Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label gun dealers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun dealers. Show all posts

Friday, June 30, 2017

Anti-Gunners Lose

Federal Judge Blocks California’s 

Latest Gun Grab

17 3 1  33
DailyHealthPulse
image: http://t.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/im.gif?data=OGRhN2U1NWFlYTUzOTBkYTFkMjY2ZDI4ZGQ2ODAwNWI0ZGVjODU0YzhiYzJkY2UyOWVjNmY0NzA5NjY4MTM3NjNjNGVmMTMxZDRjZmRmMzNhMGRmOWMyMjUxYjFiZDFhODE5N2Y0ZDczMGE0NzI1YTQxOGY4N2M1ZjFlMjg3ZGQ5MjVjYWI1MDczZGUyZjM2N2VlMmZlZDM5NGM2OWIzYjU1MzdhZmNkYjkzYTUwODM5NGZjODEyY2ZmNzZhMjhmYTI3YjBhNGIwZTVlYjUwMzUzZjdjNjMyZGM0NjczZjc5Nzk3MGM0ZTIzNjdjZTEwZTI3ODk1YmQyZGMwZTczYjIyMTA0MGZiOGFhNjc5M2NlODk4MWQyZDU3ZjgwZmEwNDFiMGFkMjQzNzkxYmY3YzI1NDkwNGZhNTJlMDM0MGI%3D&sid=c3e4aaebb7b34a11ad827234f1baa814_b277f3bb
image: http://t.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/vi.gif?data=OGRhN2U1NWFlYTUzOTBkYTFkMjY2ZDI4ZGQ2ODAwNWI0ZGVjODU0YzhiYzJkY2UyOWVjNmY0NzA5NjY4MTM3NjNjNGVmMTMxZDRjZmRmMzNhMGRmOWMyMjUxYjFiZDFhODE5N2Y0ZDczMGE0NzI1YTQxOGY4N2M1ZjFlMjg3ZGQ5MjVjYWI1MDczZGUyZjM2N2VlMmZlZDM5NGM2OWIzYjU1MzdhZmNkYjkzYTUwODM5NGZjODEyY2ZmNzZhMjhmYTI3YjBhNGIwZTVlYjUwMzUzZjdjNjMyZGM0NjczZjc5Nzk3MGM0ZTIzNjdjZTEwZTI3ODk1YmQyZGMwZTczYjIyMTA0MGZiOGFhNjc5M2NlODk4MWQyZDU3ZjgwZmEwNDFiMGFkMjQzNzkxYmY3YzI1NDkwNGZhNTJlMDM0MGI%3D&sid=c3e4aaebb7b34a11ad827234f1baa814_b277f3bb
A Federal district judge has blocked a ban on so-called “high capacity” 
magazines from going into effect on Saturday. Californians approved the ban 
as a part of Proposition 63 which also mandated background checks for
 ammunition.
 
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez issued the preliminary injunction that found 
the law was likely unconstitutional. Benitez reasoned that it was unconstitutional
 because it did not allow gun owners to use firearms that used, “whatever
 common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” according 
to the Sacramento Bee. The law forbid Californians from possessing any
 magazines that contain more than 10 bullets.
 
“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm 
magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy
 choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injection also read according
 to the Sacramento Bee.
 
The lawsuit was brought by the National Rifle Association’s affiliate, the
 California Rifle & Pistol Association.
 
The sale of “high-capacity” magazines has been outlawed in California since
 2000. However, those who had the magazines before the ban went into 
effect were allowed to keep their magazines. Gun rights advocates believe
 that there could be hundreds of thousands of those type of magazines in
 California homes.
 
Before the court injunction, Californians had several options on getting rid
 of magazines. They could take those magazines out of state. They could 
sell them to licensed gun dealers. The magazines also could be destroyed, 
permanently altered to be accept 10 rounds, or turned into law enforcement.
 
For what it’s worth, pro-gun California sheriffs were not exactly lining up to 
enforce the new ban. “We’re not going to be knocking on anybody’s door
 looking for them,” Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko said. “We’re essentially
 making law-abiding citizens into criminals with this new law.”
 
