Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Stefan Lofven. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stefan Lofven. Show all posts

Friday, July 21, 2017

Disappearing Freedom Of Speech In Sweden

  • The Swedish state, in true Orwellian style, fights those Swedish citizens who point out the obvious problems that migrants are causing.
  • When police officer Peter Springare said in February that migrants were committing a disproportionate amount of crime in the suburbs, he was investigated for inciting "racial hatred".
  • Currently, a 70-year-old Swedish pensioner is being prosecuted for "hate speech", for writing on Facebook that migrants "set fire to cars, and urinate and defecate on the streets".
The security situation in Sweden is now so critical that the national police chief, Dan Eliasson, has asked the public for help; the police are unable to solve the problems on their own. In June, the Swedish police released a new report, "Utsatta områden 2017", ("Vulnerable Areas 2017", commonly known as "no-go zones" or lawless areas). It shows that the 55 no-go zones of a year ago are now 61.
In September 2016, Prime Minister Stefan Löfven and Minister of Interior Anders Ygeman refused to see the warnings: in 2015, only 14% of all crimes in Sweden were solved, and in 2016, 80% of police officers were allegedly considering quitting the force. Both ministers refused to call it a crisis. According to Anders Ygeman:
"... we are in a very difficult position, but crisis is something completely different. ...we are in a very strained position and this is because we have done the biggest reorganization since the 1960s, while we have these very difficult external factors with the highest refugee reception since the Second World War. We have border controls for the first time in 20 years, and an increased terrorist threat".
A year later the Swedish national police chief is calling the situation "acute".

In 2015, only 14% of all crimes in Sweden were solved. In 2016, 80% of police officers were allegedly considering quitting the force. Nonetheless, Prime Minister Stefan Löfven (pictured above) refused to call it a crisis. (Photo by Michael Campanella/Getty Images)

Sweden increasingly resembles a failed state: In the 61 "no-go zones", there are 200 criminal networks with an estimated 5,000 criminals who are members. Twenty-three of those no-go zones are especially critical: children as young as 10 years old are involved in serious crimesthere, including weapons and drugs, and are literally being trained to become hardened criminals.
The trouble, however, extends beyond organized crime. In June, Swedish police in the city of Trollhättan, during a riot in the Kronogården suburb, were attacked by approximately a hundred masked migrant youths, mainly Somalis. The rioting continued for two nights.
Violent riots, however, are just part of Sweden's security problems. In 2010, according to the government, there were "only" 200 radical Islamists in Sweden. In June, the head of the Swedish Security Service (Säpo), Anders Thornberg, told the Swedish media that the country is experiencing a "historical" challenge in having to deal with thousands of "radical Islamists in Sweden". The jihadists and jihadist supporters are mainly concentrated in Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmö and Örebro, according to Säpo. "This is the 'new normal' ... It is an historic challenge that extremist circles are growing," Thornberg said.
The Swedish establishment has only itself to blame for it.
Thornberg said that Säpo now receives around 6,000 intelligence tips a month concerning terrorism and extremism, compared to an average of 2,000 a month in 2012.
Some of the reasons for the increase, according to terror expert Magnus Ranstorp of the Swedish Defense University, is due to segregation in Sweden's no-go zones:
"... it has been easy for extremists to recruit undisturbed in those areas. ...the prevention measures have been pretty tame... if you compare Denmark and Sweden, Denmark is at university level and Sweden at kindergarten level".
Asked what the increase in people supporting extremist ideologies indicated about Sweden's work to combat radicalism, Interior Minister Anders Ygeman told the Swedish news outlet TT:
"I think it says little. This is a development we have seen in a number of countries in Europe. On the other hand, it shows that it was right to take those measures we have. A permanent centre against violent extremism, that we have increased the budget to work against violent extremism, that we have increased the security police's budget for three years."
There may be even more jihadists than Säpo thinks. In 2015, at the height of the migrant crisis, when Sweden received over 160,000 migrants, 14,000 of them who were told that they were going to be deported disappeared inside Sweden without a trace. As late as April 2017, Sweden was still looking for 10,000 of them. Sweden, however, has only 200 border police staff at its disposal to look for them. One "disappeared migrant" was Rakhmat Akilov, from Uzbekistan. He drove a truck into a department store in Stockholm, killing four people and wounding many others. He later said he did it for the Islamic State (ISIS).
Meanwhile, Sweden continues to receive returning ISIS fighters from Syria, a courtesy that hardly improves the security situation. Sweden, so far, has received 150 returning ISIS fighters. There are still 112 who remain abroad -- considered the most hardcore of all -- and Sweden expects many of those to return as well. Astonishingly, the Swedish government has given several of the ISIS returnees protected identities to prevent local Swedes from finding out who they are. Two Swedish ISIS fighters who returned to Europe, Osama Krayem and Mohamed Belkaid, went on to help commit the terror attacks at Brussels airport and the Maelbeek metro station in the center of Brussels, on March 22, 2016. Thirty-one people were killed; 300 were wounded.
Swedish news outlets have reported that the Swedish towns that receive the returnees do not even know they are returning ISIS fighters. One coordinator of the work against violent Islamist extremism in Stockholm, Christina Kiernan, says that "...at the moment there is no control over those returning from ISIS-controlled areas in the Middle East".
Kiernan explains that there are rules that prevent the passing of information about returning jihadists from Säpo to the local municipalities, so that the people who are in charge in the municipal authorities, including the police, have no information about who and how many returned ISIS fighters there are in their area. It is therefore impossible to monitor them -- and this at a time when Säpo estimates the number of violent Islamist extremists in Sweden in the thousands.
Even after all this, the Swedish state, in true Orwellian style, fights those Swedish citizens who point out the obvious problems that migrants are causing. When police officer Peter Springare said in February that migrants were committing a disproportionate amount of crime in the suburbs, he was investigated for inciting "racial hatred".
Currently, a 70-year-old Swedish pensioner is being prosecuted for "hate speech", for writing on Facebook that migrants "set fire to cars, and urinate and defecate on the streets".
With thousands of jihadists all over Sweden, what could be more important than prosecuting a Swedish pensioner for writing on Facebook?
Judith Bergman is a columnist, lawyer and political analyst.
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Monday, April 10, 2017

