Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Walter E. Williams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Walter E. Williams. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

If Only They Would Listen

OPINION

The Worst Enemy of Black People

Walter E. Williams
|
Posted: Jan 02, 2019 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Worst Enemy of Black People
  
Malcolm X was a Muslim minister and human rights activist. Born in 1925, he met his death at the hands of an assassin in 1965. Malcolm X was a courageous advocate for black civil rights, but unlike Martin Luther King, he was not that forgiving of whites for their crimes against black Americans. He did not eschew violence as a tool to achieve civil and human rights. His black and white detractors accused him of preaching racism and violence. Despite the controversy, he has been called one of the greatest and most influential black Americans.
Many black Americans have great respect for Malcolm X. Many schools bear his name, and many streets have been renamed in honor of him, both at home and abroad. But while black Americans honor Malcolm X, one of his basic teachings goes largely ignored. I think it's an important lesson, so I will quote a large part of it.
Malcolm X said: "The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn't taken, tricked or deceived by the white liberal, then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America, the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man."
There's a historical tidbit that those much younger than I (almost 83 years old) are ignorant of. In black history, we have been called -- and called ourselves -- several different names. Among the more respectable have been "colored," "Negro," "black," "Afro-American" and "African-American." I recall when Mrs. Viola Meekins, when I was a student at Stoddart-Fleisher Junior High School in the late 1940s, had our class go page by page through a textbook and correct each instance in which Negro was printed with a lowercase "n." In Malcolm X's day, and mine, Negro was a proud name and not used derisively by blacks as it is today.
Malcolm X was absolutely right about our finding solutions to our own problems. The most devastating problems that black people face today have absolutely nothing to do with our history of slavery and discrimination. Chief among them is the breakdown of the black family, wherein 75 percent of blacks are born to single, often young, mothers. In some cities and neighborhoods, the percentage of out-of-wedlock births is over 80. Actually, "breakdown" is the wrong term; the black family doesn't form in the first place. This is entirely new among blacks.
According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year only 11 percent of black children were born to unwed mothers. As late as 1950, female-headed households constituted only 18 percent of the black population. Today it's close to 70 percent. In much earlier times, during the late 1800s, there were only slight differences between the black family structure and those of other ethnic groups. In New York City in 1925, 85 percent of kin-related black households were two-parent households. Welfare has encouraged young women to have children out of wedlock. The social stigma once associated with unwed pregnancy is all but gone. Plus, "shotgun" weddings are a thing of the past. That was when male members of a girl's family made the boy who got her pregnant live up to his responsibilities.
The high crime rates in so many black communities impose huge personal costs and have turned once-thriving communities into economic wastelands. The Ku Klux Klan couldn't sabotage chances for black academic excellence more effectively than the public school system in most cities. Politics and white liberals will not solve these and other problems. As Malcolm X said, "our problems will never be solved by the white man."

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

The Decline In Morals, Ethics And Respect Is One Of The Root Causes Of Our Troubles Today

SOCIETYCOMMENTARY

The Real Reason

 We Have Mass Shootings

Students are evacuated from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, after a shooter opened fire and killed 17 people on Feb. 14. (Photo: Mike Stocker/ZUMA Press/Newscom)
One of the unavoidable tragedies of youth is the temptation to think that what is seen today has always been. Nowhere is this more noticeable than in our responses to the recent Parkland, Florida, massacre.
Part of the responses to those murders are calls to raise the age to purchase a gun and to have more thorough background checks—in a word, to make gun purchases more difficult. That’s a vision that sees easy gun availability as the problem; thus, the solution is to reduce that availability.
The vision that sees “easy” availability as the problem ignores the fact of U.S. history that guns were far more available yesteryear. With truly easy gun availability, there was nowhere near the gun mayhem and murder that we see today.
I’m tempted to ask those who believe that guns are today’s problem whether they think that guns were nicer yesteryear.
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can't be done alone. Find out more >>
What about the calls for bans on the AR-15 so-called assault rifle? It turns out that, according to 2016 FBI statistics, rifles accounted for 368 of the 17,250 homicides in the U.S. that year. That means restrictions on the purchase of rifles would do little or nothing for the homicide rate.
Leaders of the gun control movement know this. Their calls for more restrictive gun laws are part of a larger strategy to outlaw gun ownership.
Gun ownership is not our problem. Our problem is a widespread decline in moral values that has nothing to do with guns. That decline includes disrespect for those in authority, disrespect for oneself, little accountability for anti-social behavior, and a scuttling of religious teachings that reinforced moral values.
Let’s examine elements of this decline.
If any of our great-grandparents or even grandparents who passed away before 1960 were to return, they would not believe the kind of personal behavior all too common today. They wouldn’t believe that youngsters could get away with cursing and assaulting teachers. They wouldn’t believe that some school districts, such as Philadelphia’s, employ more than 400 school police officers.
During my primary and secondary schooling, from 1942 to 1954, the only time one saw a policeman in school was during an assembly period where we had to listen to a boring lecture on safety. Our ancestors also wouldn’t believe that we’re now debating whether teachers should be armed.
There are other forms of behavior that would have been deemed grossly immoral yesteryear. There are companies such as National Debt Relief, CuraDebt, and LendingTree, which advertise that they will help you to avoid paying all the money you owe. So after you and a seller agree to terms of a sale, if you fail to live up to your half of the bargain, there are companies that will assist you in ripping off the seller.
There are companies that counsel senior citizens on how to shelter their assets from nursing home care costs. For example, a surviving spouse may own a completely paid-for home that’s worth $500,000. The costs of nursing home care might run $50,000 a year.
By selling her house, she could pay the nursing home costs, but her children wouldn’t inherit the house. There are firms that come in to shelter her assets so that she can bequeath her home to her heirs and leave taxpayers to foot the nursing home bill.
In my book, that’s immoral, but it is so common that most of us give it no thought.
There is one moral failing that is devastating to the future of our nation. That failing, which has wide acceptance by the American people, is the idea that Congress has the authority to forcibly use one American to serve the purposes of another American. That is nothing less than legalized theft and accounts for roughly three-quarters of federal spending.
For the Christians among us, we should consider that when God gave Moses the commandment “Thou shalt not steal,” he probably didn’t mean thou shalt not steal unless you get a majority vote in the Congress.

