Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label S&P. Show all posts
Showing posts with label S&P. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

A Trump Opponent Starts Figuring Out Trump

What I got wrong about Trump in 2017

Rick Newman
Columnist
 
 
 
Ad: 6 seconds
When Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, I predicted gloom. “The policies he favors … pose many land mines for the economy,” I wrote the day after the election. The result, I suggested, could be a prompt Trump recession.
There was no Trump recession. Quite the contrary, in fact. Economic growth accelerated modestly in 2017. Job growth has continued to improve steadily. The biggest financial story in 2017 is the stock market, with the S&P 500 index up a robust 20% for the year. Americans feel increasingly confident about their prospects, and the business tax cuts Congress just passedought to keep the party going.
How did I get this so wrong?
Many critics have weighed in via email and Twitter, arguing that I’m a fake-news practitioner biased against Trump. They’re wrong. It’s true that I’m turned off by Trump’s bombast, by his untruths, and by his racially charged incitements. But I also concede that Trump won legitimately in 2016, in large part because he understood the frustrations of millions of disaffected voters his many opponents in both parties talked down to or simply ignored. Voters wanted change. Trump delivered it.
Here’s why I guessed wrong about Trump’s impact on the economy: I expected him to do what he said he would do. Instead, Trump has done only some of what he said he would do, and apparently accepted the counsel of cooler heads persuading him to deep-six several of his most troubling campaign promises. People who know Trump say it’s a mistake to take everything he says literally. Instead, they advise, follow the direction of his thinking, while leaving considerable room for detours. This is the lesson I hope to take from 2017.
As a candidate, Trump promised several things that would almost certainly harm the economy if put into action:
  • Tough new limits on trade with China, including new tariffs on imports as high as 45%
  • Canceling the North American Free Trade Agreement if the United States doesn’t get more favorable terms, and imposing tariffs in the range of 35% on imports from Mexico and some other countries
  • Expelling all 11.3 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, and putting tough new limits on legal immigration
  • Overhauling the Federal Reserve
On three of those four issues, Trump has done nothing (yet). As a candidate, he bashed the Fed and denigrated Chair Janet Yellen, whom investors thoroughly respect for her careful leadership of one of the world’s most powerful institutions. As president, however, Trump became a quick convert to Yellen’s style of handling the economy. And his choice to succeed her, Jerome Powell, is a Yellenite whom markets like because he seems unlikely to rock the boat at the Fed.
On trade, Trump’s minions are, in fact, working behind the scenes to revamp NAFTA and the U.S. trade relationship with China. But so far, Trump has declined several opportunities to take tough steps that might disrupt the status quo.
FILE – In this Nov. 9, 2017, file photo, President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping participate in a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)
On immigration, Trump has in fact cracked down, to some extent, on undocumented migrants and imposed some new limits on legal immigration. But even this hasn’t been the Gestapo-like crusade some economists and business leaders feared.
Meanwhile, Trump has delivered the one thing companies love most: tax cuts.
As the 2016 election neared, several well-known research groups—including Moody’s Analytics, Citibank, Oxford Economics and Macroeconomic Advisers—estimated the impact Trump’s policies would have on the economy. They examined all of his policies, not just the salubrious ones. And all of them saw trouble—declining growth, falling stock values, rising unemployment, and a possible or likely recession. Those analyses, based on Trump’s full set of campaign promises, prompted gloomy stories like the one I wrote right after the election.
Trump fooled us in 2017. He only pursued policies likely to be good for the economy, while setting aside those that most troubled economists and business owners. Will he do the same in 2018? Let’s hope so. Trade wars would still raise prices, kill jobs and hurt workers. And the economy arguably needs more legal immigrants, not fewer, to help fill the 6 million job openings employers can’t fill and crank up production even more.
Trump clearly revels in the frothy stock market, tweeting frequently about how his policies are driving stocks to one record high after another. Maybe he’ll quit while he’s ahead, and find a way to declare victory on trade and immigration without changing much. Some campaign promises are best left unfulfilled. And some predictions are subject to revision.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Are People So Stupid That They Can't See What Is Happening? The Market Is In For A Major Correction!

