Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label IRS scandals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IRS scandals. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Obama's Policies And Programs Are "On The Ballot". Are Republicans Smart Enough To Make Them The Issue?



  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
A few days ago, I wrote a column saying Republicans didn’t deserve to win the election next month, strengthening their control of the House and taking over the Senate, because they did not offer a clear-eyed sweeping alternative to the leadership plague of Barack Obama and Harry Reid.
Within a day of publication, Republicans offered a tepid and not-very-inspiring list of principles to fill the void. It looked like it could have been thrown together to answer the criticism.
But a day later, Republicans got a gift from Obama that is probably more valuable than a well-crafted manifesto and all the television time they could ask for.
Obama gave a speech in which he said: “I’m not on the ballot this fall … but make no mistake, these policies are on the ballot – every single one of them.”
This may be the first time Obama has told the truth in six years.
If he wanted to motivate the Republican and independent base to turn out in November, he couldn’t have provided a more beautifully wrapped package in the spirit of the upcoming holiday season.
This was an ill-conceived moment of candor worthy of Joe Biden.
Even former White House adviser David Axelrod had this to say about it on “Meet the Press”: “It was a mistake.”
Before Obama could even scoot to the golf course, the line was being used in ads to revive the moribund campaign of Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts, a Republican who has been in Washington too long and who is facing a tough re-election campaign from an independent.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who came up with the 11 Principles of American Renewal to help rally the party’s lackluster election bid, also seized on the line on “Meet the Press.”
“The president said that his policies are on the ballot. If Barack Obama is on ballot and his policies are on the ballot, it’s going to be a pretty bad year for Democrats,” Priebus said.

Maybe so. I hope so. I hope it’s enough to carry the day. Because, as bad as Republicans have been in opposing Obama’s policies over the last two years, even with control of one house of Congress, they will need all the help they can get from Obama and Biden. Thankfully, that pair and a third stooge, Harry Reid, seem more than up to the task.
Don’t get me wrong. We need to vote for Republicans this year. We need to vote out as many Democrats as possible. It’s a matter of saving the republic. It’s a matter of national security. It’s a matter of life and death.
I just wish Republicans could articulate that message and were presenting a clear agenda for stopping Obama before he does any more to “fundamentally transform” America.
Ebola, ISIS, the tanking economy, the corruption of a politicized Internal Revenue Service, the Benghazi debacle and cover-up, a coming executive order for amnesty, the border disaster – it’s like the ultimate perfect storm for the destruction of America.
Most Democrats still don’t see it. That’s because Obama is doing what most of them want him to do. They’re not called “low-information voters” for nothing. By the time many of them realize the destructiveness of Obama’s policies, it will be too late.
So this column is really a plea to Republican and independent voters for some electoral triage Nov. 4: No matter how much you despise House Speaker John Boehner and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, this is no time to punish them.
This Election Day is about saving the country from imminent disaster by handcuffing Obama – even if you don’t have any confidence in the two sheriffs in Congress.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Park Police Guns Either UnAccounted For, Missing, Taken By Officers. Sounds Like Typical Government Work! But You Better Not Handle Your Transactions In Such A Callous Way!

From: Right To Bear Blog:

U.S. Park Police Can’t Find Their Guns

U.S. Park officials, tasked with protecting citizens as a part of their job, have lost track of their guns.
Now, it’s really no surprise the U.S. government does a poor job of tracking important things. They lose sensitive emails, as in the IRS scandal, and allow for gun runners to make off with American-bought guns and then use them against U.S. citizens like they did in the “Fast and Furious” scandal.
So where are all the handguns that once belonged to U.S. Park officials? Take a look and see for yourself…

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

IRS Pleads Guilty To Giving Donor List. This Agency Is Out Of Control And Should Be Terminated.

IRS Admits Wrongdoing In Settlement With Traditional Marriage Group Over Leaked Donor List