Saturday, April 1, 2017

Schools Are Becoming Ungovernable Due To Obama Rules



Obama Tried to Make Nice With 

Rebellious Students.

 It Backfired Miserably.

President Barack Obama speaks to the media during a meeting with the Council of the Great City Schools Leadership, with Secretary of Education Arne Duncan sitting beside him. (Photo: Yuri Gripas/Reuters /Newscom)


Nationally, black junior
high and high school
students are suspended
at a rate more than three
times as often as their
white peers, twice as
often as their Latino peers,
more than 10 times as often
as their Asian peers.
According to former Department
 of Education Secretary Arne
Duncan, the “huge disparity is
ng, professional development,
and discipline policies. It is adult
behavior that needs to change.”
In other words, the Education
 Department sees no difference
between the behavior of black
 students and white, Latino, and
 Asian students. It’s just that
black students are singled out
 for discriminatory discipline.
Driven by Obama administration
 pressures, school districts
 revised their discipline
procedures by cutting the
 number of black student
 suspensions.



Max Eden, senior fellow at the
Manhattan Institute, has written
a report, “School Discipline
Reform and Disorder: Evidence
 from New York City Public
Schools, 2012-16.”
The new discipline imposed on
public schools is called
 restorative justice. Rather
than punish a student through
 exclusion (suspension),
restorative justice encourages
 the student who has
 misbehaved to reflect on his
 behavior, take responsibility,
and resolve to behave better
 in the future.
The results of this new policy
are increased violence, drug
use, and gang activity.
Eden examines the NYC
School Survey of teachers
and students and finds that
violence increased in 50
 percent of schools and
decreased in 14 percent. Gang
 activity increased in 39 percent
 of schools and decreased in
11 percent.
For drug and alcohol use, there
 was a 37 percent increase while
 only 7 percent of schools
 improved.
It’s not just New York City where
 discipline is worse under the
 Obama administration’s policy.
 Eden reports:
One Chicago teacher told the

Chicago Tribune that her

district’s new discipline policy

led to “a totally lawless few

months” at her school. One

Denver teacher told

Chalkbeat that, under the

new discipline policy,

students had threatened

to harm or kill teachers,

“with no meaningful

consequences.” … After

Oklahoma City Public

Schools revised its discipline

policies in response to

federal pressure, one

teacher told the Oklahoman

that “[w]e were told that

referrals would not require

suspension unless there

was blood.”
Eden reports that in Oklahoma
City a teacher said that:
Students are yelling, cursing,

hitting, and screaming at

teachers and nothing is

being done but

teachers

are being told to teach

and ignore the

behaviors. These

students know there

is nothing a teacher

can do. Good students

are now suffering

because of the abuse

and issues plaguing

these classrooms.
In Buffalo, a teacher who
 was kicked in the head by
 a student said: “We have
 fights here almost every day.
 The kids walk around and
 say, ‘We can’t get
suspended—we don’t care
what you say.’”
Ramsey County attorney
John Choi of St. Paul,
Minnesota, described how
 the number of assaults
 against teachers doubled
 from 2014 to 2015 and
 called the situation a
 “public health crisis.”
Testifying before the U.S.
 Commission on Civil Rights,
 a former Philadelphia
teacher said that a student
told him, “I’m going to torture
 you. I’m doing this because
 I can’t be removed.” Eden’s
report cites similar school
horror stories in other cities.
Since most of the school
violence and discipline
problems rest with black
students, there are a few
questions that black parents,
 politicians, academics, and
 civil rights advocates should
 ponder.
Is academic achievement
 among blacks so high that
 black people can afford to
 allow miscreants and thugs
to sabotage the education
 process?
For those pushing the
Obama administration’s
 harebrained restorative
 justice policy, can blacks
 afford for anything to
 interfere with the acquisition
 of academic excellence?
Finally, how does the Obama
 restorative justice policy
differ from a Ku Klux Klan
 policy that would seek to
 sabotage black education
 by making it impossible for
 schools to rid themselves
of students who make
education impossible for
 everyone else?