Isn't This Kinda Like Closing The Door On A Burning House?

Swedish Prime Minister: We'll 'Never Go Back' to Allowing Mass Refugee Immigration


The prime minister of Sweden now says his nation will "never go back" to
 allowing mass immigration from terrorist nations like Syria, Libya and Iran.
The U-turn comes after a Muslim terrorist, who came to the country as a
refugee and sought asylum, killed four people in a truck attack. Rakhmat
Akilov, a refugee from Uzbekistan, hijacked a truck and deliberately drove
 into pedestrians on central Stockholm's main shopping street on Friday.
Akilov had applied for asylum but his final appeal failed in December. He
was given four weeks to leave the country and was being hunted by police
 and immigration officials for deportation.
Prime Minister Stefan Löfven vowed to move the country from its liberal
 stance, insisting that the massive flow of refugees into Sweden during
 the 2015 migrant crisis would never happen again.
"Sweden will never go back to the [mass immigration] we had in autumn
 2015 -- never," Löfven said on Sunday. "Everyone who has been denied
a permit should return home. This makes me feel enormously frustrated.
 If you have been denied a visa you are supposed to leave the country."
He said refugees are bringing danger into Sweden. "Terrorists want us to
be afraid, want us to change our behavior, want us to not live our lives
 normally, but that is what we're going to do. Terrorists can never defeat
Sweden, never."
His comments came as thousands of Swedes gathered in Stockholm in
 a “love manifestation” rally to show support and solidarity. And Löfven
said he wants Sweden to continue to open -- to a degree.
“I believe today’s [rally] was a clear message from Stockholm and Sweden
 that we intend to keep our open, warm and inclusive society," he said.
 “I am proud to have you as fellow countrymen. You can take this pride
 [in your actions] with you for the rest of your lives."
“Friends, this is our fundamental challenge, as social democrats and as
Swedes, during this conference and this decade. We are here to respond
 to this uncertainty.”
But Löfven said Sweden must remain vigilant. “We must prevent, obstruct
 and defend against terrorism with all the resources at our disposal. We
will chase these killers with all the strength of our democracy.”

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

If You Are A Woman, Would You Wear A Hijab? If You Are A Man, Would You Allow Your Wife To Wear A Hijab?

Are You Ready For The Battle of the Hijab? Well, Get Ready.

FEBRUARY 21, 2017
22713642 Comments21861
The hijab has been under fire for a little while now, with France
banning the face-covering veils worn by Muslim women way back
 in 2010.
But the whole hubbub died down fairly quickly. Until now.
Suddenly, the hijab -- and who does or does not wear it -- is back in
the headlines big time.
Earlier this month, the Swedish Prime Minister, Stefan Lofven, led a
delegation to Iran. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei met him and the talks
 were warm and wonderful. But in Sweden, the headlines were all about
 the female government officials who went along on the trip and chose to
wear Islamic headscarves while in Iran.
The 11 women wore them "almost all the time," adhering to the laws of Iran.
This was big news because Lofven describes his government as “feminist."
This hit Twitter and exploded.
One official said she didn't want to wear it, but "it is law in Iran that women
 must wear the veil. One can hardly come here and break the laws,” she
told the Swedish Expressen newspaper. 
An opposition party member said that was no excuse, calling the
 headscarf “a symbol of oppression for women in Iran.” 
Now, two more incidents have occurred, igniting what will soon be a big,
fat fire.
Iran on Monday banned chess grandmaster Dorsa Derakhshani from the
 national team for not wearing a hijab. The head of Iran's Chess Federation,
 Mehrdad Pahlevanzadeh, said: "The first step in dealing with them would
 be to deprive them from every game that is played in Iran and in the name
of Iran, and they will not have the chance to be on the national team,"
according to India Today.
On Tuesday, French far-right National Front presidential candidate Marine
 Le Pen made headlines when she bailed on a Tuesday with Lebanon's
grand mufti. The reason: She didn't want to wear a headscarf.
"You can pass on my respects to the grand mufti, but I will not cover
myself up," she said.
Also this past weekend, the inaugural ‘Modest Fashion Week’ was held to
 pitch clothing to Muslim consumers. The event was "sponsored by a makeup
 brand who refuse to sell products to supporters of U.S. President Donald J.
Trump," Breitbart News reported.
So, the whole can of worms is open again -- and you can expect the debate
 to wash ashore in America pretty soon. But don't look for Melania Trump
to be donning a hijab any time soon. Not gonna' happen.