Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Inland Regional Center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inland Regional Center. Show all posts

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Another Snooping Plane, Monitoring Cell Phone Conversations Without A Warrant


From Conservativetribune.com

People Saw This Plane Circling Over Calif. Shooting, Now We Know Alarming Thing It Was Doing


A report from the U.K. Daily Mail revealed that the Department of Homeland Security dispatched a spy plane capable of intercepting tens of thousands of phone signals over San Bernardino, California, in the aftermath of the Islamic State group-linked terror attack on the Inland Regional Center by Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik.
The plane, a Pilatus PC-12 equipped with “Dirtbox” technology that allows it to scan phone calls without a warrant, was ordered by DHS to circle in the skies over the San Bernardino area.
The incident called into question whether there were accomplices in the terror attack, in addition to raising serious concerns over warrantless surveillance.
The “Dirtbox” device is a two-foot wide box that acts as a cell phone tower. Since cell phones automatically lock on to the nearest possible tower, by flying overhead it would be able to detect the location of anyone using a cellular phone and track their movements.
It would not, however, be able to pick up the contents of the calls made from the phone or data usage, if any took place.
Sofrep, which first reported the use of the PC-12 equipped with Dirtbox, said that it showed the DHS was “actively searching for other members of a terrorist cell.”
A Pilatus PC-12, shown here in a hangar:
An entry on plane tracking site FlightRadar24 also showed the plane’s activities during the manhunt.
Given how quickly the plane was dispatched, one might think that the government knew more quickly than President Barack Obama acknowleged that this was not “workplace-related” as the president said it was.
It’s disconcerting to see that, while the Obama administration is totally unwilling to take reasonable steps to deal with the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State group — like, say, increased vetting on Syrian refugees — they have no problems using one of the most constitutionally troublesome forms of electronic surveillance there is.
Maybe if the Obama administration had been more vigilant in the first place, we wouldn’t have to be violating people’s rights now.
H/T WZ

If Anyone Needed To Know The Incompetency Of Our Government Agencies, Tashfeen Malik Is A Great Example


San Bernardino jihad murderer was vetted by FIVE different government agencies


It just keeps getting worse. At first we were told that she had been vetted by two agencies. Apparently Obama Administration officials were hoping to cover up the magnitude of this failure. In any case, Tashfeen Malik stands as a witness to the impossibility of vetting for jihadis.
“U.S. missed ‘red flags’ with San Bernardino shooter,” CBS News, December 14, 2015:
As investigators focus on what or who motivated San Bernardino shooters Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, to open fire at the Inland Regional Center, a report about Malik’s comments on social media before she moved to the U.S. is raising questions about how thoroughly she was vetted.
Law enforcement sources confirmed to CBS News that Malik made radical postings on Facebook as far back as 2012 — the year before she married Farook and moved to the U.S., reports CBS News correspondent Carter Evans.
According to a report in the New York Times, Malik spoke openly on social media about her support for violent jihad and said she wanted to be a part of it. But none of these postings were discovered when Malik applied for a U.S. K-1 fiancé visa.
“If you’re going to start doing a deeper dive into somebody and looking at their social media postings or other things, you really want to focus your effort on the high-risk traveler, the person that you’re really worried about being a threat to the United States,” said James Carafano, national security expert and vice president of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy at the Heritage Foundation. “The question is, how do you identify them?”
Malik was not identified as a threat despite being interviewed at the U.S. Embassy in Pakistan and vetted by five different government agencies that checked her name and picture against a terror watch list and ran her fingerprints against two databases.…

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Where Did The Third San Bernardino Shooter Go?



image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/12/San-Bernardino-Twitter3.jpg
A triage center is set up for victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, Dec. 2, 2015 (Photo: Twitter)
A triage center is set up for victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, Dec. 2, 2015 (Photo: Twitter)
A week after the terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California, that killed 14 people and left 21 injured, some are wondering whatever happened to the supposed third shooter that witnesses say shot up the Inland Regional Center.
The two Muslim suspects who were killed in a police shootout have been identified as Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, who were reportedly planning the deadly assault a year in advance.
But witnesses on the day of the Dec. 2 massacre insisted there were three shooters.
Sally Abdelmageed, who worked inside the center where the attack occurred, claimed in an interview broadcast on CBS News that there were three assailants.
“I heard shots fired and it was from – you know – an automatic weapon,” Abdelmageed told the network, adding it was all “very unusual. Why would we hear shots? As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off [...] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on. They were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three [...] one of them [...] started to shoot into the room.”
In her description of the perpetrators, Abdelmageed said she "couldn't see a face, he had a black hat on [...] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side [...] long sleeve shirt [...] gloves [...] huge assault rifle [...] six magazines [...] I just saw three dressed exactly the same."
"You are certain you saw three men?" the reporter asked her again.
"Yes," she stressed. "It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall."

A second witness, Juan Fernandez, confirmed Abdelmageed's description of events, telling reporters he also saw "three white men in military fatigues" who "took off" in a "black Impala or SUV."
At the American Spectator, writer Arnold Ahlert noted in a column focusing on the third shooter: "Since then? Nothing. Certainly eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable, but isn't that precisely the reason one might expect the media to clarify the discrepancies between their original reporting and the current status quo?"
Ahlert continued:
As bad as that lack of closure is, the second question is far more troublesome: why did the FBI abandon their investigation of the townhouse rented by the terrorists and allow media access to it only two days after the shooting – and leave shredded documents behind? Former NYPD Det. Harry Houck illuminates the insanity. "This apartment clearly is full of evidence," he explained. "I don't see any fingerprint dust on the walls where they went in there and checked for fingerprints for other people that might have been connected to these two. You've got documents laying all over the place – you've got shredded documents that need to be taken out of there and put together to see what was shredded," Houck added. "You have passports, driver's licenses – now you have thousands of fingerprints all over inside this crime scene."
The explanation offered by David Bowdich, assistant director of the FBI's Los Angeles office, strains credulity. "Once the residents have the apartment and we're not in it anymore, we don't control it," he said. "Once we turn that location back over to the occupants of that residence or once we board it up, anyone who goes in at that point, that's got nothing to do with us."
Houck wasn't buying it. "I tell you I am so shocked. This is detective 101 for crying out loud," he insisted. "It looks like there are dozens of people in there totally destroying a crime scene which is still vital in this investigation because we don't know how many other people that they were connected with in this thing. There might be tons of fingerprints in there that we need to look at to see if there is any kind of connection to those fingerprints or some people that may be on a watch list or something else."
"Something stinks here," Ahlert concluded. "Given the track record of Islamic terror denialism embraced by the Obama administration – along with innumerable examples of media malfeasance protecting that approach – the unmistakable odor of a coverup, or an orchestrated disinformation campaign, hangs heavy in the air."
Ahlert's analysis caught the attention of radio host Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday, who also has been wondering about the third shooter since watching news reports last week.
"This was not, you know, an oddball terrorist couple. This was a cell," said Limbaugh.
"They had a lot of people gathering ammunition, working on planning, driving other people around. It's not what we've been told it is. It was not a couple 'radicalized' who met on a dating site. The active theory now is that it was an arranged marriage by terrormasters and that they had, after the arranged marriage, a mission, and the San Bernardino attack was the mission – and it may have been more, we don't know. Third shooter? Who, what, when, where, why? Is there one? Was there one? Two witnesses said they saw one. The media reported third shooter. But nobody's had any interest in tracking a shooter down."
Just two days after the Caifornia carnage, Stu Tarlowe asked the same question about the purported third shooter in a column for WND.
"So, what gives, America? Did that third suspect drop off the edge of the earth?" Tarlowe wrote.
"Did he or she disappear in the same way that our ability and willingness to recognize and identify a terrorist act when we see it seems to have disappeared? Or have we collectively forgotten how to count? Have we now become a nation of the arithmetically challenged, the journalistically challenged and the cognitively challenged?
Follow Joe Kovacs on Twitter @JoeKovacsNews
Copyright 2015 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/eyewitnesses-insist-3-shooters-in-san-bernardino/#TuAedmKOrP22pDM1.99

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Farook And Victim Had Discussions On Religion And Politics


