reopen a scandal that Obama and Clinton thought they had buried long ago.
Sestak could finger the last two Democrats to sit in the Oval Office for bribery and trying to undermine American democracy.
He graduated from Annapolis and became a vice admiral in the Navy before being elected to Congress in 2007 and 2009. Then, Sestak decided to run for U.S. Senate.
The Obama administration had a different idea.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-P.A., had become liberal and decided to switch parties. That would give Obama a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, which Democrats could use to force a left-wing agenda through Congress.
Sestak thought Pennsylvania deserved better than a phony like Specter. But Obama wanted Sestak out of the race, pronto.
So, he and Bill Clinton got together and made Sestak an offer they thought he couldn’t refuse.
Clinton told Sestak that Obama would appoint him to an influential White House advisory position… if he’d agree to drop out of the primary and back Specter.
Instead, Sestak went public.
“Last summer, I received a phone call from President Clinton,” Sestak said. “White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanue had spoken with him about my being on a Presidential Board while remaining in the House of Representatives.”
“I said no,” Sestak said. The only thing he cared about was whether running was “the right thing to do for Pennsylvania working families.”
Sestak said Clinton told him that “he knew I’d say that,” and “the conversation moved on.”
Sestak, who earned a PhD at Harvard, is no dummy; he knew how serious his allegations were.
Republicans threatened to start Congressional hearings and even mentioned impeachment.
It’s illegal to offer a bribe to stop someone from running for office, which means both Obama and Clinton could both be in hot water.
“Those involved could be guilty of violating federal laws,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said at the time. “At least four of them.”
One federal law says “whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position…or other benefit” in “connection with any primary election” faces a fine or a year in prison, “or both.”
Another makes says that anyone who “uses his official authority for the purpose of interfering with, or affecting, the nomination or the election of any candidate for…Member of the Senate…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”
To make matters worse for Obama, he pulled the same move in September 2009, having his deputy chief of staff offer a position to a Colorado Democrat named Andrew Romanoff if he’d drop out of the U.S. Senate primary.
“There is simply no wiggle room for Sestak,” said Fitton. “Either he lied or someone at the White House committed a felony.”
But after Sestak went public, a funny thing happened: He clammed up and refused to give any more details.
Republicans saw the long arm of the Clinton-Obama machine gettiing its claws into him and telling him to shut up—or else.
Michelle Malkin’s website said that Sestak may have had a “Godfather” experience and “woke up next to a horse’s head one day.”
Still, Sestak refused to step aside. He beat Specter like a drum in the  primary.
Then the Democratic Party pulled its support and let him lose to Republican Pat Toomey.
Inside the beltway, establishment Republicans let the bribery scandal slide — former President George W. Bush had done the same thing a few years earlier.
Sestak ran for Senate again in 2016, but that year the Clinton Machine made sure he didn’t even win the nomination.
They thought they buried Sestak forever.
Now, he’s running for president—and he could reopen the whole can of worms.
Of course, the most explosive Democrat running for president wasn’t invited to the debate stage this week. But that hasn’t stopped Sestak from speaking out.
“I had worn the cloth of our nation for over 31 years in peace and war,” Sestak said.
He’s not afraid to fight one more time — and the Obama/Clinton syndicate is shaking in its boots.
Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”

If Tax Returns Are Private, Why Is This Occuring?

Wednesday, 26 June 2019 07:23

Democrats May Get Trump’s Tax Records

Written by
    Rate this item
    (1 Vote)
    Democrats May Get Trump’s Tax Records
    (Washington)
    A US District Judge is allowing a lawsuit from Democrats against President Trump to proceed. The lawsuit is from Congressional Democrats and the green light they have received will allow them to begin collecting records from businesses owned by the president. The judge denied a request by the DOJ to pause the case in order for it to be reviewed by a higher court. “This case should have been dismissed. It presents important questions that warrant immediate appellate review and is another impractical attempt to disrupt and distract the president from his official duties”, said the DOJ. The department will now try a long-shot emergency plea to an appeals court in Washington.

    FINSUM: This did not get covered much in the media, but it is an important development as this will bring the Democrats closer to getting all the records they want. The fight is escalating.

    Wednesday, June 12, 2019

    Agree? Disagree?

    Bob Livingston Alerts
    History is repeating itself.In 1935, the American Eugenics Society's dogma held that eugenics was a "racial preventive medicine" that sought to remove "degenerates" that were an "insidious disease" affecting the societal body in a similar manner to a cancer in the human body.
    Or as Konrad Lorenz, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and later a psychologist with the Nazi Germany's Office of Racial Policy put it:
    There is a close analogy between a human body invaded by a cancer and a nation afflicted with subpopulations whose inborn defects cause them to become social liabilities. Just as in cancer the best treatment is to eradicate the parasitic growth as quickly as possible, the eugenic defense against the dysgenic social effects of afflicted subpopulations is of necessity limited to equally drastic measures. ... When these inferior elements are not effectively eliminated from a (healthy) population, then — just as when the cells of a malignant tumor are allowed to proliferate throughout a human body — they destroy the host body as well as themselves.
    These "degenerates" were not only the "inferior races" (that is the nonwhites), but also the "two million (in 1935) ‘feebleminded' persons in the United States in need of institutional care and 150,000 epileptics (90,000 were actually institutionalized). Another 320,006 persons were institutionalized for insanity."* These people were afflicted with "defects" that eugenicists believed made them a drain on society.
    The American Eugenic Society (spawned from the Progressive movement), which had helped push sterilization laws through in as many as 30 states in the early 20th century, was a staunch proponent of the Nazi Germany sterilization program in 1937. The organization's secretary, Frederick Osborne, noted: "Taken altogether, recent developments in Germany constitute perhaps the most important social experiment that has ever been tried." American and German eugenicists were so ideologically close that they regularly translated and shared each other's literature.
    The Nazi eugenic sterilization program Osborne was lauding mandated the sterilization of people with disabilities deemed heritable. Those "disabilities" included being a human of "worthless" or "inferior" value in hereditary terms. Eugenics was synonymous with "race hygiene," and its most fundamental program was to purify the race by eliminating "low grade" and "degenerate" groups. This created in America and Germany a generic racism and sexism. Not surprisingly, the victims always turned out to be the traditional victims of racism: Jews, blacks, women and the poor.*
    Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was a longtime sponsor and board member of the American Eugenics Society. She used the wealth of her husband Noah Slee's 3-In-One Oil company fortune to promote eugenics and grow Planned Parenthood. Sanger, in a 1925 essay titled "The Need of Birth Control in America," wrote:
    Such human weeds [defined by her in published writings alternately as morons/defectives, delinquents/misfits/the maladjusted, and dependents/the poor] clog up the path, drain up the energies and the resources of this little earth. We must clear the way for a better world, we must cultivate our garden.
    To "clear the way" Sanger wanted to segregate and neuter those deemed by her and society to be racially or socially undesirable.*

