Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Todd Starnes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Todd Starnes. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

When FBI Intentionally Tries To Effect Election, Is This Not What Happens In Third World Countries?

US Congressman: The FBI Tried to Stop Donald Trump from Becoming President

 Print
Speculation has run rampant for months that the FBI was working against a Donald Trump presidency, and now a United States congressman has given credit to that theory and what it would mean.
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told conservative radio host Todd Starnes he is convinced the FBI was working against Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign.
“The whole pretext is wrong. Think about this, you had — I’m convinced now — the FBI actively seeking with intent, actively trying to stop Donald Trump from being president of the United States,” Jordan said on the Todd Starnes Show.
Jordan pointed to text messages written by investigator Peter Strzok that referred to an “insurance” policy.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok wrote.
TRENDING: Watch: Dump Truck Driver Hits Wrong Switch… Seconds Later, Interstate in Ruin
The reference was meant to convey that the bureau needed to aggressively investigate allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, people familiar with the situation told The Wall Street Journal.
Jordan was concerned the “insurance policy” might have included dressing up the infamous Trump-Russia dossier, turning it into an intelligence document and using it to obtain warrants in the FISA court that allowed them to spy on Americans.
In the same text messages, Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page disparaged Trump, calling him an “idiot” and “loathsome human,” showing their obvious bias against the then-candidate.
To make matters worse, Strzok was the lead agent on the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state.
He was also the top investigator for special counsel Robert Mueller, who has been in charge of looking into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Strzok was removed from that position after the problematic texts surfaced. But lawmakers like Jordan have remained concerned over how his bias may have influenced his role.
In fact, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley wrote to the Justice Department about the issue, saying Strzok’s texts appeared to “go beyond merely expressing a private political opinion.”
They “appear to cross the line into taking some official action to create an ‘insurance policy’ against a Trump presidency,” Grassley wrote.
RELATED: FBI Offered Anti-Trump Spy $50k if He Could Prove Russian Connection
Jordan called the situation “as wrong as it gets.”
“If that happened, and it sure looks like it did – if that happened it is wrong as it can possibly be in this great country for the FBI to actively be trying to make sure one individual, one major party’s nominee does not become the next president is as wrong as it gets,” Jordan told Starnes.
He’s right. The FBI should never be involved in trying to sway the outcome of an election — especially the U.S. presidential election.
It certainly appears they crossed that line, however, and something must be done to ensure they’re dealt with appropriately and that this never happens ever again.
Like and share this article on Facebook and Twitter and tell us what you think about the FBI potentially trying to stop Trump from becoming president.
What should happen to the agents involved in trying to take down Trump? 

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Kathy Griffin Should Be Relegated To The Dust Bin Of History!

Secret Service To Investigate Kathy Griffin’s Photo Of Decapitated Trump

"Each alleged or perceived threat has to be investigated thoroughly ..."
 Print

The Secret Service apparently will be paying comedian Kathy Griffin a visit in the near future.
Law enforcement sources told TMZ that the Secret Service has launched an investigation into “the circumstances surrounding the photo shoot” with famed photographer Tyler Shields.
After Griffin posted an image of her holding a mock, decapitated bloodied head of President Donald Trump, the agency tweeted “On it.”

The Secret Service added that threats against its protectees received the highest priority.
The agency also released a statement in response to the incident.
“The U.S. Secret Service has a critical mission. It is always unfortunate when people make statements that could be perceived as threats,” the statement read, according to ABC News. “We don’t have the luxury of knowing a person’s intent. Each alleged or perceived threat has to be investigated thoroughly which taxes Secret Service manpower and resources that could be utilized elsewhere.”
Many responded to Griffin’s viral image by calling on the Secret Service to take action.

Griffin has co-hosted CNN’s New Year’s Eve special with Anderson Cooper the last several years, but the network is now “evaluating” that relationship.
“We found what she did disgusting and offensive,” a CNN spokesperson said. “We are pleased to see she has apologized and asked that the photos be taken down. We are evaluating our New Year’s Eve coverage and have made no decisions at this point.”
Cooper tweeted that he was “appalled” by the photo.
Fox News contributor Todd Starnes suggested CNN’s advertisers could play a role in helping the network during its evaluation process.
The comedian posted a video on Tuesday evening apologizing for image, admitting what was obvious to people across the political spectrum, stating, “I went too far.”
Wednesday morning on Fox & Friends, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich asked a question many likely had following Griffin’s disturbing post.
“Imagine if somebody on the right had done that with a head of Barack Obama?” Gingrich said. “I think what was done by the comedian, by the Left, has grown into pathologies. Its radical values are so great that I think they are literally becoming dangerous.”
What do you think?