September swoon? Stocks pummeled as global growth worries mount

Yahoo Finance 
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during the morning of August 27, 2015
.
View photo
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during the morning of August 27, 2015 (AFP Photo/Andrew Burton)
U.S. stocks kicked off September with heavy losses on the heels of the worst month for Wall Street since 2012 amid growing concerns over the strength of the global economy.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) dropped 427 points, or 2.7%, to 16101.8, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) fell 51.9 points, or 2.6%, to 1920.3 and the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) tumbled 116.3 points, or 2.4%, to 4660.2.

The broad S&P 500 tumbled 6.26% in August, its worst month since May 2012. The rout erased some $5 trillion in global equity market value as traders ditched stocks.

On Tuesday, traders cited swelling anxiety over thestate of two of the world's biggest economies as reasons for steep losses.

The Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing PMI dropped to 51.1 in August from 52.7 the month prior, compared to expectations of a much shallower drop to 52.6. The reading indicates U.S. factory growth slowed down in August to the lowest level since August 2013.

Michael Montgomery, U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight, reckons the rest of the year could be a "bumpy ride" for American manufacturers. However, Montgomery notes factory activity has "stalled," and probably won't deteriorate or improve much before next year.

Meanwhile, China's official PMI reading suggests the manufacturing sector in the world's second-biggest economy contracted at the swiftest pace since August 2012 last month. Separately, the Caixin PMI gauge for August pointed to the heaviest drop in factory activity in more than six years.

"Another day, another sign of weakness from the Chinese economy," wrote Joshua Mahony, a market analyst at London-based IG, in a note to clients, adding, "the importance of today's announcement is that the slowdown is hitting the larger state-backed firms who typically take longer to feel the pain."

The gloomy data out of China ignited a selloff in Asia, where the Shanghai Composite (000001.SS) dropped 1.2%. The Japanese Nikkei 225 (^N225) tumbled 3.8%, while the MSCI's index of Asia-Pacific performance excluding Japan dipped 1.9%.

The selling ricocheted into Europe, with the Euro Stoxx 50, a measure of large-capitalization European stocks, sinking 3.2%. Benchmark indexes in Germany and France were both down more than 2%, while the UK's FTSE 100 (^FTSE) plummeted more than 3%.

Commodities took a beating as well. U.S. crude oil prices (CLV15.NYM) collapsed 6.2% to $46.20 a barrel, extending 2015 losses to 13.3%. Wholesale New York Harbor gasoline prices tumbled 9 cents, or 5.1%, to $1.41 a gallon.

In metals, copper, seen as an economic bellwether, melted by 1%, to $2.31 a pound. Gold (GCZ15.CMX) drifted slightly higher to $1,138.40 a troy ounce.
Digging into U.S. markets, every major S&P 500 sector was in the red. The worst performers were energy, financials, materials and industrials -- all segments that tend to be linked closely to economic performance. Consumer staples, health-care and utilities, seen as defensive plays, avoided the worst selling.

Traders also took shelter in U.S. Treasury bonds. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note fell 0.028 percentage point to 2.172% as traders bid-up the asset. Bond yields move in the opposite direction of prices, so as traders buy, the yield falls.

The CBOE's VIX, sometimes called Wall Street's fear gauge, jumped 8%, adding to a year-to-date surge of close to 60%.
Eyes on the Fed
As the September meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee looms, investors have been paying ever-closer attention to comments by key Federal Reserve officials. On Tuesday, Boston Fed chief Eric Rosengren noted in a speech in New York that while the labor market improved enough to satisfy policymakers, data have not "been as clear-cut" on whether the rate of inflation will move up to the Fed's 2% target in a "reasonable time frame."
Rosengren, who is currently a non-voting alternate on the FOMC, said slowing in foreign economies, stock-market volatility and sliding commodity prices could keep the U.S. economy from growing quickly enough to boost the pace of inflation.
Over the weekend, vice chair Stanley Fischer said there is "good reason to believe" inflation will indeed move higher, and that the Fed needn't wait for inflation to hit 2% in order for the Fed to hike rates for the first time in nearly a decade.
Fed funds futures pointed to an implied probability of about 32% that the Fed will boost rates in September, according to data from the CME Group. Meanwhile, a recent poll by Bloomberg indicated Wall Street economists were essentially evenly split on whether to expect a September liftoff.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Is This A Scary Time To Look At The Market?

