Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Is Biden Really This Corrupt?

Joe Biden’s Corruption in China WAY WORSE than What He Did in Ukraine

539Shares
 368
 66
 102
The mainstream media is actively covering up the fact the former Vice President Joe Biden helped funnel more than a billion dollars in foreign money through his son’s businesses. Bank records and photographic evidence indicates that the Bidens are beholding to China, and Sleazy Joe is running to further the communist nation’s agenda.
It sounds like a plotline from the Manchurian Candidate book in which an American family is brainwashed into working for the Communists. But no one had to take such measures with the Bidens.
The ex-Obama number two and his son, Hunter, actively flew to China to hold high-level, backroom talks and get paid. The money flowing from China into the Biden family bank accounts appears to be why Sleazy Joe Biden is the only politician who wants to go easy on China’s thieving ways.
“Come on, man,” Biden reportedly said. “I mean, you know, they’re not bad folks, folks. But guess what, they’re not competition for us.”
Although Hunter Biden had no expertise in foreign affairs or the businesses China and Ukraine paid him for, the family’s coffers swelled. A Ukrainian company allegedly paid him $50,000 a month while his Dad was still Vice President.
While the Ukraine scandal is bad for Joe Biden, the dealings with China appear to go much deeper than a quick payoff. Hunter Biden was reportedly flown to the communist nation on Air Force Two to meet high-level financial officers. Soon after, a $1.5 billion deal was inked.
“China should start an investigation into the Bidens because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine,” Pres. Trump reportedly said.
But what the president may not yet understand is that Biden owes China, big league. Joe Biden was spearheading high-level trade negotiations during the Obama years. He pushed forward the notorious Trans-Pacific Partnership that would have hamstrung U.S. companies to fight China’s corrupt practices. If it seemed as if Sleazy Joe Biden was selling out working Americans, he was.
It appeared that deal would come to fruition, and the $1.5 billion China financing of a company Hunter Biden was involved in would be squared up. But Hillary lost in 2016 and Pres. Trump scrapped the one-sided trade deal. It took the Herculean efforts of investigative journalists years to unearth evidence that Biden and his son were in bed with China. Many believe them to be traitors.
Biden, now making his third run at becoming president, appears to be running scared. His campaign officials have insisted that White House lawyer, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, be banned from interviews. Biased outlets such as CNN are expected to oblige. And Biden’s demands have ramped up actively stating, “any article, segment, analysis, and commentary that does not demonstrably state at the outset that there is no factual basis for Trump’s claims, and in fact that they are wholly discredited, is misleading readers and viewers.”
It appears Biden does not want the American people to know that he and his son had dealings with China that led to the purchase of a U.S. military contractor corporation being sold off to the communists.
The facts appear to be quickly coming into focus despite the fake news media’s willingness to cover up for Biden and his son. They expected the gravy train to keep running after Hillary won the White House. The historic win of populist Pres. Trump upended the corruption gravy train that was kicking everyday Americans to the curb.
The ex-vice president’s annual income has plummeted over the last two years, and his son can no longer leverage foreign entities. It’s easy to connect the dots that the Bidens are greedy for the type of wealth of the Trumps, Obamas, Bushes, and other prominent political families enjoy. Joe Biden appears ready to do China’s bidding, again, to get rich at America’s expense.

Saturday, February 23, 2019

AOC Is Perfect For Slimy, Corrupt, Double Dealing Washington


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez caught in SLEAZY sex and money scandal

“On the Holmes Front” with Frank Holmes
If Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, N.Y., really wants to clean up Washington, she can start with her own campaign.
Damning new evidence shows that Cortez — and her romantic “partner”— could be caught up in a swirling scandal of sex, money and the deep, ugly swamp of Washington corruption.
Cortez collected donations door-to-door from her poor neighbors in the Bronx… and then watched a nice chunk of that cash funnel back to her live-in boyfriend!
Of course, we didn’t learn a single detail about this from the media, which tried to catapult the 29-year-old bartender onto Mount Rushmore.
All the details came from a plucky political operative who started digging into public records.
Luke Thompson first noticed something was fishy when he saw that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s boyfriend, Riley Roberts, had his own congressional e-mail account, even though they’re usually reserved for staffers.
When Thompson tweeted the fact out, Cortez’s office pushed back hard… too hard.

