Foreign Affairs Has NOT Been A Major Topic Of Republicans

BOLTON: GOP FORGETTING 1 CRITICAL ISSUE IN DEBATES

'I think that's very dangerous for the country'

Published: 6 hours ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/02/gcorombos_avatar-96x96.jpg

 GREG COROMBOS About | Email | Archive

image: http://www.wnd.com/wp-content/themes/worldnet-theme/_/images//feed.png

 Subscribe to feed

• 
  
   Print
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     166

Republish
Reprint

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/03/GOP-debate-TW6.jpg

GOP presidential candidates Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich (Photo: Twitter)

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton says there needs to be much for focus on national security issues by Republican presidential candidates to convince voters they are ready to be commander in chief and would be far better than Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.

Virtually all of the Democratic Party debates have focused heavily on domestic issues, with the exception of the event that came just one day after the November terrorist attacks in Paris. Republicans had one debate devoted to national security, but most of the other encounters have also spent less time on foreign policy.

Bolton told WND and Radio America that’s a disservice to voters.

“There still hasn’t been enough discussion of the issue,” he said. “There has been, intermittently. I think consideration of terrorism, how to deal with ISIS and the expanding threat of radical Islam (has been discussed at length).

“I don’t really consider these debates. I consider them serial press conferences,” he added, in reference to the brief time given to answer questions and contrast positions.

Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America’s independent news network.

He said the media should be doing a better job.

“The moderators should be asking more questions about it because the most important job of the president is to keep the country safe internationally,” he said. “We need to hear what the various candidates’ views are.”

Bolton said Republicans could build a big advantage by discussing national security issues more because Democrats are largely ignoring them.

“The people are going to be deprived of a real opportunity to judge among the candidates,” he said. “That’s why I have long argued that the Republican Party is, of the two parties, it’s the only one that’s the party of national security. If there’s no debate in the Republican Party, there’s not going to be a debate at all. I think that’s very dangerous for the country.”

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with John Bolton:

While the position of the candidates is important, Bolton believes voters can get an important glimpse into how candidates approach a national security crisis by hearing them discuss issues now.

"It's not just their views on what China's doing in the South China Sea that threatens us or what Russia's doing in eastern Europe that threatens us. It's how people think about these issues," he said. "The next president is going to face threats and challenges that we can't even predict at the moment."

Bolton continued, "It's critical people have a way of judging their character, their integrity and their ability to deal with problems."

On top of that, Bolton stresses there are many critical issues facing the next president in addition to the fight against radical Islamic terrorism.

"Terrorism is the most imminent threat we face," he said. "But there are larger strategic threats from China in East Asia, from Russia in East Europe and others in this hemisphere, the Castro brothers and the mistakes President Obama has made opening relations with them, possibly giving the Guantanamo naval facility back to Cuba. There's a long list."

Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America's independent news network.

In Thursday's debate, the biggest international flash-point was over how the president should approach the Middle East peace process. Donald Trump said he is very pro-Israel but would approach talks in an impartial way. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio say they would stand with Israel ,and John Kasich believes the peace process is largely a waste of time right now.

Bolton said the U.S. must stand with Israel or else no one else will, although he says given all the other problems in the Middle East, he does not expect the next president to address the Israeli-Palestinian question anytime soon.

Bolton briefly flirted with a 2016 bid of his own to keep the focus on foreign policy. Instead, he says he is in communication with multiple candidates and provides feedback on their ideas for a wide range of issues.

He is not endorsing anyone at this time, but Bolton is perfectly willing to sound the alarm as to why Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders should not be commander in chief.

When it comes to Clinton, he said her entire time at the State Department is a red flag to the nation, especially after the disastrous response in Benghazi.

"It's just a dereliction of duty, really, to see your people in danger, not just in Libya but potentially all around the Middle East, and to go home," he said. "It sends a signal within the bureaucracy that the secretary doesn't care enough to stay at her desk, late at night if need be, until all Americans are accounted for."

He also said Hillary's handling of State Department email on an unsecured, private server also depicts a troubling lack of judgment.

