Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label BLM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BLM. Show all posts

Monday, March 9, 2020

Bunch Of Crybabies!

Federal Agency Sees More Than Half Its DC Staff Quit After Trump Order


More than half of the Bureau of Land Management’s Washington, D.C. staff quit their jobs after being told they would be transferred to Colorado and other western states to be closer to the lands they manage.
“New internal numbers from the Interior Department obtained by The Hill show 69 employees have left the agency rather than accept the new assignment. Another 18 left after the plans were announced but before they could be reassigned,” The Hill reports. “Those 87 employees outnumber the 80 who have agreed to the move.”
“The BLM move would uproot nearly all of the agency’s dwindling Washington staff out West, leaving just 61 of 10,000 employees in the nation’s capital,” The Hill reports.
The move is part of a Trump administration initiative to place regulatory agencies closer to the people they are supposed to serve. Most of America’s federal lands are in the western mountains and deserts.
Liberals have howled over the move, publicly admitting regulatory positions will be less likely to be filled by professional D.C. bureaucrats and more likely to be filled by people with direct ties to those affected by regulations.
Former top-level BLM employee Steve Ellis bemoaned the agency’s move, complaining it “removes BLM from the sphere of direct influence in the nation’s capital and critically weakens the agency’s ability for career leadership and their staff to collaborate across disciplines and work closely with other key agencies.”
“It will weaken the agency by marginalizing leadership in a relatively small western community,” he added, overlooking the fact those are exactly who know best about federal lands.
“The Trump administration is destroying the Bureau of Land Management by mistreating its staff and politicizing its mission and then lying to Congress and the public about the damage it’s causing. This is what happens when you put fossil fuel industry lobbyists and anti-public lands extremists in charge of government agencies,” complained House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Raul Grijalva, an avowed ecosocialist and advocate for total D.C. control of western lands.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Black Lives Matter Should Be Sued Out Of Existence