The congresswoman’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, said that Cortez’s boyfriend hadn’t been hired, or gotten any money from Congress—he was just given an e-mail account so he could see AOC’s congressional schedule.
Twitter ganged up with the Democrats and locked Thompson’s account, claiming he broke its “rules against posting private information.”
The social media giant only unlocked it when Thompson proved that all he did was post public records.

The hard-hitting response told him he was onto something, so Thompson started digging — and he uncovered something big.
It turns out AOC, Chakrabarti, and the boyfriend have been involved in a shady financial threesome going back years… and her donors were the ones who seemingly got screwed.
When she started her campaign, Cortez got a huge boost from Brand New Congress PAC.
Brand New Congress, or BNC, is actually two organizations: It is a “progressive” political action committee that backs left-wing candidates, like Cortez. Any donations the PAC makes have to be public.
But it’s also a private corporation, an LLC, that runs political campaigns—and it doesn’t have to report a single dollar it spends…or who it’s working for.
“It’s a rather ingenious organization,” Thompson wrote, “but one that dwells in a legal gray-area as far as campaign finance law is concerned.”
Cortez hired BNC to provide “strategic consulting” for her campaign—but then BNC turned around and put the money back in her boyfriend’s pocket.
And after she won, Cortez hired the group’s founder to become the most influential member of her team.
Cortez paid BNC $18,880.14 for their services. But BNC’s PAC cut two checks to Roberts totaling $6,000.
Usually, when you hire a company, they don’t pay you back. So, Thompson followed the money.
BNC PAC paid Riley $3,000 on August 9, 2017.
Just 18 days later, Cortez paid BNC’s LLC $6,191.
Then, at the end of the next month, BNC PAC cut Riley another $3,000 check.
Thompson asked why BNC would hire Roberts, “a no-name ‘UX Experience’ guy with little discernible marketing experience to serve as Brand New Congress PAC’s sole marketing consultant?”
As a matter of fact, BNC PAC paid Cortez’s live-in boyfriend more money than anybody who didn’t work for BNC!
What was going on here?
At this time, Cortez had only raised about $33,000 in campaign donations, according to Fox News — and she already paid BNC more than half of that.
So, the group gave Cortez a kickback of about one-third of the expenses, Thompson says.

“Regardless of whether or not Roberts was officially AOC’s spouse at that time, it seems probable [the PAC’s founder] was reimbursing her for her campaign expenses off-books,” Thompson wrote. “Brand New Congress PAC simply served as a pass-through to do so.”
Spend $18,000 in public contributions… and get back $6,000 in your boyfriend’s check? How sleazy!
Did the community activists in the Bronx sign up to put money in Riley’s pocket?! Since Riley lives with Cortez, this was like giving money directly to her.
Since this has come out AOC’s office—which usually can’t wait to swat down the smallest criticism of the congresswoman—hasn’t said a word about these serious allegations.
BNC’s PR flack told Fox News that Roberts “is a professional digital marketing and growth consultant” and they hired him only because of “his experience managing successful advertising and social media campaigns.”
His new job was supposed to be “aiding in execution of strategy to increase brand awareness for the PAC as a whole.”
Who’s kidding who?
It sure looks like Cortez took money intended for her campaign and found a way to enrich her boyfriend…somebody she’s told Congress to treat as her spouse.
Oh, one more detail: BNC was founded by Chakrabarti. After he paid Cortez’s boyfriend $6,000, she hired him as her chief of staff!
The whole thing stinks of corruption—and they’re only getting started!
“Ocasio-Cortez has been in office for only 48 days,” writes Becket Adams at The Washington Examiner.
For pulling off this level of underhanded campaign shenanigans, Adams says, Cortez belongs in the “swamp hall of fame.”
We say Cortez, Riley, and BNC all belong under investigation.
Frank Holmes is a reporter for The Horn News. He is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”

Friday, September 1, 2017

The Corruption Around The Clinton Machine Is Unbelievable.