In Wednesday's Democratic debate, Bernie Sanders came under fire for comments he made in 1985 suggesting the Cuban people weren't all that upset with the Castro regime. When asked to clarify his current position, Sanders lamented that Cuba remains an authoritarian state but also lauded its work in education and health care.

Bolton was horrified.

"It shows what an astoundingly left-wing radical this man still is at an age when common sense normally begins to descend on people," said Bolton, while slamming the Obama administration for getting nothing in exchange for opening diplomatic relations with Cuba.

Click here for reuse options!

Copyright 2016 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/bolton-gop-forgetting-1-critical-issue-in-debates/#qTHAZWtbt0kvzCiW.99

Will Obama Ever Do Anything To Protect The US? Or Is His Intent To Make America A Third Rate Country?

Should America Take A Different Tact With The World? Should We Become Isolationists And Retreat To Our Shores? Will These Actions Right Our Ship Or Has That Ship Sailed?

John Myers writes an interesting piece today. We do not necessarily agree with all of his article but it was thought provoking.

If we become isolationist can we rebuild our economy or is the world too intertwined to allow us to take that approach? Could we retreat even if we wanted?  Our belief is that the world is a messy place and there has to be one country (or a group) that leads it, which for the past 30 years or so, that has been the US. 

Should we relinquish our leadership? We think not. If there is one thing that America has shown the world is that, in most cases, we have been the leading example of freedom, both personal and business. That is changing.   We have lost our way. We impose our will on others, try to bribe despots to agree with us with money and ignore friends and court enemies. We are no longer the "light on the hill" about which Reagan spoke.

There are two areas which we disagree with Myers. As far as military misadventures, we have gone the wrong way since 1950 or so. He mentions Viet Nam but we would say that Korea has been a draw, at best, and some would say that we are losing in the long run with the North's acquisition of nukes.

The other area of disagreement is with the topic of Israel. In his article he says "It means making Israel stand on its own two feet." While we agree with him that Israel should not have to rely on the US for much more than moral support, he only brings up Israel and not the rest of the Middle East.  Israel would not require military equipment and financial assistance, if the Arabs would leave it alone.  

Israel is the only democratic nation in the Middle East. It has Arab legislators in the Knesset (their national legislature). No other nation in the Middle East can claim a Jewish legislator. In fact, most Middle East nations have few Jews at all as most have been forcibly evicted.  Additionally, It has provided the world with thousands of patents, medicines and other advances while turning a desert into a lush garden.

Myers should read more about the Arab lobby which is much stronger, especially in the State Department, than any power that Israel can muster.  The blaming of the influence of Israel only illustrates his lack of understanding.

When looking at foreign affairs, we don't need to throw out the baby with the bathwater as was done with ObamaCrapCare. There are nations which still deserve our support, if we are going to continue to be a leader in the world. Israel is one of those.

Exceptionalism does not occur overnight but it can disappear quickly.  We need to rebuild our economy by cutting programs (including payments to foreign nations) which are not performing or are duplicated, eliminating automatic increases to all programs and to seriously analyze the effectiveness of all personnel and programs. The cost curve must go down.  We can start with Obamacrapcare.  

America must show the world that when things need to change, we lead the way. Can we do it?  Let us know what you think.

Conservative Tom

Exceptionally Incompetent Obama Has The Temerity To Talk About Exceptionalism

October 9, 2013 by John Myers 

PHOTOS.COM

Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin wrote an opinion piece in The New York Times that was contrary to President Barack Obama’s mantra that America is exceptional.

Some of my friends were outraged at Putin’s remarks. After all, Putin is an ex-KGB thug and a dictator who controls Russia. He also has hang-ups about homosexuals. He has waged war on his neighbors and has been ruthless in expanding Russia’s influence. Yetwas Putin wrong to write:

It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan “you’re either with us or against us.”

But force has proved ineffective and pointless. Afghanistan is reeling, and no one can say what will happen after international forces withdraw. Libya is divided into tribes and clans. In Iraq the civil war continues, with dozens killed each day. In the United States, many draw an analogy between Iraq and Syria, and ask why their government would want to repeat recent mistakes.

