Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label deplorables. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deplorables. Show all posts

Monday, March 12, 2018

Hillary Slams The Democratic Base. Is She Stupid Or Vengeful Or Trying To Destroy The Democratic Party?

WATCH: Hillary Says Racist Poor People Voted For Trump, 'Optimistic, Diverse, Dynamic' People Voted For Her

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech during a campaign rally at Northern Community College in Annandale, Washington, USA on July 14, 2016.
Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
On Monday, a woman who was never elected to the presidency, Hillary Clinton, spoke to a crowd in India. There, she laid out the reason she lost: those stupid, stupid poor people.
Yes, Hillary was a blue collar candidate, all right.
Here’s what she said:
There’s all that red in the middle, where Trump won. Now, I win the coasts, I win Illinois, Minnesota, places like that. But what the map doesn’t show you is that I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product. So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward, and his whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards. “You don’t like black people getting rights, you don’t like women getting jobs, you don’t want to see that Indian-American succeeding more than you are, whatever your problem is, I’m going to solve it.”
Clearly, this is the way that Democrats will win back the middle of the country: by calling them racist rubes who despise immigrants and still have outhouses.
It never occurred to Clinton that perhaps she lost because she scorned those people; it never occurred to Clinton that perhaps those people scorned her not because her agenda was sophisticated, but because her hatred of them was so basic to her nature. Mitt Romney was hurt in 2012 because he suggested that 47 percent of the public didn’t pay taxes, and so couldn’t hear his call for tax decreases; Hillary lost because she thinks people who live outside big cities are idiots and deplorables.
It’s also worth thinking about Hillary’s take on wealth here. Is she advocating for an income-based voting system? If so, that gives the lie to the idea that Democrats are the party of the poor – and if Democrats actively alienate those who earn less, they’ll be alienating a core constituency, by the numbers. Those of low income already show up less often to the polls. They’re certainly not going to show up to vote for Hillary Clinton or anyone like her.
Hilariously, Democrats seem more interested in doubling down on intersectional politics than in appealing to the rural voters they’ve lost. That opens the door to Trump’s re-election. But with each passing day, Hillary shows why she never became president – and why she never should have.

Thursday, November 9, 2017

Hillary Must "Love" This Tweet

Trump Torches Hillary With Best 

Tweet Ever

7 5 1  22


President Trump just loves to needle Hillary Clinton. And even though he 
crushed her in the 2016 presidential election — sending her on an extended
 walk in the woods — Trump rarely misses an opportunity to deliver a jab.

On Wednesday, exactly one year after he trounced the Democrat, he posted 
this on Twitter:
 
Trump's reference to "deplorables" comes from a September 2016 speech 
in which Hillary said half of Trump's supporters belonged in a “basket of 
deplorables.” Appearing at an LGBT gala fundraiser where Barbra
 Streisand performed, Clinton said many of Trump's supporters are
 “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/trump-torches-hillary-with-best-tweet-ever#2J4SczIIsTU74Yys.99

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Even This Educated Suburban Business Owner Thinks Zakaria Is A Fool

CNN HOST: TRUMP WON BECAUSE OF RACISTS LIKE YOU

Says POTUS supporters are bigoted sexists and homophobes

SHARES135
Nine months later, CNN still can’t get over the fact that Donald Trump won the election. So the network aired a special Monday ‘investigating’ “Why Trump Won,” and it came to the conclusion that everyone who voted for him is a racist.
The ‘investigation’ was headed up by impartial CNN host Fareed Zakaria, who still dines with former President Obama, and has previously said multiple times that Trump is a “bullshit artist”:
In his latest offering, Zakaria argued that a stupid, racist, homophobic, and sexist majority of Americans are fed up of being lectured by “educated professionals who live in cities, who have cosmopolitan views” like him.
“There’s a part of America that is sick and tired of being told what to do by this overeducated population that Hillary Clinton perfectly represented. That’s why they’re sticking with him,” Zakaria argued.
The CNN host then suggested that Trump tapped into the underlying bigotry of most Americans, labeling it a “toxic energy”.
“He knew that the election of a black president had stirred a kind of ugly racial animus. A small subset but he knew how to get them.” Zakaria said.
“A real sense of cultural alienation that the older white, non-college educated Americans have the sense that their country is changing because of immigrants. Because maybe blacks are getting — rising up to a kind of central place in society. Because of, you know, gays being afforded equal rights. Because of, frankly, a lot of working women.” he added.
And that was pretty much the full scope of Zakaria’s findings.
Unsurprisingly, he didn’t touch upon the scandal ridden campaign of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, their labeling of Americans as ‘deplorables’, and an embracing of ideals that most Americans find repulsive.