The Father of a Dallas Police Officer Is Suing

 Black Lives Matter

 66  27  2  58  165 
 

  6

Capture a a a a a a a a alknhsadl;asdfkl'asd
Last July, the group Black Lives Matter (BLM) held a protest in Dallas, during which five police officers were gunned down and seven others wounded by a sniper who fled and was later killed by a police robot armed with an explosive device. It was the deadliest day for law enforcement since the 9/11 terror attacks.
While committing the shooting spree, the gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, stated he wanted to “kill white people,” and especially police officers. During a standoff prior to being killed, Johnson said he would only negotiate with black officers. Johnson was reportedly motivated by police shootings of black men and was known to have anger management issues. A friend said he would watch the 1991 video of the Rodney King beating by police repeatedly.
Besides BLM, Johnson sympathized with or “Liked” the Facebook pages of the Black Riders Liberation Army, the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) and the Nation of Islam, all of which are listed as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Johnson also liked the page belonging to the African-American Defense League, an organization whose leader had called for the murder of U.S. police officers in the wake of the 2014 police killing of mentally challenged Chicagoan Laquan McDonald.
When street music seller Alton Sterling was killed by police in Baton Rouge, the organization “posted a message… encouraging violence against police,” reported the UK’s Guardian newspaper. According to a representative of NBPP, Johnson had asked the Houston chapter of the group why it had not purchased more guns and ammunition. Before his attack, Johnson had posted an angry diatribe against white people on his Facebook page.
Now, nine months after the incident, Enrique Zamarripa, the father of one of the police victims, 32-year-old Dallas Officer Patrick Zamarripa, is suing BLM and 12 other social justice groups in the Northern District of Texas for $550 million. The suit contends BLM incited “civil war between blacks and law enforcement, thereby calling for immediate violence and severe bodily injury or death” to police officers.
The lawsuit refers to BLM as a “violent and revolutionary gang” and says that “while defendant Black Lives Matter claims to combat anti-black racism, the movement has in fact incited and committed further violence, severe bodily injury and death against police officers of all races and ethnicities, Jews, and Caucasians.”
Enrique Zamarripa says, “I want justice for my son. He served three tours in Iraq, he protected his country, and he protected everybody. And he gave up his life doing that.”
The lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Zamarripa by Freedom Watch, a nonprofit group that has sued Hillary Clinton for her role in the Benghazi consulate attacks of 2012 and former President Obama over issues such as immigration, gun control legislation and biological epidemic readiness.
BLM, which up until this point has consisted only of a loose national structure with 30+ regional chapters, was founded by Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi in 2013. Despite having no official registration as a formal nonprofit organization, it’s received more than a hundred million dollars in donations from both the Ford Foundation and billionaire philanthropist George Soros, who’s also named in Zamarripa’s lawsuit.
BLM has been criticized for its anti-police stance by Sheriff David Clarke, Jr. of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin and by police officers in the states of Oregon and North Carolina. In the latter case, a police chief in Surf City retired after referring to BLM as a “terrorist group.”
The chief of the St. Louis (Missouri) Police Department, Sam Dotson, coined the term “The Ferguson Effect” to account for the rise in violent crime throughout the U.S. in 2015 following riots in Ferguson, Missouri related to the killing of African-American Michael Brown. According to Dotson, in the wake of many police shootings and subsequent protests, police were less active when enforcing the law because of fears that they might be charged with illegal behavior. As a result, Dotson claims, the homicide rate in 56 American cities rose measurably that year.