It’s always a good day whenever a judge tosses out one of California’s
 anti-freedom laws. This particular law not only made criminals out of
 law-abiding citizens, but it also makes them less safe. When facing multiple
 criminals such as in a gang home invasion, it’s good to have a high-capacity 
magazine weapon.
 
Cases like this are why pro-gun presidents and judges are important. They 
act as a firewall to whatever lunacy the anti-gun left comes up with.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/federal-judge-blocks-california-s-latest-gun-grab#7qkOpwoIZs7hjYA4.99

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Left Has A Weak Argument With Its Attempt To Allow Gun Manufacturers And Seller Lawsuits

Survey: Majority of Americans Oppose Lawsuits Against Gun Makers, Dealers

Image: Survey: Majority of Americans Oppose Lawsuits Against Gun Makers, DealersAn employee shows handguns to customers at the RTSP shooting range in Randolph, NJ. (Photo credit Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images)
By Jason Devaney   |   Monday, 25 Apr 2016 07:35 PM
Nearly three-quarters of Americans support the rights of gun makers and retailers when it comes to victims of crimes and their desire to file a lawsuit.

According to the results of a poll released Monday by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), 72 percent of those surveyed do not think victims of crimes involving firearms should be able to sue gun manufacturers or stores because of what happened to them.
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) of 2005 protects gun makers and dealers from lawsuits stemming from crimes in which their products are used.

The percentage of various groups that support the PLCAA, according to the survey results:
  • 91 percent of "strong Republican" voters
  • 86 percent of voters who "lean Republican"
  • 47 percent of "strong Democrat" voters
  • 67 percent of voters who "lean Democrat"
  • 75 percent of independent voters
Within those demographics, the highest percentage of voters who oppose the PLCAA were 45 percent of those who claim to be a "strong Democrat."
Latest News Update

Hillary Clinton, the leading Democrat candidate for president, has campaigned against the NRA and gun lobbyists, saying if she becomes president she would fight for tougher gun laws and tighter restrictions on the industry.

"We commissioned this poll to help determine where Americans stand. They have told us," NSSF senior vice president and general counsel Lawrence G. Keane said. "Now, it's time for politicians to demonstrate that they have some respect for the good sense of the people and to stop vilifying the hard-working people of an entire industry and exploiting real tragedy that is the result of criminal conduct."

Related Stories:

© 2016 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/US/gun-laws-gun-rights-survey-democrats/2016/04/25/id/725678/#ixzz472MMX76J

Sunday, June 8, 2014

Killing The Second Amendment Without Firing A Shot!