San Bernardino victim was upfront about politics and religion -- with Farook too



Nicholas Thalasinos, who died Wednesday in the San Bernardino shootingrampage that killed 14, was absolutely upfront about his religious and political leanings. And they could be harsh.
His Facebook page and Twitter feed were full of political opinions about radical Islam, President Obama, the Iraq nuclear agreement and gun control.
He was a Messianic Jew, which means he accepted Jesus Christ as his savior, and a passionate defender of Israel. According to his wife, Jennifer Thalasinos, he was not shy about proselytizing, or criticizing Islam, even to Muslim co-worker Syed Rizwan Farook, who has been identified as one of the shooters.
“He just wanted to evangelize to everybody, and that’s what he did,” Jennifer Thalasinos told CNN.  “I’m sure they would have had discussions about religion because my husband would discuss religion with anyone that would listen.”


Indeed, two weeks before the rampage at the Inland Regional Center, a friend of Thalasinos overheard him having a discussion about Islam with Farook.
Kuuleme Stephens said she called Thalasinos during his lunch break, and when he picked up the phone she could hear him in conversation with someone else.


The other person was Farook, a fellow health inspector. The men were discussing politics, religion and Islam.
She said Thalasinos told her that "Syed did not believe Islam was not a peaceful religion."
The conversation, said Stephens, was “nothing out of the ordinary. It was like an everyday conversation. It didn’t set off any bells or whistles for me.”  And yet she said her friend told her that “he didn’t know what to do to get through to [Farook] and how to talk to him.”
She said Thalasinos never mentioned Farook’s name before that call and that he had not expressed any concerns about Farook hurting him or anyone else.


"Nicholas was a very caring person," Stephens said. “He would help anybody if they needed.”
Stephens said she met Thalasinos about five years ago on Facebook and the Last Civil Right, a website for conservative African Americans. They shared the same political views, she said, and spoke frequently by phone. Thalasinos, Stephens said, called her his “sister.”
She said it was not unusual for Thalasinos to have spirited discussions with his co-workers about politics and religion. “He always kept the door open for discussion.”
Authorities are now investigating the attack at the social services center as an act of terrorism. But they have also said witnesses reported a tense exchange Wednesday at a holiday luncheon for the county health department before Farook left and returned with his wife, Tashfeen Malik. The couple fired assault rifles and semiautomatic pistols to kill 14 people, including the 52-year-old Nicholas Thalasinos.
Some conservative news outlets, including Red State and Brietbart, have slammed mainstream outlets for asking Jennifer Thalasinos questions implying that her husband was involved in an encounter that may have set off Farook.
It’s not clear whom Farook argued with before leaving the party.
On Thursday, friends and family posted loving messages on his Facebook page. Diane Jakopovic wrote that she was a longtime friend who met him online and bonded over shared political beliefs.
“However, he was also very religious, often citing Scripture,” she said. “I never really knew much about him; I used to accept everyone as my friend, but I liked his comments. He was inspiring. He understood that there is a lot of evil happening in this world.”

Friday, December 4, 2015

It's About Time! Now If We Can Only Get Obama To Admit It Was "Islamic" Terrorism. Fat Chance!

FBI: Massacre Investigated as 'Act of Terrorism'


By Newsmax Wires   |   Friday, 04 Dec 2015 02:44 PM
The FBI said Friday that it is now investigating the San Bernardino attacks as "an act of terrorism."

"I do want to go forward today and tell you that as of today based on the information and the facts as we know them, we are now investigating these horrific acts as an act of terrorism," David Bowdich, assistant director of the FBI's Los Angeles office, said at an afternoon press conference.

"We have uncovered evidence that has led us to learn of extensive planning.

"We have uncovered evidence of explosives, armaments — you know the ammunition that was out there: the high-powered weapons, the explosive devices. "We are continuing to go down the path to ensure that we find all of the evidence that pertains to this matter," Bowdich said.

Bowdich said that the FBI has uncovered evidence that the suspects "attempted to destroy their digital fingerprints.