In March of 2016, BLM disrupted a planned Donald Trump rally in Chicago, forcing its cancellation. Four BLM protesters were arrested; two were “charged with felony aggravated battery to a police officer and resisting arrest,” according to the Chicago Tribune. One was “charged with one misdemeanor count of resisting and obstructing a peace officer.” The fourth person was “charged with two misdemeanor counts of resisting and obstructing a peace officer.”
BLM has also been accused of prejudice against Israel and has been termed an “inherently racist” group by former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.
For its part, BLM has denounced Micah Johnson, but has never denied that he had participated in its protests. Given that BLM has no formal structure (which may be by design to inhibit lawsuits such as this one), it may be difficult to pin blame on it as a national organization. Nonetheless, it’s lawsuits like this one that will determine how much goodwill the group enjoys from the public in the future.
Currently, approximately 42 percent of white Americans were unsure of their opinion of BLM, while 41 percent thought the group “advocated violence.” Less than 47 percent of white Americans see BLM as a movement versus a slogan, while 67 percent of black Americans feel exactly the opposite.
About 40 percent of white Americans support BLM, and less than 35 percent feel the group would “be effective, in the long run, in helping blacks achieve equality.”
~ Liberty Planet

Monday, February 22, 2016

When The Shoe Is On The Other Foot, Black Lives Matter Members Throw A Fit!

Black Lives Matter told it can’t discriminate against library patrons… blames ‘white supremacy’

Facebook/BLM Nashville
Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists in Nashville are accusing a local public library of having white supremacist policies because librarians informed the group that it cannot ban white people from the library while it meets.
According to reports, BLM issued a notice setting up a meeting at the North Branch Library in North Nashville stating “only black people as well as non-black people of color are allowed to attend.”
The library, being a taxpayer-funded institution, naturally asked the group to take its exclusionary event elsewhere.
“All meetings at our facilities must be open to the general public and news media,” library spokesperson Emily Waltenbaugh said. “We’re a library. We’re taxpayer funded.”
“We have to be open to anyone anytime,” she added.
Sounds sensible enough, right?
Well, the BLM chapter evidently didn’t think so. The group issued a statement announcing that their meeting had been moved to a local church, “Due to white supremacy in our local government…”
11143350_1062708673795689_5524270846174437417_o
The BLM group also suggested that the library deliberately attempted to disenfranchise the group during Black History Month.
The group further explained that its exclusionary policy is aimed at keeping white people from hijacking its conversations.
“In our space, we really don’t have that time to deconstruct the ways in which white people can help our movement. It really is a time dedicated to healing and community building among black people and people of color,” said a member of the Nashville group.
Needless to say, BLM Nashville is receiving significant backlash via social media.
“[I]f any group in America held a meeting and said blacks are not allowed you guys would be screaming bloody murder from the top of your lungs racism, racism, racism they don’t like it cuz were (sic) black it would be a freaking insane situation. So now that the shoes on the other foot you’re receiving virtually little or no resistance. So just keep that in mind,” one commenter pointed out.
Another said: “Am I the only black person here that finds this appalling? Not all whites are your enemies. And not all blacks are your friends.”