From: Right To Bear.com

The Surprising Way Obama Will Finally Get Rid of Guns




 
Weeks ago it was revealed the Department of Justice was working with the FDIC to provide new monetary regulations that would halt the sale of guns by licensed gun dealers.
Though Obama maintains that he only wants to enforce “reasonable, common sense” gun control, when you peak behind the curtain it’s easy to see this is just a magic trick he’s using to distract Americans from what’s really happening.
So how is Obama going to finally starve Americans of access to firearms? It’s called “Operation Chokepoint.”
Operation Chokepoint is a devious means of shutting down gun stores by blocking them from obtaining credit and even basic banking services.
Operation Chokepoint works directly with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and lumps gun sellers into the same category as “high risk” businesses like pornographers, head shops, and pyramid schemes to prevent lending institutions from providing them with open lines of credit to fund their businesses.
By categorizing gun stores in such a way, it could virtually shut down gun dealers across the nation.
Gun store owners are understandably concerned, and despite claims to the contrary, they feel the DOJ is unjustly restricting access to the credit they need to operate their businesses.
According to a Washington Times article:
A Justice Department representative said the agency is conducting several investigations that aim to hold accountable banks “who are knowingly assisting fraudulent merchants who harm consumers.”
“We’re committed to ensuring that our efforts to combat fraud do not discourage or inhibit the lawful conduct of these honest merchants,” the Justice Department said in a May 7 blog post.
The Obama administration understands that if they can limit the ability of gun stores to do business, they can destroy the second amendment without having to touch the Constitution or pass more legislation.
Operation Chokepoint will likely work in tandem with new private seller laws that require the sale of a firearm to go through a licensed gun broker.
This is problematic because if the only way to obtain a gun through private sale is to make the sale through a gun broker, and there are no gun brokers in the area because they’ve been shutdown through credit or banking restrictions, it will make the transfer of firearms from one person to the other nearly impossible.
In light of this disturbing revelation, it might bring comfort to know that there are already several grassroots efforts underway to challenge Operation Chokepoint.
According to Gun Owners of America:
[GOA] is encouraging Members of Congress to defund Obama’s efforts to dry up funding for the firearms industry by regulatory fiat.
Congressman Steve Stockman put it this way: “It’s pretty clear that, unless Congress uses the power of the purse to stop him, Barack Obama will use his ‘phone and his pen’ to ban guns by cutting off money for gun manufacturers and dealers.”
Legislators are proposing bills on a wide variety of fronts. Blaine Luetkemeyer, vice chairman of the House committee with jurisdiction, has called for legislation to block the FDIC’s insidious scheme. And good for him! But, given that Obama will veto any free-standing legislation to save the gun industry, an appropriations rider is also necessary.
Let’s hope these legislative efforts successfully stop Obama from fully implementing his plan.

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

If They Can't Get Your Guns One Way, They Will Another.