Monday, January 23, 2017

This Article Is As Close To Conservative Tom As Any.

America at a crossroads

Make America great again was President-elect Donald Trump’s promise and he will start to make good on it when he is sworn in on Friday. Almost 62 million Americans answered Trump’s call for one fundamental reason — they believed that President Barack Obama had undermined America’s traditional values.
There has been an overwhelming blacklash against Trump and his vision for America since the election. There have been vile and personal attacks against Trump and they will not lessen after his inauguration. In fact, they will intensify over time to a point where the United States of America may become ungovernable.
You may recall that during the final presidential debate, after Trump refused to commit to accepting the election results, Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton went off on one of her diatribes:
“That’s horrifying. Let’s be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating — he (Trump) is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position.”
As it turned out these were the words of a dyed–in–the–wool hypocrite. For two months Clinton and her allies have argued that Trump’s victory in November was the result of skullduggery and therefore he is an illegitimate president.
One theory is that Clinton lost because FBI Director James Comey sent a letter to Congress about the FBI investigation into her emails 11 days before Election Day, which put the controversy back into the news.
“There are lots of reasons why an election like this is not successful,” Clinton said adding, “Our analysis is that Comey’s letter raising doubts that were groundless, baseless, proven to be, stopped our momentum.”
Let’s take an analytical look at Clinton’s argument. Trump’s relationship with Comey comes from a single meeting where the FBI Director presented a two-paged synopsis of unconfirmed allegations about Russia regarding Trump. Are we to believe from that one meeting Comey was either bribed by Trump or was so mesmerized by him that he would forsake his oath of office “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States?”
If Comey did such a thing he would face felony charges and jail time. He would also go down in the history books next to Benedict Arnold. This is the same man that President George W. Bush thought highly enough of to appoint as deputy attorney general and a man who President Barack Obama appointed as director of the FBI.