Monday, August 18, 2014

While We Agree That Law And Order Must Prevail, We Are Very Concerned By Militarization Of The Police And The Refusal Of Rioters To Stop Rioting.

America Is Under Military Occupation, But Americans Are Pushing Back

August 18, 2014 by 
 477 27

 4 688

Heavily armed and armored, camouflage-clad storm troopers swarmed across the city, pointing rifles at citizens and journalists, firing tear gas and blasting with sound cannons the crowds that were standing in their own yards and business parking lots, or walking down the streets. An armored vehicle with a machine gun mounted on top rolled past in a show of force.
A scene from some Third World dictatorship or from Communist China? No. It’s right out of middle America.
The response by the St. Louis County Police Department to protests in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed teenager, by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson was to demonstrate the overwhelming force of a military occupation in an effort to intimidate the populace into submission. It served to do the opposite.
Rather than disperse as ordered, residents stood in defiance, shouting “Hands up, don’t shoot,” and holding their hands in the air as a symbolic gesture to descriptions by multiple witnesses of Brown’s actions as he was shot multiple times. With crowds growing — and growing increasingly militant by throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at their oppressors — the local police were relieved of patrol duties by Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon and replaced by state police, led by a black former resident of Ferguson, Capt. Ron Johnson.
Capt. Ronald Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol smiles at demonstrators marching along W. Florissant Avenue in Ferguson on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2014. (David Carson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/MCT)
MCT/Capt. Ronald Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol smiled as demonstrators marched in Ferguson on Thursday.
Johnson came to Ferguson as a peace officer rather than an oppressor; and like a light switch had been turned, the tensions of the crowd subsided and protests became peaceful. Johnson walked the streets with protesters, listened to their concerns and showed he was on their side rather than on the side of their occupiers.
The crowd stood up to tyranny and won — at least temporarily. That changed Friday night. After some looting began, police again moved on the crowd but did little or nothing to help those being looted. On Saturday, Nixon declared a state of emergency and curfew. The curfew was largely ignored and the police brought the military equipment back. It erupted again on Sunday night when police moved in with teargas and smoke canisters and rubber bullets.
It’s the second time in recent months that American citizens have stood to defy a militarized assault. Back in April, armed goons from the Bureau of Land Management began rustling Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle in order to free up land he’s been grazing for years so that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, his family and his cronies could make what they considered better use of it. It was land to which Bundy claimed ancestral grazing rights, land he claimed belonged to Nevada rather than the U.S. government.
After a video went viral that showed armed BLM agents siccing dogs on and shooting Tasers at Bundy family members, members of Oath Keepers and other patriots — many of them armed — showed up at the Bundy ranch to stand up to the BLM, which was bringing in heavily armed and armored troops of its own.
A tense standoff ensued. Some of the highest-ranking members of the U.S. government called Bundy and his supporters domestic terrorists. President Barack Obama considereddeploying the military to drive Bundy and his supporters off the land. Some reports identified special forces members among the BLM agents on the scene.
In the end, the armed aggressors backed off and dispersed.
The militaristic style response by the St. Louis County PD is not surprising given the rising militarism of local police across the country. I began warning you of this several years ago in articles like “The Violent Militarization Of Local Police,” “Local Law Enforcement More Dangerous, Thanks To Trickle Down Of Military Equipment, Militarized Mindset,” and others that can be found in our Power of the State section. It is a natural and predicted outgrowth of the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, which has created an us-versus-them mindset between the government and those it views as its subjects and has resulted in the U.S. having the largest prison population in the world.
The increasing interaction between local police and unconstitutional federal law enforcement agencies like the Department of Homeland Security, the passing out of federal dollars to local agencies for training and equipment purchases and the proliferation of military hardware and weaponry have turned peace officers into oppression officers with military training, military equipment and the natural outgrowth of that: a military mindset.
Of course, blacks have for years been subject to special scrutiny and abuse by local police, but their complaints are usually dismissed by the majority that has been propagandized into believing that anyone falling on the wrong end of a police encounter must have been guilty of something and was, therefore, deserving of the abuse, no matter how egregious. Self-styled “law and order conservatives” are quick to dismiss the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendment rights of blacks and those who they think look like thugs or criminals or drug dealers whenever they have an encounter with police that ends badly. If they got shot, those “law and order conservatives” say, then they deserved it.
It appears that Ferguson police may have a history of not only abusing innocent people, like many other LEO (legally entitled to oppress) agencies, but of officers’ committing perjury in order to cover their abuse.
With a history like that, and with the militaristic response that followed, it’s certainly not surprising that Ferguson residents would suspect that their chances of learning the truth about the Brown shooting and seeing any punishment meted out to the LEO if he did — as it appears — go too far in administering his form of justice to a suspected strong-armed robber would be nil.
Another newly leaked document from DHS predicts an increased “anti-government violence of the next year.” Of course, the regime has been peddling this for several years with DHS missives and reports warning that enemies of America include people who believe in small government, fly the Gadsden flag, store food and water, served in the military, photograph landmarks or oppose gun laws.
But if there is anti-government violence in the next year, it will be because an abusive and oppressive government kept pushing Americans until they wouldn’t be pushed anymore. And if the government fears that if it pushes too far there will be anti-government violence, that is a good thing.
Update 1 (7:32 a.m.): After protests turned violent with claims by police that shots were fired in their direction and amid reports of more looting, the Missouri governor deployed the National Guard overnight to help restore order. The human rights group Amnesty International also announced last night that it was sending a team to observe the events. It’s the first time a human rights team from the organization has ever been sent to the U.S. -BL