The Dollar  
Vigilante
Tuesday,April 29, 2014
BREAKING: The Department Of (In)Justice Goes After Guns In Further  
Capital Controls
[Editor's Note: The following post is by TDV Editor-in-Chief, Jeff Berwick]
The US government is attempting every possible angle to ensure Americans don't have access to guns.  The latest is a new twist on capital controls being instituted by the Department of (In)Justice.
The DoJ is why financial institutions are refusing services to companies as diverse as gun shops, bitcoin businesses, marijuana dispensaries and even the porn industry.
Just last week a gun shop in Florida had an old bank account closed after their local bank was bought out by Wall Street interests.
The Miami News Times writes,
The Libertis’ battle with BankUnited began last month. For seven years, they say, they had no problem with the Miami Lakes-based bank. T.R. had run a gun store in the Garden State, and when he opened Top-Gun Firearms on Calle Ocho, BankUnited operated the account.
But when T.R. decided to retire and let Elizabeth take the store online — under the new name Discount Ammo-N-Guns — the Libertis found themselves suddenly under fire.
A March 12 letter mysteriously informed them that BankUnited was closing their checking account “pursuant to the terms and conditions listed in our Depositor’s Agreement.” It gave the Libertis three days to transfer their cash elsewhere. When the Libertis called BankUnited for an explanation, they were politely informed that none would be forthcoming.
“I was very angry,” Elizabeth says. “They were very inconsiderate. We had all our credit cards going through that bank. All of a sudden, we had to run and find another bank to keep our business going. We shut down for two weeks, and they wouldn’t even tell us why.”
This is normal operating procedures for banks in the United States, according to news of a secretive DoJ operation which broke last week in the Wall Street Journal and American Banker.
It is called Operation Chokepoint. It appears as reports of credit card processors, banks, and lending institutions refuse to do business with any business that is legally buying and selling guns.
Smaller financial institutions are unable to cater to these owners, under pressure of penalty by the DoJ.
Ironically, Bank of America has led the charge against the gun industry. General Electric Capital began cutting of lending to the gun industry around a year ago. Wells Fargo is being sued by a bank manager for being fired for bringing her gun to work in Tampa, Florida. In the card processing industry, a Visa owned subsidiary cut off service to a gun shop.
US citizens soon won't find anywhere to buy guns once this is over with. Forget regulations on what sorts of guns one can buy. Once you're dead, unless you have a gun trust, which TDV has written about in its newsletter HomeGrown, your gun will end up with the State, and your descendents won't have any option to buy guns since every gun shop owner will have been run out of business.
BITCOIN BUSINESS ARE TARGETS
Bitcoin businesses have had their accounts shutdown by major banking institutions merely for their involvement in bitcoin. Banks which at one time marketed themselves as bitcoin friendly had to go back on that sentiment, and shut down bitcoin accounts, such as what happened to the Internet Credit Union. 
Our recommendation to gun owners and bitcoin advocates is to get together now to transact all firearms transactions in bitcoin before the US government shuts down all retail firearm firms bank accounts.
MARIJUANA BUSINESSES TOO
Marijuana businesses have also been targeted. These small businesses have been forced in Washington and Colorado to deal in cash, a much riskier and expensive form of handling money than credit or even cheque for a business like a marijuana dispensary. 
This has created dangerous obstacles for workers and owners, who must transport the cash they've been forced to handle. Sure, they might be saving out on certain fees, but sometimes, if you're handling enough money, cash is not perfect. That is why bitcoin makes much sense for this industry as well.
AND THE PORN INDUSTRY...
And yes, the US government is even going after the porn industry!
Last week, when porn star Teagan Presley arrived to her Las Vegas home from an extensive strip club tour, she foundan unsettling letter from her bank. Chase was closing her account, which was listed under her legal name, as well as her husband's account. And so Presley went to the bank to get to the bottom of this. She was told, like many bitcoiners have been told, that her bank account was considered "high risk." High risk? What is she, a terrorist? If she is considered such, then you best believe so too are gun shop owners, bitcoiners, and marijuana dispensaries. Presley explains further:
“And then they told me that they canceled my husband’s account too, because our social security numbers are linked,” Presley told VICE News. “They told him that it was because I’m a notorious adult star. Which is funny, because I’m kind of a goody-goody in the business, and I’m not even doing porn anymore.” Presley is not alone. Many adult entertainers have experienced the same discrimination.
CNBC wrote in 2013 of actress Chanel Preston, whose bank account was terminated at Los Angeles City National Bank, and porn studio head Marc Greenberg's lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for violation of fair lending laws. Greenberg wanted to refinance his longstanding home loan, but JP Morgan vice president told him he was being declined moral grounds.
A Chase representative had no comment for VICE News.
PAYDAY LENDERS ALSO A TARGET
At a March hearing before a Senate Banking subcommittee, according to the Washington Post, Senator David Vitter (R-La.) said “there is a determined effort, from [the Justice Department] to the regulators… to cut off credit and use other tactics to force [payday lenders] out of business. I find that deeply troubling because it has no statutory basis, no statutory authority.”
IS THE US JUSTICE DEPARTMENT FORCING BANKS TO BAN 30 INDUSTRIES, INCLUDING GUNS, BITCOIN, MARIJUANA, PAYDAY LENDERS..AND EVEN PORN?
Yes.
Operation Choke Point is a targeted effort to shut down as many as 30 separate industries by making it impossible for them to access the banking system.
Wall Street Journal published an op-ed on Thursday by American Banking Association CEO Frank Keating, who wrote that the Justice Department tells "bankers to behave like policemen and judges."
“Operation Choke Point is asking banks to identify customers who may be breaking the law or simply doing something government officials don’t like,” Keating wrote. “Banks must then ‘choke off’ those customers’ access to financial services, shutting down their accounts.”
Keating calls the operation highly secretive, pinpointing it to early 2013, just as porn stars began to complain to the media that their banks were being shutdown.
The banks are beholden to the feds. This is what fascism is - the merger between states and corporations. So, basically, government and corporations are not separate entities. At the top, they are all one. What Noam Chomsky terms the "state-enterprise apparatus."  Or, what we call, Crapitalism.
“If a bank doesn’t shut down a questionable account when directed to do so, Justice slaps the institution with a penalty for wrongdoing that may or may not have happened,” Keating wrote.
Bureaucrats are also dismayed by the behavior of the DoJ!
Former chairman of the FDIC, William Isaac, wrote in American Banker magazine last week that Operation Choke Point is “way out of control,” continuing that 23 bipartisan members of Congress authored a letter to the DOJ explicating that the operation is putting legal industries out of business...including banks!
The president of the Independent Community Bankers of America penned a letter to the Justice Department earlier this month, writing that Operation Chokepoint prevents small community banks from competing with the major chains.
The Justice Department did not respond to VICE News' inquiry for comment.
HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF
The closure of these accounts is a part of an overarching policy, laid out in a 2011 FDIC document which listed 30 "merchant categories that have been associated with high-risk activity," like pornography, Ponzi schemes, racist materials, "lifetime guarantees," and sales of fireworks and tobacco. You can be sure that since 2011, bitcoin and the marijuana industries have been added to that.
As we've covered numerous times, the US is no place to do business... and is quickly becoming nearly impossible for many to do so.  Those with money or businesses inside the US should be looking to internationalize their companies and bank accounts to protect against this. Consult with TDV Offshore on internationalizing your businesses and bank accounts and TDV Wealth Management for internationalizing your assets. Instead of constantly worrying when you're going to get that letter from your bank shutting down your bank account or worse, offshore your assets, like so many others have done before you. If you're not quite there yet, our newsletter might be for you. For more information, click here
pic
Anarcho-Capitalist.  Libertarian.  Freedom fighter against mankind’s two biggest enemies, the State and the Central Banks.  Jeff Berwick is the founder of The Dollar Vigilante, CEO of TDV Media & Services and host of the popular video podcast,Anarchast.  Jeff is a prominent speaker at many of the world’s freedom, investment and gold conferences as well as regularly in the media including CNBC, CNN and Fox Business.

