Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Brexit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brexit. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Is Facebook Going To Get In Big Trouble For Selling User Information?

Zuck Says “Dumb F***s”… Incredible Disregard for Users Is on Full Display Again

Zuck Says “Dumb F***s”… Incredible Disregard For Users Is On Full Display Again
The past has a particularly painful way of dredging itself up, particularly when it repeats itself.
 
 Print
The past has a particularly painful way of dredging itself up, particularly when it repeats itself.
Mark Zuckerberg is finding that out in a very acute way. The Facebook boss is currently embroiled in a scandal involving Cambridge Analytica, a firm that allegedly bought data from no less than 50 million Facebook users without their permission.
That, along with the fact that privacy breaches have happened at Facebook before, makes this a story the media would pick up. And then came the fact that, according to the U.K. Daily Mail, that data was used by the Donald Trump and Brexit campaigns.
That’s when the hue and cry broke out like nothing else. But what did they expect? His disregard for users has always been on display.
Cambridge Analytica promised to “find your voters and move them to action” through data-driven campaigns and a team that includes data scientists and behavioral psychologists.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Facebook
 
“Within the United States alone, we have played a pivotal role in winning presidential races as well as congressional and state elections.”
OK. But where did everyone think they were getting that data? From you. Because Mark Zuckerberg thinks you’re dumb and isn’t afraid to sell your every detail. And he said as much in a 2003 IM conversation.
Back during the formation of Facebook at Harvard — back when it was called The Facebook and limited to campus — Zuckerberg offered user data to a friend in an infamous instant messenger conversation which was later leaked on the file-sharing site Medium.
Zuckerberg: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuckerberg: Just ask.
Zuckerberg: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses,
Friend: What? How’d you manage that one?
Zuck: People just submitted it.
Zuck: I don’t know why.
RELATED: New Yorker Magazine Reveals Disgusting Trump Cover That Even Liberals Hate
Zuck: They “trust me”
Zuck: Dumb f***s
In a 2010 interview with The New Yorker, the profane exchange was brought up. Zuckerberg claimed that he’d “grown.”

Do you think Mark Zuckerberg has contempt for Facebook users?

   
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
“If you’re going to go on to build a service that is influential and that a lot of people rely on, then you need to be mature, right?” the Facebook CEO said. “I think I’ve grown and learned a lot.”
Yes. He’s certainly grown. Grown to the point where he could sell user data to the Obama campaign back in 2012, for instance. Grown to the point where he could sell the data of 50 million users to Cambridge Analytica, for another. Or grown to the point where they feel they can purge people’s news feeds of things they don’t like, particularly when it comes to things that may be conservative in nature. They know what’s best for you, after all.
Mark Zuckerberg has certainly grown. And that’s not a good thing for you or your personal data.
What are your thoughts on this chat transcript?

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Will Theresa May Be Re-Elected

May’s U.K. Election Gamble Imperiled

Prime Minister Theresa May’s bet that she could bolster her parliamentary majority ahead of Brexit talks now looks dicey

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May answers questions during a campaign appearance at a manufacturer in Bath, England, on Wednesday.
Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May answers questions during a campaign appearance at a manufacturer in Bath, England, on Wednesday. PHOTO: LEON NEAL/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
LONDON—For British Prime Minister Theresa May, what looked like a sure thing is 
starting to look more like a gamble.
When she called an election on April 18, some opinion polls showed her Conservative 
Party leading the main opposition Labour Party by more than 20 percentage points. 
That would have expanded her working majority in the House of Commons from 17 
seats to as many as 150.
Just a week before the vote, many of those polls show that lead has shrunk to single
 digits—though none point to an outright Labour win. On Thursday, polling firm
 YouGov PLC said her advantage had dwindled to 3 percentage points and suggested
 her party could lose seats. That would deprive her of the solid majority she says
 is essential in looming Brexit talks with the European Union.
Failing to win big would be a blow for the prime minister, who led her party into this
 election hoping to exploit the apparent unpopularity of Labour and its leader Jeremy
 Corbyn, a veteran left-winger beloved by young activists but less popular than
 Mrs. May among most voters.
“If it looks like it was in the bag and it was mishandled, then that’s not going to give
 her the same authority within the party,” said Anthony Wells, director of political
 and social research at YouGov.
Mrs. May’s failure to maintain 
her lead in the polls is the result of Conservative missteps and a better-than-expected public reception for Labour, analysts say.
The prime minister began her campaign with a focus on leadership, contrasting her experience in government with Mr. Corbyn’s lack of it. But her party’s manifesto, published in the week before a suicide bomber killed 22 in Manchester, was poorly received. The slip was blamed on a complex plan to finance elderly care, a proposal that bombed with graying voters.
Labour’s manifesto was packed with clear policies with broad appeal, especially to those who had voted Labour in the past but hadn’t made up their minds. The party said it would nationalize railways and pay for college tuition and child care.
At campaign stops and on television debates, Mr. Corbyn’s avuncular style contrasted with Mrs. May’s stilted performances and her repetition of her mantra of “strong and stable government.”
Her opponents have seized opportunities to turn Mrs. May’s emphasis on leadership against her. “The first rule of leadership is to show up,” said Caroline Lucas, co-leader of Britain’s Green Party, at a television debate Wednesday night attended by all party leaders except Mrs. May.
YouGov’s poll was accompanied by an analysis projecting the makeup of the next Parliament based on a separate and ongoing survey of as many as 50,000 voters. Its modeling suggested the Conservatives are on course to win 317 seats at the election June 8. That is 13 fewer than the party currently holds and short of the 326 needed to secure a majority in the 650-seat House of Commons.
YouGov cautioned that the projection is a median estimate and the same modeling yielded a range of gains and losses for the Conservatives, from a low of 285 seats to a high of 353.
The election will also be seen as a fresh test for pollsters in Britain, who have been revamping their methods after Mrs. May’s predecessor, David Cameron, defied expectations to win a comfortable victory in 2015. Polls also underestimated the strength of voters’ support for Brexit ahead of last year’s referendum.
A multitude of other surveys published by rival polling firms show a wide variation, with a Panelbase survey Thursday giving the Conservatives an eight-point lead. Analysts say the variation reflects differences in how results are weighed to reflect factors including voter turnout among different groups.
With her poll lead slipping, Mrs. May has tried to wrest the election debate back to Brexit, perceived as her strongest card, and to play down the surveys. At a recent campaign event, she fielded questions from factory workers, a format that contrasted with her more stage-managed appearances before party loyalists and media.
Parliamentary PopularityThe Conservative Party gained ground after Theresa May became prime minister in July,but its lead has shrunk in recent weeks.Party support, 14-day moving averageTHE WALL STREET JOURNALSource: WSJ average of opinion polls from BMG, ComRes, GfK, ICM, Ipsos Mori, Kantar TNS, ORB, Opinium, Panelbase, Survationand YouGov
%ConservativeLabourLib. Dem.UKIPJune ’16Aug.Oct.Dec.Feb. ’17AprilJune01020304050Brexit voteJune 23, 2016Election announcedApril 18, 2017
“There’s only one poll that matters and that’s the poll that’s going to take place next Thursday,” Mrs. May said Thursday at a speech deep in Labour territory in northeast England.
Some Conservative candidates say the narrowing in the polls is helping encourage supporters and wavering voters to cast ballots rather than stay home.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, a Conservative lawmaker, said that with the prospect of a Labour government negotiating Brexit there has been a shift back to the party and Mrs. May.
“Corbyn and Brexit remain absolutely at the heart of the campaign,” Mr. Rees-Mogg said. “That is why I think the Conservatives will win—Corbyn is ultimately very unpopular and people want a good Brexit negotiation.”