Obama And White House Refuse To Meet With Netanyahu During Visit Here In March To Address Congress. White House Threatens Major Payback! Sounds Like Sanctions To Us!

White House Officials: Netanyahu “Spat in Our Face”

By Lea Speyer January 23, 2015 , 9:59 am

93 27

2 4Email 187Share

“The mocker seeks wisdom and finds none, but knowledge comes easily to the discerning.” (Proverbs 14:6)

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/obama-and-bibi-press-tv-fb.jpg

White House officials said Netanyahu “spat” in Obama’s face for accepting an invitation to address Congress. (Photo: Press-TV/Facebook)

The White House is red-hot angry over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to speak before the US Congress in March.

The invitation to address a joint session of Congress was issued by Republican House Speak John Boehner in what Obama officials say is “breach of protocol.” Usually, invitations are extended through the State Department via consultation with the White House.

Reminiscent of “Chickenshit-Gate,” US officials told Ha’aretz on Friday that the Israeli leader had “spat” in the president’s face in accepting the invitation.

“We thought we’ve seen everything,” an unnamed senior US official said. “But Bibi managed to surprise even us.”

“There are things you simply don’t do. He spat in our face publicly and that’s no way to behave. Netanyahu ought to remember that President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price,” he said.

 

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/46-Subscribe-Generic-600WIDE.jpg

The White House confirmed on Thursday that both the president and Secretary of State John Kerry will not meet with Netanyahu when he travels to Washington. A spokesman cited a “long-standing practice and principle” in which a president does not meet with heads of state close to election season.

Netanyahu is scheduled to address Congress on March 3. He was originally slated to appear before Congress on February 11 but changed the date so that he could attend the annual AIPAC conference.

The visit is meant to bolster support for a bill being pushed through Congress to impose harsher sanctions on Iran should nuclear talks with the P5+1 fail to reach an agreement by the June deadline.

President Obama threatened that he would veto the bill should it pass approval by US lawmakers. In his recent State of the Union address, he said that the bill would “all but guarantee that diplomacy fails.”

LISTEN BELOW: Congress To Roll Out Red Carpet For Bibi; White House Red-Faced

image: http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/VOI-bibi.png

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/28169/white-house-officials-netanyahu-spat-in-our-face-by-coming-to-us-jerusalem/#frLfLfObeikYCXgC.99

Will Obama's Meddling In Israeli Elections Bring About A New Government Or Backfire?

ISRAELI OFFICIAL TAUNTS OBAMA: CRITICISM ONLY HELPS NETANYAHU

'They actually are achieving the opposite direction'

Published: 15 hours ago

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     141

The Obama administration’s criticism of the current Israeli government only serves to make Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party more popular with the electorate, charged Likud Knesset Member Danny Danon in a U.S. radio interview Sunday.

Danon was speaking on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s AM 970 The Answer.

Danon had been asked about some recent accusations the Obama administration may be trying to influence the March 17 general elections in Israel by repeatedly criticizing Netanyahu’s policies.

The Likud politician charged “there are a few people in the administration who sometimes want to get involved and I can tell you one thing. Whenever somebody tries to get involved in our politics they actually are achieving the opposite direction.”

He continued: “For example, when President Clinton was trying to get involved in the elections in Israel, he was supporting the Likud party. The same for today.

“The more pressure we see that comes from the U.S. it makes my party, the Likud party, stronger. Because the people understand that the prime minister and the Likud Party are standing on the issues.”

Danon stressed he was referring only to some White House members and not the general U.S. leadership.

He spoke of Israel’s “very strong relationship with the United States,” which he told Klein he had personally witnessed.

“I was in the Pentagon in the last summer as the deputy minister of defense and I was exposed to the level of support and confidence that we have between the strong nations,” stated Danon.

Leftist politicians here have repeatedly utilized Obama administration criticism of the current Israeli government to attack Netanyahu politically.

In October, Israel’s Ynet news website reported that a request by Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon to meet with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and National Security Adviser Susan Rice during his visit to Washington had been denied by the White House. This reported move is highly unusual, and was seen in Israel as a nearly unprecedented snub of Netanyahu’s government.

It helped to set off a firestorm against Netanyahu domestically, particularly among the center and the left, with senior politicians Tzippy Livni and Yair Lapid leading the charge.

Also in October, the U.S. espoused uncharacteristically harsh language to oppose a plan for Israel to build 2,610 new homes on empty lots in Givat Hamatos, a Jerusalem neighborhood in the eastern section of the city where Palestinians want to build a future state.

Immediately following a meeting between Netanyahu and President Obama in October, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki and White House spokesman Josh Earnest took the Israeli leader’s delegation by surprise when they released nearly identical statements slamming the Jerusalem construction.

They warned the housing plans could distance Israel from its “closest allies,” a clear euphemism for the U.S., and questioned whether Netanyahu was interested in peace.

Netanyahu for his part said at the time that he was “baffled” by the U.S. criticism, stating the American position “doesn’t really reflect American values.”

Lapid and Livni endorsed the U.S. condemnation and accused Netanyahu of damaging U.S.-Israeli relations.

Lapid took further issue with Netanyahu’s plan to build roughly 400 homes in Har Homa and about 600 in Ramat Shlomo.

“This plan will lead to a serious crisis in Israel-U.S. relations and will harm Israel’s standing in the world,” Lapid said.

Again in October, the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg described relations between the U.S. and Israel as a “full-blown crisis” and reported that senior Obama administration officials had called Netanyahu “chickensh-t” on matters related to the so-called peace process.

Lapid jumped on the remarks to release a vaguely nuanced criticism of Netanyahu: “I said only a few days ago that there is a real crisis in the relations and it needs to be dealt with responsibly,” he said, while lecturing U.S. and Israeli officials on the “need to tackle the crisis behind the scenes.”

Adding more fuel to the firestorm, Israel’s Ha’aretz newspaper reported last month the Obama administration had held a classified discussion a few weeks earlier about possibly taking more proactive measures against the “settlements,” including mulling sanctions or punishing Israel at the United Nations.

The State Department dismissed the claims as “unfounded and completely without merit.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/israeli-official-taunts-obama/#OTDG4Kj48oUEhmLx.99