    The END of CNN is Coming...

    Trump Derangement Syndrome is taking this once-proud news station down. Recent ratings show DOUBLE-digit decline AGAIN this year. They're down 15% in primetime alone! If you want the TRUTH, the WHOLE truth, there IS a place you can still trust.

    Click here to keep reading...

    The abortion crowd continues to use the philosophy of the eugenics movement to justify the mass slaughter of developing human beings even today. Their mantra is that the developing baby is not a human but a parasite that the mother can choose to keep or discard at will.
    In other words, the elites of society determine who is worthy to continue their existence, and who is "socially undesirable" and may/must therefore be eradicated. They then seek to justify their actions by labeling the "undesirables" in ways that lessens their personhood and makes them expendable.
    As if to prove our point, Oregon's state legislature last year passed a bill to allow patients with dementia or severe mental illness to be starved to death without their consent. Iceland claims to have "basically eradicated, almost, Down syndrome." That's a generous — and deceptive — slant on what Iceland's done. It actually has a program that encourages mothers to abort their babies if tests show the child has Down syndrome. Because most Down syndrome babies are murdered in the womb, only a few are born alive.
    Society has determined dementia, mental illness and Down syndrome are "undesirable" traits and must be eliminated from society.
    The new "undesirables" are Christian fundamentalists — though exactly what that means isn't quite clear. A new study published in the journal Neuropsychologia claims to have found a lesion in the brain's frontal lobe that is a predictor of "religious fundamentalism" or "the narrowing of religious beliefs." The study involved testing a sampling of 119 brain-damaged Vietnam War veterans versus 50 Vietnam War veterans with no history of brain injury. They were assessed based on a Religious Fundamentalism Scale (RFS).
    The RFS defined religious fundamentalism "as a cognitive construct based on specific religious beliefs: existence of religious teachings containing the fundamental truth about humanity; this fundamental truth is opposed to evil; the fundamental truth must be followed daily, and people that follow this fundamental truth have a special relationship with God."
    The study determined that the brain-damaged veterans sustained a more rigid belief system and were less likely to embrace progressive Christianity — or what I call Universalism.
    Universalism is the belief that all men are or will be saved or redeemed, regardless of creed. It is the perfect religious system for deceiving people into political slavery because of its mass appeal to equality.
    Universalism requires that we dismiss God's word as The Truth and instead accept that it is a malleable set of guidelines or nothing more than a cafeteria line from which we can pick and choose what we want to be true and what we don't. This is a pseudo-Christian front that is very much a part of the world system and an Antichrist.
    It turns us into a people of no opinion, no standards and no Christian morality. Under the guise of Universalism and tolerance, the world shrugs its shoulders at all sorts of evil. We no longer can differentiate good from evil — or even care to — and instead become "accepting" and "tolerant" of sinful behavior above all else. And this "all else" includes repentance, baptism and obedience — which are the requirements of salvation. We are taught a dumbed-down "Christianity" that seeks to mold God into man's image rather man into God's.
    So what the study scientists are telling us is that if we remain glued to the Truth we have damaged brains. An enlightened people with undamaged brains embraces progressive change as dictated by evolving mores and malleable social "truths."
    The Christian faith in its true New Testament form — what science is now labeling "fundamentalism" — is the only religion that cannot be manipulated in favor of One Worldism or Universalism, sometimes called the New World Order. This is precisely why the world system and its political leaders hate, despise and persecute Christians and Christianity.
    So again, I say that history is repeating itself. First, they call you mentally ill for believing there are basic Truths found in the Holy Scriptures. Then they can commit you to institutions and judge you mentally defective. Then they can kill you.
    This is the progress of the eugenics movement in the early 20th century that gave Hitler the impetus to eliminate Jews, the mentally and physically handicapped and anyone who wasn't of pure Anglo blood. The abortion movement, begun by progressive embracers of the eugenics movement to eliminate blacks and children who were "defective," survived the temporary destruction of European Nazism and is now back with a vengeance.
    We have "advanced" to euthanasia for the elderly and those in declining health with degenerative diseases. The next step is people with "mental defects" as defined by the progressives. Scary times.

    Yours for the truth,
    Bob Livingston
    Editor, The Bob Livingston Letter™

    Source:
     ferris.edu/isar/archives/eliminating-inferior.htm

    That Is The Game Plan!

    Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley