Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Rasmea odeh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rasmea odeh. Show all posts

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Mainstream Hate And Discrimination--Sarsour Style

Linda Sarsour: NYC’s queen of hate


Women’s March co-organizer Linda Sarsour said in her speech to a Jewish Voice for Peace conference in Chicago on Sunday that she’s “providing a service . . . that I’m allowing the Jewish community to have the real hard conversation that it always needed to be having” about whether it should support Israel.
Thanks! Let me return the favor and encourage Sarsour to have a hard conversation about how she is preaching hatred while claiming to be fighting for equality, and putting women down while saying she’s trying to lift them up.
The Brooklyn-born Sarsour, daughter of Palestinian immigrants, shared the dais Sunday with another darling of the feminist “resistance,” Rasmea Odeh — convicted in Israel of killing two Hebrew University students in a 1969 terrorist attack and of planning an attack on the British Consulate. After her release, Odeh was able to immigrate to the United States by hiding her crime. She’s now being deported to Jordan.
Odeh has become a leftist hero. Sunday night, she and Sarsour embraced, and Sarsour gushed to the audience about feeling “honored and privileged to be here in this space, and honored to be on this stage with Rasmea.”
It’s a curious embrace of terrorism and anti-Semitism from a recipient of a $500,000 taxpayer grant from Mayor de Blasio, as Sarsour’s group, the Arab American Association of New York, was last year. Sarsour, in fact, has been an important ally of de Blasio’s since his election — a role she’s sure to reprise in the mayor’s bid for a second term.
Sarsour said last month feminism is “about the rights of all women.” Yet in the same interview, when asked whether there’s “room for people who support the state of Israel” in the women’s movement, she said: “There can’t be in feminism.” Apparently, Sarsour doesn’t believe all women deserve equal rights — Israeli and Israel-supporting women are an exception. And, by her logic, since she isn’t for the rights of all women, she isn’t a feminist.
In a flattering interview with Ha’aretz, Sarsour advocated a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in which the Jewish state would no longer exist. And Sarsour once tweeted that “nothing is creepier than Zionism.” Meaning that her struggles, whether they’re for Palestinians or women, are just, but the Jewish liberation movement has no right to exist.
In her speech to Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization of extremist Jewish activists dedicated to delegitimizing Israel, Sarsour said, “There’s always been anti-Semitism,” and people must fight it.
She doesn’t seem to grasp that advocating wiping Israel off the map, as she does, is fighting for the continued oppression of Jews, denying their self-determination and taking away their safe haven — nor did she seem to grasp the chutzpah required to make a statement like that after embracing and praising Odeh.
Sarsour doesn’t only deny the rights of Jewish and pro-Israel women — for example, she said Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a prominent critic of radical Islam and victim of female genital mutilation should have her vagina taken away.
Sarsour claimed that Zionists are asking her “to somehow leave out a portion of my identity so you can be welcomed to a space to work on justice . . . We, as Palestinian-Americans . . . will not change who we are to make anyone comfortable.”
Here’s the thing: No one asked Sarsour to stop being a Palestinian-American or wanting there to be a Palestinian state. What pro-Israel feminists — like myself and Emily Shire, who wrote a New York Times column that sparked the question of feminism and Zionism — are saying is, we may not agree on the solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but we agree that we want equal rights for women, so let’s join forces on that.
But Sarsour is an adherent of intersectionality, an idea that women cannot separate the different elements of a woman’s identity, such that the oppression of marginalized groups is compounded with women’s oppression. The women’s movement, according to people who believe this idea, can’t just be about equality for women.
Therefore, Sarsour has argued, Palestinian women suffer more than Palestinian men and the women’s movement must be anti-Israel. What she forgets is that, by that logic, Israeli women suffer more than Israeli men, for example, when Hamas shoots rockets from Gaza at Israeli civilians or Palestinian terrorists try to run them over.
Yet she doesn’t think all bigotry must be fought. “Of course there’s anti-Semitism,” she said Sunday, adding that she doesn’t ask for Jews’ political opinions before she opposes discrimination against them. But then, she said anti-Semitism “can’t exactly compare . . . to anti-black racism or Islamophobia.”
Sorry, Jews, your safety doesn’t really matter. Then again, that’s not surprising from someone who thinks Israel shouldn’t exist and praises a murderer of Israelis.
Any movement that seeks to uplift women shouldn’t be led by someone so unapologetically discriminatory, or it cannot claim to stand for the rights of all women. Women deserve better than Linda Sarsour’s doublespeak.
Lahav Harkov is The Jerusalem Post’s senior Knesset correspondent.

Thursday, April 6, 2017

Linda Sarsour Exhibits A Basic Tenant Of Islam (Taqiyya). Lying To The Unbeliever Is Ok As Long As It Advances The Religion.

Linda Sarsour: NYC’s queen of hate


Women’s March co-organizer Linda Sarsour said in her speech to a Jewish Voice for Peace conference in Chicago on Sunday that she’s “providing a service . . . that I’m allowing the Jewish community to have the real hard conversation that it always needed to be having” about whether it should support Israel.
Thanks! Let me return the favor and encourage Sarsour to have a hard conversation about how she is preaching hatred while claiming to be fighting for equality, and putting women down while saying she’s trying to lift them up.
The Brooklyn-born Sarsour, daughter of Palestinian immigrants, shared the dais Sunday with another darling of the feminist “resistance,” Rasmea Odeh — convicted in Israel of killing two Hebrew University students in a 1969 terrorist attack and of planning an attack on the British Consulate. After her release, Odeh was able to immigrate to the United States by hiding her crime. She’s now being deported to Jordan.
Odeh has become a leftist hero. Sunday night, she and Sarsour embraced, and Sarsour gushed to the audience about feeling “honored and privileged to be here in this space, and honored to be on this stage with Rasmea.”
It’s a curious embrace of terrorism and anti-Semitism from a recipient of a $500,000 taxpayer grant from Mayor de Blasio, as Sarsour’s group, the Arab American Association of New York, was last year. Sarsour, in fact, has been an important ally of de Blasio’s since his election — a role she’s sure to reprise in the mayor’s bid for a second term.
Sarsour said last month feminism is “about the rights of all women.” Yet in the same interview, when asked whether there’s “room for people who support the state of Israel” in the women’s movement, she said: “There can’t be in feminism.” Apparently, Sarsour doesn’t believe all women deserve equal rights — Israeli and Israel-supporting women are an exception. And, by her logic, since she isn’t for the rights of all women, she isn’t a feminist.
In a flattering interview with Ha’aretz, Sarsour advocated a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in which the Jewish state would no longer exist. And Sarsour once tweeted that “nothing is creepier than Zionism.” Meaning that her struggles, whether they’re for Palestinians or women, are just, but the Jewish liberation movement has no right to exist.
In her speech to Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization of extremist Jewish activists dedicated to delegitimizing Israel, Sarsour said, “There’s always been anti-Semitism,” and people must fight it.
She doesn’t seem to grasp that advocating wiping Israel off the map, as she does, is fighting for the continued oppression of Jews, denying their self-determination and taking away their safe haven — nor did she seem to grasp the chutzpah required to make a statement like that after embracing and praising Odeh.
Sarsour doesn’t only deny the rights of Jewish and pro-Israel women — for example, she said Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a prominent critic of radical Islam and victim of female genital mutilation should have her vagina taken away.
Sarsour claimed that Zionists are asking her “to somehow leave out a portion of my identity so you can be welcomed to a space to work on justice . . . We, as Palestinian-Americans . . . will not change who we are to make anyone comfortable.”
Here’s the thing: No one asked Sarsour to stop being a Palestinian-American or wanting there to be a Palestinian state. What pro-Israel feminists — like myself and Emily Shire, who wrote a New York Times column that sparked the question of feminism and Zionism — are saying is, we may not agree on the solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but we agree that we want equal rights for women, so let’s join forces on that.
But Sarsour is an adherent of intersectionality, an idea that women cannot separate the different elements of a woman’s identity, such that the oppression of marginalized groups is compounded with women’s oppression. The women’s movement, according to people who believe this idea, can’t just be about equality for women.
Therefore, Sarsour has argued, Palestinian women suffer more than Palestinian men and the women’s movement must be anti-Israel. What she forgets is that, by that logic, Israeli women suffer more than Israeli men, for example, when Hamas shoots rockets from Gaza at Israeli civilians or Palestinian terrorists try to run them over.
Yet she doesn’t think all bigotry must be fought. “Of course there’s anti-Semitism,” she said Sunday, adding that she doesn’t ask for Jews’ political opinions before she opposes discrimination against them. But then, she said anti-Semitism “can’t exactly compare . . . to anti-black racism or Islamophobia.”
Sorry, Jews, your safety doesn’t really matter. Then again, that’s not surprising from someone who thinks Israel shouldn’t exist and praises a murderer of Israelis.
Any movement that seeks to uplift women shouldn’t be led by someone so unapologetically discriminatory, or it cannot claim to stand for the rights of all women. Women deserve better than Linda Sarsour’s doublespeak.
Lahav Harkov is The Jerusalem Post’s senior Knesset correspondent.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Phony Support Of Israel By Some American Jews Is Not Wanted By Israel.

