Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Barbary pirates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barbary pirates. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Do You Know What The Real History Of The Conflict Between Christianity And Islam? Doubtful!


The True History of Christendom and Islam


U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama’s recent condemnation of medieval Christian history to exonerate modern Islam is a reminder of how woefully ignorant (or intentionally deceptive) a good many people in the West are concerning the true history of Christian Europe and Islam.
The problem is that those who condemn things like the Crusades—including “mainstream” academics, journalists, movie-makers, and politicians—do so without mention of historical context.  Worse, they imply “we” already know the context: evil popes and greedy knights exploiting Christianity to seize Muslim lands and wealth.  Or as Karen Armstrong put it, “the idea that Islam imposed itself by the sword is a Western fiction, fabricated during the time of the Crusades when, in fact, it was Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam.”
The true story of Christendom and Islam is the antithesis of such claims.  Consider some facts for a moment:
A mere decade after the birth of Islam in the 7th century, the jihad burst out of Arabia.  Leaving aside all the thousands of miles of ancient lands and civilizations that were permanently conquered—including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and parts of India and China—much of Europe was also, at one time or another, conquered by the sword of Islam.
Among other nations and territories that were attacked and/or came under Muslim domination are (to give them their modern names in no particular order): Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Sicily, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Greece, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Lithuania, Romania, Albania, Serbia, Armenia, Georgia, Crete, Cyprus, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Belarus, Malta, Sardinia, Moldova, Slovakia, and Montenegro.
In 846 Rome was sacked and the Vatican defiled by Muslim Arab raiders; some 600 years later, in 1453, Christendom’s other great basilica, Holy Wisdom (or Hagia Sophia) was conquered by Muslim Turks, permanently.  (Till this day, Turkish Muslims celebrate the sack of Constantinople, which saw much rapine and slaughter.)
The few European regions that escaped direct Islamic occupation due to their northwest remoteness include Great Britain, Scandinavia, and Germany.  That, of course, does not mean that they were not attacked by Islam. Indeed, in the furthest northwest of Europe, in Iceland, Christians used to pray that God save them from the “terror of the Turk.” This was not mere paranoia; as late as 1627, Muslim corsairs raided the northern Christian island seizing four hundred captives and selling them in the slave markets of Algiers.
Nor did America escape.  A few years after the formation of the United States, in 1800, American trading ships in the Mediterranean were plundered and their sailors enslaved by Muslim corsairs.  The ambassador of Tripoli explained to Thomas Jefferson that it was a Muslim’s “right and duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to enslave as many as they could take as prisoners.”
In short, for roughly one millennium—punctuated by a Crusader-rebuttal that the modern West is obsessed with demonizing—Islam daily posed an existential threat to Christian Europe and by extension Western civilization.
And therein lies the rub: Today, whether as taught in high school or graduate school, whether as portrayed by Hollywood or the news media, the predominant historic narrative is that Muslims are the historic “victims” of “intolerant” Western Christians.  (Watch my response to a Fox News host wondering why Christians have always persecuted Muslims.)
So here we are, paying the price of being an ahistorical society: A few years after the Islamic strikes of 9/11—merely the latest in the centuries-long, continents-wide jihad on the West—Americans elected (twice) a man with a Muslim name and heritage for president; a man who condemns the Crusades while openly empowering the same Islamic ideology that Christian warriors fought for centuries.
Surely the United States’ European forebears—who at one time or another either fought off or were conquered by Islam—must be turning in their graves.
But all this is history, you say? Why rehash it?  Why not let it be and move on, begin a new chapter of mutual tolerance and respect, even if history must be “touched up” a bit?
This would be a somewhat plausible position—if not for the fact that, all around the globe, Muslims are still exhibiting the same imperial impulse and intolerant supremacism that their conquering forbears did.  The only difference is that the Muslim world is currently incapable of defeating the West through a conventional war.
Yet this may not even be necessary.  Thanks to the West’s ignorance of history, Muslims are flooding Europe under the guise of “immigration,” refusing to assimilate, and forming enclaves which in modern parlance are called “ghettoes” but in Islamic terminology are the ribat—frontier posts where the jihad is waged on the infidel, one way or the other.
All this leads to another, perhaps even more important point: If the true history of the West and Islam is being turned upside its head, what other historical “orthodoxies” being peddled around as truth are also false?
Were the Dark Ages truly benighted because of the “suffocating” forces of Christianity?  Or were these dark ages—which “coincidentally” occurred during the same centuries when jihad was constantly harrying Europe—a product of another suffocating “religion”? Was the Spanish Inquisition—also condemned by Obama—a reflection of Christian barbarism or was it at least partially a reflection of Christian desperation vis-à-vis the many Muslims who, while claiming to have converted to Christianity, were practicing taqiyya and living as moles trying to subvert the Christian nation back to Islam?
Don’t expect to get true answers to these and other questions from the makers, guardians, and disseminators of the West’s fabricated epistemology.
In the future (whatever one there may be) the histories written about our times will likely stress how our era, ironically called the “information age,” was not an age when people were so well informed, but rather an age when disinformation was so widespread and unquestioned that generations of people lived in bubbles of alternate realities—till they were finally popped.
Reprinted with author’s permission from FrontPage Magazine

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/30159/true-history-christendom-islam-opinion/#QmqhSlRjsjlkqmph.99

Monday, January 19, 2015

Is Obama A Muslim Believer? We Think So.


When it comes to Islamic terrorism, is Obama on our side?

Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. As a kid, we used to say: “Sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me.” We were wrong. Words are dangerous. Words can be deadly. Words (or the lack of them) can inspire terrorism. As radical Islamic jihad threatens our countries, our children and our free speech, there is a new Neville Chamberlain. His name is Barack Hussein Obama.
The problem is in the words Obama says and doesn’t say. The words he uses to praise Islam and the words he refuses to say to denounce radical Islam are dangerous to America.
Ask any general. The key to fighting a war is to know your enemy. In the history of warfare, no one has ever been afraid to say the enemy’s name out loud. Until now. Until Obama.
Why can’t Obama connect the words “Islam” and “terrorism”? It’s not as if there isn’t enough evidence:
  • 9/11 was Islamic terrorism.
  • The Madrid train bombing was Islamic terrorism.
  • The London subway bombings were Islamic terrorism.
  • The Mumbai, India, hotel attack was Islamic terrorism.
  • The Kenyan mall attack was Islamic terrorism.
  • The Benghazi embassy attack was Islamic terrorism.
  • The burning of entire villages and wholesale murder of women and children in Nigeria is Islamic terrorism.
  • The murder of more than 100 innocent children at one school in Pakistan was Islamic terrorism.
  • The attack on Canada’s Parliament was Islamic terrorism.
  • The Boston bombing and Fort Hood massacre was Islamic terrorism.
  • The beheadings and slaughter of thousands of women and children by ISIS is Islamic terrorism.
  • The attack on the coffee shop in Australia was Islamic terrorism.
  • The attack and murder only days ago of cartoonists in Paris were very much Islamic terrorism.
If our President can’t put those two words together — if he can’t say “Islamic” and “terrorism” in the same sentence — then something is very wrong. Remember this is the same guy who denies that ISIS has anything to do with Islam.
It’s clear to anyone but an idiot or a liberal (I know, I repeat myself) that the world’s enemy is radical Islam. But sadly, it’s more not just “radical Islam.” Let’s stop being politically correct. Islam itself is a problem. Millions of Muslims who aren’t “radical” support and even celebrate intolerance and terrorism.
This is a battle being fought since the Crusades. Even Thomas Jefferson, the original libertarian isolationist, made an exception for Islam. Jefferson wanted no wars, no big military expenditures and no “entangling alliances.” Yet under Jefferson, we fought five long years of war versus Islamic terrorists (then called Barbary pirates).
As you can see, nothing much has changed. Call it Islam, call it radical Islam, call it jihad or call it fundamental Islam. The fact is Islam is producing hate, intolerance and death. Yes, it is the radical faction that wants to kill us, murder our children, drop gays from rooftops, stone women who show an inch of ankle, throw acid in the face of girls who dare try to educate themselves and, worst of all, murder anyone who speaks, writes or even draws cartoons with which they disagree. But there is more at work here than just a few “radicals.”
I was born a Jew. My relatives were murdered in Germany. Not every German was a Nazi murderer. But almost every German went along with the Holocaust. They knew what was happening. They let it happen. They remained silent while 6 million Jews were tortured, enslaved and gassed. That made them complicit in the murders.
What is happening today is eerily similar. Not all Muslims are bad people. Ninety-five percent will never murder anyone. Ninety-five percent will never be a terrorist. But like Germans of the Nazi era, most Muslims remain silent about the horrific acts of their brothers and sisters.
Even Muslims in America are guilty of silence. Have you seen any marches in Detroit by American Muslims denouncing terrorism? That makes them complicit. You are either for intolerance, terrorism and murder… or against it.
And that is why what Obama doesn’t say is such a problem. He, too, is silent. He, too, refuses to place blame on Islam. He refuses to call it what it is: Islamic terrorism or jihad. He refuses to call out American Muslims for not taking a strong public stand against terrorism.
Obama’s words (or the lack thereof) are dangerous. But his actions are even more dangerous. Here are but a few:
  • When a “unity rally” against Islamic terrorism was held in Paris this past Sunday, more than 40 world leaders were there. But not Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry or Eric Holder. The U.S. sent no top officials to attend. Even Turkey’s prime minister participated in the rally that Obama had no time to join. But Obama sent three White House officials to the funeral of thug Michael Brown. What was the message to the world? Maybe the important question is what message was Obama sending to radical Islamic terrorists?
  • Obama has left our borders wide open for terrorists. ISIS and al-Qaida terrorist cells are very likely in this country right now, ready to attack. Don’t take my word for it. Democratic U.S. Sen. Diane Feinstein just announced it. It’s a shame she doesn’t understand her own president is the enabler.
  • Obama (in concert with the United Nations) has suspended immigration laws to import thousands of Muslims from war zones like Iraq, Somalia and Syria.
  • He’s bringing the same violent, radicalized Muslims to America that have led to crisis, intolerance, terror attacks and crisis in Europe.
  • Obama has repeatedly condemned Israel for defending itself.
  • It was Obama who in 2010 criticized the now-infamous French magazine Charlie Hebdo for daring to publish cartoons offensive to Islam.
  • It was the Obama administration who banned the word “Islamic” from being associated with terrorism in FBI, law enforcement and military manuals.
  • Obama’s negotiations with Iran over its right to build a nuclear bomb can best be described as “surrender.”
  • Obama is releasing radical Islamic leaders from Gitmo, many who have already vowed to kill more Americans.
  • He’s even freed a nuclear terrorist.
What is Obama’s agenda? It certainly isn’t to protect Americans, our country or our children.
Does Obama suffer from complete ignorance? Crippling political correctness? Is he blinded by his childhood in Indonesia? I don’t know. But I know something is wrong.
Forget “I am Charlie.” We should all be asking publicly: “Who is Obama, and what is Obama’s agenda toward Islamic terrorism? Is he on our side? Is he here to help us, or to hurt us?”
I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.