June 24, 2014 by  
 52 22
 
 4 160

The IRS has admitted wrongdoing in the illegal release of names on a confidential list on conservative donors to a rival political group and has agreed to pay $50,000 to the conservative group whose members’ names were wrongly leaked.
A U.S. District Court judge accepted a settlement today in the case, which pitted the IRS as a defendant against the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), a conservative group whose membership was leaked by an internal IRS source, using information meant only for IRS documentation purposes, to a liaison for a gay rights group, the Human Rights Campaign (HRC).
A reading of this case’s history quickly disabuses the observer of any impression of an impersonal, run-of-the-mill bureaucratic screw-up and replaces it with something far more human and mendacious. This wasn’t a case of someone inadvertently hitting the wrong button on a computer or mistakenly lumping in one stack of information with another; it was instead an attempt to wilfully present legally-protected donor information to an adversarial political group to influence the relative power one wielded against the other.
Here’s how The Daily Signal, which first reported today’s decision, summarizes it:
In February 2012, the Human Rights Campaign posted on its web site NOM’s 2008 tax return and the names and contact information of the marriage group’s major donors, including soon-to-be Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. That information then was published by the Huffington Post and other liberal-leaning news sites.
HRC’s president at the time, Joe Solmonese, was tapped that same month as a national co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign.
Eastman said an investigation in the civil lawsuit determined that someone gave NOM’s tax return and list of major donors to Boston-based gay rights activist Matthew Meisel. Email correspondence from Meisel revealed that he told a colleague of “a conduit” to obtain the marriage group’s confidential information.
Testifying under oath in a deposition as part of the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Meisel invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and declined to disclose the identity of his “conduit.”
To get at that fact, Eastman said, the National Organization for Marriage has asked Attorney General Eric Holder to grant immunity from prosecution to Meisel.
So a “conduit” at the IRS fished out the names of all the donors who expressed their support for the state’s present legal definition of marriage through a political movement, and handed that confidential information over to an activist who wants that definition to change. Then that activist revealed that illegally-obtained information to a competing political group, which got its cause some instant press from media outlets invested in advancing the issue. The Obama campaign then swooped in and recruited the president of the group that had shared the illegally-gotten info away from his position and made him the President’s campaign manager. Oh, and the President’s opponent in that election cycle just happened to be one of the guys on the victim group’s donor list.
Regardless of which side of the marriage issue you stand on, that’s just messed up.
It’s also not just a civil matter – it’s a crime. “Unauthorized disclosure of confidential tax information is a felony offense that can result in five years in prison, but the Department of Justice did not bring criminal charges,” the Daily Signal observed. So far, and until the “conduit” (presumably an IRS employee) is revealed, the IRS itself is the only named culprit – and that’s merely for this now-settled civil action.
The $50,000 the IRS must pay will necessary come from public coffers, whether by means of a standing liability protection plan or direct payment. “The $50,000 to be paid by the IRS represents actual damages NOM incurred responding to the illegal disclosure, not punitive damages,” notes the Signal, because “the marriage group was unable to prove disclosure of the confidential records was deliberate after Meisel took the Fifth.”

Saturday, November 9, 2013

"I Didn't Know That"--The Obama Mantra

Our Know-Nothing President

November 1, 2013 by  
 104 9
 
 0 207
Our Know-Nothing President
UPI FILE
Is it really possible that the President of the United States knows as little about what his Administration is doing as his defenders claim? That no one tells him anything about what’s going on until he reads it in the papers?
Consider all of the scandals that have taken place since Barack Obama moved into the White House: Operation Fast and Furious; the murder of our ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya; the Internal Revenue Service harassment of Tea Party and other patriotic groups; National Security Agency spying on foreign leaders, as well as millions of Americans; the incredibly botched implementation of Obamacare… The list goes on and on.
We’re supposed to believe that Obama remained in blissful ignorance about all of them until the media reports started. When that happened, he was just as surprised and upset as the rest of us.
The latest “I didn’t know anything about it” scandal is the revelation that the NSA has been monitoring the private conversations of some 35 world leaders. Apparently, the bugging operation has been going on for years. Yet we’re supposed to believe that no one told the President about it until a couple of months ago.
Sure, that sounds credible, doesn’t it? Turns out, we’re tapping the cellphone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, among others; yet no one in the chain of command thinks that maybe, just maybe, Obama should be told about it.
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, followed the party line when she said: “It is my understanding that President Obama was not aware Chancellor Merkel’s communications were being collected since 2002. That is a big problem.”
It certainly is. Of all the sorry excuses that have been offered for this Presidential ignorance, my favorite is the one from anonymous officials who said that “the NSA has so many eavesdropping operations under way that it wouldn’t have been practical to brief him on all of them.”
If you were in charge, how would you like to have that pathetic excuse laid in front of you? Do you think that maybe some heads would roll? That’s what would happen in the real world — but not in this Administration, where the watchword is to protect the President at all costs. And always, but always, blame somebody else when anything goes wrong.
The latest example of this came on Wednesday, when Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the woman in charge of implementing Obamacare, trudged up Capitol Hill to explain why things have gone so disastrously wrong in the launch of the President’s pet program — and to promise that they will get better very soon.
In her testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Sebelius said that she was “as frustrated and angry as anyone” about the problems that have occurred since the launch of Obamacare on Oct. 1.
At one point, she even denied that the Healthcare.gov website had actually crashed, saying it just runs a lot slower than it should. Hah! In a piece of cosmic irony, the website crashed again, just as she was delivering this whopper. When it did, CNN broadcast a split screen, showing Sebelius on the right half and the crash error message from the website (“The system is down at the moment”) on the left-hand side of the screen.
Potential enrollees aren’t the only ones who can’t get the information they need from the Obamacare website. Turns out that neither can the HHS Secretary. When asked how many people had actually managed to navigate through the website to the end and actually purchase one of the government-mandated health plans, Sibelius said that the numbers weren’t available yet. Check back next month.
Is it that the total number of enrollments can’t be tabulated or that they won’t be released, since they are so embarrassingly low?
Still, Sebelius promised her skeptical inquisitors that everything would be hunky-dory by the end of November, when the website will finally be working properly. In the meantime, she proclaimed, “Hold me accountable for the debacle. I’m responsible.”
Does that mean she’ll do the honorable thing and tender her resignation to the President? Not on your life. Or at least, not yet. If the promised re-launch of the website comes on Dec. 1, as seems likely, I don’t think the White House will bear with her much longer. By sometime in January, I suspect you can color Sebelius gone.
Meanwhile, CNN reports that the Administration is putting pressure on insurance companies not to say anything critical of Obamacare. “What’s going on,” reporter Andrew Griffin told Anderson Cooper, “is [a] behind-the-scenes attempt by the White House to at least keep insurers from publicly criticizing what is happening under this Affordable Care Act rollout. Basically, if you speak out, if you are quoted, you’re going to get a call from the White House, pressure to be quiet.”
Bob Laszewski, a consultant for several insurance companies, says he’s getting calls from executives he knows, asking him to speak out on their behalf. He told CNN: “The White House is exerting massive pressure on the industry, including the trade associations, to keep quiet.”
Now it turns out that the insurance companies — and the Obama Administration — have known for years that millions of Americans would lose their health insurance once Obamacare went into effect, despite all of the claims to the contrary.
Regulations written by the Department of Health and Human Services in July 2010 estimated that “40 to 67 percent” of policyholders would not be able to keep their health insurance once the Affordable Care Act went into effect. Now there are estimates that the actual figure may be as high as 80 percent. So somewhere between 8 million and 14 million Americans will lose the health insurance they presently have.
Of course, Obama promised the American people exactly the opposite. Back in June 2009 he said, “[W]e will keep this promise to the American people: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your healthcare plan, you will be able to keep your healthcare plan. Period.”
And he’s repeated that promise countless times since then. In fact, as of yesterday, the official White House website still claimed, “If you like your plan, you can keep it and you don’t have to change a thing due to the healthcare law.”
Of course, we now know that this isn’t true. Millions of people are learning that they won’t be able to keep their present policy, no matter how much they might like it. But the Obama Administration continues to spread this falsehood.
This helps explain why Obama’s popularity is plummeting faster than a safe falling from a window. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll says that the President’s job-approval rating has fallen to an all-time low. According to the poll, a majority of Americans — 51 percent — now disapprove of the job he is doing. Only 42 percent say they still approve of his performance. That’s down from 53 percent at the end of last year.
In the same poll, just 29 percent said that their representative deserved to be re-elected to Congress. More than twice as many, some 63 percent, said it was time to give a new person a chance.
The disdain was bipartisan, by the way, with two Republican leaders — House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell — joining Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in getting their highest negative ratings ever.
Oh, and get this: Half of those polled don’t believe that an accord will be reached by the Jan. 15 deadline on a plan to fund the government. They say another Federal shutdown is likely.
Will all of this disdain and distrust result in votes to actually reduce the size, power and cost of our central government? It would be wonderful if that were the case. But I wouldn’t count on it.
Until next time, keep some powder dry.