While We Agree That Law And Order Must Prevail, We Are Very Concerned By The Police Equipment And The Continual Rioting.

America Is Under Military Occupation, But Americans Are Pushing Back

August 18, 2014 by  
 477 27
 
 4 688

Heavily armed and armored, camouflage-clad storm troopers swarmed across the city, pointing rifles at citizens and journalists, firing tear gas and blasting with sound cannons the crowds that were standing in their own yards and business parking lots, or walking down the streets. An armored vehicle with a machine gun mounted on top rolled past in a show of force.
A scene from some Third World dictatorship or from Communist China? No. It’s right out of middle America.
The response by the St. Louis County Police Department to protests in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed teenager, by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson was to demonstrate the overwhelming force of a military occupation in an effort to intimidate the populace into submission. It served to do the opposite.
Rather than disperse as ordered, residents stood in defiance, shouting “Hands up, don’t shoot,” and holding their hands in the air as a symbolic gesture to descriptions by multiple witnesses of Brown’s actions as he was shot multiple times. With crowds growing — and growing increasingly militant by throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at their oppressors — the local police were relieved of patrol duties by Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon and replaced by state police, led by a black former resident of Ferguson, Capt. Ron Johnson.
Capt. Ronald Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol smiles at demonstrators marching along W. Florissant Avenue in Ferguson on Thursday, Aug. 14, 2014. (David Carson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/MCT)
MCT/Capt. Ronald Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol smiled as demonstrators marched in Ferguson on Thursday.
Johnson came to Ferguson as a peace officer rather than an oppressor; and like a light switch had been turned, the tensions of the crowd subsided and protests became peaceful. Johnson walked the streets with protesters, listened to their concerns and showed he was on their side rather than on the side of their occupiers.
The crowd stood up to tyranny and won — at least temporarily. That changed Friday night. After some looting began, police again moved on the crowd but did little or nothing to help those being looted. On Saturday, Nixon declared a state of emergency and curfew. The curfew was largely ignored and the police brought the military equipment back. It erupted again on Sunday night when police moved in with teargas and smoke canisters and rubber bullets.
It’s the second time in recent months that American citizens have stood to defy a militarized assault. Back in April, armed goons from the Bureau of Land Management began rustling Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle in order to free up land he’s been grazing for years so that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, his family and his cronies could make what they considered better use of it. It was land to which Bundy claimed ancestral grazing rights, land he claimed belonged to Nevada rather than the U.S. government.
After a video went viral that showed armed BLM agents siccing dogs on and shooting Tasers at Bundy family members, members of Oath Keepers and other patriots — many of them armed — showed up at the Bundy ranch to stand up to the BLM, which was bringing in heavily armed and armored troops of its own.
A tense standoff ensued. Some of the highest-ranking members of the U.S. government called Bundy and his supporters domestic terrorists. President Barack Obama considered deploying the military to drive Bundy and his supporters off the land. Some reports identified special forces members among the BLM agents on the scene.
In the end, the armed aggressors backed off and dispersed.
The militaristic style response by the St. Louis County PD is not surprising given the rising militarism of local police across the country. I began warning you of this several years ago in articles like “The Violent Militarization Of Local Police,” “Local Law Enforcement More Dangerous, Thanks To Trickle Down Of Military Equipment, Militarized Mindset,” and others that can be found in our Power of the State section. It is a natural and predicted outgrowth of the War on Drugs and the War on Terror, which has created an us-versus-them mindset between the government and those it views as its subjects and has resulted in the U.S. having the largest prison population in the world.
The increasing interaction between local police and unconstitutional federal law enforcement agencies like the Department of Homeland Security, the passing out of federal dollars to local agencies for training and equipment purchases and the proliferation of military hardware and weaponry have turned peace officers into oppression officers with military training, military equipment and the natural outgrowth of that: a military mindset.
Of course, blacks have for years been subject to special scrutiny and abuse by local police, but their complaints are usually dismissed by the majority that has been propagandized into believing that anyone falling on the wrong end of a police encounter must have been guilty of something and was, therefore, deserving of the abuse, no matter how egregious. Self-styled “law and order conservatives” are quick to dismiss the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendment rights of blacks and those who they think look like thugs or criminals or drug dealers whenever they have an encounter with police that ends badly. If they got shot, those “law and order conservatives” say, then they deserved it.
It appears that Ferguson police may have a history of not only abusing innocent people, like many other LEO (legally entitled to oppress) agencies, but of officers’ committing perjury in order to cover their abuse.
With a history like that, and with the militaristic response that followed, it’s certainly not surprising that Ferguson residents would suspect that their chances of learning the truth about the Brown shooting and seeing any punishment meted out to the LEO if he did — as it appears — go too far in administering his form of justice to a suspected strong-armed robber would be nil.
Another newly leaked document from DHS predicts an increased “anti-government violence of the next year.” Of course, the regime has been peddling this for several years with DHS missives and reports warning that enemies of America include people who believe in small government, fly the Gadsden flag, store food and water, served in the military, photograph landmarks or oppose gun laws.
But if there is anti-government violence in the next year, it will be because an abusive and oppressive government kept pushing Americans until they wouldn’t be pushed anymore. And if the government fears that if it pushes too far there will be anti-government violence, that is a good thing.
Update 1 (7:32 a.m.): After protests turned violent with claims by police that shots were fired in their direction and amid reports of more looting, the Missouri governor deployed the National Guard overnight to help restore order. The human rights group Amnesty International also announced last night that it was sending a team to observe the events. It’s the first time a human rights team from the organization has ever been sent to the U.S. -BL