Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label food assistance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food assistance. Show all posts

Sunday, May 27, 2018

Racial Hoax Fraud Should Get Her Punishment

Race Hoaxer Rachel Dolezal May

 Be Going to Prison For Lying About THIS

  • 05/26/2018 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN
Race Hoaxer Rachel Dolezal May Be Going to Prison For Lying About THIS
By Alex E. Proimos (http://www.flickr.com/photos/proimos/4199675334/) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Former Spokane, Wash. NCAA leader Rachel Dolezal, who made international headlines in 2015 when it was revealed she was a white woman falsely claiming to be black, has been criminally charged on three counts relating to a welfare fraud scheme.

She has been charged with first degree theft by welfare fraud, perjury in the second degree, and false verification for public assistance, after investigators discovered she lied about her income in order to qualify for welfare payments.

Dolezal, who now admits she is biologically white but continues to call herself black, legally changed her name to Nkechi Diallo.

“According to court documents, Diallo illegally received $8,747 in food assistance, and illegally received $100 in childcare assistance. Total restitution, according to the documents, is $8,847, allegedly stolen from August 2015 through November 2017,” Spokane NBC affiliate KHQ reported in breaking the story.

KHQ reports the investigation began in March 2017 when welfare officials learned Diallo has published a book about her life, but had not reported any income or royalties.

Subpoenaed bank records reveal Diallo deposited a total of $83,924 into her bank account between August 2015 and September 2017. In filings for welfare payments during that time Diallo reported her income as less than $500 a month.

Just as she did when confronted about her race claims in 2015, Diallo tried to pretend there was no issue, then refused to answer any further questions.

The State of Washington is seeking restitution for the defrauded payments, and may seek a prison term of up to 15 years.

Several months before being exposed as a race hoaxster, Diallo she told police she was being targeted by white supremacists who were mailing her threatening letters at the Spokane NAACP’s post office box.

A police investigation revealed the letters could not have been mailed, as they had no stamps or postmarks, and only Diallo and the mail carrier had access to the mailbox. No postal employee reported handling or seeing the envelopes, leaving Diallo as the only possible source for the letters.

Diallo was previously employed by Eastern Washington University where, in her online biography, she claimed to have been the victim of “at least eight documented hate crimes [targeting her] and her children during her residency in North Idaho.”

In each case, Diallo was the only witness. Diallo claimed racists painted a swastika on the door of the Human Rights Education Institute at which she worked, but no one witnessed the incident and the group’s security cameras had been turned off. HREI suspected Diallo staged it.

Diallo also claims racists left a noose on her front porch. Again, there were no witnesses. A neighbor recognized the rope as one he had fashioned into a makeshift noose a year earlier to hang up a deer for processing, but the rope had gone missing. Investigators called Diallo to ask about the neighbor’s statement, at which point she did not return their call.

Friday, March 9, 2018

Work Should Be Required For Those Who Get Benefits--Unless They Physically Cannot!

Trump’s idea for tougher work requirements for food stamp recipients worries anti-hunger advocates

Trump’s idea for tougher work requirements for food stamp recipients worries anti-hunger advocates
The Trump administration is looking for ways to get more people off of food stamps. (Ljupco/Getty Images)

Anti-hunger advocates said they plan to resist the Trump administration’s latest announced efforts to get people off food stamps, The Hill reported. They have said President Donald Trump’s plans would boot thousands of unemployed people off the program.
In his 2018 budget, Trump proposed limiting the number of state waivers for the work requirement for receiving aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the Hill reported. Limiting the number of waivers would force people back into the workforce, supporters of the move say.
“We can totally understand in a bad economy or in certain isolated cases someone might need an exception … however, today we have 6 million open jobs, we’re approaching all-time low unemployment and employers are having a hard time filling jobs,” Sam Adolphsen, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Government Accountability, told The Hill. “Now is not the time to be waiving the work requirement.”
Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.) introduced legislation last March that would eliminate work requirement waivers. He told The Hill that SNAP now discourages people from working.
“Particularly in today’s economy, the idea that you should have to work to get food stamps seems to be pretty much common sense,” he said.
Grothman said removing people from the program is not a funding issue.
“To me it’s more of a moral thing,” he said. “We don’t want to encourage people to behave improperly.”
Currently, adults ages 18 to 49 who are not disabled or raising minor children cannot receive aid through SNAP for more than three months over a three-year period. To keep their benefits, these adults must work at least 20 hours a week, participate in a state work-training program, or volunteer.

How many people receive SNAP?

According to the Department of Agriculture approximately 3.8 million of the 42 million people receiving SNAP benefits are able-bodied adults without dependents.
States can apply for a federal waiver for the work requirement, if jobs are lacking in the area. But some officials believe the waivers being abused. Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue has said too many states are seeking the waivers. As a result, they are “abdicating their responsibility to move participants to self-sufficiency.”
The USDA reportedly plans to change waiver eligibility requirements. In a statement last month, Perdue said: “Past decisions may have been the easy short-term choice, but USDA policies must change if they contribute to a long-term failure for many SNAP participants and their families.”
Twenty-eight states have waivers for certain areas, while the District of of Columbia, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands have full waivers now, according to the USDA website. To qualify, states must have an area with an average 12-month unemployment rate of more than 10 percent, or show there are not enough available jobs.

What do anti-hunger advocates say?

Anti-hunger advocates maintain that it’s a myth that adults capable of working are simply freeloading off of the government.
“No one is living comfortably on this,” Josh Protas, vice president of public policy at Mazon, told The Hill.
Most adults want to work but face employment barriers such as a lack of education or a criminal record, according to anti-hunger advocates. Others work at low-wage jobs but cannot get the minimum of 20 hours a week to qualify for assistance.
The average monthly benefit for an able-bodied adult without dependents is $163, according to the USDA.
Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, said states are not required to offer a job or training SNAP recipients. Also, many don’t receive enough funding to do so.
Last April, Rep. Alma Adams (D-N.C.) offered a bill to strengthen the food stamp program and exempt able-bodied adults without dependents from the work requirement if their state can’t provide them with a slot in a SNAP employment or training program. But the measure is unlikely to get enough support from Republicans to pass the House, since the GOP has made work requirements for SNAP a policy priority.
In a statement to The Hill, a USDA spokesperson said the agency’s goal is to move individuals from SNAP back to the workforce as the best long-term solution to poverty.
“[P]ublic input is an important part of finding the best approaches, and USDA will use the information gathered to consider options, including potential rule-making, to help able-bodied SNAP participants move out of poverty in a manner that is consistent with the structure and intent of the program,” the spokesperson said.