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

IRS Official Gives Tax Records To White House--When Are We Going To See Some Of These Lawbreakers In Court?

IRS's Ingram May Have Given Confidential Taxpayer Info to White House

Friday, 11 Oct 2013 05:40 PM
By Lisa Furgison
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The IRS official who was in the hot seat for scrutinizing the tax-exempt status of conservative groups is making headlines once again. 

Sarah Hall Ingram, a top IRS employee, shared confidential taxpayer information with several people at the White House, The Daily Caller reports.

Emails given to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and obtained by The Daily Caller show Ingram shared confidential taxpayer information with Jeanne Lambrew, the deputy assistant to the president for health policies, as well White House health policy advisor Ellen Montz.

The conservative news site reported that Ingram went to the White House 155 times to meet Lambrew.

The exchange of information was meant to counsel the Obama administration on a lawsuit filed by several non-profits that opposed the contraception mandate in the Affordable Care Act, The Daily Caller said.

It its review of the emails, the oversight panel found large sections redacted and labeled with the number 6103. Section 6103 of the IRS code forbids any employee from sharing confidential information gathered through tax forms.

When asked at a committee hearing what those redacted areas said, Ingram replied, "I don’t recall the document so I can’t help you with what’s underneath that redaction."

Ingram now heads the IRS division responsible for implementing Obamacare. The agency is responsible for making sure Americans purchase the required healthcare or pay a tax penalty if they fail to do so. The agency is also responsible for issuing tax credits to consumers who qualify to help them cover the costs of purchasing insurance coverage.

Republican lawmakers are concerned that Ingram still has access to confidential information in her new position, something Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan made a point of in a recent hearing where Ingram testified, The Washington Free Beacon reported.

"You shared personal taxpayer information with the White House," Jordan told Ingram. "And now under the Affordable Care Act, Americans have to give personal information to the IRS — to the same organization that potentially shared all kinds of information with the White House political people. That’s what people are nervous about. That’s what scares a lot of people."

According to the Daily Caller, the IRS declined to comment on the Ingram visits, citing the government shutdown as the reason.

Related Stories:

Republicans Push for IRS Official's Firing

IRS Scandal, Higher Premiums Cast Doubts on Obamacare