David Stockman: Brace for 'Huge, Nasty Morning After' When Stocks Collapse

Friday, 22 May 2015 12:39 PM
By FJ McGuire


Former White House Budget Director and Newsmax Finance Insider David Stockman warns that stocks and bonds will soon crash and urged investors to brace for a “huge, nasty morning after.”

"The markets are going to be in for a huge, nasty morning after as people begin to look at where we really are," the White House budget chief in the Reagan administration told CNBC.

"We saw that Wednesday when the market had another spasm upward on the suggestion that the Fed won't raise interest rates after all," said Stockman, describing the S&P 500’s jump to an all-time intraday high Wednesday after Fed minutes hinted that a rate increase isn’t likely.

“The market seems to want to keep chopping up all of it on the basis that maybe the Fed will give them one more month of reprieve," he said.

He described the market as "a coiled spring that is going to break loose one of these days and there is going to be some pretty drastic, and even violent, adjustment."

Stockman said the market seems to crash “every eight years," he said. "We had one in 2000 and everyone said, 'This time was different.' Then we saw a massive catastrophic decline. Eight years later, we had the same thing," Stockman said.

"Now we've had the weakest recovery in post-war history and what has happened? The Fed has simply reflated the bubble to an even more gigantic proportion," he said.

To be sure, Stockman sees troubling signs everywhere he looks.

"It's not possible that the interest rate on the 10-year German bond should be 70 basis points when it was 5 just a few weeks ago — or even that the U.S. Treasurys should be trading at 2 percent on the 10-year when we have taxes and inflation," he said.

"Everything is totally distorted and there is a day of reckoning coming down the pike."

Stockman isn’t the only prominent pundit to see economic omens.

Legendary Vanguard Group founder Jack Bogle warns that there is an "awful lot" to fear in the current stock market and investors have few “good options.”
Special:
Latest News Update

"This is a hard time to invest because there aren't a lot of good options to stocks, and bond yields are extremely low," he told CNBC.

He said the Federal Reserve’s continued insistence on low interest rates has only artificially boosted stock prices.

"That's a scary thing because it can't stay that way forever," he said. "So, I do advocate a cautious approach to investing."

"I've been through, I think, four 50 percent declines, at least three, and we get over them and march on," he said. "It's a good idea to not pay too much attention to the stock market and think about the long-term productivity of business," he said.

Nobel Laureate Economist Robert Shiller says that the world’s economy remains mired in “a vicious circle of despair” seven years after the 2008 global financial crisis.

“Fear causes individuals to restrain their spending and firms to withhold investments; as a result, the economy weakens, confirming their fear and leading them to restrain spending further,” wrote Shiller, a Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale University and is a fellow at the Yale School of Management's International Center for Finance.

“The downturn deepens, and a vicious circle of despair takes hold. Though the 2008 financial crisis has passed, we remain stuck in the emotional cycle that it set in motion,”he wrote in his Project Syndicate blog.

“It is a bit like stage fright. Dwelling on performance anxiety may cause hesitation or a loss of inspiration. As fear turns into fact, the anxiety worsens – and so does the performance. Once such a cycle starts, it can be very difficult to stop.”

Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.

Monday, March 9, 2015

A Different View Of The Market.

Warning: Do not take any investment decisions based on this information. Before making any decision, consult appropriate financial, legal and accounting professionals.