Let’s focus on what Putin did not say. He did not say that Russia is exceptional. He said that America is no longer exceptional. It is a big difference, and the best way I know how to explain it is with a personal story.

One man in my group of friends 20 years ago was a gifted individual. He was handsome, had a degree from Yale and had been a competitive pianist and swimmer. He was even related to Hollywood royalty. One day after a group of us finished playing golf, he announced: “I have an exceptional body! I’m 6 feet tall and weigh 168 pounds.” I started laughing. Back then, I was in pretty good shape and so were the rest of my friends. His outburst cracked me up, and he was outraged: “What!? Myers, you think you have an exceptional body?” I told him that no, I never ever thought that and that just because I didn’t agree that his body was exceptional didn’t mean that I thought mine was.

Yet Obama tells the world that, under his Presidency, America is exceptional: his America, which has yet to recover from an ongoing recession; his country, which is troubled with worse race relations than it has been in 50 years; and his Nation, which is more politically divided than ever.

I have no doubt that, given the President’s ego, he is like that friend at the golf course with the exceptional body; both have been told they are exceptional their entire lives. But just because Obama believes he is exceptional doesn’t make it so.

Rather than exceptional, Obama has been unacceptable. Under Obama, America has become the biggest creditor and the largest debtor in the world. And when loans ran out (first from domestic creditors and then from foreign creditors), Obama has allowed the Federal Reserve to print as much money as needed just the way a Latin dictator would. No wonder that under Obama, America has seen its middle class decline while crime and poverty rates have soared.

Once Upon A Time

There was a time when America was exceptional. Yet in the past 50 years, Washington has thrust America into three insurgent wars. With the greatest fighting men and women in the world and the best military technology ever invented, America has lost one war (Vietnam) and at best eked out two ties (Iraq and Afghanistan). All that righteous intervention has cost the United States more than $10 trillion in inflation adjusted dollars and led to the deaths of more than 55,000 young Americans.

Given the spillage of red ink and American blood, it is hard for this writer to see how America has been exceptional since the 1960s, a decade when the Nation was a shining example to the rest of the world.

Now we are at the brink of default, with the Federal government unable to even function. What stands out most is a President who may secretly be a Muslim, who may not have been born in the United States and who rules more like a monarch than an elected leader.

Presidents before Obama refused to negotiate with terrorists. Obama has no qualms with talking with terrorists like Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and the government he represents in Tehran, but won’t sit down with Republicans.

Our Federal government has shut down. America could yet default. Yet Obama and many other Democrats and Republicans believe they have not just a right but an obligation to tell other nations that speak different languages, have different cultures and customs, and are afflicted by different problems, how to best fulfill their destinies. To some countries that have to hear advice from America, it must seem like listening to a marriage counselor who has been through three divorces.

Writing for TomDispatch.com, Tom Engelhardt may have said it best:

Barack Obama is only the latest in a jostling crowd of presidential candidates, presidential wannabes, major politicians, and minor figures of every sort, not to speak of a raging horde of neocons and pundits galore, who have felt compelled in recent years to tell us and the world just how exceptional the last superpower really is. They tend to emphasize our ability to use this country’s overwhelming power, especially the military variety, for the global good — to save children and other deserving innocents. This particularly American aptitude for doing good forcibly, by killing others, is considered an incontestable fact of earthly life needing no proof.

How American Can Once Again Become Exceptional

The first thing that the United States needs to do is put its own house in order. That means getting back to the very roots that made America great. This means cutting taxes, getting government off people’s backs and rebuilding the economy. It means growing the middle class and focusing on growth while not shoving expensive legislation like Obamacare down the throats of tens of millions of Americans who don’t want it.

It also means electing a President who can get along with people and Congressmen who are willing to compromise to meet America’s goals and who are not obsessed with surviving the next election cycle. It mostly means dumping Democrats who think any humanitarian intervention is noble and Republican neocons who want to reshape the world in America’s image.