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Will Guns Be Allowed To Be Sold In Chicago Again Or Will The Anti-Gunners Keep Blocking Second Amendment Rights?

Chicago Handgun Sales Ban UnConstitutional, Judge Rules

 1 2

 0 8

CHICAGO (UPI) — Chicago may not ban gun dealers from selling guns or stop private individuals from giving or selling them, a Federal judge ruled, citing the 2nd Amendment.
The city’s 2010 blanket ban on gun sales and transfers within city limits “goes too far in outright banning legal buyers and legal dealers from engaging in lawful acquisitions and lawful sales of firearms,” U.S. District Court Judge Edmond E. Chang said.
“The stark reality facing the city each year is thousands of shooting victims and hundreds of murders committed with a gun,” he said.
“But on the other side of this case is another feature of government: Certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution, put outside government’s reach, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense under the Second Amendment,” the judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said in a 35-page decision, which can be found at tinyurl.com/UPI-Gun-Ruling.
Chang — appointed by President Barack Obama, who supports stronger gun-safety laws — said regulation and licensing, or even a law that’s less restrictive than a blanket ban, could ease most of the city’s gun-violence concerns and still let law-abiding citizens exercise their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
Chang said he would temporarily delay his ruling to let Chicago decide if it will appeal.
Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a defendant in the case, “strongly disagrees” with the judge’s decision and has instructed city attorneys “to consider all options to better regulate the sale of firearms within the city’s borders,” city Law Department spokesman Roderick Drew said in a statement.
“Every year Chicago Police recover more illegal guns than officers in any city in the country, a factor of lax federal laws as well as lax laws in Illinois and surrounding states related to straw purchasing and the transfer of guns,” he said.
Straw purchasers use their clean criminal backgrounds to buy guns for criminals.
“We need stronger gun-safety laws, not increased access to firearms within the city,” Drew said.
City attorneys had argued the gun sale ban made it harder for criminals to get their hands on weapons.
The Illinois Association of Firearm Retailers, which was among the plaintiffs that filed the 2010 lawsuit, was quick to predict neighborhood gun stores would open before the end of the year, the Chicago Sun-Times said.
Illinois National Rifle Association lobbyist Todd Vandermyde told the Chicago Tribune none of the city’s arguments were upheld by the judge.
“The city is going to have to allow retail gun shops to operate and they are going to have to allow individuals to transfer firearms in normal transactions,” he said. “So the question now is: How much more money does Rahm [Emanuel] want to spend fighting it?”