Six Years Of Bull Market

By David Stockman of David Stockman's Contra Corner
Monday, March 9, 2015 6:51 PM EDT
Never has there been a more artificial—indeed, phony—gain in the stock market than the 215% eruption orchestrated by the Fed since the post-crisis bottom six years ago today. And the operative word is “orchestrated” because there is nothing fundamental, sustainable, logical or warranted about today’s S&P 500 index at 2080.
In fact, the fundamental financial and economic rot which gave rise to the 672 index bottom on March 9, 2009 has not been ameliorated at all. The US economy remains mired in even more debt, less real productive investment, fewer breadwinner jobs and vastly more destructive financialization and asset price speculation than had been prevalent at the time of the Lehman event in September 2008.
Indeed, embedded in Friday’s allegedly “strong” jobs report is striking proof that the main street economy is the very opposite of bullish. In January 2015 there were still 2 million fewer full-time, full-pay “breadwinner” jobs in the US economy than there were before the crisis in December 2007.
Breadwinner Economy Jobs
Not surprisingly, therefore, real median household income is still 4% below where it stood prior to the crisis. That cardinal fact nullifies in its entirety all of the Wall Street propaganda about “recovery” based on spurious paint-by-the-numbers data on waiter and bartender jobs or the temporary surge in car sales fueled by unrepayble subprime auto loans.
As should be more than evident by now, the household sector has reached a condition of peak debt, meaning that sustainable consumption spending is now solely dependent upon income growth. And that’s not happening.
Image result for images of real median household income in 2014
Likewise, the supply side of the economy—- where income is actually generated—-cannot grow if investment in productive assets lags. On that score, there is absolutely no reason for a bullish stock market, either.  Even as measured by the false Keynesian investment “spending” metric, real investment in business fixed assets is up by only 1.1% per year from pre-crisis levels.
And, of course, the flatlining trend shown above doesn’t even take into account the consumption of plant, equipment and other assets in current production. Accordingly, the only valid measure of future economic growth prospects is real net investment—–or current spending as recorded in the GDP accounts less depreciation. As I documented last week, that number stood at about $400 billion in Q4 or about 25% lower than the pre-crisis level of $500 billion, and nearly 33% lower than the level recorded at the turn of the century.  So there is nothing bullish at all in the single most important metric for future economic growth and profitability.
Net Real Domestic Business Investment
In short, the endless buy-the-dip trajectory shown below is not the consequence of a sustainable improving outlook for main street prosperity and corporate profits or honest price discovery in the financial markets. Its just reflective of bull market bull; its the flashing daily scoreboard recorded in a casino that has been juiced by the greatest central bank monetary fraud in human history.
Needless to say, six years of continuous monetary levitation by the Fed and its fellow traveling central banks around the world has generated a ticking time bomb. That’s because after 80 months of drastic financial repression, financial markets have been reduced to a state of abject addiction to central bank monetary stimulus.
That pathological condition was evident once again in Friday’s stock market plunge—-a kneejerk reflection of Wall Street’s abiding fear that its monetary narcotics will someday be withheld. In this case, its mini hissy fit arose from fear that a purportedly “strong” jobs report would induce the Fed to go ahead with a pinprick 25 basis point increase in money market interest rates. And as soon as 90 days down the road!
Do not be confused by this “goods news is bad news” tantrum. There is now a dangerous fragility embedded in the Wall Street casino. After all, the six year “bull market” being celebrated today by the financial media was powered upward dip-after-dip-after-dip by the very same headline-reading robo-machines, day traders, hedge fund hustlers and shameless Wall Street equity strategists who, it turns out, are actually afraid of financial mice. That is, they are petrified at the prospect of tiny interest rate increases that amount to irrelevant rounding errors to main street—–and which, at worst, may reach 100 basis points sometime in the year ahead.
Let’s see. Never during the 750 months between the end of WW II and December 2008, did money market rates penetrate below 1%. In fact, other than during the 24 months of the Greenspan  panic between June 2003 and June 2005—-did they even come close.
So this is really not about interest rate ticks in the federal funds market. Its actually about the fact that the entire post-crisis bull market is a monumental house of cards built on a historically aberrant monetary regime that is unsustainable and eventually heading for a crash landing.