COLUMN ONE: LEAVING THE BIG TENT
BY

 APRIL 3, 2017 22:18

“If I will have to choose between losing more lives of Israelis, whether they are civilians or soldiers, or losing you, I will sadly, sorrowfully, rather lose you.”











Palestinian activist Rasmieh Yousef Odeh
Palestinian activist Rasmieh Yousef Odeh . (photo credit:REUTERS)
The divide between Israelis and American Jews seems to be growing. Indications
of the widening gap came last week with reports of a confrontation between an
American Jewish activist and four members of Knesset, from across the political
spectrum, at a synagogue near Boston.

As reported at The Algemeiner, at the end of a forum at Brookline’s Congregation
 Kehillath Israel, an audience member named Shifrah told the four Israeli
lawmakers, “You are losing me and you are losing many, many people in the
Jewish community... I cannot look the other way when three Israeli teenagers
 are brutally murdered and the response is to kill 2,300 Palestinians [in
 Operation Protective Edge in 2014]. I want to know what you are doing
 to make peace with the Palestinians. I want to know what the government
 is doing to make peace.”


Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.



Despite the general fractiousness of Israeli politics, the lawmakers, who
spanned the Right-Left spectrum, rejected the woman’s claims. Not one of
 them was willing to accept her view that Israel was morally impaired for
 defending itself from Hamas’s terror war against it. Each in his or her own
 way pointed out that the woman’s question exposed a callous indifference
and utter ignorance to the actual situation in Israel.

Speaking last, Likud MK Amir Ohana noted that Israel didn’t enter into its
war with Hamas three years ago because of the execution and abduction of
 the three youths by Palestinian terrorists. Israel went to war against Hamas
in Operation Protective Edge because the terrorist regime in Gaza began
pummeling Israel with tens of thousands of mortars, rockets and missiles.

Unmute
Current Time1:32
/
Duration Time1:32
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
Vocal protest outside Israeli embassy in Washington
Anti-Israel protest outside Israeli embassy in Washington in 2014

And as Ohana noted, “Each and every one of them [was] targeted to kill us.”

Ohana concluded, “If I will have to choose between losing more lives of Israelis,
 whether they are civilians or soldiers, or losing you, I will sadly, sorrowfully,
 rather lose you.”

To a degree, the Brookline exchange was a watershed event. This is true for
 two reasons.

First, there was the unanimity of the responses. And second, the lawmakers
 were willing to walk away from the increasingly vocal anti-Israel faction of
the American Jewish community.

Shifrah’s statement was a moral and criminal indictment of Israel. It was also
an egregious slander of the entire country.

Shifrah stood before a crowd of American Jews at a synagogue and alleged
 libelously that in retribution for the murder of three boys, Israel maliciously
 killed 2,300 innocent Gazans.

And the Knesset members told her not to let the flap slam her on her way
out of the pro-Israel tent.

This action was long in the making and long overdue. For more than a decade,
American Jews led by radical rabbis and thought leaders have been threatening
Israel.

You are making us embarrassed, Peter Beinart and his supporters have said.
We won’t be able to keep supporting Israel if you don’t succumb to all the
demands that the PLO and Hamas are making. Their terrorism – that is,
their “resistance to occupation” – is understandable.

Israel, they harangue, is losing American Jewry. We are progressives. We
stand up for the oppressed against the oppressors. Israelis, you are oppressors
 and we won’t be able to stand with you and as Jews, we will stand against you.

We will seek common ground with anti-Semites like Roger Waters and Alice
 Walker and invite them to our most prestigious forums to speak. We will make
 common cause with terrorist supporters like Linda Sarsour and terrorists like
 Rasmea Odeh. We will show that we don’t hate Israelis by hosting EU-funded
 anti-Israel groups like Breaking the Silence at our synagogues and campuses.
And we will insist we are pro-Israel and pro-peace and send our checks to
J Street, a group that has never sided with Israel on anything.

Over and over again Israel has heard these voices, which are often well-paid
 and always well-covered by the media. Over and over we have listened to
 their threats of abandonment.