"We found cell phones in a nearby trash can. The cell phones were actually crushed. "We have retained those cell phones, and we do continue to exploit the data," Bowdich added. "We do hope that the digital fingerprints left by these two individuals will take us towards their motivation. That evidence is incredibly important.
"I want to ensure that everyone understands that just because the FBI has taken the leadership based on the trajectory of this case, we're not just taking this on our own," he said.

Earlier in the day, intelligence officials had said the wife of the male gunman had pledged allegiance to a leader of the Islamic State militant group and that the U.S. is pressing  the investigation overseas with Pakistan.
Tashfeen Malik, 27, and her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, were killed in a shootout with police hours after the Wednesday massacre at the Inland Regional Center social services agency in San Bernardino, about 60 miles (100 km) east of Los Angeles. The attack was the deadliest mass shooting the United States has experienced in three years.
U.S. investigators are evaluating evidence that Malik, a Pakistani native who had been living in Saudi Arabia when she married Farook, had pledged allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, two U.S. officials told Reuters. They said the finding, if confirmed, could be a "game changer" in the investigation.
Pakistani intelligence officials have contacted Malik's family in her homeland as part of the investigation, a family member said.
"I only found out about this tragedy today when some intelligence officials contacted me to ask me about my links with Tashfeen," Malik's uncle, Javed Rabbani, said in an interview. "I had heard in the news that this tragedy had taken place but I could never even imagine that it would be someone from my family. Of course, we are in shock."
He said his brother, Malik's father, had become considerably more conservative since moving with his family to Saudi Arabia a quarter century ago.
Latest News Update
Tashfeen Malik had moved back to Pakistan five or six years ago to study pharmacy, Pakistani officials said.
\
Before going on their rampage on Wednesday, Malik and Farook had destroyed computer hard drives and other electronics, a U.S. government source said.
Investigators are looking into a report that Farook had engaged in an argument with a co-worker who denounced the "inherent dangers of Islam," a U.S. government source said.
CNN reported on Friday that one U.S. official said Malik had pledged allegiance to al-Baghdadi in a posting on Facebook made on Wednesday, the day of the attack, under an account that used a different name.

One CNN source said she posted the pledge while while the attack was ongoing, though the timing is unclear. The investigation has been focused on the motivation for the attack with officials including President Barack Obama and San Bernardino Police Chief Jarrod Burguan saying it may have been motivated by extremist ideology.
The couple left behind a 6-month old daughter. Farook's brother-in-law, Farhan Khan, told NBC News he had begun legal proceedings to adopt the girl and was "very upset and angry" at Farook.
"You left your 6-month-old daughter," Khan said. "In this life some people cannot have kids. God gave you a gift of a daughter. And you left that kid behind ... What did you achieve?"
Twenty-one people were wounded in the attack, the worst gun violence in the nation since the December 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
Farook, a U.S. citizen born in Illinois, was the son of Pakistani immigrants, said Hussam Ayloush, head of the Los Angeles area chapter of the Muslim advocacy group Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Christian Nwadike, who worked with Farook for five years, told CBS that his co-worker had been different since he returned from Saudi Arabia.
"I think he married a terrorist," Nwadike said.
Investigators are reviewing the couples' computers and cellphones to see if they had browsed jihadist websites or had contact with militant groups, according to officials in Washington familiar with the investigation.
Police said the couple had two assault-style rifles, two semi-automatic handguns and 1,600 rounds of ammunition in their vehicle, with 12 pipe bombs found in their home.
Authorities have not dismiss other issues — including that Farook had a workplace grievance — as additional motives.

Wearing body armor and black tactical gear with GoPro cameras, Farook and  Malik shot up a holiday party hosted by Farook's employer, the county health department.

Authorities said each attacker carried an AR-15 rifle and a pistol, and their vests were stuffed with ammunition magazines. One of the weapons was capable of piercing body armor.

All of the guns were later determined to have been legally purchased, though not by the attackers. The assault rifles were bought by a third person who is not considered a suspect, according to a senior law enforcement official, The New York Times reports.

They fled in a black SUV and hours later died in a gunbattle with police less than two miles away.

"They came prepared to do what they did, as if they were on a mission," San Bernardino Police Chief Burguan said.


© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.