Other scapegoats

Clinton’s disregard for preserving state secrets could have led to overseas intelligence agents being abducted, tortured and even murdered. If not criminal, Clinton’s actions were reckless. They included keeping multiple personal email devices against State Department protocol. Then there is her constant stream of lies. At first she admitted to having two cell phones rather than the prescribed one. That number eventually grew to 13 mobile devices.
Other theories include but are not limited to:
  1. Putin personally liked Trump better than Clinton.
  2. Putin believed Trump would be soft on Russia compared to Clinton.
  3. Putin has financial records and video of Trump’s deviant sexual behavior while staying in a Moscow hotel. The argument being that Trump’s business dealings and sexual deviancy would force him to acquiesce to Russian dictates.
Some Democrats in Congress like Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) maintain that Donald Trump is not a “legitimate president,” citing Russian interference in last year’s election.
Despite all that money spent and all the praise from the press, the fact is Clinton was a terrible candidate, devoid of any of the charisma her husband and former President Bill Clinton had and lacking in a message other than her presidency was going to continue the status quo of the Obama administration. That was a big misjudgment in what Americans wanted. Election exit polls showed that as many as two-thirds of all voters wanted change.
I was angry at Clinton when she said at a campaign fundraiser in New York City last September that:
You know, to just be grossly generalistic [SIC], you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.
If you have been reading me over the past year and a half you know I never did give Trump a ringing endorsement. There is a lot about him that runs against my libertarian values. But it seems to me Clinton’s conviction that there is a lot of white trash out there which undoubtedly includes me. Clinton thinks those that choose decency over diversity and don’t accept the notion of white privilege are unenlightened.
What do Trump supporters want? I believe it is decency over diversity; debate without debacle and politeness rather than political correctness. Most people don’t want to be lectured, especially by someone who gets rich for talking in front of a camera. I proudly count myself as one of Clinton’s deplorables rather than a progressive clone in the Democratic Party.
I consider myself to be smarter and better read than average. I have a good education from a university that didn’t have a liberal bias or institute political correctness when I attended in the 1970s. As a result, I am an independent thinker as I believe most of the Personal Liberty® readers are, based on reading your comments over the past eight years.
I don’t believe that we need a lecture from the media either.
Consider Jim Rutenberg, a political correspondent for The New York Times. He writes regularly against Trump. Last summer he wrote an article that should have gotten him fired. In it he urged the news media to abandon all pretense of objectivity in covering Donald Trump and rather write for the express purpose of defeating him:
If you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies, that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?
Because if you believe all of those things, you have to throw out the textbook American journalism has been using for the better part of the past half-century, if not longer, and approach it in a way you’ve never approached anything in your career. If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that…
Rutenberg believes the media and not Americans are the best judge of Trump. He credits journalists as having some kind of special knowledge that mere mortals don’t have — that a Trump presidency is very dangerous.
What has followed has hardly been a surprise. In November, New York Times Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. came right out and admitted the newspaper’s bias against Trump.
How does anyone know what is in another man’s heart? Trump has done nothing in his life to deserve the derision against him. Real evidence doesn’t seem important to The New York Times. They have insight into the future that must be listened to even if it is libelous to Trump, runs counter to decency and represents a much bigger threat to American democracy than Trump.
The Times also dishonors the Founding Fathers with the assumption that the checks and balances built into the Constitution are so flimsy that on a whim a U.S. President can install him or herself as a dictator.
The Times has the hubris to claim that only their publisher, editors and reporters can see evil in Trump — as well as his cabinet picks which include generals in the military and captains of industry — that remains hidden from the Americans who voted for him.
I find it interesting that the news media are so convinced that Trump is evil because of some of the moronic comments he has made over the past year. Trump has often said something stupid or inappropriate. That doesn’t mean he is evil or tyrannical.
The progressive media are pouring gasoline onto hot embers. If all hell breaks loose it won’t be Donald Trump that brings it about, but his enemies that care not about what is good for America but rather their own socialist agenda.
Yours in good times and bad,
— John Myers

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Media Lost It Big During The 2016 Election And Has Not Realized It Yet

Bozell on TV: Liberal Media Are 'Second-Biggest Losers' of Election; 'They Cheated and Got Caught'



Appearing on Fox Business Network’s Varney & Co., MRC founder and president Brent Bozell said the liberal media were the second-biggest losers on election night: “They were crushed. They were the second-biggest losers. But the difference between them and Hillary Clinton is that their loss continues. She is finished, but they still stay in the game. They have a public that simply repudiated them. The public didn’t distinguish between her calling them a basket of deplorable and the media treating them like a basket of deplorables.”
Bozell harped on leaks exposing the media's shameless collusion and cheating with the Clintons:
VARNEY: Do you think they’ll ever acknowledge their sins, so to speak, of working actually with and for the Clinton campaign? Because those Wikileaks revealed exactly what they were doing. Will they acknowledge that?
BOZELL. Never. Not in a million years. And they will excuse this election as some kind of aberration., you know, the The poor, uneducated and easy to command types, those rural hillbillies, the basket of deplorables, they had their say. In four years we’ll get back to normalcy. That’s going to be their attitude. They will never concede that they worked hand in glove with the Clinton campaign that they were defeated as much as she was. They’ll never concede that -- and Stuart, we have to understand that they were cheating all along, they were cheating! That Donna Brazile – she’s going to become the face of the national media. They cheated in this campaign and they were caught.
But looking ahead to the media’s coverage of the incoming Trump administration, Bozell predicted: “Well, I think they will become even more radical, believe it or not. Because, my God, they've got to stop this man. I mean, he's going to introduce freedom in America -- we can't have that! So they will be going ballistic.”