First and foremost, it means a return to American isolationism. It means the end to all foreign aid and any interference in the internal politics of other nations, particularly in the Mideast. It means making Israel stand on its own two feet.

It is not too late for America to again be exceptional, but it will mean hardship. We are already seeing that Washington has little ability to shape events in places like Syria, Egypt and even Iraq. Change also means a down and dirty fight with the American Jewish lobby who believe that America was put on Earth to support Israel from its inception throughout eternity.

There will be costs to becoming isolationist. It won’t be cheap or easy. Taxes should fall because less will have to be spent on the military. But higher energy prices, especially for gasoline, are a given. Withdrawal from the Mideast may mean the loss of cheap Mideast oil. It will be costly to replace, and it won’t be as clean. It will mean importing oil sands from Canada, using more domestic coal, oil and natural gas reserves. Most of all it will mean that new leaders in Washington will have to stand up to the military-industrial complex, which has been making a killing for 50 years by supporting candidates who are more warmongers than lawmakers.

If we take these steps, America can again be exceptional. Think about it and then decide. Ask yourself if you are willing to send your child or grandchild into another war. Ask yourself if fretting about global warming is more important than seeing your child or grandchild have a good career and a productive future. Ask yourself if you believe that if Islam is left alone, they will leave us alone.

Yours in good times and bad,

–John Myers

P.S.: Many great powers in decline labeled themselves as exceptional, including Rome, Spain and Great Britain. A good understanding of the history this can be found reading Paul Kennedy’s The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers.

Who Are The Idiots Who Still Believe That Obama Is Doing A Good Job On Foreign Affairs?

When 31% of the population still believes that Obama is doing a good job in foreign affairs, something is wrong. Is it our education system? Is it the press? Or are they just uninformed "low information" voters who will never say anything bad about Obama? We believe it is all three. 

This country has become one so involved in celebrity and sports that to think about something overseas, is "foreign" to many. We have reality shows, entertainment shows and sports talk. Most of these have higher ratings than those shows which talk about substantive topics.  

When most Americans cannot name who the Vice President is or correctly identify individual states no less where other countries are on the globe, this is an indication of the sad state of our schools.  How can we be citizens of the world and not know where other countries are?

Lastly, this country has become very polarized and these "low information" voters do not care about anything that their talking heads think they should. These news readers all come from the liberal side of the political spectrum and were nearly completely "in the bag" for Obama. So, of course, the news is made to make Obama look good. These voters lap up this pro-Presidential news like their favorite drink.

The key to a free society is an educated and informed public. Unfortunately in the US today, we have neither. This explains how a President can have weekly scandals and still remain in office. Today, he has nearly a third think he is doing fine in foreign affairs and nearly half believe him when it comes to domestic issues. This is bad. Obama should be in the 5-10% range in both categories.

This is just another indicator of the fall of the US. Sad but true.

Conservative Tom

CNN Poll: Obama's Foreign Policy Rating at All-Time Low

Monday, 09 Sep 2013 05:06 PM

By Jim Meyers

Share:

More . . .

A    A   |

   Email Us   |

   Print   |

   Forward Article

• 0
  inShare

A day before President Obama is scheduled to deliver a prime time address on Syria, a new national poll shows his approval rating on foreign policy has hit an all-time low.

Only four in 10 approve of the job Obama is doing on foreign policy, while 57 percent disapprove, according to the CNN/ORC International survey of more than 1,000 adults.

"President Obama's approval rating on foreign affairs has continued its steady decline - from 54 percent in January to 49 percent in April, 44 percent in June, and just 40 percent now," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "This may be a troubling sign for a president who in past polls had always scored his highest ratings for his handling of foreign affairs."

Obama is pushing for congressional authorization for U.S. military action to punish Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime for allegedly using chemical weapons in the ongoing civil war in Syria.

The poll also found that just 31 percent of respondents approve of the president's policies and actions regarding Syria, and 63 percent disapprove.

The president's overall approval rating stands at 45 percent, with 52 percent saying they disapprove of the job he's doing. The 45 percent approval rating is unchanged from CNN's previous poll, which was conducted in June.


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.