Stated differently, today’s S&P 500 index at 3X its March 2009 low is rooted not in the real domestic and world economy, but in the perverse mechanics that ZIRP and QE have touched off within the canyons of Wall Street. On that matter there is no better authority than the very bullish “strategists” who dispense the Cool Aid.
Thus, calling in the homegamers for yet another slaughter, Charles Schwab’s perpetually bullish stock peddler, Liz Ann Sonders, assured one and all that the huge gain during the last six years is completely on the up-and-up:
“Earnings growth and the power of stock buybacks have more than explained the >250% appreciation since the March 2009 lows,” she said.
Well, yes, by the end of this month there will have been approximately $2.5 trillion of stock buybacks by the S&P 500 companies alone since March 2009. So a drastic shrinkage of the share count has flattered the math of EPS calculations. But that only begs the question of earnings quality, and whether on that basis market multiples should be rising or falling.
In fact, the Fed’s drastic money printing regime has transformed corporate America into an equity strip-mining machine. Virtually the entirety of S&P net income is being flushed back into the stock market, meaning that there is virtually no free cash flow left to fund growth—–a development fully consistent with the sharply declining trend of real net investment for the overall US economy depicted above.
Thus, during the year ended in Q3 2014 (latest available data), the S&P 500 companies reported aggregate net income of $945 billion, but flushed fully $892 billion or 95% of that total back into the Wall Street casino in the form of dividends and share repurchases.
Nor are these results an aberration. In fact, go back to the beginning of today’s six-year bull market and the data show that the stock market is essentially capitalizing at higher and higher  multiples the earnings generated by companies with steadily deteriorating growth prospects and balance sheets. By the end of March 2015, the S&P companies will have flushed the staggering sum of $4 trillion back into the market in the form of dividends and buybacks or upwards of 85% of the their net earnings since the post-crisis bottom.
So the six year bull market amounts to this. The quality of current earnings is being deeply impaired by the very cash extraction and recycling process that has funded the soaring index averages. That means that PE multiples should be shrinking, not expanding to nearly all-time highs.
Yet with 98% of companies reporting, GAAP earnings for the S&P 500 came in at $102/share during Q4, meaning that today’s 6th anniversary market is trading at 20.5X LTM profits. Needless to say, the last time outside of recession quarters that the broad market PE ratio was above 20X was during the fall of 2007.
Even that is cold comfort, however. At least back then when reported earnings peaked at $85 per share in Q2 2007 they had not yet been deformed by 75 quarters of ZIRP—-a distortion that has subsequently ballooned earnings by $5-10 per share owing to artificially cheap interest carry costs on upwards of $3 trillion of S&P company debt. Nor had a concerted global central bank driven economic boom lifted materials, energy and industrial company earnings to wholly artificial heights. Nor had virtually zero cost funding—–extracted from the hides of savers and depositors—–artificially boosted bank and financial company earnings by triple digit billions.
So there has been an enormous deterioration in the quality of reported earnings. On an apples-to-apples basis, today’s $102/share does not likely even equal the $85/share reported way back in the June 2007 quarter. Moreover, after adjusting for the impact of inflation it is not even close.
The more important point, however, is that all of these bull market stimulants are now in the rear-view mirror.Thus, the global economy is rapidly cooling under the double whammy of $200 trillion of credit market debt compared to $140 billion prior to the financial crisis; and profitability is being hammered by a deflationary crunch in the energy, materials and industrial sector and by the rising dollar exchange rate propelled by the global scramble to fund massive amounts of off-shore dollar debts.
So six years on from the bottom the market is now chasing its own tail, valuing artificially inflated earnings at nosebleed PE multiples and buying the dips on any faint sign that the central bank stimulus drugs will be dispensed for a while longer. All the while, of course, the fundamental malady that triggered the last crisis goes unrelieved—–namely, the crushing burden of public and private debt that has been enabled by more than two decades of drastic financial repression and systematically false pricing throughout the financial markets.
In fact, the US economy now has $8 trillion or 16% more public and private debt outstanding than it did when the “debt crisis” first incepted in Q4 2007. Once upon a time it was understood that nation’s can not borrow their way to prosperity. By  contrast, today’s celebrants of the 6-year “bull market” are apparently happy to believe that wealth can be manufactured out of thin air by central bank printing presses.
That amounts to something for nothing. Its never worked before, and most assuredly this time is not different.