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Hillary Believed It Was "Her Right" To Become President. No Desire To Talk About Regular Folks


Joe Biden Says Hillary Clinton Ran for President Because She Had “No Choice”


 Print

Success models often say that you can’t achieve the what, or even the how, until you know the why. Every goal needs a purpose greater than the goal itself.
It appears the Democrats are beginning to get some hindsight in that respect.
After a scorching election defeat for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and plenty of Monday morning quarterbacking, vice president Joe Biden is coming clean. Biden told the Los Angeles Times last week what he couldn’t say while he was campaigning for Hillary.

She didn’t have a burning ambition to be president and lead the country, and his gut told him it would cost her the election.
“I don’t think she ever really figured it out,” Biden said. “She thought she had no choice but to run. That, as the first woman who had an opportunity to win the presidency, I think it was a real burden on her.”
Hmm. “No choice” is not a reason to be the leader of the free world, even for so good a cause as gender equality. We need more than role models; we need bold and brave leaders.

When Clinton announced her candidacy in April 2015, she promised to be a champion of middle-class Americans, reported The Guardian. Now, Biden admits that she and the Democrats were totally out of touch with working class America.
The Democrats have no one but themselves to blame. Even as she announced her candidacy, she came into the race less well-liked than when she left office two years earlier, according to The Washington Post.
And yet, the Democrats put forward no serious challenger. Those who called now-president-elect Donald Trump supporters “lazy” and “deplorables” were in fact playing working class voters for fools.
Biden makes it clear that he had to hold his tongue about his party not reaching the people who previously supported it. “I was trying to be as tactful as I could in making it clear that I thought we constantly made a mistake of not speaking to the fears, aspirations, concerns of middle class people,” he said.

All of which, in hindsight, was a really bad decision. See you in four years, Dems. Maybe you can up your game.
We’re sorry, Joe. Your candidate failed, and your party is to blame.
Do you think Joe Biden actually had a point here?

We Are Deplorable And Proud Of It!


Tapper: A Lot of the Media Thinks a Lot of Trump Supporters Are ‘Deplorable,’ ‘Racist’


Tapper
Breitbart

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Monday on CNN’s “Wolf,” while discussing the 2016 presidential election when Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton said that half of Republican Donald Trump’s supporters belong in a “basket of deplorables,” guest host Jake Tapper said, “I don’t think there’s any story that demonstrates the divide between the people who report on politicians and the voters, than that story,” adding our reaction was, “a lot of them are deplorable, a lot of them are racist.”
Partial transcript as follows:
BASH: Number one —you and I talked about this in the break —for sure, Hillary Clinton’s deplorables comment.
TAPPER: Basket of deplorables, yeah.
BASH: Baskets of deplorables where she said  — She wasn’t caught on tape, she was saying it  with a camera there at a fund-raiser, she was talking about Donald Trump supporters. Accusing them of, at least half of them of being deplorable.
TAPPER: And irredeemable.
BASH: And she sort of apologized but she didn’t really apologize properly. And correct I’m wrong. I think it was — your interview with Robby Mook, the campaign manager, where he said that was sort of the under-reported thing that really changed their polling internally and made them realize, ‘You know what? It wasn’t necessarily just Comey. It was that issue.’ It made the traditional Democratic base, the people who ended up going to Donald Trump think she really doesn’t get us.
TAPPER:  I don’t think there’s any story that demonstrates the divide between the people who report on politicians and the voters, than that story, because a lot of us, our reaction was, okay, she got the number right but a lot of them are deplorable, a lot of them are racist. And what a lot –which is where she landed it, she got the number wrong, not the fact they’re deplorable. And a lot of voters out there were like, ‘You are , you’re talking about my husband. talking about my brother. You’re talking about where I might vote.’ And a woman who worked for the Clinton campaign, her entire job was to just talk to undecided voters in swing states the entire election. She published something in the ‘Boston Globe’ after the election saying that was the moment they all started moving away from Hillary Clinton. Fascinating moment…. Attacking the voters is bad idea. A general rule of thumb.