Rather than criticize them for their hostility and reject their threats, Israeli
spokesmen, particularly from the Left, have tried to make these Jewish
Israel bashers feel better about Israel.

True, we are “occupiers,” voices like Haaretz’s former columnist Ari Shavit
told his American audiences. But we feel really bad about it so please don’t
hate us.

We love you so, please love us back. We are one.

The time has long since passed for Israel to begin a frank exchange with
 these people.

There are lines you cannot cross and still expect us to care what you think.

Sometimes those lines are crystal clear.

For instance, last week, the anti-Israel and increasingly antisemitic Jewish
 Voices for Peace BDS pressure group held its annual conference in Chicago.

More than a thousand people showed up. JVP decided to use its annual event
to honor a Palestinian terrorist murderer.

Rasmea Odeh, who was imprisoned in Israel for her role in the terrorist
 bombing of a Jerusalem supermarket in 1969 that murdered two Israelis,
 was honored by JVP for her fight against Israel.

Odeh is about to be deported to Jordan after being found guilty of immigration
fraud for failing to mention that she is a convicted terrorist murderer on her
 immigration forms when she moved to the US in 1994.

Odeh took advantage of the microphone JVP provided her to pledge to continue
 fighting for the eradication of Israel for the rest of her life, and urging her
audience to do so as well.

In her words, “Zionists aren’t going to stop their land grab in Palestine. The
 Palestinians there and the Palestinians and our supporters here have to stop
them with our resistance and our organizing.”

JVP is certainly a Jewish group. Odeh was introduced by Rabbi Alissa Wise.
But everyone associated with JVP is an enemy of Israel, Jewish or not. And
Israel has begun to treat it as an enemy. Just this week, Internal Security
Minister Gilad Erdan rightly castigated the group as antisemitic.

If JVP is the easy case, the situation quickly becomes complicated.

Can we draw a line when seemingly mainstream leaders join the ranks of
Shifrah and JVP in libeling Israel? Can we walk away from prominent
American Jews who indicate that as far as they are concerned, Israel is a
moral burden that they are having a hard time carrying because they believe –
 and propagate – slanders of Israeli society and of the IDF? Consider the case
of Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove. Cosgrove is the rabbi of the toney Conservative
Park Avenue Synagogue in New York.

Last week Cosgrove joined the radical chorus of voices advancing the Israel
is Apartheid slander.

According to Mondoweiss
, in an event at his synagogue following the AIPAC
 conference, Cosgrove spoke of his daughter’s uneasiness at the sound of
speaker after speaker rejecting the false allegation that Israel is an apartheid state.

Cosgrove said that his daughter pointed to the fact that the Palestinians do
 not vote for the Knesset as proof that Israel is in fact apartheid.

As Yisrael Medad noted on his website, Cosgrove’s daughter’s statement
was utter nonsense.

Why would Palestinians vote for the Knesset when they have the right to
vote in the Palestinian elections? The Palestinian Authority, not Israel, is
 their governing body.

It isn’t Israel’s fault that PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas has failed to hold
 an election since 2006.

The fact that Rabbi Cosgrove was unwilling to point this obvious truth out
to his daughter, and indeed, the fact he thought her ignorant slur was worth
 repeating publicly and supportively to his congregants speaks volumes
 about his own anti-Israel prejudices.

Medad also noted that in an article in The Jerusalem Post last year, Cosgrove
threatened Israel with a withdrawal of American Jewish communal support.

Cosgrove wrote, “American Jewry isn’t able to reconcile the dream of Israel
 as a liberal democracy and the death of the two-state solution; it is unable or
 unwilling to defend Israeli actions in the court of world or campus opinion.”

There is a straight line between Shifrah’s false claim that Israel needlessly
 and maliciously killed 2,300 Palestinians in Gaza in the 2014 war with Hamas
and Cosgrove’s insinuations that Israel and its military actions are to blame
 for the absence of peace with the Palestinians.

Both are slanderous attacks against Israel. Their goal is not to cultivate a
dialogue but to justify condemnations and opposition to Israel.

Telling the Shifrahs and JVPs of the world that they are beyond the pale is
important, but insufficient. Israel needs to make clear that blaming Israel
for the crimes of its enemies and ignoring objective reality is not acceptable.
 If the Cosgroves of the American Jewish community cannot tell the difference
between Israelis and our enemies, then it is they that require a moral reckoning.

We, with sorrow, will have to make do without their phony support.