Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Trump Cruz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump Cruz. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2016

The Only Reason Establishment Republcians Are Not Happy Is That Trump Will Mean A New Era In Washington Where The Old Ways Of Paybacks and Pay Offs No Longer Work. It's All About The Establishment's Power But More Importantly, Their MONEY!

Let’s look at the bright side of the Republican primary contest so far:
  • The Republican establishment, which set the rules for how the 2016 primaries would be conducted, have been utterly defeated. There’s no way they can win. One by one, its candidates have been defeated. One still standing, John Kasich, has been mathematically eliminated from any chance of winning the nomination on the first ballot. He just can’t count, or has some other reason for remaining in the race. The two front-runners are anti-establishment – and either is well-positioned to win the general election in November.
  • The terms of debate have been reset. All candidates left standing, even the last Republican establishment favorite, have been forced to agree that a big wall needs to be built to put a stop to the flood of illegal immigration across the southern border. The mental illness of political correctness has been set back 30 years. The political left is desperate, and it shows in its desperate tactics of violence and intimidation.
  • Voters have been energized by the liveliness of the debate – setting records for turnout in primary after primary, with many Democrats and independents crossing over to be part of the fun.
  • Meanwhile, on the other side, two left-wing extremists try to outdo one another in their wacky, non-mainstream, fringe ideas. The leading candidate is considered fundamentally dishonest among most Democrat voters. The Democratic primary system is anything but democratic. The fix is in – and everyone knows it.
You might think all of this would be cause for celebration among nearly all Republicans – especially those who have battled the party’s establishment since Ronald Reagan left office.
Think again.
Some of the most conservative Republicans are wringing their hands.
Few are breaking out the champagne.
Uniformly, those who are worried fear Donald Trump. They are actively plotting how to thwart him, sabotage him, stop him by almost any means necessary short of joining the MoveOn.org nutcases.
The question is why.

The Republican establishment, which has been arguably the No. 1 enemy of conservatives, has been overcome.
Few saw it coming. Maybe some haven’t recognize it yet. They’re done. Its only hope now is a hopelessly deadlocked convention in which a white knight rides in to the rescue.
For some conservatives, they are actually thinking about pushing a third-party candidate to run if Trump is nominated.
It’s crazy!
It is quite literally the only scenario that would snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Donald Trump may not be the conventional, anti-establishment candidate, but tell me how he could possibly be worse than the last two Republican nominees in 2008 and 2012?
Can anyone imagine Trump actually being worse than John McCain or Mitt Romney if he wins?
I can’t. As a matter of fact, I can honestly say I would expect him to be much, much better.
Ted Cruz, should he win, would be like Ronald Reagan.
So that’s where we are today.
If Republicans simply vote their consciences between now and the convention, they are likely to have the strongest nominee Republicans have had since 1988, when they won a landslide victory.
Come 2017, Republicans will have no more excuses as to why they can’t do the following:
  • Repeal Obamacare
  • Secure the borders
  • Return prosperity to America through lower taxation, deregulation and ending borrowing
  • Defund Planned Parenthood
  • Cut Washington spending and end federal power grabs
  • Return to constitutionally limited government
  • Appoint Supreme Court justices who believe in the original intent of the founders
Can someone please explain to me why Republicans aren’t just giddy about November?

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/why-republicans-should-be-celebrating/#xebkmEvzqohOlY68.99

Monday, December 7, 2015

Obama, The Weak, Unprepared, Incompetent President Tries To Blame Americans For Our Problems With ISIS and Islamic Terrorism.

Pete King: Obama's Terror Speech 'Pitiful, Total Failure of Leadership'

Image: Pete King: Obama's Terror Speech 'Pitiful, Total Failure of Leadership'(Getty Images)
By Greg Richter   |   Sunday, 06 Dec 2015 10:37 PM
Conservative Rep. Pete King slammed President Barack Obama's Oval Office address on terrorism Sunday night, calling it "pitiful — a total failure of leadership."

"Nothing the president proposed or spoke about had any relevance or connection to the San Bernardino massacre," the New York Republican said in a statement. "Once again he failed to say that our enemy is Islamist terrorism. Nor did he call for increased surveillance of the Muslim community. Instead he tried to raise the phony specter of Islamophobia.

"The truth is that the Obama policy against ISIS has failed totally and his speech totally failed to address or correct that failure! Nothing he said will calm the fears of the American people."

GOP presidential candidates also slammed Obama's address.

Republican front-runner Donald Trump live-tweeted the speech, saying at the end.





"Nothing that happened in the speech tonight is going to assuage people's fears," Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, another GOP White House hopeful, told Fox News. "And then the cynicism, the cynicism tonight to spend a significant amount of time talking about discrimination against Muslims. Where is there widespread evidence that we have a problem in America with discrimination against Muslims? … I think not only did the president not make things better tonight, I fear he may have made things worse in the minds of many Americans."

Other candidates weighed in as well:

"We have heard people say it is better to fight them there than here," former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee told Fox News. "We are fighting them here. They are here. That's what happened in San Bernardino. It may not be ISIS but it is radical Islam."

Still, he said, the female shooter in San Bernardino "was more vetted than the Syrian refugees are going to be. As Dr. Phil would say, how did that work out for you?"

South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told Fox News he would replenish the National Security Administration and CIA budgets if elected president.

"We are at war and president Obama is fighting crime," Graham said.



Pundits also piled on, with conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer  calling the 13-minute speech "a complete failure."

"Woody Allen said showing up is 80 percent of life. In that sense, he showed up," Krauthammer said on Fox News Channel immediately afterward. "He finally appeared to address the issue. I think that counts for something. As to the substance and tone, it's a complete failure."

Weekly Standard columnist Steve Hayes, also on Fox News, calling it a "low bar" for anyone to be celebrating the mere fact that that "the president of the United States has called a terrorist attack a terrorist attack."

Fox News host Bret Baier had noted that the speech marked the first the first time since last week's San Bernardino mass shooting that Obama specifically said the killings were terrorism.

The Hill's A.B. Stoddard noted that Obama was somber in tone, "but there was no 'What now?'"

"Americans watching tonight were not assuaged there's going to be a battle against encryption and dark spaces where these people can communicate overseas without detection," Stoddard said.

National Review's Jim Geraghty was unimpressed, writing a piece headlined, "Obama Actually Thought He Was Being Reassuring Tonight."

"The lone bits of good news was the president’s belated acknowledgement that the Fort Hood shooting was terrorism – not 'workplace violence' – and that he didn’t announce any new executive orders dealing with gun control," Geraghty wrote.

"Ramping up the rhetoric is not the same as ramping up action." said David Gergen, who served as an adviser to presidents Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Clinton.

"There was no new action here," Gergen told CNN. "This was a stay-the-course speech. He thinks the course is going to lead to victory. There is not evidence that that's the case."

Obama appears to be leaving the Islamic State (ISIS) problem to the next president, Gergen said.

Some people took consolation where they could find it.

Many Democrats weren't happy with the speech.

But Fox News' Juan Williams pronounced it a success, a good job after he had been given a "mulligan" after what Williams called a disastrous response to the Paris attacks.
Related Stories:






© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.