Deep State covered for Clinton… and it still is

title

Personal Liberty Poll

Exercise your right to vote.
Thanks to revelations out from two GOP senators this week, we learned what we already knew: Former FBI Director James Comey never had any intention to thoroughly investigate Hillary Clinton’s use of a secret email server while at the State Department. In other words, his firing was totally justified. Now, watch as the Washington machine works feverishly to continue to keep traces of Clinton corruption under wraps.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina on Thursday released a letter to the new FBI director demanding an explanation for why it appears that Comey wrote a statement clearing Clinton of wrongdoing in May 2016, before the agency had even interviewed her or key aides tied to the scandal.
“These individuals had intimate and personal knowledge relating to Secretary Clinton’s non-government server, including helping her build and administer the device,” they noted in the letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray.
“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy,” Grassley and Graham added.
President Donald Trump tweeted about the letter early Friday, calling it proof of a “rigged system.”
And he’s right.
Just after the senators’ letter became public, another letter involving Trump/Comey/Russia/Clinton is getting press over at The New York Times.
Of course, there isn’t much to the coverage beyond revealing that different people close to Trump had different opinions about why he should fire Comey. The story is based on information about a draft letter from the Trump White House that FBI special prosecutor Robert Mueller apparently has in his possession. The draft, The Times claims, “appears to provide the clearest rationale that Mr. Trump had for firing Mr. Comey.”
The story continues into this gobbledygook:
It is unclear how much of Mr. Trump’s rationale focuses on the Russia investigation, although Mr. Trump told aides at the time he was angry that Mr. Comey refused to publicly say that Mr. Trump himself was not under investigation. Mr. Comey later said in testimony to Congress that the president was not under investigation.
Mr. Mueller is conducting a wide-ranging investigation into Russia and associates of Mr. Trump, including whether the president obstructed justice when he dismissed the F.B.I. director.
The Justice Department turned over a copy of the letter to Mr. Mueller in recent weeks.
Ty Cobb, a White House lawyer, declined to discuss the letter or its contents. “To the extent the special prosecutor is interested in these matters, we will be fully transparent with him,’’ he said.
So much desperation to find something, anything to skewer Trump– yet, so little substance.
Still, the mainstream media’s job of muddying the waters and keeping Trump’s alleged relationship with unidentified Russian election hijackers will continue to give Clinton’s supporters something to whine about.
And while NYT and its big media peers diligently play their part– factions within Trump’s own government are working to ensure that Clinton never suffers a proper investigation.
This week, Judicial Watch won a victory via a ruling from United States District Judge James E. Boasberg that the State Departmemnt must make public a FBI declaration detailing its efforts to retrieve Hillary Clinton’s government emails.
Why did it need such a declaration?
Because officials like acting Assistant Attorney General Chad Readler, a Trump appointee, keep declaring that the FBI already has done all it can to assure the public of its earlier finding that Clinton is an innocent old woman who simply doesn’t understand how email security works.
“We’re happy with the ruling but it is unbelievable we’re being opposed by Trump appointees in the State and Justice Department’s on the Clinton email issue,” Judicial Watch Tom Fitton said this week.” President Trump ought to be outraged his appointees are protecting Hillary Clinton. The State Department should initiate action with the Justice Department – and both agencies should finally take the necessary steps to recover all the government emails Hillary Clinton unlawfully removed.”
No doubt he’s correct. But government insiders will continue foot dragging as long as possible to avoid any real investigation into the Clinton issue.
As I’ve written before, the Clintons learned long ago how to protect themselves by implicating as many people as possible in their schemes.